The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allows firms to redact information from material contracts by submitting confidential treatment requests, if redacted information is not material and would cause competitive harm upon public disclosure. This study examines whether managers use confidential treatment requests to conceal bad news. We show that confidential treatment requests are positively associated with residual short interest, a proxy for managers’ private negative information. This positive association is more pronounced for firms with lower litigation risk, higher executive equity incentives, and lower external monitoring. Confidential treatment requests filed by firms with higher residual short interests are associated with higher stock price crash risk and poorer future performance. Collectively, our results suggest that managers redact information from material contracts to conceal bad news.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 09 2021
Do Firms Redact Information from Material Contracts to Conceal Bad News?
Yongtae Kim;
Yongtae Kim
Santa Clara University and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
500 El Camino Real
UNITED STATES
Santa Clara
CA
95053
408 554-2331
408-554-4667
Search for other works by this author on:
Lixin (Nancy) Su
Lixin (Nancy) Su
HONG KONG
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Search for other works by this author on:
The Accounting Review (2021)
Article history
Received:
April 22 2020
Revision Received:
January 29 2021
Revision Received:
July 13 2021
Revision Received:
September 28 2021
Accepted:
October 13 2021
Citation
Dichu Bao, Yongtae Kim, Lixin (Nancy) Su; Do Firms Redact Information from Material Contracts to Conceal Bad News?. The Accounting Review 2021; doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2020-0255
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
106
Views
0
Citations