The College of American Pathologists offers these protocols to assist pathologists in providing clinically useful and relevant information when reporting results of surgical specimen examinations. The College regards the reporting elements in the “Surgical Pathology Cancer Case Summary” section of the protocols as essential elements of the pathology report. However, the manner in which these elements are reported is at the discretion of each specific pathologist, taking into account clinician preferences, institutional policies, and individual practice.

The College developed these protocols as an educational tool to assist pathologists in the useful reporting of relevant information. It did not issue the protocols for use in litigation, reimbursement, or other contexts. Nevertheless, the College recognizes that the protocols might be used by hospitals, attorneys, payers, and others. Indeed, effective January 1, 2004, the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons has mandated the use of the checklist elements of the protocols as part of its Cancer Program Standards for Approved Cancer Programs. Therefore, it becomes even more important for pathologists to familiarize themselves with the document. At the same time, the College cautions that use of the protocols other than for their intended educational purpose may involve additional considerations that are beyond the scope of this document.

This protocol applies to carcinomas of the urinary bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis. It applies primarily to invasive bladder carcinomas and/or associated epithelial lesions, including urothelial carcinoma in situ. It is based on the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer TNM classification system for the staging of carcinomas of the urinary bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis.

Background Documentation

  1. I. Bladder Biopsy, Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Specimen

    • A. Clinical Information

      • 1. Patient identification

        •  a. Name

        •  b. Identification number

        •  c. Age (birth date)

        •  d. Sex

      • 2. Responsible physician(s)

      • 3. Date of procedure

      • 4. Other clinical information

        •  a. Relevant history (note A)

        •  b. Relevant findings (eg, cystoscopic or imaging study findings)

        •  c. Clinical diagnosis

        •  d. Procedure (eg, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, cold cup, electroresection biopsy, tumor removal [specify site])

        •  e. Anatomic site/type of specimen

    • B. Macroscopic Examination

      • 1. Specimen

        •  a. Unfixed/fixed (specify type of fixative)

        •  b. Number of pieces

        •  c. Greatest dimension of single specimen

        •  d. Aggregate volume of multiple fragments

      • 2. Results of intraoperative consultation, if appropriate

      • 3. Tissue submitted for microscopic evaluation

        •  a. All or selected sample(s) (if selected, estimate percentage submitted)

        •  b. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless saved for special studies)

      • 4. Special studies (specify)

    • C. Microscopic Evaluation

      • 1. Specimen

        •  a. Adequacy of specimen (if unsatisfactory for evaluation, specify reason)

        •  b. Layers of bladder (specify if present or absent)

          •  (1) urothelium

          •  (2) lamina propria (subepithelial connective tissue)

          •  (3) muscularis propria

      • 2. Tumor

        •  a. Histologic type (note B)

        •  b. Histologic grade (specify grading system and total number of grades, if applicable) (note C)

        •  c. Site(s) of involvement (eg, trigone, dome)

        •  d. Pattern of growth

          •  (1) noninvasive (pure)

            •  i. papillary

            •  ii. flat carcinoma in situ (CIS)

            •  iii. papillary and flat CIS

          •  (2) invasive (pure)

          •  (3) mixed, noninvasive and invasive

            •  i. papillary and invasive

            •  ii. flat CIS and invasive

            •  iii. papillary and flat CIS and invasive

          •  (4) indeterminate

        •  e. Extent of invasion (specify invasion of layers listed)

          •  (1) confined to epithelium (note D)

          •  (2) subepithelial connective tissue or lamina propria, including muscularis mucosae (notes D and E)

          •  (3) muscularis propria (notes D and E)

          •  (4) prostatic involvement (note E)

            •  i. urethral mucosa (flat in situ, papillary noninvasive, or invasive)

            •  ii. restricted to prostatic ducts or acini (in situ)

            •  iii. prostatic stromal invasion

            •  iv. multiple patterns (urethral mucosa, prostatic ducts or acini, stromal)

            •  v. indeterminate: state reason (eg, tumor only, cautery artifact)

          •  f. Venous/lymphatic vessel invasion (note F)

      • 3. Additional pathologic findings, if present

        •  a. Urothelial CIS (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) (focal/multifocal)

        •  b. Urothelial dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) (focal/multifocal)

        •  c. Inflammation/regenerative changes

        •  d. Therapy related

        •  e. Thermocoagulation effect (note D)

        •  f. Other(s) (specify) (eg, cystitis cystica glandularis, keratinizing squamous metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia)

      • 4. Results/status of special studies (specify) (eg, immunohistochemistry)

      • 5. Comments

        •  a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation, as appropriate

        •  b. Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate

        •  c. Correlation with clinical information, as appropriate

  2. II. Cystectomy (Partial, Total), Radical Cystoprostatectomy, Pelvic Exenteration

    •  A. Clinical Information

      •  1. Patient identification

        •  a. Name

        •  b. Identification number

        •  c. Age (birth date)

        •  d. Sex

      •  2. Responsible physician(s)

      •  3. Date of procedure

      •  4. Other clinical information

        •  a. Relevant history (eg, previous diagnosis, previous treatment) (note A)

        •  b. Relevant findings (eg, clinical findings, cystoscopic findings, radiologic studies)

        •  c. Clinical diagnosis

        •  d. Procedure

          •  (1) partial cystectomy

          •  (2) total cystectomy

          •  (3) cystoprostatectomy

          •  (4) pelvic exenteration

          •  (5) lymphadenectomy

        •  e. Operative findings

        •  f. Anatomic sites of specimen

  3. B. Macroscopic Examination

    • 1. Specimen

      •  a. Organ(s)/tissue(s) included

      •  b. Unfixed/fixed (specify type of fixative)

      •  c. Opened/unopened

      •  d. External aspect (documentation of extent of resection)

      •  e. Size (3 dimensions) (specify for partial cystectomy)

      •  f. Note areas designated by surgeon

      •  g. Results of intraoperative consultation

    • 2. Tumor

      •  a. Location (trigone, left/right/anterior/posterior wall, dome)

      •  b. Size (3 dimensions)

      •  c. Descriptive features (pattern of growth, gross appearance)

        •  (1) papillary (pure)

        •  (2) solid/nodular, flat, ulcerated

        •  (3) mixed

        •  (4) indeterminate

      •  d. Extent (depth of bladder wall) of invasion (note E)

      •  e. Involvement of adjacent structures, if present (eg, prostate, vagina) (note G)

      •  f. Relation to specimen margins (note H)

    • 3. Other pathologic findings, if present

      •  a. Mucosal abnormalities

      •  4. Other

    • 4. Ureter(s)

    • 5. Margins, as appropriate (note H)

    • 6. Regional lymph nodes

      •  a. Location (all nodes are designated contiguous unless specified by surgeon)

      •  b. Number

      •  c. Description (describe gross tumors)

    • 7. Separately submitted lymph nodes

      •  a. Location (as specified by surgeon)

      •  b. Number

      •  c. Description (describe gross tumors)

    • 8. Other submitted tissue

      •  a. Location (as specified by surgeon)

      •  b. Descriptive features

        •  (1) prostate

        •  (2) seminal vesicles

        •  (3) uterus

        •  (4) vagina

        •  (5) rectum

        •  (6) pelvic wall

        •  (7) urethra

        •  (8) ureter(s)

        •  (9) other(s) (specify)

    • 9. Sections submitted for microscopic evaluation (note G)

      •  a. Tumor

        •  (1) representative

        •  (2) tumor at point of deepest penetration of wall

        •  (3) interface of tumor with adjacent bladder wall

      •  b. Mucosa remote from cancer

      •  c. Areas with additional pathologic findings

      •  d. Margin(s) of resection

      •  e. Ureter(s)

      •  f. Penile/bulbomembranous urethra

      •  g. Prostatic urethra

      •  h. Prostate and seminal vesicles, representative

      •  i. Lymph nodes

      •  j. Pelvic wall

      •  k. Areas designated by surgeon

      •  l. Sections of other submitted tissues (specify) (eg, vagina, uterus, rectum)

      •  m. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless saved for special studies)

    • 10. Special studies (specify) (eg, immunohistochemistry, morphometry, DNA analysis [specify type], gross photograph [if obtained])

  4. C. Microscopic Evaluation

    • 1. Tumor

      •  a. Histologic type (note B)

      •  b. Histologic grade (specify grading scheme and total number of grades, if applicable) (note C)

      •  c. Site(s) (focal/multifocal)

      •  d. Pattern of growth

        •  (1) noninvasive (pure)

          •  i. papillary

          •  ii. flat CIS

          •  iii. papillary and flat CIS

        •  (2) invasive (pure)

        •  (3) mixed, noninvasive and invasive

          •  i. papillary and invasive

          •  ii. flat CIS and invasive

          •  iii. papillary and flat CIS and invasive

        •  (4) indeterminate

      •  e. Extent of invasion (specify each layer as involved or uninvolved by tumor) (note D)

      •  f. Involvement of other tissue(s)/structure(s) (notes D and E)

        • (1) prostatic urethra (flat CIS, noninvasive papillary, or invasive)

        • (2) prostate ducts and acini (without stromal invasion)

        • (3) prostatic stroma

        • (4) seminal vesicles

        • (5) bulbomembranous or penile urethral mucosa

        • (6) uterus

        • (7) vagina

        • (8) rectum

        • (9) pelvic wall

        • (10) abdominal wall

      •  g. Areas marked by surgeon

      •  h. Venous/lymphatic vessel invasion (note F)

    • 2. Margins (note H)

      •  a. Ureters

      •  b. Urethral

      •  c. Paravesicular soft tissue (total cystectomy specimens)

      •  d. Pelvic soft tissue (pelvic exenteration specimens)

    • 3. Additional pathologic findings, if present

      •  a. Urothelial CIS (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) (focal/multifocal)

      •  b. Urothelial dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) (focal/multifocal)

      •  c. Inflammation/regenerative changes

      •  d. Therapy related

      •  e. Other(s) (specify) (eg, cystitis cystica glandularis, keratinizing squamous metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia)

    • 4. Regional lymph nodes (note E)

      •  a. Site(s)/laterality

      •  b. Number

      •  c. Number involved by tumor

      •  d. Extranodal extension

      •  e. Size of metastasis

    • 5. Separately submitted lymph nodes (report as specified)

      •  a. Total number examined, by site and laterality

      •  b. Number

      •  c. Number involved by tumor

      •  d. Extranodal extension

      •  e. Size of metastasis

    • 6. Other submitted organ(s)/tissue(s)

      •  a. Prostate

        •  (1) invaded by bladder tumor

        •  (2) prostatic adenocarcinoma (see protocol for prostate1 for details)

        •  (3) other pathologic features (eg, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, inflammation, hyperplasia)

      •  b. Other(s) (ureter/urethra/seminal vesicles/vagina/rectum)

        •  (1) invaded by bladder tumor

        •  (2) other tumors

        •  (3) other pathologic features (eg, inflammation, hyperplasia, CIS)

      •  c. Margins, as appropriate

    • 7. Results/status of special studies (specify)

    • 8. Distant metastasis (specify sites)

    • 9. Comments

      •  a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation, as appropriate

      •  b. Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate

      •  c. Correlation with clinical information, as appropriate

  5. III.Nephroureterectomy or Ureterectomy Specimen

    • A. Clinical Information

      • 1. Patient identification

        •  a. Name

        •  b. Identification number

        •  c. Age (birth date)

        •  d. Sex

      • 2. Responsible physician(s)

      • 3. Date of procedure

      • 4. Other clinical information

        •  a. Relevant history (eg, previous diagnosis, previous treatment) (note A)

        •  b. Relevant findings (eg, radiologic studies)

        •  c. Clinical diagnosis

        •  d. Procedure (specify anatomic site[s])

        •  e. Operative findings

        •  f. Anatomic site(s) of specimen

        •  g. Results of intraoperative consultation

    • B.Macroscopic Examination

      • 1. Specimen

        •  a. Organ(s)/tissue(s) included

        •  b. Unfixed/fixed (specify type of fixative)

        •  c. External aspect (documentation of extent of resection)

        •  d. Size (3 dimensions) (specify if partial nephrectomy)

        •  e. Areas designated by surgeon

        •  f. Results of intraoperative consultation

      • 2. Tumor

        •  a. Location (pelvi-calyceal system, ureter)

        •  b. Size (3 dimensions)

        •  c. Description (pattern of growth, gross appearance)

          •  (1) papillary (pure)

          •  (2) solid/nodule, flat, ulcerated

          •  (3) mixed

          •  (4) indeterminate

        •  d. Extent (depth) of invasion (notes D and E)

      • 3. Margins

        •  a. Ureteral margin (proximal and distal in ureterectomy specimen)

        •  b. Bladder cuff/renal pelvic margin

        •  c. Gerota fascia/perinephric fat margin (in nephrectomy specimen)

        •  d. Hilar soft tissue

        •  e. Renal parenchyma (partial nephrectomy)

        •  f. Periureteral soft tissue radial margin (ureterectomy specimens)

      • 4. Additional pathologic features, if present

        •  a. Mucosal abnormalities

        •  b. Other lesions (including of renal parenchyma)

      • 5. Lymph nodes submitted as part of specimen

        •  a. Location (all nodes are designated contiguous unless otherwise specified by surgeon)

        •  b. Number

        •  c. Description (specify gross metastasis)

      • 6. Separately submitted lymph nodes

        •  a. Location (as specified by surgeon)

        •  b. Number

        •  c. Description (specify gross metastasis)

      • 7. Sections submitted for microscopic evaluation

        •  a. Tumor

          •  (1) representative

          •  (2) tumor at point of deepest penetration

          •  (3) interface of tumor with adjacent pelvis and kidney

        •  b. Mucosa of pelvis remote from cancer

        •  c. Areas with additional pathologic findings

        •  d. Margin(s) of resection

          •  (1) ureter (proximal and distal in ureterectomy specimens)

          •  (2) bladder cuff margin

          •  (3) Gerota fascia (perinephric fat)

          •  (4) hilar soft tissue margin

          •  (5) renal parenchyma (partial nephrectomy)

        •  e. Areas designated by surgeon

        •  f. All lymph nodes

        •  g. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless saved for special studies)

      • 8. Special studies (specify type) (eg, immunohistochemistry, DNA analysis) and gross photography, if obtained

    • C. Microscopic Evaluation

      • 1. Tumor

        •  a. Histologic type (note B)

        •  b. Histologic grade (specify grading scheme and total number of grades, if applicable) (note C)

        •  c. Pattern of growth

          •  (1) noninvasive (pure)

            •  i. papillary

            •  ii. flat CIS

            •  iii. papillary and flat CIS

          •  (2) invasive (pure)

          •  (3) mixed, noninvasive and invasive

            •  i. papillary and invasive

            •  ii. flat CIS and invasive

            •  iii. papillary and flat CIS and invasive

          •  (4) indeterminate

        •  d. Site(s)

        •  e. Extent of invasion (specify each layer as involved or uninvolved) (notes D and E)

          •  (1) confined to epithelium

          •  (2) subepithelial connective tissue

          •  (3) muscularis propria

          •  (4) peripelvic connective tissue

          •  (5) renal parenchyma

          •  (6) beyond kidney in perinephric fat

        •  f.Venous/lymphatic vessel invasion (note F)

      • 2. Margins (note H)

        •  a. Ureteral

        •  b. Bladder neck

        •  c. Gerota fascia (perinephric fat margin)

        •  d. Hilar soft tissue

        •  e. Renal parenchyma (partial nephrectomy)

      • 3. Additional pathologic findings, if present

        •  a. Urothelial CIS (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) (focal/multifocal)

        •  b. Urothelial dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia) (focal/multifocal)

        •  c. Inflammation/regenerative changes

        •  d. Therapy related

        •  e. Renal epithelial neoplasm (see protocol for kidney2 for details)

        •  f. Other(s) (specify) (eg, cystitis cystica glandularis, keratinizing squamous metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia)

      • 4. Regional lymph nodes (note E)

        •  a. Site(s)/laterality

        •  b. Number

        •  c. Number involved by tumor

        •  d. Extranodal extension

        •  e. Size of metastasis

      • 5. Separately submitted lymph nodes (report as specified)

        •  a. Total number examined by site and laterality

        •  b. Number involved by tumor

        •  c. Extranodal extension

        •  d. Size of metastasis

      • 6. Distant metastasis (specify sites)

      • 7. Results/status of special studies (specify)

      • 8. Comments

        •  a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation, as appropriate

        •  b. Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate

        •  c. Correlation with clinical information, as appropriate

A: History

A relevant history is important for interpretation of all bladder specimens.3–6 A history of renal stones, recent urinary tract procedures, infections, or obstruction can influence the urinary cytologic interpretation or the interpretation of random biopsies obtained from patients with hematuria. Any neoplasms previously diagnosed should be specified, including the histologic type, primary site, and histologic grade. Primary tumors of the ureter may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome. Renal pelvic tumors are more often seen in analgesic abusers, who often have analgesic nephropathy, including papillary necrosis. If prior therapy has been given, it should be described (systemic or intravesical chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation, etc). The method of collection and date also should be specified in urine cytology specimens. Cytologic specimens from the ureter or renal pelvis may be overinterpreted if their site of sampling is not stated.

B: Histologic Type

The vast majority (>95%) of carcinomas of the urinary bladder, renal pelvis, and ureter are urothelial or transitional cell in origin. A working histologic classification encompassing the wide histologic diversity and histologic range within the different types of carcinomas of the urothelial tract is tabulated in this note. Benign tumors are included in this classification because, within the same patient, a spectrum of differentiation from benign to malignant tumors may be seen in the bladder, either at the same time or over the clinical course of the disease. Also, clinicians stage most tumors irrespective of histologic grade.7–12 The distinction between a urothelial carcinoma with aberrant squamous or glandular differentiation and a primary squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma is rather arbitrary. Most authorities require a pure histology of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma to designate a tumor as such, all others with recognizable papillary, invasive, or flat carcinoma in situ (CIS) urothelial components being considered as urothelial carcinoma with aberrant differentiation.

Classification of Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder, Including Urothelial (Transitional Cell) Carcinoma and Its Variants*

  • Urothelial (Transitional Cell) Neoplasia

    • Benign

      • Transitional papilloma (World Health Organization [WHO]/International Society of Urologic Pathology [ISUP], 1998; WHO, 1973, grade 0)

      • Inverted papilloma

    • Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (WHO/ISUP, 1998; WHO, 1973, grade I)

    • Malignant

      • Papillary†

        • Typical, noninvasive

        • Typical, with invasion

          • Variant

            • With squamous or glandular differentiation

        • Micropapillary

      • Nonpapillary

        • Carcinoma in situ

        • Invasive carcinoma

          • Variants containing or exhibiting

          • Deceptively benign features

            • Nested pattern (resembling von Brunn nests)

            • Small tubular pattern

            • Microcystic pattern

            • Inverted pattern

          • Squamous differentiation

          • Glandular differentiation

          • Micropapillary histology

          • Sarcomatoid histology (“sarcomatoid carcinoma”)

          • Urothelial carcinoma with unusual cytoplasmic features

            • Clear cell

            • Plasmacytoid

          • Urothelial carcinoma with syncytiotrophoblasts

          • Unusual stromal reactions

            • Pseudosarcomatous stroma

            • Stromal osseous or cartilaginous metaplasia

            • Osteoclast-type giant cells

            • With prominent lymphoid infiltrate

  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    • Typical

    • Variant

      • Verrucous carcinoma

      • Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma

      • Sarcomatoid carcinoma

    • Adenocarcinoma

      • Anatomic variants

        • Bladder mucosa

        • Urachal

        • With exstrophy

        • From endometriosis

      • Histologic variants

        • Typical intestinal type

        • Mucinous (including colloid)

        • Signet ring cell

        • Clear cell

        • Hepatoid

        • Mixture of above patterns—adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified

  • Tumors of Mixed Cell Types

  • Undifferentiated Carcinoma‡

    • Small cell carcinoma

    • Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

    • Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma

    • Giant cell carcinoma

    • Not otherwise specified

  • Metastatic Carcinoma

* Modified from Amin et al.7 

† Papillary tumors may be invasive or noninvasive, and when invasive may be microinvasive (invasive to a depth of ≤2 mm) or frankly invasive (like nonpapillary tumors).

‡ Refers to tumors that are undifferentiated by light microscopy.

C: Histologic Grade

Flat intraepithelial lesions and papillary and invasive lesions are graded separately.11–16 Until recently, there was significant controversy in the classification of these lesions. Flat lesions were graded as mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia and CIS; or atypical hyperplasia and CIS; or dysplasia and CIS.7,9 Papillary lesions were classified as papillomas (grade 0) and transitional cell carcinomas (grades I, II, and III); or as papillomas, low-grade transitional cell carcinomas, and high-grade transitional cell carcinomas.12–14 Due to variable classification systems and the need for a universally acceptable system, the WHO/ISUP consensus classification was proposed.12 Other systems (that were being used previously) may still be used according to institutional preference. Until the WHO/ISUP system is clinically and prognostically validated, tumor grade according to both the WHO/ISUP system12 and the older WHO14 system, for example, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (WHO/ISUP, 1998)/transitional cell carcinoma, grade I (WHO, 1973), may be used concurrently.

The WHO (1999) classification of bladder tumors11 differs only slightly from the WHO/ISUP (1998) system12 in that carcinomas are graded on a scale of I to III in the former and as low-grade and high-grade in the latter. Most cases designated as grade II and III by the WHO (1999) system correspond to high-grade carcinomas in the WHO/ISUP (1998) Consensus Classification.

WHO/ISUP (1998) Consensus Classification for Urothelial (Transitional Cell) Lesions

  • Normal

    • Normal*

  • Hyperplasia

    • Flat hyperplasia

    • Papillary hyperplasia

  • Flat Lesions With Atypia

    • Reactive (inflammatory) atypia

    • Atypia of unknown significance

    • Dysplasia (low-grade intraurothelial neoplasia)

    • Carcinoma in situ (high-grade intraurothelial neoplasia)†

  • Papillary Neoplasms

    • Papilloma

    • Inverted papilloma

    • Papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential

    • Papillary carcinoma, low-grade

    • Papillary carcinoma, high-grade‡

  • Invasive Neoplasms

    • Lamina propria invasion

    • Muscularis propria (detrusor muscle) invasion

* May include cases formerly diagnosed as “mild dysplasia.”

† Includes cases with “severe dysplasia.”

‡ Option exists to add comment as to the presence of marked anaplasia.

Squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas may be graded as well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated.

D: Extent of Invasion

A critical role of the surgical pathologist is to diagnose the depth and extent of invasion into the subepithelial connective tissue/lamina propria/submucosa (pT1), muscularis propria (pT2), or beyond (pT3 or pT4).17–19 In papillary tumors, invasion occurs most often at the base of the tumor and very infrequently in the stalk. In the urinary bladder, a tumor infiltrating the lamina propria (pT1) is sometimes overdiagnosed as vascular invasion; hence, caution should be exercised when diagnosing this feature, which in some cases may be supported by performing immunohistochemical studies for endothelial markers.20–22 Although attempts at substaging bladder pT1 tumors have been made, the WHO/ISUP committee recommended that it is currently not necessary for the practice to be universally adopted.12 Pathologists are, however, encouraged to provide some assessment as to the extent of lamina propria invasion (ie, focal vs extensive, or depth in millimeters, or by level—above, at, or below muscularis mucosae). Designation of a tumor as merely muscle invasive is inappropriate, but the type of muscle invasion, that is, muscularis mucosae (pT1 tumors) versus muscularis propria (pT2 tumors) invasion, needs to be clearly stated.23 Descriptive terminology, such as “urothelial carcinoma with muscle invasion, indeterminate for type of muscle invasion,” may be used when it is not possible to be certain whether the type of muscle invaded by the tumor is hypertrophic muscularis mucosae or muscularis propria. A comment on thermocoagulation effect may be made, especially if its presence impedes diagnostic evaluation.24 In transurethral resection of bladder tumor specimens invasive into muscularis propria, no attempt should be made to substage the depth of muscularis propria invasion. Since fat may be present in the lamina propria and muscularis propria, the presence of tumor in adipose tissue is not necessarily diagnostic of extravesical spread; this determination is reserved for cystectomy specimens.25 

Involvement of the prostate gland may occur in several different patterns. The prostatic urethra may be involved (flat CIS, papillary or invasive carcinoma), or the prostate gland may be involved. Involvement of the prostate gland may be evident as involvement of prostatic ducts and acini without stromal invasion (CIS involving prostate glands), or as urothelial carcinoma involving prostatic stroma (either from prostatic urethral carcinoma, carcinoma extending directly through the bladder wall, or carcinoma involving prostatic ducts and acini additionally with stromal invasion).26 

E: TNM and Stage Groupings

The TNM Staging System for carcinomas of the urinary bladder of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is recommended and is shown in this note.17,18 

By AJCC/UICC convention, the designation “T” refers to a primary tumor that has not been previously treated. The symbol “p” refers to the pathologic classification of the TNM, as opposed to the clinical classification, and is based on gross and microscopic examination. pT entails a resection of the primary tumor or biopsy adequate to evaluate the highest pT category, pN entails removal of nodes adequate to validate lymph node metastasis, and pM implies microscopic examination of distant lesions. Clinical classification (cTNM) is usually carried out by the referring physician before treatment, during initial evaluation of the patient or when pathologic classification is not possible.

Pathologic staging is usually performed after surgical resection of the primary tumor. Pathologic staging depends on pathologic documentation of the anatomic extent of disease, regardless of whether the primary tumor has been completely removed. If a biopsied tumor is not resected for any reason (eg, when technically unfeasible) and if the highest T and N categories or the M1 category of the tumor can be confirmed microscopically, the criteria for pathologic classification and staging have been satisfied without total removal of the primary cancer.

Primary Tumor (T): Urinary Bladder* (Figure 1)

Figure 1.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) for carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag

Figure 1.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) for carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag

Close modal
  • TX  Primary tumor cannot be assessed

  • T0  No evidence of primary tumor

  • Ta  Papillary noninvasive carcinoma

  • Tis  Carcinoma in situ: “flat tumor”

  • T1  Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue

  • T2  Tumor invades muscle

  • T2a  Tumor invades superficial muscle (inner half)

  • T2b  Tumor invades deep muscle (outer half)

  • T3  Tumor invades perivesical tissue

  • T3a  Microscopically

  • T3b  Macroscopically (extravesicular mass)

  • T4  Tumor invades any of the following: prostate, uterus, vagina, pelvic wall, or abdominal wall

  • T4a  Tumor invades prostate, uterus, or vagina

  • T4b  Tumor invades pelvic wall or abdominal wall

Primary Tumor (T): Renal Pelvis and Ureter* (Figures 2 through 4)

Figure 2.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) pTa, pT1, and pT2 carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag

Figure 2.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) pTa, pT1, and pT2 carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag

Close modal
  • TX  Primary tumor cannot be assessed

  • T0  No evidence of primary tumor

  • Ta  Papillary noninvasive carcinoma

  • Tis  Carcinoma in situ

  • T1  Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue

  • T2  Tumor invades the muscularis

  • T3  For renal pelvis only: Tumor invades beyond muscularis into peripelvic fat or the renal parenchyma

  • T3  For ureter only: Tumor invades beyond muscularis into periureteric fat

  • T4  Tumor invades adjacent organs, or through the kidney into the perinephric fat

* The suffix “m” should be added to the appropriate T category to indicate multiple tumors. The suffix “is” may be added to any T to indicate the presence of associated CIS.

Regional Lymph Nodes (N)

Regional lymph nodes are those within the true pelvis; all others are distant nodes.

  • NX  Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed

  • N0  No regional lymph node metastasis

  • N1  Metastasis in a single lymph node, 2 cm or less in greatest dimension

  • N2  Metastasis in a single lymph node, more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension, or multiple lymph nodes, none more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

  • N3  Metastasis in a lymph node more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

Distant Metastasis (M)

  • MX  Distant metastasis cannot be assessed

  • M0  No distant metastasis

  • M1  Distant metastasis

TNM Stage Grouping: Bladder

TNM Stage Grouping: Renal Pelvis and Ureter

TNM Descriptors

For identification of special cases of TNM or pTNM classifications, the “m” suffix and “y,” “r,” and “a” prefixes are used. Although they do not affect the stage grouping, they indicate cases needing separate analysis.

The “m” suffix indicates the presence of multiple primary tumors in a single site and is recorded in parentheses: pT(m)NM.

The “y” prefix indicates those cases in which classification is performed during or following initial multimodality therapy (ie, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both chemotherapy and radiation therapy). The cTNM or pTNM category is identified by a “y” prefix. The ycTNM or ypTNM categorizes the extent of tumor actually present at the time of that examination. The “y” categorization is not an estimate of tumor prior to multimodality therapy (ie, before initiation of neoadjuvant therapy).

The “r” prefix indicates a recurrent tumor when staged after a documented disease-free interval and is identified by the “r” prefix: rTNM.

The “a” prefix designates the stage determined at autopsy: aTNM.

Additional Descriptors

Residual Tumor (R)

Tumor remaining in a patient after therapy with curative intent (eg, surgical resection for cure) is categorized by a system known as the R classification.

  • RX  Presence of residual tumor cannot be assessed

  • R0  No residual tumor

  • R1  Microscopic residual tumor

  • R2  Macroscopic residual tumor

For the surgeon, the R classification may be useful to indicate the known or assumed status of the completeness of a surgical excision. For the pathologist, the R classification is relevant to the status of the margins of a surgical resection specimen, that is, tumor involving the resection margin on pathologic examination may be assumed to correspond to residual tumor in the patient and may be classified as macroscopic or microscopic according to the findings at the specimen margin(s).

F: Venous/Lymphatic Vascular Invasion

Urothelial carcinoma may invade blood vessels or lymphatic channels. In suspicious cases, blood vessels can be highlighted by immunohistochemical staining for factor VIII–related antigen, CD31, or CD34.19–22 Staining will not resolve the problem of differentiating lymphatic versus artifactual space entrapment by tumor cells, and as mentioned, this is frequently seen in urothelial tumors invading the lamina propria. Retraction artifact is also prominent in the “micropapillary variant” of urothelial carcinoma.7 

G: Sections for Microscopic Evaluation

Bladder

Sections of bladder needed for microscopic evaluation are as follows: in transurethral resection of bladder tumor specimens, submit 1 section per centimeter of tumor diameter (up to 10 cassettes). If the tumor is noninvasive by the initial sampling, additional submission of tissue (including possibly submitting all tissue) is necessary to diagnose or rule out the presence of invasion. If tumor is invasive into the lamina propria in the initial sampling, additional sections (including possibly submitting the entire specimen) may be necessary to diagnose or rule out the possibility of muscularis propria invasion. In cystectomy specimens, several representative sections of the tumor, including the macroscopically deepest penetration, should be sampled. Submit several sections of the mucosa remote from the carcinoma, especially if abnormal, including the lateral wall(s), dome, and trigone. Submit one section of ureteral margin, unless submitted separately as frozen section specimens, and one section of urethral margin. If a long segment of the ureter(s) is present, then additional sections from the mid-portion may be necessary, as urothelial cancer often is multifocal.

Prostate and Prostatic Urethra

Prostatic urethral involvement should be carefully investigated in cystectomy specimens. Sections should include the prostatic urethra, including at the margin and with the surrounding prostatic parenchyma. Representative sections of the peripheral zone, central zone, and seminal vesicles should be included. Parenthetically, it must be noted that there is a higher incidence of prostatic adenocarcinoma in cystoprostatectomy specimens of bladder carcinoma. Close gross examination may help target sampling of selective, abnormal-appearing areas.

Lymph Nodes

Submit one section from each grossly positive lymph node. All other lymph nodes should be entirely submitted, as presence of nodal disease may be used as an indication for adjuvant therapy. Lymph nodes may be grossly or microscopically detected in the perivesical fat.

Other Tissues

Submit one or more sections of uterus (as indicated) and one or more sections of vagina, seminal vesicles, and other organs (as indicated). If the tumor grossly appears to invade the prostate, uterus, or vagina, sections should be targeted such that the relationship of the infiltrating tumor in the bladder wall and the adjacent viscus is clearly demonstrable.

H: Margins

Resection margins, including those mentioned in note G, should be carefully specified. Statements about deep soft tissue margins should specify whether peritoneal surfaces are involved by tumor. In cases of urachal adenocarcinoma in which partial cystectomy with excision of the urachal tract and umbilicus is performed, the margins of the urachal tract, ie, the soft tissue surrounding the urachus and the skin around the umbilical margin, should be specified. In renal pelvis, ureter, and nephroureterectomy specimens, the margins may include radial hilar soft tissue margin; bladder cuff; and ureteral, renal parenchymal, and Gerota fascia margins, depending on the type of surgical specimen.

Figure 3.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) pT3 carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag

Figure 3.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) pT3 carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag

Close modal
Figure 4.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) pT4 carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter. A, Involvement of a vertebral body. B, Involvement of major blood vessel and direct extension into the bladder. C, Extension into perinephric fat through the kidney. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag.

Figure 4.

Schematic depiction of pathologic stage (TNM, 1997; TNM, 2002) pT4 carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter. A, Involvement of a vertebral body. B, Involvement of major blood vessel and direct extension into the bladder. C, Extension into perinephric fat through the kidney. Reproduced with permission.27 Copyright 1997, Springer-Verlag.

Close modal
for the Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists.
Prostate: Protocol Applies to Invasive Carcinomas of the Prostate Gland.
Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 2003. Available at: ftp://ftp.cap.org/cancerprotocols/prostate03_p.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2003
.
for the Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists.
Kidney: Protocol Applies to All Invasive Carcinomas of Renal Tubular Origin; It Excludes Wilms Tumors and Tumors of Urothelial Origin.
Northfield, Ill: College of American Pathologists; 2003. Available at: ftp://ftp.cap.org/cancerprotocols/kidney03_p.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2003
.
Murphy
,
W. M.
Diseases of the urinary bladder, urethra, ureters and renal pelvis.
In: Murphy WM, ed. Urological Pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1997:75–96
.
Ro
,
J. Y.
,
G. A.
Staerkel
, and
A. G.
Ayala
.
Cytologic and histologic features of superficial bladder cancer.
Urol Clin North Am
1992
.
19
:
435
453
.
Grignon
,
D. J.
Neoplasms of the urinary bladder.
In: Bostwick DG, Eble JN, eds. Urologic Surgical Pathology. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book Inc; 1997:223–230
.
Hughes
,
J. H.
,
S. S.
Raab
, and
M. B.
Cohen
.
The cytologic diagnosis of low-grade transitional cell carcinoma.
Am J Clin Pathol
2000
.
114
:(
suppl
).
559
567
.
Amin
,
M. B.
,
W. M.
Murphy
, and
V. E.
Reuter
.
et al
.
Controversies in the pathology of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
In: Rosen PP, Fechner RE, eds. Reviews of Pathology. Vol 1, part I. Chicago, Ill: ASCP Press; 1996:1–39
.
Reuter
,
V. E.
and
M. R.
Melamed
.
The urothelial tract: renal pelvis, ureter, urinary bladder and urethra.
In: Sternberg SS, Antonioli DA, Carter D, Mills SE, Oberman HR, eds. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:1853–93
.
Amin
,
M. B.
and
R. H.
Young
.
Intraepithelial lesions of the urinary bladder with a discussion of the histogenesis of urothelial neoplasia.
Semin Diagn Pathol
1997
.
14
:
84
97
.
Eble
,
J. N.
and
R. H.
Young
.
Carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a review of its diverse morphology.
Semin Diagn Pathol
1997
.
14
:
98
108
.
Mostofi
,
F. K.
,
C. J.
Davis
, and
I. A.
Sesterhenn
.
Histologic typing of urinary bladder tumors.
In: World Health Organization International Histologic Classification of Tumours. 2nd ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1999
.
and the Bladder Consensus Conference Committee.
The World Health Organization/ International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder.
Am J Surg Pathol
1998
.
22
:
1435
1448
.
Murphy
,
W. M.
,
J. B.
Beckwith
, and
G. M.
Farrow
.
Tumors of the kidney, bladder, and related urinary structures.
Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1994. Atlas of Tumor Pathology; 3rd series, fascicle 11
.
Mostofi
,
F. K.
Histological typing of urinary bladder tumours.
In: WHO Histological Classification of Tumours. No. 10. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1973
.
Bergkvist
,
A.
,
A.
Ljungqvist
, and
G.
Moberger
.
Classification of bladder tumors based on the cellular pattern.
Acta Chir Scand
1965
.
130
:
371
378
.
Friedell
,
G. H.
,
J. R.
Bell
,
S. W.
Burney
,
E. A.
Soto
, and
A. J.
Tiltman
.
Histopathology and classification of urinary bladder carcinoma.
Urol Clin North Am
1976
.
3
:
265
227
.
Greene
,
F. L.
,
D. L.
Page
, and
I. D.
Fleming
.
et al, eds
.
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed.
New York, NY: Springer; 2002
.
Sobin
,
L. H.
and
C.
Wittekind
.
UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 6th ed.
New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 2002
.
Jimenez
,
R. E.
,
T. E.
Keane
,
H. T.
Hardy
, and
M. B.
Amin
.
pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: criteria for diagnosis, pitfalls, and clinical implications.
Adv Anat Pathol
2000
.
7
:
13
25
.
Amin
,
M. B.
,
W. M.
Murphy
, and
V. E.
Reuter
.
et al
.
Controversies in the pathology of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
In: Rosen PP, Fechner RE, eds. Reviews of Pathology. Vol 2, part II. Chicago, Ill: ASCP Press; 1997:71–110
.
Larsen
,
M. P.
,
G. D.
Steinberg
,
C. B.
Brendler
, and
J. I.
Epstein
.
Use of Ulex europaeus agglutinin I (UEAI) to distinguish vascular and “pseudovascular” invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of bladder with lamina propria invasion.
Mod Pathol
1990
.
3
:
83
88
.
Ramani
,
P.
,
B. R.
Birch
,
S. J.
Harland
, and
M. C.
Parkinson
.
Evaluation of endothelial markers in detecting blood and lymphatic channel invasion in pT1 transitional carcinoma of bladder.
Histopathology
1991
.
19
:
551
554
.
Ro
,
J. Y.
,
A. G.
Ayala
, and
A.
El-Naggar
.
Muscularis mucosa of urinary bladder: importance for staging and treatment.
Am J Surg Pathol
1983
.
136
:
265
271
.
Murphy
,
W. M.
ASCP survey on pathology examination of the urinary bladder.
Am J Clin Pathol
1994
.
102
:
715
723
.
Philip
,
A. T.
,
M. B.
Amin
,
P.
Tamboli
,
T. J.
Lee
,
C. E.
Hill
, and
J. Y.
Ro
.
Intravesical adipose tissue: a quantitative study of its presence and location with implications for therapy and prognosis.
Am J Surg Pathol
2000
.
24
:
1286
1290
.
Mahadevia
,
P. S.
,
L. G.
Koss
, and
I. J.
Tar
.
Prostatic involvement in bladder cancer.
Cancer
1986
.
58
:
2096
2102
.
Hermanek
,
P.
,
R. V. P.
Hutter
,
L. H.
Sobin
,
G.
Wagner
, and
C.
Wittekind
.
eds
.
UICC TNM Atlas: Illustrated Guide to the TNM/pTNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 4th ed.
Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1997:304 (figures 387, 388), 305 (figures 389–391), 311 (figure 399)
.

APPENDIX

Originally published in Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;120:1103–110. Previous contributors: M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, MD; Donald Earl Henson, MD.

Author notes

Reprints: Mahul B. Amin, MD, Emory University Hospital, Department of Pathology, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room G-167, Atlanta, GA 30322-8110 ([email protected])