Objectives

To evaluate the predictability of the Invisalign appliance (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) in leveling the maxillary curve of Spee (COS).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective sample of adult subjects treated with the Invisalign appliance between 2013 and 2019 were selected. Patients were treated nonextraction in the maxillary arch and had either Angle Class I or II malocclusions with a minimum of 14 aligners with no bite ramps. Initial, predicted, and actual outcomes were analyzed with Geomagic Control X software (version 2017.0.3; 3D Systems, Cary, NC).

Results

A sample of 53 cases satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria. Paired t-tests demonstrated a significant difference between mean predicted and actual maxillary COS leveling with a shortfall of 0.11 mm (SD = 0.37; P = .033). Planned intrusion tended to be more accurate posteriorly with an overexpression of 117% for the first molars. Planned extrusion was the least accurate, with the mid-arch demonstrating expressions of −14% to −48%. These teeth intruded despite a prescribed extrusive movement.

Conclusions

The Invisalign appliance did not accurately predict maxillary COS leveling. Planned intrusive movements were overcorrected, and planned extrusive movements were either undercorrected or resulted in intrusion. This effect was most apparent for the upper first molar, which expressed 117% and −48% of planned intrusion and extrusion, respectively.

Occlusal plane, Maxilla, Invisalign, Aligner
This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

a 

Orthodontic Resident, Department of Orthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

b 

Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

c 

Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

© 0000 by the EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
2023