Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains: | Citedby Results | The Angle Orthodontist

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains:A split-mouth randomized controlled trial

Angle Orthod (2021) 91 (4): 441–448.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Methods of measuring distal canine movement and rotation- A review

Mohammed Nahidh
YassirA Yassir

journal of orthodontic science (2023) 12 (1): 25.

Comparison of retraction efficacy of titanium-molybdenum and titanium-niobium alloy wires – A prospective split-mouth study

Nikhil Jain
Gauri Vichare
Veera Bhosale

APOS Trends in Orthodontics (2022) 12: 245.

Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study

Haleh Hashemzadeh
Milad Soleimani
Mona Golbar
Anahita Dehghani Soltani
Seyedeh Pegah Mirmalek

International Orthodontics (2022) 20 (1): 100601.

Comparing patient-centered outcomes and efficiency of space closure between nickel-titanium closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains during orthodontic treatment:

Serene A. Badran
Juman M. Al-Zaben
Lina M. Al-Taie
Haya Tbeishi
Mahmoud K. AL-Omiri

The Angle Orthodontist (2022) 92 (4): 471.

Evaluation of the rate of anterior segment retraction in orthodontic patients with bimaxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: a single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial

Monica Guirguis Youssif Tawfik
Dorra M. H. D. Izzat Bakhit
Fouad A. El Sharaby
Yehya A. Moustafa
Heba Mohamed Dehis

The Angle Orthodontist (2022) 92 (6): 738.