This paper analyzes 595 letter, phone, facsimile, and e-mail correspondence units sent to the Southern Historical Collection and General and Literary Manuscripts (SHC) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1995 and 1999, to observe the effects of providing online holdings information and the increased use of e-mail in reference correspondence. From 1995 to 1999, e-mail became the preferred method of inquiry, more questions came from casual users researching for personal reasons, more users took advantage of online holdings information to shape their reference questions, and the proportion of remote users visiting in person decreased. The paper concludes by suggesting ways for archivists to prepare for new influxes of remote researchers and methods to improve remote reference services.
Skip Nav Destination
THEODORE CALVIN PEASE AWARD| January 01 2001
Analysis of Remote Reference Correspondence at a Large Academic Manuscripts Collection
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (2001) 64 (1): 17–42.
Kristin Martin; Analysis of Remote Reference Correspondence at a Large Academic Manuscripts Collection. The American Archivist 1 January 2001; 64 (1): 17–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.g224234uv117734p
Download citation file:
Level Up! Lessons Learned from Six Years of Collaborative Technical Skills Development
Max Eckard, Elizabeth Gadelha, Mike Shallcross
Redesigning Program Assessment for Teaching with Primary Sources: Understanding the Impacts of Our Work
Jen Hoyer, Kaitlin Holt, John Voiklis, Bennett Attaway, Rebecca Joy Norlander
Tales from “THE disK FILES”: Lessons Learnt from a Data Recovery Project in 2003–2006 at the National Archives of Australia
David Pearson, FSA, James Doig
The Social Movement Archive