The idea of archives as collective memory is sometimes employed as a metaphor for discussing the social and cultural role of archives. It is argued here that the idea is more than a metaphor and is supported by theories that would view collections of documents and material artifacts as means of extending the temporal and spatial range of communication. Archives, along with other communicational resources such as oral and ritual tradition, help to transfer information—and thereby sustain memory—from generation to generation. Two examples illustrate the interrelationship of archives and memory within this broadened view of communication and culture. The first arises from attempts to find ways to warn future generations of the location of radioactive waste repositories. The second revolves around pressure to efface from cultural landscapes evidence of tragic events that people wish to forget.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 01 1990
To Remember and Forget: Archives, Memory, and Culture
Kenneth Foote
Kenneth Foote
1
University of Texas, Austin
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (1990) 53 (3): 378–392.
Citation
Kenneth Foote; To Remember and Forget: Archives, Memory, and Culture. The American Archivist 1 July 1990; 53 (3): 378–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.53.3.d87u013444j3g6r2
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
“The Career Does Not Love You Back”: Impacts of Contingent Employment on Workers, Cultural Heritage Institutions, and the Archival Profession
Stephanie Bredbenner, Alison Fulmer, Rose Oliveira-Abbey, Meghan R. Rinn
Redefining Archival Reference: Relationship-based Reference
Wendy Duff, Jessica Ho, Christa Sato, Henria Aton, Peter Deziak, Cheryl Regehr
Forms, Formations, and Reforms
David Amel Olson
(Re)Appraising Our Archival Identity: Demystifying the Process and Changing the Dialogue about Promotion and Tenure for Academic Archivists
Elizabeth M. Scott, Heidi Abbey Moyer, Rebecca Hankins, Rachel Walton