According to a recent survey by the Organization of American Historians, the fastest growing field of historical research is social history. Although many social historians use computers, this is not the most significant feature of the New Social History (NSH). More important implications for archivists and manuscripts curators arise from the use of new kinds of source materials and from a new approach to social inquiry and interpretation. Archivists who have attempted to respond to the challenges posed by NSH have tended to attack the problem piecemeal, dealing only with isolated aspects. Recognizing the highly interactive nature of archival functions, this study provides an overview of NSH's impact on all major aspects of archival practice and management. Traditional archival concerns such as solicitation strategies, appraisal criteria, provenance, and arrangement and description options are re-examined to assess the impact of NSH, point out some serious implications for archivists, and provide a starting point for institutional self-assessments and integrated planning.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 01 1985
The New Social History: Implications for Archivists
Dale Mayer
Dale Mayer
1
University of Michigan
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (1985) 48 (4): 388–399.
Citation
Dale Mayer; The New Social History: Implications for Archivists. The American Archivist 1 October 1985; 48 (4): 388–399. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.4.l107660916858k13
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
Digital Preservation Practices and Challenges at University Archives in the United States
Maali F. Alghnimi, Donald C. Force
An Impossible Balance: Navigating Archival Work and Caregiving Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Alexis Braun Marks, Rachael Dreyer, Jennifer Johnson, Michelle Sweetser
Recruiting for Cultural Competency: A Content Analysis of Archives Job Postings
Helen Wong Smith, Dawn Schmitz, Cyndi Shein, Lisa Schmitz