Context.—Leiomyosarcoma most commonly involves the female genital tract and occasionally arises within the retroperitoneum, abdominal cavity, or the soft tissues of the extremity. Presentation as a primary bone tumor is extraordinarily uncommon, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. The prognosis is traditionally thought to be dismal. However, this conclusion is largely based on individual case reports and small series, in some of which the pathologic diagnosis is not well documented.

Objective.—To review the clinicopathologic features of well-established cases of primary skeletal leiomyosarcoma and reevaluate the prognostic implications thereof.

Data Sources.—A National Center for Biotechnology Information PubMed search of the English language literature identified 104 authenticated cases of primary leiomyosarcoma of extragnathic bone. An additional 3 cases are reported and illustrated herein.

Conclusions.—Approximately half of all patients with primary skeletal leiomyosarcoma either presented with metastatic disease or developed metastases within 1 year of diagnosis. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 59% and 41%, respectively, comparable to that of other skeletal sarcomas. As for other bone and soft tissue sarcomas, high histologic grade and tumor stage are predictive of poor outcome.

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a malignant neoplasm with histologic, immunophenotypic, and ultrastructural evidence of smooth muscle differentiation. Excluding cutaneous LMS, most cases involve the female genital tract or, less commonly, the retroperitoneum, abdominal and pelvic cavities, or deep soft tissues of the extremities. Rarely, LMS may present as a primary tumor of bone, where it is hypothesized to arise from intraosseous blood vessels, pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells, or intermediate cellular forms such as myofibroblasts.1–4 Since the initial report by Evans and Sanerkin5 in 1965, 131 cases of primary LMS of extragnathic bone have been reported in the English literature. Because it is so uncommon, however, it is likely that primary LMS of bone is often misdiagnosed as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (previously known as malignant fibrous histiocytoma), fibrosarcoma, fibroblastic osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, myofibroblastic sarcoma, or other unspecified sarcoma of bone. In contrast, some reported cases of LMS of bone appear to be better classified as one of these other unusual sarcomas of bone. Based on these prior reports, LMS of bone has been considered to portend a dismal prognosis.6–12 We present 3 cases and review the clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics of this tumor. In addition, the prognosis of primary LMS of extragnathic bone is reevaluated, considering only those reported cases in which the published histomorphologic, immunophenotypic, and/or ultrastructural data are conclusive of smooth muscle differentiation.

A computerized search of the surgical pathology files at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, Tennessee) from 1999 to 2008 yielded 3 cases of primary LMS of bone, after metastases were excluded. These cases were reviewed and clinical data were recorded from the patient's electronic medical record. A literature search for primary LMS of extragnathic bone was conducted using MEDLINE. Key words used for this search were “leiomyosarcoma” and “bone.” The search was limited to reports written in the English language. Cases arising in the craniofacial bones and those determined to be metastases from other primary sites were excluded. Each case report or series was reviewed for pertinent clinical, radiographic, and pathologic data. Twenty-seven of the 131 reported cases of primary LMS of extragnathic bone were excluded because of inadequate illustrational evidence of smooth muscle differentiation defined by standard histomorphologic, immunophenotypic, or ultrastructural criteria.13,14 

For purposes of comparison, all tumors were restaged according to the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for bone sarcomas.15 Histologic grades were recorded using a binary grading system (low or high grade) by conversion from the reported 3- or 4-tiered system grade (intermediate grade sarcomas in the 3-tiered system were considered high grade). For cases in which histologic grade was not explicitly reported, photomicrographs and accompanying histologic descriptions were reviewed and assessed for French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading criteria (degree of differentiation, mitotic activity, and tumor cell necrosis).16 Inadequate data were published for accurate grading of 22 of the 104 cases reviewed in this series. The prognostic value of clinical and pathologic parameters, including age, gender, anatomic location, associated pathologic fracture, histologic grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and local recurrence was evaluated by standard univariate methods using InStat v3.06 and Prism v5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, California).

Case Summaries

Case 1

A 34-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of right knee pain. Radiographs showed a 6 × 4-cm osteolytic lesion with indistinct borders in the metaphysis of the distal femur (Figure 1, A). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 7-cm lesion that was hypointense on T1- and hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging; soft tissue extension was also observed. An incisional biopsy revealed atypical spindle cells suggestive of high-grade sarcoma. Immunohistochemical stains demonstrated strong and diffuse reactivity for muscle-specific actin (HHF-35), α-smooth muscle actin (1A4), and desmin. The diagnosis of LMS was made. Subsequent staging studies revealed no evidence of pulmonary metastasis. Six cycles of mesna, ifosfamide, Adriamycin, and dacarbazine were administered before wide surgical excision was performed. Eighteen months postoperatively, there is no evidence of disease recurrence.

Figure 1.

A, Case 1. Plain radiograph demonstrates a lytic lesion with ill-defined borders in the distal femoral metaphysis. B, Case 2. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates a mass in the distal fibula associated with cortical destruction and involvement of tibiofibular syndesmosis

Figure 1.

A, Case 1. Plain radiograph demonstrates a lytic lesion with ill-defined borders in the distal femoral metaphysis. B, Case 2. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates a mass in the distal fibula associated with cortical destruction and involvement of tibiofibular syndesmosis

Close modal

Case 2

A 46-year-old man presented with acute left knee pain and swelling. Radiographs showed a 6-cm osteolytic lesion involving the medial tibial plateau with associated soft tissue swelling and pathologic fracture. Incisional biopsy revealed fascicles of spindle cells with mild to moderate nuclear atypia. Immunohistochemical stains were positive for muscle-specific actin, α-smooth muscle actin, and desmin, consistent with LMS. The patient underwent 2 cycles of neoadjuvant Adriamycin and cisplatin. After results of staging studies were negative for distant disease, wide resection of the tumor was performed and followed by reconstruction with a tibial osteoarticular hemiallograft. Within 18 months, the allograft failed and he was converted to a total knee replacement. He has no signs of local recurrence or metastasis 8 years after surgery.

Case 3

A 42-year-old woman complained of right ankle pain for 1 year. Radiographs demonstrated a solitary osteolytic lesion occupying the distal 6.5 cm of the fibula. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of soft tissue extension involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis and peroneal tendons (Figure 1, B). Incisional biopsy revealed a low-grade LMS. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed the diagnosis. Staging studies revealed no distant disease. Radical resection and ankle arthrodesis was performed. The presence of coagulative tumor necrosis, significant cytologic atypia, and conspicuous mitotic activity observed on sampling the resection specimen prompted alteration of the diagnosis to high-grade LMS. Currently, the patient is undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical Presentation and Radiographic Studies

Primary LMS of bone is extremely rare, with only 107 well-documented cases reported, including the current series (Table 1). The incidence of this tumor is highest between the fourth and seventh decades (median age, 47 years; range, 9–87 years). Males and females are affected equally. Most patients (77%) cited pain as their primary complaint. Swelling was also a common presenting symptom. Sixteen of 80 evaluable cases (20%) presented with pathologic fracture. Similar to the more common primary sarcomas of bone, LMS most often involves the appendicular skeleton (Table 2). Potential risk factors were identified in approximately 10% of cases (Table 3).

Table 1. 

Reported Cases of Primary Leiomyosarcoma of Extragnathic Bone

Reported Cases of Primary Leiomyosarcoma of Extragnathic Bone
Reported Cases of Primary Leiomyosarcoma of Extragnathic Bone
Table 2. 

Anatomic Sites of Origin of Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma

Anatomic Sites of Origin of Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma
Anatomic Sites of Origin of Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma
Table 3. 

Potential Risk Factors Associated With Primary Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of Bone

Potential Risk Factors Associated With Primary Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of Bone
Potential Risk Factors Associated With Primary Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of Bone

Plain radiographs characteristically show a solitary osteolytic lesion with a permeative appearance, indistinct margins, irregular cortical erosion, and minimal to no sclerosis or periosteal reaction. In the long bones, most cases are metaphyseal, with occasional extension into the diaphysis or epiphysis. Although intralesional calcifications are not considered typical radiographic features of LMS of bone or soft tissue, a recent study demonstrated that nearly 20% of these tumors may contain areas of calcification, mimicking more commonly mineralized neoplasms such as osteosarcoma.17 Computed tomography scans typically show an intramedullary lesion with associated cortical destruction and extension into the surrounding soft tissues. These findings can also be demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging, in which the lesion is usually hypointense or isointense relative to skeletal muscle on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging. The radiographic characteristics of histologically low-grade LMS of bone may be slightly different. The lesional margins are usually more distinct and may often be delimited by a surrounding rim of sclerotic bone, thereby mimicking benign tumors such as nonossifying fibroma or giant cell tumor of bone.1,18–20 

Pathologic Features

Grossly, LMS of bone often appears well circumscribed and is usually firm and white to gray, with areas of tumor necrosis or hemorrhage in some cases (Figure 2). The histologic features of LMS of bone are identical to LMS arising in more common anatomic locations.13,14 The classic pattern is that of fascicles of spindle-shaped cells, intersecting at wide, often perpendicular angles (Figure 3, A). Tumor cells have blunt-ended, cigar-shaped nuclei and abundant, eosinophilic, often fibrillary cytoplasm. Occasionally, multinucleated giant cells may be seen.1,9,12,18,21–25 Despite the gross circumscription of these tumors, extensive infiltration of adjacent trabecular bone is seen on microscopic examination (Figure 3, B). Importantly, there is no associated osteoid or chondroid matrix deposition by tumor cells. Most primary LMS of bone are of high histologic grade; only 23 of 85 (27%) previously reported cases were low grade.

Figure 2.

A firm, gray-white intramedullary mass with a central area of hemorrhage and necrosis in resection specimen from case 1

Figure 2.

A firm, gray-white intramedullary mass with a central area of hemorrhage and necrosis in resection specimen from case 1

Close modal
Figure 3.

A, Characteristic growth pattern of leiomyosarcoma composed of perpendicular fascicles of spindle cells with cigar-shaped nuclei and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×200). B, Tumor infiltrates preexisting trabeculae of bone, indicative of an aggressive growth pattern (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40). Figure 4. A, Immunohistochemical stain from case 3 demonstrating strong and diffuse immunoreactivity for desmin (original magnification ×400). B, Fine-needle aspiration specimen showing variably sized spindle cells with pronounced nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, and prominent nucleoli, indicative of high-grade sarcoma (Papanicolaou, original magnification ×1000)

Figure 3.

A, Characteristic growth pattern of leiomyosarcoma composed of perpendicular fascicles of spindle cells with cigar-shaped nuclei and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×200). B, Tumor infiltrates preexisting trabeculae of bone, indicative of an aggressive growth pattern (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40). Figure 4. A, Immunohistochemical stain from case 3 demonstrating strong and diffuse immunoreactivity for desmin (original magnification ×400). B, Fine-needle aspiration specimen showing variably sized spindle cells with pronounced nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, and prominent nucleoli, indicative of high-grade sarcoma (Papanicolaou, original magnification ×1000)

Close modal

Immunohistochemistry is often required for accurate diagnosis, particularly for poorly differentiated anaplastic tumors. Muscle-specific actin was positive in 56 of 60 reported cases (93%), and α-smooth muscle actin was positive in 59 of 62 cases (95%). Desmin staining can be helpful, but only about half of the reported cases (42 of 74) were positive for it (Figure 4, A). It should be noted that these markers are not specific for smooth muscle and are positive in myofibroblastic sarcoma and pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma. Focal or weak staining may also be seen in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and osteosarcoma.26,27 H-caldesmon and smooth muscle myosin may be used to demonstrate smooth muscle differentiation and exclude myofibroblastic sarcoma but have not been extensively studied in this diagnostic setting.8,28–30 In equivocal cases, ultrastructural examination can confirm the presence of smooth muscle differentiation, particularly when myofibroblastic sarcoma is a diagnostic consideration.28,29,31 

Cytokeratin expression was described in 10 of 29 cases (34%) of LMS of bone. However, 8 of these 10 keratin-positive cases are from 2 studies published more than 10 years ago in which the immunohistochemical protocols are not described in detail.23,24 Similarly, 4 of 5 reported S100-positive cases were presented in a single report.12 Only one of an additional 20 cases stained for S100 protein was reportedly positive.10 

The cytopathologic features of LMS are dependent on the histologic grade of the neoplasm. Well-differentiated tumors often yield hypocellular smears containing fascicles of spindle cells with relatively abundant dense fibrillar to granular cytoplasm, elongated, blunt-ended nuclei, and minimal nuclear atypia.32 Single intact cells are usually scant. In contrast, aspirates of high-grade LMS are typically cellular and composed of many single or small, disorganized groups of variably sized spindle cells that show pronounced nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, and prominent nucleoli (Figure 4, B). Sanerkin2 initially described the presence of numerous binucleate and multinucleated giant cells in fine-needle aspirates. Evidence of smooth muscle differentiation in high-grade LMS may be extremely difficult to discern in cytologic specimens without the assistance of ancillary studies.

Treatment and Prognosis

Before definitive therapy is initiated, the possibility of metastasis from another site of origin, most commonly the gynecologic tract or retroperitoneum, must be excluded. Radiographic features that would suggest the possibility of metastasis include multiple, small tumors or involvement of unusual anatomic sites, such as the axial skeleton or proximal femur.24,33–35 Although LMS arising in soft tissue could theoretically involve adjacent bone, concern for this possibility should be extremely low, as even high-grade soft tissue sarcomas tend to follow the path of least resistance and are more likely to slowly erode cortical bone rather than aggressively invade the underlying medullary cavity.36 

Once the diagnosis of primary LMS of bone is confirmed, the treatment of choice is wide surgical resection. Approximately 20% of reported cases were treated by amputation; however, most of these cases predated limb salvage techniques. Both chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy have been used to augment surgical treatment, although the efficacy of chemotherapy has not been confirmed. Some authors have reported that LMS of bone is relatively radioresistant.1,11 For example, in their review of 33 cases (26 of which were extragnathic), Antonescu et al1 were not able to demonstrate a therapeutic benefit of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of primary LMS of bone. Efficacy of adjuvant therapy was difficult to evaluate in this series because of the lack of uniformity in treatment regimens and the limited number of cases available for comparison. Therefore, recommendations regarding adjuvant therapy for primary LMS of bone are difficult to substantiate.

Of the 49 cases for which tumor stage could be assigned, 7 patients (all with high-grade LMS) presented with metastatic disease and 1 patient with low-grade LMS had discontinuous tumors within a rib (stage III). Similar to other primary sarcomas of bone, the most common site of metastasis is the lung; skeletal metastases (particularly to the axial skeleton) were also common (Table 4). Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis of the reported cases demonstrated that tumors of advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage and high histologic grade are associated with adverse outcomes (Table 5). Patients with stage I and IIA tumors show prolonged overall and disease-free survival compared with those with stage IIB, III, or IV tumors (Figure 5, A). A post hoc comparison limited to patients with nonmetastatic, high-grade LMS confirmed that patients with stage IIA tumors (≤8 cm in greatest dimension) have longer overall survival compared with patients with stage IIB tumors (>8 cm in greatest dimension; log-rank test, P = .007).

Table 4. 

Sites of Distant Metastases From Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma

Sites of Distant Metastases From Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma
Sites of Distant Metastases From Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma
Table 5. 

Overall and Disease-Free Survival of Patients With Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma

Overall and Disease-Free Survival of Patients With Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma
Overall and Disease-Free Survival of Patients With Primary Skeletal Leiomyosarcoma
Figure 5.

Kaplan-Meier curves depicting differences in overall survival according to American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage (A) and disease-free survival by histologic grade (B). For analysis of tumor stage, cases were categorized as stage I (n = 15), stage IIA (n = 17), stage IIB (n = 9), and stage III or IV (n = 8). Differences in survival curves were determined using the log-rank test

Figure 5.

Kaplan-Meier curves depicting differences in overall survival according to American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage (A) and disease-free survival by histologic grade (B). For analysis of tumor stage, cases were categorized as stage I (n = 15), stage IIA (n = 17), stage IIB (n = 9), and stage III or IV (n = 8). Differences in survival curves were determined using the log-rank test

Close modal

High histologic grade also correlated with decreased overall and disease-free survival (Table 5; Figure 5, B). Among cases with a reported follow-up duration of at least 2 years, 24 of 47 patients (51%) with high-grade tumors died a median of 19 months after definitive surgery (range, 1–72 months). An additional 11 patients (23%) were alive with disease at last follow-up. Distant metastasis occurred in 27 patients (57%) with high-grade LMS (median interval to metastasis, 12 months; range, 3–84 months). During comparable follow-up intervals, 4 deaths (29%) occurred in 14 patients with low-grade LMS (median survival interval, 65 months; range, 18–115 months). Two additional patients (14%) with low-grade LMS were alive with metastatic disease 30 and 72 months after surgery. Six patients (43%) with low-grade LMS developed metastatic disease (median metastasis-free interval, 36 months; range, 12–78 months).

Local recurrence was relatively uncommon, occurring in 15% of patients with high-grade LMS and 14% of patients with low-grade LMS, usually within 3 years of initial surgical resection. Locally recurrent disease had no discernible impact on overall survival (log-rank test, P = .73). Although tumors arising in the axial skeleton correlated with decreased overall survival, this analysis was confounded by the tendency for axial tumors to present in advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (Fisher exact test, P = .007). Patients with postradiation LMS had significantly shorter median overall survival (15 months) than those with tumors not arising in previously irradiated fields (115 months; log-rank test, P = .01). Due to the small number of cases available for comparison, it is unclear whether LMS of bone arising in the setting of previous chemotherapy, Paget disease of bone, or adjacent to orthopedic implants portends a worse prognosis, as demonstrated for other primary bone sarcomas.37–40 There were no statistically significant differences in either overall or disease-free survival based on age, sex, or associated pathologic fracture.

Presentation of LMS as a primary bone tumor is extraordinarily uncommon. Despite publication of one relatively large series, the clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic features of these tumors and their associated prognostic factors are not well defined.1 The radiologic differential diagnosis is often broad and includes fibroblastic osteosarcoma, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Depending on the dominant morphologic features, the pathologic differential diagnosis can also be quite diverse. Immunohistochemical or ultrastructural analysis is required to confirm the diagnosis in many cases.

Primary LMS of bone has traditionally been considered to have a dismal prognosis.6–12 However, this conclusion was based on a limited number of case reports and small series, some of which were poorly documented. In this review, the 5-year overall survival rate of LMS of bone (59%) is similar to those of conventional intramedullary osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma (each approximately 50%) and chondrosarcoma (68%).41 

Table 1. 

Continued

Continued
Continued
Table 1. 

Continued

Continued
Continued

We thank Jean McClure for editorial assistance.

1
Antonescu
,
C. R.
,
R. A.
Erlandson
, and
A. G.
Huvos
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of 33 patients and a literature review.
Am J Surg Pathol
1997
.
21
:
1281
1294
.
2
Sanerkin
,
N. G.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of the bone and its comparison with fibrosarcoma.
Cancer
1979
.
44
:
1375
1387
.
3
Wang
,
T. Y.
,
R. A.
Erlandson
,
R. C.
Marcove
, and
A. G.
Huvos
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
1980
.
104
:
100
104
.
4
Meister
,
P.
,
E.
Konrad
,
J. M.
Gokel
, and
K.
Remberger
.
Case report 59.
Skeletal Radiol
1978
.
2
:
265
267
.
5
Evans
,
D. M.
and
N. G.
Sanerkin
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
J Pathol Bacteriol
1965
.
90
:
348
350
.
6
Aoki
,
T.
,
Y.
Ozeki
,
M.
Watanabe
,
S.
Tanaka
,
H.
Isaki
, and
S.
Terahata
.
Development of primary leiomyosarcoma of the sternum postirradiation: report of a case.
Surg Today
1998
.
28
:
1326
1328
.
7
Berlin
,
O.
,
L.
Angervall
,
L. G.
Kindblom
,
I. C.
Berlin
, and
B.
Stener
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: a clinical, radiographic, pathologic-anatomic, and prognostic study of 16 cases.
Skeletal Radiol
1987
.
16
:
364
376
.
8
Endo
,
K.
,
M.
Takahashi
,
Y.
Matsui
,
T.
Hasegawa
, and
N.
Yasui
.
Bone tumor of the distal femur in a 67-year-old woman.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2005
.
440
:
262
268
.
9
Kameda
,
N.
,
M.
Kagesawa
,
N.
Hiruta
,
M.
Akima
,
M.
Ohki
, and
T.
Matsumoto
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: a case report and review of the literature.
Acta Pathol Jpn
1987
.
37
:
291
303
.
10
Khoddami
,
M.
,
Y. C.
Bedard
,
R. S.
Bell
, and
R. A.
Kandel
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: report of seven cases and review of the literature.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
1996
.
120
:
671
675
.
11
Ochiai
,
H.
,
Y.
Yamakawa
,
T.
Fukushima
,
H.
Yamada
, and
T.
Hayashi
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of the cervical spine causing spontaneous compression fracture: report of an autopsy case.
Neuropathology
2000
.
20
:
60
64
.
12
Wirbel
,
R. J.
,
S.
Verelst
,
R.
Hanselmann
,
K.
Remberger
,
R.
Kubale
, and
W. E.
Mutschler
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular biologic aspects.
Ann Surg Oncol
1998
.
5
:
635
641
.
13
Evans
,
H. L.
and
J.
Shipley
.
Leiomyosarcoma.
In: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002:131–134. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours
.
14
Weiss
,
S. W.
and
J. R.
Goldblum
.
Leiomyosarcoma.
In: Enzinger FM, Weiss SW, eds. Soft Tissue Tumors. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: The CV Mosby Co; 2001:727–748
.
15
Green
,
F. L.
,
D. L.
Page
, and
I. D.
Fleming
.
et al
.
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed.
New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002:193–200
.
16
Kempson
,
R. L.
,
C. D. M.
Fletcher
,
H. L.
Evans
,
M. R.
Hendrickson
, and
R. K.
Sibley
.
Tumors of the Soft Tissues.
Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2001:507. Atlas of Tumor Pathology; 3rd series, fascicle 30
.
17
Bush
,
C. H.
,
J. D.
Reith
, and
S. S.
Spanier
.
Mineralization in musculoskeletal leiomyosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2003
.
180
:
109
113
.
18
Amstalden
,
E. M.
,
C. S.
Barbosa
, and
R.
Gamba
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: report of two cases in extragnathic bones.
Ann Diagn Pathol
1998
.
2
:
103
110
.
19
Eady
,
J. L.
,
J. D.
McKinney
, and
E. C.
McDonald
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: a case report and review of the literature.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
1987
.
69
:
287
289
.
20
Young
,
C. L.
,
L. E.
Wold
,
R. A.
McLeod
, and
F. H.
Sim
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Orthopedics
1988
.
11
:
615
618
.
21
Angervall
,
L.
,
O.
Berlin
,
L. G.
Kindblom
, and
B.
Stener
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: a study of five cases.
Cancer
1980
.
46
:
1270
1279
.
22
Guse
,
T. R.
and
L. D.
Weis
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the femur in a patient with a history of retinoblastoma: a case report.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
1994
.
76
:
904
906
.
23
Jundt
,
G.
,
C.
Moll
,
A.
Nidecker
,
R.
Schilt
, and
W.
Remagen
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: report of eight cases.
Hum Pathol
1994
.
25
:
1205
1212
.
24
Myers
,
J. L.
,
J.
Arocho
,
W.
Bernreuter
,
W.
Dunham
, and
M. T.
Mazur
.
Leiomyosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of five cases.
Cancer
1991
.
67
:
1051
1056
.
25
Shamsuddin
,
A. K.
,
F.
Reyes
,
J. W.
Harvey
, and
C.
Toker
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Hum Pathol
1980
.
11
:
581
583
.
26
Hasegawa
,
T.
,
T.
Hirose
,
E.
Kudo
,
K.
Hizawa
,
M.
Usui
, and
S.
Ishii
.
Immunophenotypic heterogeneity in osteosarcomas.
Hum Pathol
1991
.
22
:
583
590
.
27
Ueda
,
T.
,
N.
Araki
, and
M.
Mano
.
et al
.
Frequent expression of smooth muscle markers in malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone.
J Clin Pathol
2002
.
55
:
853
858
.
28
Fisher
,
C.
Myofibrosarcoma.
Virchows Arch
2004
.
445
:
215
223
.
29
Fisher
,
C.
Myofibroblastic malignancies.
Adv Anat Pathol
2004
.
11
:
190
201
.
30
Watanabe
,
K.
,
G.
Ogura
,
T.
Tajino
,
N.
Hoshi
, and
T.
Suzuki
.
Myofibrosarcoma of the bone: a clinicopathologic study.
Am J Surg Pathol
2001
.
25
:
1501
1507
.
31
Montgomery
,
E.
,
J. R.
Goldblum
, and
C.
Fisher
.
Myofibrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study.
Am J Surg Pathol
2001
.
25
:
219
228
.
32
DeMay
,
R. M.
The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Chicago, IL: ASCP Press; 1996
.
33
Shen
,
S. H.
,
L. S.
Steinbach
,
S. F.
Wang
,
W. Y.
Chen
,
W. M.
Chen
, and
C. Y.
Chang
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Skeletal Radiol
2001
.
30
:
600
603
.
34
Fornasier
,
V. L.
and
D.
Paley
.
Leiomyosarcoma in bone: primary or secondary?: a case report and review of the literature.
Skeletal Radiol
1983
.
10
:
147
153
.
35
Meltzer
,
C. C.
,
E. K.
Fishman
, and
W. W. Jr
Scott
.
Computed tomography appearance of bone metastases of leiomyosarcoma.
Skeletal Radiol
1992
.
21
:
445
447
.
36
Delsmann
,
B. M.
,
M.
Pfahler
,
A.
Nerlich
, and
H. J.
Refior
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma affecting the ankle joint.
Foot Ankle Int
1996
.
17
:
420
424
.
37
Deyrup
,
A. T.
,
A. G.
Montag
,
C. Y.
Inwards
,
Z.
Xu
,
R. G.
Swee
, and
K.
Unni
.
Sarcomas arising in Paget disease of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis of 70 cases.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
2007
.
131
:
942
946
.
38
Keel
,
S. B.
,
K. A.
Jaffe
,
G. P.
Nielsen
, and
A. E.
Rosenberg
.
Orthopaedic implant-related sarcoma: a study of twelve cases.
Mod Pathol
2001
.
14
:
969
977
.
39
McDonald
,
D. J.
,
W. F.
Enneking
, and
M.
Sundaram
.
Metal-associated angiosarcoma of bone: report of two cases and review of the literature.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2002
.
396
:
206
214
.
40
Sim
,
F. H.
,
R. E.
Cupps
,
D. C.
Dahlin
, and
J. C.
Ivins
.
Postradiation sarcoma of bone.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
1972
.
54
:
1479
1489
.
41
Damron
,
T. A.
,
W. G.
Ward
, and
A.
Stewart
.
Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing's sarcoma: National Cancer Data Base Report.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2007
.
459
:
40
47
.
42
Overgaard
,
J.
,
P.
Frederiksen
,
O.
Helmig
, and
O. M.
Jensen
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Cancer
1977
.
39
:
1664
1671
.
43
Gould
,
V. E.
,
N. S.
Patel
,
L. E.
Dardi
, and
V. A.
Memoli
.
Painful lytic lesion of the left femur in an adult male.
Ultrastruct Pathol
1982
.
3
:
301
307
.
44
Kawai
,
T.
,
M.
Suzuki
,
M.
Mukai
,
K.
Hiroshima
, and
M.
Shinmei
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
1983
.
107
:
433
437
.
45
von Hochstetter
,
A. R.
,
H.
Eberle
, and
J. R.
Ruttner
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of extragnathic bones: case report and review of literature.
Cancer
1984
.
53
:
2194
2200
.
46
Marymont
,
J. V.
and
T. O.
Clanton
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the os calcis.
Foot Ankle
1990
.
10
:
239
242
.
47
Young
,
M. P.
and
A. J.
Freemont
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Histopathology
1991
.
19
:
257
262
.
48
Abdelwahab
,
I. F.
,
G.
Hermann
,
S.
Kenan
,
M. J.
Klein
, and
M. M.
Lewis
.
Case report 794.
Skeletal Radiol
1993
.
22
:
379
381
.
49
Abdelwahab
,
I. F.
,
S.
Kenan
,
G.
Hermann
,
M. J.
Klein
, and
M. M.
Lewis
.
Radiation-induced leiomyosarcoma.
Skeletal Radiol
1995
.
24
:
81
83
.
50
Da Silva
,
L. F.
,
O.
Mejjad
, and
O.
Vittecoq
.
et al
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the tibia: report of a case.
Rev Rhum Engl Ed
1997
.
64
:
835
838
.
51
Lopez-Barea
,
F.
,
J. L.
Rodriguez-Peralto
,
S.
Sanchez-Herrera
,
J.
Gonzalez-Lopez
, and
E.
Burgos-Lizaldez
.
Primary epithelioid leiomyosarcoma of bone: case report and literature review.
Virchows Arch
1999
.
434
:
367
371
.
52
Inoue
,
S.
,
K.
Tanaka
,
A.
Sakamoto
,
S.
Matsuda
,
M.
Tsuneyoshi
, and
Y.
Iwamoto
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of the patella.
Skeletal Radiol
2001
.
30
:
530
533
.
53
Goto
,
T.
,
T.
Ishida
, and
N.
Motoi
.
et al
.
Primary leiomyosarcoma of the femur.
J Orthop Sci
2002
.
7
:
267
273
.
54
Nishida
,
J.
,
S.
Kato
, and
H.
Shiraishi
.
et al
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the lumbar spine: case report.
Spine
2002
.
27
:
42E
46E
.
55
Caron
,
J. J.
,
S. E.
Pambuccian
,
J. T.
Steen
, and
E. Y.
Cheng
.
Leiomyosarcoma of the distal femur after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2004
.
419
:
214
217
.
56
Narvaez
,
J. A.
,
E.
De Lama
,
F.
Portabella
,
R.
Ortega
, and
E.
Condom
.
Subperiosteal leiomyosarcoma of the tibia.
Skeletal Radiol
2005
.
34
:
42
46
.
57
Templeton
,
K.
Leiomyosarcoma of bone.
Am J Orthop
2005
.
34
:
249
251
.
58
Rigopoulou
,
A.
,
M.
Vlychou
,
S. J.
Ostlere
,
C. L.
Gibbons
, and
N. A.
Athanasou
.
A primary leiomyosarcoma of bone containing pseudoepithelial plexiform elements.
Skeletal Radiol
2007
.
36
:
791
796
.
59
Gonzalez-Billalabeitia
,
E.
,
M.
Quintela-Fandino
, and
I.
Alemany
.
et al
.
Coexistence of two rare sarcomas: primary leiomyosarcoma of bone and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver.
Sarcoma. 2008;2008:416085. doi:10.1155/ 2008/416085
.

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.