The American Archivist Editorial Board administered a Web-based survey to 6,000 Society of American Archivists members and affiliates. The survey was open for response for 45 days during April and May 2010. Respondents expressed overall satisfaction with the American Archivist. Print remains the publishing vehicle of choice. Reading the American Archivist varies in priority. Three major issues emerge from the data analysis. First is the apparent contradiction between generally high overall satisfaction with the American Archivist and significant variation in the perception of the value of its individual components. Second is whether the journal should focus primarily on matters of practice or on scholarly or theoretical explorations of archival principles. The third issue is the relationship of the print and online versions of the journal.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 23 2011
Valuing the American Archivist: An Interpretation of SAA's First Readership Survey
Kathleen Fear;
Kathleen Fear
1
Editorial Board, American Archivist
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Conway
Paul Conway
1
Editorial Board, American Archivist
Search for other works by this author on:
The American Archivist (2011) 74 (2): 685–701.
Citation
Kathleen Fear, Paul Conway; Valuing the American Archivist: An Interpretation of SAA's First Readership Survey. The American Archivist 1 September 2011; 74 (2): 685–701. doi: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.2.1p5h34j67450524v
Download citation file:
81
Views
Citing articles via
Get Email Alerts
Digital Preservation Practices and Challenges at University Archives in the United States
Maali F. Alghnimi, Donald C. Force
An Impossible Balance: Navigating Archival Work and Caregiving Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
Alexis Braun Marks, Rachael Dreyer, Jennifer Johnson, Michelle Sweetser
Recruiting for Cultural Competency: A Content Analysis of Archives Job Postings
Helen Wong Smith, Dawn Schmitz, Cyndi Shein, Lisa Schmitz