The literature of a profession—or the quality of its theory, research on that theory, and the dissemination of that research—is one indication of a profession's health and vitality. Fortunately, American archival literature has shown steady and considerable improvement over the years, but archivists still must grapple with some serious problems challenging their literature; more importantly, the archival profession's future partly depends on the resolution of problems such as those that affect its literature. This essay reviews the history of archival writing in the United States, analyzes the development of this literature, evaluates obstacles to archival research and publication, and recommends actions for the improvement of the literature.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 01 1987
American Archival Literature: Expanding Horizons and Continuing Needs, 1901-1987
Richard Cox
Richard Cox
1
Alabama Department of Archives and History, City of Baltimore, and the Maryland Historical Society, University of Maryland
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (1987) 50 (3): 306–323.
Citation
Richard Cox; American Archival Literature: Expanding Horizons and Continuing Needs, 1901-1987. The American Archivist 1 July 1987; 50 (3): 306–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.3.l0r6284v0r925527
Download citation file:
73
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
WE Are SAA
Meredith R. Evans
Something New
Amy Cooper Cary
Documenting Disability History in Western Pennsylvania
Bridget Malley
Reviews in Reflection
Bethany Anderson
Our Comeback Story: Impostor Syndrome in the Archival Profession
April K. Anderson-Zorn, Michael Andrew Davis, Danielle Nowak, Alison Stankrauff