To the Editor.—After reviewing our data, we wish to acknowledge an error in our recently published article.1 A sentence on page 202 of the published article states, “The detection of low-grade SILs increased by 59%, from 2.7% to 4.3%.” The correct data, as indicated in Table 6 on page 203, are that the detection of LSILs increased by 142%, from 2.4% to 5.8%.
References
Limaye
, A.
, A. J.
Connor
, X.
Huang
, and R.
Luff
. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
2003
. 127
:200
–204
.College of American Pathologists
2003