Manuscripts curators who wish to microfilm or otherwise duplicate a collection for preservation and access commonly confront a problem: multiple copyrights represented in a collection. It is practically impossible to obtain permission from the numerous parties who may hold such copyrights. What are the limits of fair use in such a case, particularly considering the restrictive environment after Salinger v. Random House, Inc.? Archival tradition and practice offer some answers more hopeful for preservation and access to materials, but the law still limits. To best serve the research community, archivists must lobby to have more liberal policies codified into law. The Papers of Katherine Anne Porter, a collection held by Archives and Manuscripts at the University of Maryland at College Park Libraries, is used as an example.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Case Study|
July 01 1995
Access in the Time of Salinger: Fair Use and the Papers of Katherine Anne Porter
Jodi Allison-Bunnell
Jodi Allison-Bunnell
1
University of Maryland Libraries
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (1995) 58 (3): 270–282.
Citation
Jodi Allison-Bunnell; Access in the Time of Salinger: Fair Use and the Papers of Katherine Anne Porter. The American Archivist 1 July 1995; 58 (3): 270–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.58.3.5g34717634366781
Download citation file:
182
Views
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
Digital Preservation Practices and Challenges at University Archives in the United States
Maali F. Alghnimi, Donald C. Force
An Impossible Balance: Navigating Archival Work and Caregiving Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Alexis Braun Marks, Rachael Dreyer, Jennifer Johnson, Michelle Sweetser
Recruiting for Cultural Competency: A Content Analysis of Archives Job Postings
Helen Wong Smith, Dawn Schmitz, Cyndi Shein, Lisa Schmitz