Self-care abilities in patients with heart failure (HF) are directly related to quality of life and outcomes such as hospitalizations and mortality. Patient education is essential in helping patients gain knowledge and skills to become successful in self-care. As the trajectory of the patient’s course changes, the HF team members identify barriers, help the patient adapt, and work toward desired goals. Communication and shared decisions about prognosis, symptom management, and treatment options require the HF team to connect with patients and have difficult conversations that can be facilitated with palliative care consultations.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart disease is the most common cause of PH.1  PH is a parameter of increased risk and disease progression in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced and preserved ejection fraction, left-sided valvular, and congenital heart diseases leading to postcapillary PH.2  HF guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is often the topic of focus; however, nonpharmacological management of HF including attention to self-care, adherence, diet, exercise, and supportive care are complementary components to pharmacological management. The HF multidisciplinary team educates patients on disease process, medication purpose and side effects, and self-care through the continuum of care. Self-care skills in patients with HF are commonly thought of as acts of monitoring of symptoms, weight, diet, and activity. Poor adherence to self-care can lead to hospitalizations and worsened outcomes despite optimal medical management. Knowledge alone is not sufficient for patients to create long-term self-care strategies. Patients with HF require time and ongoing support to develop skills to overcome barriers to effective self-care.3  Time constraints can make it difficult for health care providers (HCPs) to create conversations around effective ways to improve self-care. This is a review focused on helping nurse coordinators develop a collaboration with patients to develop self-care management strategies and will also explore tips for patient education and use palliative care to help with support of the patient and caregiver.

Patients should be referred to HF specialists for assistance with disease management and for consideration of advanced cardiac therapies. Triggers for referral include need for inotropes, advancing function classification, end organ dysfunction, persistent reduced ejection fraction, defibrillation shock, hospitalizations, refractory edema, low blood pressure, and down titration of GDMT (acronym I-NEED-HELP).4  It is essential for the HF team to deliver accurate diagnosis and, through shared decision making, determine the best treatment options as the patient’s course progresses. The multidisciplinary HF team supports patients to obtain and titrate medications and devices and monitor response to therapy. The HF team provides social and psychological support and resources, coordination of care for comorbidities, and offers supportive and palliative care. Education for the patient and caregiver is necessary throughout the entire continuum of care, including prognosis, disease state, treatment options, lifestyle changes, and self-care.

Educating HF Patients

The nurse coordinator’s primary role includes educating patients about HF self-care. An effective teacher is engaged and keeps learners interested. When teaching, it is important to be optimistic, nonjudgmental, and apply the material to the patient’s specific circumstances while managing time and resources. Assess the patient’s readiness to learn and how the patient best receives information. To improve efficiency, consider what the patient already knows and what the patient needs to know without making any assumptions. Establish and set goals and identify what is immediately applicable for the initial information exchange.

It is important not to overteach and remember that most people can store 7 items in short-term memory (±2 items).5  Storytelling can aid in remembering for the learner because it uses memories and experiences from long-term memory. ­Using medical terminology instead of plain language is a common mistake made by HCPs when teaching, so be selective with words.6  Use vocabulary and examples that the learner will relate to from life experiences. Educational materials from Internet sources are often written at much higher readability than the recommended fifth- to sixth-grade reading levels and can be a barrier to adherence; therefore, checking readability levels is necessary for handouts and tools provided to patients.7 

Upon diagnosis, introduce topics of self-care during clinic visits or during inpatient admissions but not at time of discharge. Focus on topics that are most essential to prevent patients from becoming overwhelmed. Plan time for education when it is convenient for the patient, caregiver, and nurse.

Present topics with visual and written materials while verbally reviewing basic skills to allow visual and auditory learners to process knowledge. Ask patients to repeat back certain parts of the instructions to reinforce concepts for those who learn by doing tasks. Handouts with areas for notes and questions can be beneficial for those who remember by taking notes. Materials should be culturally appropriate and reviewed with family and caregivers when possible.8  It is important to keep the initial information extremely basic while focusing on information necessary for the patient to start immediately after instruction.

Next steps of the education process should include adding more chunks of information and reinforcing information from earlier discussions. Explore how the patient is tracking or applying information to a daily routine during follow-up telemonitoring, medication titration, or blood work reminder phone checks. Quiz patients about daily habits during follow-up appointments and phone calls to identify barriers and identity misunderstandings or forgotten information. It is important to keep information simple and reinforce often.

Create handouts, resource lists, and tip sheets for patients to use and refer to later. It will improve efficiency for the HF team to have checklists and resources to ensure that essential messages are completed and documented for each patient. Guidelines and disease-specific organizations have tip sheets that can be modified for telemonitoring and patient education materials to include nonpharmacological management and self-care skills. (Table 1).9 

Table 1.

HF Self-Care Educational Resourcesa

HF Self-Care Educational Resourcesa
HF Self-Care Educational Resourcesa

Self-care is the foundation of maintaining health and preventing and managing chronic illness.11  In patients with HF, patients with better self-care have higher quality-of-life scores and lower mortality and readmissions than patients with poor self-care practices.12  Three concepts of self-care described by Riegel and Dickson13  include self-care maintenance, symptom perception (monitoring), and self-care management. Self-care maintenance is achieved when patients can consistently log daily weights and keep intake of fluid and sodium levels at recommended levels. Patients recognize the importance of taking medications as prescribed and avoid gaps in treatments. Patients have an exercise regimen and advance activity safely. It can be summarized as treatment adherence and involves the patient, caregivers, and HCPs. Symptom monitoring or symptom perception is the next skill in self-care, where patients recognize changes, then label change, and make note of the change in condition. Finally, self-care management involves action or a response to the identified concern. This could include contacting HCPs for guidance or adjusting diuretics if authorized to take diuretics as needed.

HF readmissions are common and often preventable; therefore, initiatives to prevent readmission include education on medication management as part of self-management skills, focusing on purpose, changes in doses/frequency, and which to start and stop as part of self-care education topics. Medication nonadherence should be assessed during phone calls and during clinic visits to identify potential deviations from prescribed regimens. Deviations may include not refilling, doubling up doses, skipping doses, incorrect intervals, interrupting therapy, or borrowing someone else’s medications and may give clues into deterioration in symptoms or unusual side effects.14 

Nurse coordinators have opportunities to impact self-care as a patient’s course changes to continually help learn new skills and adapt.15  Understanding barriers to self-care is an important way to identify if resources are needed or skill review is necessary. Barriers can be complex medical or social issues and may require additional resources such as home health nursing, social services, community agencies, and consultations to other services to manage underlying comorbidities.16  Adherence to self-care can be limited by a patient’s perceived lack of effect, poor health literacy, physical impairments, depression, and cognition. Behavior change is necessary to perform self-care and may be limited by an attachment to the unhealthy behavior, lack of motivation to change, difficulty deciding when to start the healthy behavior, and difficulty in maintaining the healthy behavior over time.17  Illness-related barriers to self-care include difficulty integrating self-care across other comorbid conditions, not responding promptly to symptoms, and life events that interfere with healthy behaviors. These barriers make it difficult to start and maintain momentum of behaviors that lead to lifestyle changes.

As a patient’s condition progresses and medical regimen increases in complexity, it can be more difficult to expend energy to maintain self-care behaviors. Increasing frequency of telemonitoring and implantable monitors can assist HCPs monitor patients more closely by remote capabilities.18  Desai and ­Stevenson19  describe an intense integrated home management regimen involving a multidisciplinary HF team approach to monitor and direct education, social resources, and supportive care to prevent hospitalizations. Breakdowns in communication with patients and caregivers can be barriers to care such as being unable to leave messages, blocked calls, and unreturned missed calls and letters from the HF team. In addition, changes associated with caregiver support, expenses associated with medications, diet, and transportation can impact adherence.

Finally, palliative care is another essential component of nonpharmacological care for patients with chronic illness and a HF or PH care center. Risk assessment tools such as Seattle Heart Failure Model or PARADIGM Risk of Events and Death in the Contemporary Treatment of HF (PREDICT-HF) help support clinician judgment to estimate prognosis and help HCPs and patients engage in shared decision making.20  Decisions for timing and types of advanced therapies should be reassessed often and with condition changes or HF hospitalizations.21  Patients with HF have a high burden of symptoms, are frequently hospitalized, and often have poor prognostic awareness.22  Palliative care has been shown to improve quality of life, anxiety, depression, and spiritual wellbeing over usual care.23 

Since the trajectory of each patient is different, timing of a formal referral to palliative care should be early and increase in frequency of interactions as disease progresses. Common triggers for referral include worsening symptoms, functional decline, hospitalization, increase in diuretic, hypotension, or decline in renal function. Areas of management include physical and psychological symptom management, goals of care in complex medical decisions, advanced care planning, and caregiving support.24  HF team members become skilled at discussing symptom burden and disease progression; however, goals of care and advanced care planning are less likely to be discussed.25  Often, patients want HCPs to initiate discussions about disease progression, but HCP are reluctant to initiate discussions due to concerns of causing patient anxiety.26  A discrepancy in approaching sensitive topics can make a palliative care consultation appreciated by patients and HCPs. Primary palliative care may be best initiated by providers with established relationships with patients to identify values, goals, and preferred treatments. Palliative care specialists have expertise in more difficult conversations can collaborate with the HF team, patient, and family for more challenging needs and discussions. Palliative care tools such as the serious illness conversation guide and practice by role play sessions have been shown to improve effective communication.27  The benefits of palliative care early in the patient’s course can improve quality of life and prevent suffering.16 

The nonpharmacological aspects of HF management are the focus of HF nurse coordinators. Working with patients to educate, set goals, change behaviors, identify barriers, and achieve self-management is a continual process. Along with the HF team and palliative care clinicians, nurses serve as a direct link between the patient’s treatment plan and outcome.

1.
Guazzi
M,
Ghio
S,
Adir
Y,
et al.
Pulmonary hypertension in HFpEF and HFrEF
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2020
;
76
(
9
):
1102
1111
.
2.
Al-Omary
MS,
Sugito
S,
Boyle
AJ,
et al.
Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease
.
Hypertension
.
2020
;
75
:
1397
1408
.
3.
Riegel
B,
Lee
CS,
Dickson
VV,
et al.
Self-care in patients with chronic heart failure
.
Nat Rev Cardiol
.
2011
;
8
:
644
654
.
4.
Yancy
C,
Januzzi
J,
Allen
L,
et al.
2017 ACC Expert consensus decision pathway for optimization of heart failure treatment: answers to 10 pivotal issues about heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2018
;
71
(
2
):
201
230
.
5.
Miller
G.
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information
.
Psychological Review
.
1956
;
63
:
81
97
.
6.
Bass
L.
Health literacy: implications for teaching the adult patient
.
J Infus Nurs
.
2005
;
28
:
15
22
.
7.
Ayyaswami
V,
Padmanabhan
D,
Patel
M,
et al.
A readability analysis of online cardiovascular disease-related health education materials
.
Health Lit Res Pract
.
2019
;
3
:
e74
e80
.
8.
Riegel
B,
Jaarsma,
T,
Stromberg,
Anna.
A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness
.
Adv Nurs Sci
.
2012
;
35
(
3
):
194
204
. .
9.
Hollenberg
S,
Warner Stevenson
L,
Ahmad
T,
et al.
2019
ACC expert consensus decision pathway on risk assessment, management, and clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized with heart failure
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2019
;
74
:
1966
2011
.
10.
Ismail
R,
Hegab
S,
Kelly
B,
et al.
Serious illness conversations in pulmonary hypertension
.
Pulm Circ
.
2021
;
11
:
1
6
.
11.
Riegel
B,
Moser
SK,
Buck
HG,
et al.
Self-care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke
.
J Am Heart Assoc
.
2017
;
6
:
e006997
.
12.
Riegel
B,
Moser
DK,
Anker
SA,
et al.
State of the science promoting self-care in persons with heart failure
.
Circulation
.
2009
;
120
:
1141
1163
.
13.
Riegel
B,
Dickson
VV.
A situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care
.
J Cardiovasc Nurs
.
2008
;
23
:
190
196
.
14.
Stewart
T.
Facilitating pulmonary arterial hypertension medication adherence: patient-centered management
.
Adv Pulm Hypertens
.
2009
;
8
:
228
231
.
15.
Ryan
C,
Bierle
R,
Vuckovic
KM.
The three Rs for preventing heart failure readmission: review, reassess, and reeducate
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2019
;
39
:
85
93
.
16.
Heidenreich
P,
Bozkurt
B,
Aguilar
D,
et al.
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2022
May
,
79
(
17
)
e263
e421
.
17.
Riegel
B,
Dunbar
SB,
Fitzsimons
D,
et al.
Self-care research: Where are we now? Where are we going?
Int J Nurs Stud
.
2021
;
116
:
103402
.
18.
Jaarsma
T,
Hill
L,
Gayes-Genis
A,
et al.
Self-care of heart failure patients: practical management recommendations for the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
.
Eur J Heart Fail
.
2021
;
23
:
157
174
.
19.
Desai
AS,
Stevenson
LW.
Rehospitalization for heart failure: predict or prevent
.
Circulation
.
2012
;
126
:
501
506
.
20.
Murphy
SP,
Ibrahim
NE,
Januzzi
JL.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a review
.
JAMA
.
2020
;
324
:
488
504
.
21.
Codina
P,
Lupón
J,
Borrellas
A,
et al.
Head-to-head comparison of contemporary heart failure risk scores
.
Eur J Heart Fail
.
2021
;
23
:
2035
2044
.
22.
Gelfman
LP,
Bakitas
M,
Warner Stevenson
L,
et al.
The state of the science on integrating palliative care in heart failure
.
J Palliat Med
.
2017
;
20
:
592
603
.
23.
Rogers
JG,
Patel
CB,
Mentz
RJ,
et al.
Palliative care in heart failure: the PAL-HF randomized, controlled clinical trial
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2017
;
70
:
331
341
.
24.
Puckett
C,
Goodlin
SJ,
A modern integration of palliative care into the management of heart failure
.
Can J Cardiol
.
2020
;
36
:
1050
1060
.
25.
Hill
L,
Prager Geller
T,
Baruah
R,
et al.
Integration of a palliative approach into heart failure care: a European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association position paper
.
Eur J Heart Fail
,
2020
;
22
:
2327
2339
.
26.
Kelemen
AM,
Ruiz
G,
Groninger
H.
Choosing words wisely in communication with patients with heart failure and families
.
Am J Card
.
2016
;
117
:
1779
1782
.
27.
Daubman
BR,
Bernacki
R,
Stoltenberg
M,
et al.
Best practices for teaching clinicians to use a serious illness conversation guide
.
Palliat Med Rep
.
2020
;
1
:
135
142
.

Disclosure: T. Stewart has served as an advisor for Actelion/Janssen and Merck.