Objective: To test through various oxidation procedures the differences in antibacterial activities against Streptococcus mutans (S mutans) of Titanium (Ti) and Titanium silver (TiAg) metals coated with TiO2.
Materials and Methods: This study examined the photocatalytic antibacterial effects on S mutans of Ti and TiAg ubstrates coated with two crystalline forms of TiO2 by thermal and anodic oxidation. A bacterial suspension of S mutans was pipetted onto TiO2-coated metal specimens and uncoated specimens with ultraviolet A (UVA) illumination for 20 to 100 minutes. The same specimen without UVA was used as the control. The level of colony-forming units of S mutans after UVA illumination was compared with that of the control.
Results: The level of colony-forming units of S mutans was significantly lower on TiO2-coated Ti and TiAg metal specimens after UVA illumination than on uncoated Ti and TiAg specimens. The level of colony-forming units of S mutans was significantly lower on the metals coated by anodic oxidation than on those coated by thermal oxidation. The TiO2 coating on TiAg had a significantly higher and more rapid antibacterial effect than did the TiO2 coating on Ti.
Conclusions: The antibacterial effect of a TiO2 film formed by anodic oxidation was superior to that formed by thermal oxidation. The addition of Ag to the Ti specimen indicated a synergistic effect on the photocatalytic antibacterial property against S mutans.
Titanium (Ti), because of its good corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and self-cleaning effect, is commonly used for orthodontic brackets, wires, and temporary anchorage devices such as miniscrews.1 The corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of Ti alloys are maintained by the surface oxide layer, which mainly consists of Titanium dioxide (TiO2). The surface oxide film on Ti alloys generally exists in an amorphous state, which does not indicate photocatalytic activity.2,3 However, three crystal structures of TiO2—anatase, rutile, and brookite—can be produced by various oxidation methods to induce a photocatalytic reaction.2,3 Hydroxyl radicals that are extremely reactive to organic compounds are produced by the irradiation of TiO2 at wavelengths >385 nm, resulting in photocatalytic antibacterial activity.4,5 TiO2 was reported to have antibacterial activity against two major bacteria in the dental field—Lactobacillus acidophilus5 and Streptococcus mutans (s mutans)6—indicating its possible clinical applications.
TiO2 can be produced by the oxidation of Ti itself7 or by a sol-gel method by dipping the metal into a liquid-coating agent followed by solidification, which results in surface crystallization.8 It is interesting to note that the photocatalytic effects can be enhanced by the addition of noble metals such as platinum (Pt) and silver (Ag) to the TiO2 surface.5,9 Recently, Ag has attracted attention, and now it is widely used in medical materials owing to its antibacterial effects.10 Therefore, it was hypothesized that a TiO2 coating formed on a Titanium silver (TiAg) alloy might exhibit superior antibacterial activity against oral microorganisms to that formed on a Ti substrate alone.
This study investigated the antibacterial activity of metals coated with TiO2 through various oxidation procedures against S mutans and examined whether or not the addition of Ag to Ti can improve antibacterial activity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of Metals
Ti (Grade III, ASTM F67, Supra Alloys Inc, Camarillo, Calif) and a TiAg (Ti-2.0at%Ag, Biomaterialskorea, Seoul, Korea) plate were cut into 5 × 5 mm2 specimens. TiO2 exists in three crystal structures: rutile, anatase, and brookite. In this study, anodic oxidation (AO) and thermal oxidation (TO) were used to produce anatase and rutile, respectively.5
For TO, the Ti and TiAg alloys were treated in a muffle furnace at 400°C for 1 hour in air and were cooled. For AO, the samples were anodic-oxidized at 250 V for 3 minutes in a solution that contained 0.04 M β-glycerophosphate disodium salt pentahydrate and 0.4 M calcium acetate.5 The x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns on the uncoated specimens (Ti and TiAg) and those on the thermally oxidized Ti (TO) and TiAg (TO) were similar, as was previously reported.5 Metastable anatase peaks were identified on the surfaces of Ti (AO) and TiAg (AO) after anodic oxidation; this event is identical to that described in previous reports.5,7
S mutans (KCTC 3298) was cultured in 20 mL of a brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 12 hours, centrifuged, and adjusted to 4.8 × 106 colony-forming units (CFU) by dilution with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
To investigate photocatalytic antibacterial activity, 100 μL of a bacterial solution was pipetted onto the metal specimens (Ti, TiAg, Ti [TO], TiAg [TO], Ti [AO], and TiAg [AO]). The samples were illuminated with ultraviolet A (UVA) light for 60 minutes (Philips Electronics, Seoul, Korea) 2 × 15 W, black light, 356 nm peak emission). The light source was placed 7 cm above the sample. For the control group, the light was covered with a black cloth to confirm the viability of germs during the experiment. The samples were placed on cold water–filled Petri dishes to prevent them from drying.
After illumination, each reaction solution was diluted in a 10-fold series to 105 and was shaken for 10 minutes (vortex 200 rpm). A total of 100 μL of each sample was plated onto BHI agar and was incubated for 36 hours at 37°C; the CFU then were counted. The experiments performed for each specimen, including those of controls, were repeated four times.
To determine time dependence on photocatalysis, 100 μL of each bacterial solution was used to examine antibacterial performance at 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 minutes.
Differences in CFU for each specimen were examined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). All results were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P < .05 was considered significant.
The viability of S mutans was decreased after the photocatalytic reaction had occurred. After UV illumination for 60 minutes, the level of CFU of S mutans on Ti, Ti (TO), and Ti (AO) was significantly lower than that found on the surfaces of controls (blocked UV illumination) (P < .05) (Figure 1a). The TiO2-coated groups, both TO and AO, showed a significantly lower level of CFU than Ti after UV illumination. Between the TiO2-coated groups, the antibacterial activity of the Ti (AO) samples was significantly greater than that of the Ti (TO) samples (P < .05) (Figure 1a).
The level of CFU of S mutans on the TiAg, TiAg (TO), and TiAg (AO) substrates after 60 minutes of illumination was significantly lower than that of controls (P < .05) (Figure 1b). The level of CFU was significantly decreased in the TiO2-coated TiAg specimens, even under control conditions (without UV illumination). Antibacterial activity after UV illumination was significantly greater in TiO2-coated TiAg specimens than in uncoated TiAg specimens. However, the antibacterial activities of TiAg (TO) and TiAg (AO) after UV illumination were similar (Figure 1b).
Time-dependent analysis indicated that the level of CFU of all Ti specimens decreased with increasing illumination time. Ti (AO) was sterilized completely after 60 minutes, but this process took 100 minutes for Ti and Ti (TO) (Figure 2a). A similar trend was noted for the TiAg specimens. The CFU level of S mutans in TiAg (AO) reached near 0 after 20 minutes, compared with 80 minutes for TiAg (TO) and 100 minutes for TiAg (Figure 2b). Compared with the Ti specimens, TiAg specimens showed a rapid decrease in level of CFU, particularly in the early stages (<20 min) of illumination (Figure 2).
The use of fixed orthodontic appliances can accelerate the rate of plaque accumulation, which can result in enamel decalcification and dental caries without proper maintenance.11,12 The main bacterial species that may cause dental caries is S mutans.13 The number of oral bacteria can be decreased by brushing, or with the additional use of fluoride, chlorhexidine, and antibiotics.14–16 In addition, considerable effort has been made to produce antibacterial dental materials in the oral environment.
According to these results, UV illumination alone revealed a decrease in CFU in all types of metal specimens after 60 minutes. However, the photocatalytic activities of both Ti and the TiAg alloy significantly decreased the CFU level of the surface-coated S mutans in vitro. The addition of Ag resulted in significant enhancement of the antibacterial effect within 20 minutes, indicating its effectiveness. Irradiation of the TiO2 surface with a wavelength >385 nm generates an electronic hole pair on the TiO2 surface. This hole reacts with H2O to produce hydroxyl radicals, which are extremely reactive to organic compounds.4 It was reported that the photocatalytic effect can be enhanced by preventing the recombination of electrons and holes through the addition of a noble metal.6,9 A similar mechanism might also apply in the case of Ag.
Similar to previous reports, the photocatalytic reaction induced a relatively mild decrease in germ counts for Ti and TiO2 (TO) after the first 20 minutes of UV illumination and showed a rapid decrease in subsequent stages.1,17 In case of TiAg alloys, germ counts decreased rapidly in the initial 20 minutes. The primary step in photocatalytic decomposition consists of hydroxyl radical attack on the cell wall. This leads to increased permeability, which allows radicals to reach and damage the cytoplasmic membrane, causing lipid peroxidation. It was reported that the antibacterial effect of TiO2 is based on the disorder of the cytoplasmic membrane.1,6,17 The photocatalytic ability is lost if the electronic hole pairs of TiO2 recombine before they can be used for photocatalysis. The high levels of antibacterial efficiency of TiAg compared with that of Ti may be explained by the role of Ag in preventing the recombination of electrons and holes, which in turn, facilitates disruption of the cell wall. The antibacterial effect of the TiO2 coating for various organisms is determined primarily by the complexity and density of the cell walls,18 as well as by the types of microorganisms.19 Therefore, additional studies on the effects of Ag on various organisms are needed not only under in vitro conditions but also under in vivo and intraoral conditions. In addition, to clarify the direct and indirect effects of improved photocatalysis of TiAg, time course results of the CFU level without UV illumination would be helpful.
Among the two types of oxidation procedures, a greater and more rapid photocatalytic antibacterial effect was observed for the Ti and TiAg specimens coated by anodic oxidation—Ti (AO) and TiAg (AO)—compared with the specimens that were thermally oxidized—Ti (TO) and TiAg (TO). This enhancement of photocatalytic activity of the AO type may be due to differences in the reducing power of AO compared with TO. TiO2 absorbs light with energy greater than the band gap, which causes electrons to jump to the conduction band to create holes in the valence band. In both rutile (TO) and anatase (AO), the position of the valence band is deep. However, the position of the conduction band in anatase is more negative than in rutile, which results in stronger reducing power.7
Several reports have showed that the physical properties of Ti brackets, including friction and strength, are comparable with those of stainless steel brackets.20,21 TiAg alloys also have been used in dental implants to supplement the weak strength and wear resistance of Ti.22 Given these results, a TiO2 film coating may assist in the oral hygiene of orthodontic patients. However, for a photocatalytic reaction to occur, the TiO2 surface must be exposed to UV radiation. This means that the brackets in oral environments should be exposed to UV light, possibly through smiling or widely opening outdoors. Although UVA has a lower impact on humans than does UVB or UVC, long-term exposure to UVA can be harmful.23 Therefore, for clinical applications, outdoor UV or UVA lamps at an intensity of 1 mW/cm2,24 or the development of a visible light photocatalyst that reacts in indoor light is advisable.24 In addition to studies undertaken to explore limitations in its light source, studies of the intraoral environment should be conducted to clarify fully the photocatalytic antibacterial effect and its potential clinical applications in the orthodontic field.
Photocatalyst reactions of TiO2-coated metals showed antibacterial activity against S mutans.
Synergistic enhancement of photocatalytic antibacterial effect against S mutans was achieved by the addition of Ag to Ti metal.
Anatase produced by anodic oxidation (AO) showed greater and more rapid antibacterial activity against S mutans than did rutile produced by thermal oxidation (TO).
Corresponding author: Dr Kyung-Ho Kim, Department of Orthodontics, Yongdong Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, 146-92 Dogok-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, South Korea (email@example.com)