This article charts Durham’s use of “strategic ambiguity,” whereby the uncertainty at the center of the controversy has ultimately served to protect the artist and his livelihood. Durham is the subject of nearly four times more articles and books than any other contemporary artist who identifies as Cherokee. It is almost impossible to interpret Durham’s work outside the perspective of a Cherokee identity. Although some articles offer the usual dual admission—that he identifies as Cherokee and that his heritage has been questioned—they nonetheless offer praise for Durham’s work as both authentically “Native American” and progressive in the contemporary art world. In refuting the various reasons given for the artist’s lack of tribal enrollment, this article emphasizes that art critics’ insistence on referencing Durham’s Cherokee “heritage” is crucial because if the artist is not Native, his work becomes not simply meaningless, but even insulting.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 20 2020
Living in a (Schrödinger’s) Box: Jimmie Durham’s Strategic Use of Ambiguity
American Indian Culture and Research Journal (2019) 43 (4): 55–64.
Citation
Suzanne Newman Fricke; Living in a (Schrödinger’s) Box: Jimmie Durham’s Strategic Use of Ambiguity. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 1 October 2019; 43 (4): 55–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.43.4.fricke
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
42
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
A Chapter Closed?
America Meredith
Living in a (Schrödinger’s) Box: Jimmie Durham’s Strategic Use of Ambiguity
Suzanne Newman Fricke
The Artist Knows Best: The De-Professionalism of a Profession
Nancy Marie Mithlo