This commentary essay, a co-written dialogue, attends to the ongoing phenomenon that has plagued American history known as “playing Indian.” In oscillating between the simultaneous conquest and dispossession of Native people, this phenomenon allows “white” Americans to define, mask, and evade the multiple paradoxes that stem from settler-colonial violence. Simas and Mitchell have worked extensively in the dance field. As their conversation discusses both the histories and the strategies of these “performances,” the coauthors explore the repercussions of non-Native people’s attempts to perform Native experiences through dance paradigms in particular. They link the aesthetic and fiscal consequences of “playing Indian” to the trauma of erasure and invisibilization that has continued to haunt Native experience.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
Article Commentary|
October 20 2020
Playing Indian, between Idealization and Vilification: Seems You have to Play Indian to be Indian
American Indian Culture and Research Journal (2019) 43 (4): 133–140.
Citation
Rosy Simas, Sam Aros Mitchell; Playing Indian, between Idealization and Vilification: Seems You have to Play Indian to be Indian. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 1 October 2019; 43 (4): 133–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.43.4.simas-mitchell
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
58
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
A Chapter Closed?
America Meredith
Living in a (Schrödinger’s) Box: Jimmie Durham’s Strategic Use of Ambiguity
Suzanne Newman Fricke
The Artist Knows Best: The De-Professionalism of a Profession
Nancy Marie Mithlo