This article describes the selection process and theory behind the "great collections" approach to microfilming books. The author argues that this approach will not work for archival materials because: (1) there is no methodology to identify exceptionally strong collections; (2) archival collecting has not been the product of ongoing collaboration with subject specialists, nor are collections periodically reappraised; and (3) few archives have undertaken systematic analysis of their collections to assess their strengths and weaknesses. The author calls for the development of a selection methodology that identifies both the most endangered and the most significant documentary records in order to establish priorities for preserving them. Selection for preservation must be built into every aspect of a repository's collections management, from the initial decision to acquire a collection onwards.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Perspective|
April 01 1990
Selection for Microfilming
Margaret Child
Margaret Child
1
Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (1990) 53 (2): 250–255.
Citation
Margaret Child; Selection for Microfilming. The American Archivist 1 April 1990; 53 (2): 250–255. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.53.2.dg210731537vm360
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
Digital Preservation Practices and Challenges at University Archives in the United States
Maali F. Alghnimi, Donald C. Force
An Impossible Balance: Navigating Archival Work and Caregiving Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Alexis Braun Marks, Rachael Dreyer, Jennifer Johnson, Michelle Sweetser
Recruiting for Cultural Competency: A Content Analysis of Archives Job Postings
Helen Wong Smith, Dawn Schmitz, Cyndi Shein, Lisa Schmitz