The meaning or meanings of record, and the relationship of records to other concepts such as evidence and information, are continuing subjects of debate. This paper examines statements about the nature of the record made by writers and practitioners within the archives and records management community, and it identifies some of the ways in which understandings and emphases vary. After reviewing different attitudes to definition and the perception of meaning, it discusses the challenges of defining records in terms of evidence or information, and suggests that archivists and records managers may prefer to consider evidence and information as two of the many affordances that records provide to their users. It concludes by exploring the concept of representation and proposing an alternative characterization of records as persistent representations of activities.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
February 20 2008
Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations
The American Archivist (2007) 70 (2): 315–343.
Citation
Geoffrey Yeo; Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist 1 September 2007; 70 (2): 315–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
“The Career Does Not Love You Back”: Impacts of Contingent Employment on Workers, Cultural Heritage Institutions, and the Archival Profession
Stephanie Bredbenner, Alison Fulmer, Rose Oliveira-Abbey, Meghan R. Rinn
Redefining Archival Reference: Relationship-based Reference
Wendy Duff, Jessica Ho, Christa Sato, Henria Aton, Peter Deziak, Cheryl Regehr
Forms, Formations, and Reforms
David Amel Olson
(Re)Appraising Our Archival Identity: Demystifying the Process and Changing the Dialogue about Promotion and Tenure for Academic Archivists
Elizabeth M. Scott, Heidi Abbey Moyer, Rebecca Hankins, Rachel Walton