Context.—

Histologic distinction between condyloma acuminatum and various benign and malignant condyloma-like lesions in the anogenital area poses a common diagnostic challenge to pathologists across subspecialties.

Objective.—

To review the overlapping and distinguishing features of condyloma acuminatum and its mimics, and to clarify confusing terminology and diagnostic criteria for problematic entities.

Data Sources.—

A review of the literature on condyloma acuminatum (ordinary and giant types), verrucous carcinoma, warty/warty-basaloid high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma, papillary squamous cell carcinoma, bowenoid papulosis, verruca vulgaris, epidermolytic acanthoma, and verruciform xanthoma was performed.

Conclusions.—

Correct diagnosis of condyloma acuminatum and condyloma-like lesions has important clinical implication and entails familiarization with their clinical presentations and histopathologic features. Contrary to historical belief, giant condyloma acuminatum and verrucous carcinoma should be considered distinct entities based on different pathogenetic pathways. Ancillary tools available for identifying and genotyping human papillomavirus can aid in diagnosis when histopathologic findings are inconclusive. Recognition of relatively rare entities such as bowenoid papulosis, epidermolytic acanthoma, and verruciform xanthoma would avoid overdiagnosis and unnecessary, overaggressive treatment.

Condyloma acuminatum frequently enters the differential diagnosis of anogenital papules or plaques, especially those with a verruciform silhouette. Classification of these lesions is often challenging owing to significant histopathologic overlap and sometimes controversial and confusing diagnostic criteria. Insufficient “crosstalk” between genitourinary, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and general surgical pathologists and dermatopathologists further contributes to the practice gap in this area. This article reviews the clinicopathologic features and etiopathogenesis of condyloma acuminatum and its mimics, with an emphasis on their morphologic similarities and unique characteristics that help in their distinction. The clinical and pathologic features of all discussed entities are summarized in the Table.

Summary of the Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Condyloma Acuminatum and Condyloma-like Squamous Proliferations in the Anogenital Region

Summary of the Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Condyloma Acuminatum and Condyloma-like Squamous Proliferations in the Anogenital Region
Summary of the Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Condyloma Acuminatum and Condyloma-like Squamous Proliferations in the Anogenital Region

The incidence of condyloma acuminatum (genital wart) is highest among young adults,1  but has declined since the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines.24  The lesions typically arise in the genitalia, anus, and the surrounding area (pubis, groin, and medial thigh). Clinically, these are solitary or coalescent skin-colored papules with a papillomatous surface. Its giant variant (giant condyloma acuminatum of Buschke-Löwenstein) is discussed separately in the next section. Condyloma acuminatum is caused by HPV infection, with HPV types 6 and 11 being the most prevalent.5  HPV 6 and 11 belong to the low-risk HPV group, which essentially has no risk for malignant progression. Cases associated with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and warty/basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are coinfected with high-risk HPV types.68 

The epithelium in condyloma acuminatum is acanthotic with variable degree of papillomatosis. Compared to the “spiky” papillae in verruca vulgaris (VV), the papillae in condyloma acuminatum have more rounded and undulating contours, with less robust hyperkeratosis (Figure 1, A). Collectively, these feature give rise to a “softer” appearance compared to VV. Koilocytes containing enlarged and irregular nuclei, perinuclear halos, and coarse keratohyalin granules may be found in the granular and upper spinous layers. These viral cytopathic changes serve as an important diagnostic hallmark (Figure 1, B).9  Binucleated or multinucleated forms may be present. The rest of the keratinocytes lack cytologic atypia and mature orderly toward the surface.

Figure 1

Condyloma acuminatum. A, A typical papillomatous papule with only mild hyperkeratosis. The papillae have mostly rounded tips and prominent fibrovascular cores. B, Koilocytes containing enlarged, irregular, and hyperchromatic nuclei, perinuclear halos, and coarse keratohyalin granules are found in the granular and upper spinous layers. The rest of the keratinocytes appear normal. C, An anogenital seborrheic keratosis with an undulating base and numerous pseudohorn cysts without evidence of koilocytosis. Similar lesions frequently harbor human papillomavirus and should at least raise suspicion for a seborrheic keratosis-like condyloma acuminatum. D, Patchy p16 immunostaining in a condyloma acuminatum (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A], ×400 [B], and ×100 [C]; original magnification ×100 [D]).

Figure 2 Giant condyloma acuminatum. A, Portion of a large, mostly exophytic, and papillomatous lesion with a “cauliflower-like” silhouette. The papillae contain prominent fibrovascular cores and lack significant hyperkeratosis, imparting a relatively “soft” appearance. The tumor base is round and noninfiltrative. B, Koilocytes are readily found in the upper epidermis, while the remaining keratinocytes are cytologically uniform and bland (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×10 [A] and ×200 [B]).

Figure 1

Condyloma acuminatum. A, A typical papillomatous papule with only mild hyperkeratosis. The papillae have mostly rounded tips and prominent fibrovascular cores. B, Koilocytes containing enlarged, irregular, and hyperchromatic nuclei, perinuclear halos, and coarse keratohyalin granules are found in the granular and upper spinous layers. The rest of the keratinocytes appear normal. C, An anogenital seborrheic keratosis with an undulating base and numerous pseudohorn cysts without evidence of koilocytosis. Similar lesions frequently harbor human papillomavirus and should at least raise suspicion for a seborrheic keratosis-like condyloma acuminatum. D, Patchy p16 immunostaining in a condyloma acuminatum (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A], ×400 [B], and ×100 [C]; original magnification ×100 [D]).

Figure 2 Giant condyloma acuminatum. A, Portion of a large, mostly exophytic, and papillomatous lesion with a “cauliflower-like” silhouette. The papillae contain prominent fibrovascular cores and lack significant hyperkeratosis, imparting a relatively “soft” appearance. The tumor base is round and noninfiltrative. B, Koilocytes are readily found in the upper epidermis, while the remaining keratinocytes are cytologically uniform and bland (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×10 [A] and ×200 [B]).

Close modal

A common diagnostic quandary is regarding anogenital seborrheic keratosis (SK)–like lesions without identifiable koilocytes (Figure 1, C). Multiple studies have demonstrated the presence of HPV, predominantly type 6, in up to 70% of anogenital SKs.1014  In contrast, HPV was rarely detected in extragenital SK and other non–HPV-mediated lesions on genital skin (such as fibroepithelial polyp, epidermolytic acanthoma, and chronic dermatitis).12,13  These findings suggest that genital SK is at least similar or related to condyloma acuminatum. Indeed, Li and Ackerman15  regarded HPV-harboring SK in the anogenital region as synonymous with condyloma acuminatum. As a general rule, anogenital SK-like lesions with an undulating appearance (Figure 1, C), with or without pseudohorn cysts, are probably best treated as condyloma acuminatum, as opposed to those with a flat base.15 

Pirog et al16,17  have found positive Ki-67 (MIB-1) immunostaining, defined as any cluster of at least 2 positive nuclei in the upper two-thirds of the epithelium, in all vulvar and anal condylomas examined, a finding that correlated well with positive HPV results by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing. Unlike lesions infected with high-risk HPV, which are diffusely and strongly positive for p16, condylomas display negative, focal, or patchy staining (Figure 1, D).17,18  When necessary, testing for low-risk HPV (types 6 and 11) by PCR-DNA sequencing, in situ hybridization, or immunohistochemistry may also aid in diagnosis.19 

Giant condyloma acuminatum is a large, fungating, and locally destructive form of condyloma acuminatum. It is 3 times more common in men than women, with a predisposition for immunocompromised individuals.20  Giant condyloma acuminatum often covers multiple anatomic structures owing to its large size, most frequently involving the penis and the anorectum. The scrotum, groin, and pubis may also be affected.2123  The tumor grows exophytically and endophytically, and the exophytic excrescences are often described as “cauliflower-like.” Fistula formation between papillae is common. Given its papillomatous architecture and large size, many regarded giant condyloma acuminatum as a variant of verrucous carcinoma. However, this view has been challenged by the frequent detection of HPV in giant condylomas but rarely in verrucous carcinomas.24,25  As in ordinary condyloma acuminatum, giant condylomas usually harbor HPV 6 and 11.24  Recurrence rate is high,21  and malignant transformation to invasive SCC has been reported in more than 50% of cases, most commonly in HIV-positive patients.20,21  Not surprisingly, coinfection with high-risk HPV has been demonstrated in carcinoma ex giant condyloma acuminatum.26 

The microscopic features of giant condyloma acuminatum are similar to those of its ordinary counterpart except for its large size and more florid excrescences. There is marked papillomatosis with usually mild hyperkeratosis (Figure 2, A). Aside from koilocytosis, cytologic atypia is absent (Figure 2, B). Mitotic activity is low and is confined to the lower third of the epithelium. The large tumor mass compresses but does not infiltrate normal structures. Reverse maturation and stromal invasion, when present, should raise concern for malignant transformation.21,27  Immunohistochemical profile, including negative, focal, or patchy staining for p16, is the same as described in ordinary condyloma acuminatum.24 

Verrucous carcinoma is a unique variant of well-differentiated SCC. As mentioned above, controversy exists regarding the relationship between verrucous carcinoma and giant condyloma acuminatum. While some authors believe that the 2 are either identical or closely related on a continuous spectrum, accumulating evidence suggests that these are distinct entities. Much of the confusion stems from the lack of consistent diagnostic criteria, leading to mixed data with controversial diagnoses reported in the literature. Multiple studies have shown that unlike giant condylomas, which consistently harbor HPV, anogenital verrucous carcinomas diagnosed on the basis of strict histopathologic criteria (see below) are predominantly negative for HPV.24,25,2830  These findings support distinct pathogenetic pathways in verrucous carcinoma and giant condyloma acuminatum, and that they should be considered separate entities. Similar to other HPV-negative SCCs of the anogenital tract, verrucous carcinoma is associated with chronic inflammatory conditions such as lichen sclerosus and lichen simplex chronicus, which play a key role in its pathogenesis.29,3133 

Clinically, verrucous carcinoma and giant condyloma acuminatum share many common features including large tumor size, verrucous surface, exophytic and endophytic growth, typically slow progression, and virtual lack of metastatic potential.34,35  In addition to the anogenital area, verrucous carcinoma also occurs in the oral cavity, larynx, and extragenital skin.34,36  The warty excrescences in verrucous carcinoma tend to be coarse and irregular, whereas those in giant condyloma acuminatum are finer and more regular.25  Verrucous carcinoma is also more keratotic and firm than giant condyloma acuminatum, which has a more delicate and soft texture.25 

Histopathologically, verrucous carcinoma is a well-demarcated verrucous squamous proliferation with bulbous rete ridges that push, rather than infiltrate, into the underlying stroma (Figure 3, A). Compact hyperkeratosis often fills the spaces between the verrucous projections (Figure 3, A).24,25,37  Fibrovascular cores tend to be thin and inconspicuous relative to the hypertrophic epithelium. These features impart a “firm” and “rigid” appearance at low magnification, which contrasts with the “soft” appearance of giant condyloma acuminatum. Keratinocytes in the spinous layer are markedly enlarged with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and minimal nuclear atypia (Figure 3, B).25,28  Scattered dyskeratotic cells are common.24  An important diagnostic criterion is the absence of koilocytes, which distinguishes it from giant condyloma acuminatum. Mitoses are rare and confined to the basal layer.25  A band of lymphocytic infiltrate is usually found at the base of the tumor (Figure 3, A).

Figure 3

Verrucous carcinoma. A, An exophytic and endophytic verrucous squamous proliferation with a bulbous, pushing base. Conspicuous parakeratosis fills many gaps between the verrucous projections, giving rise to a “firm” and “rigid” appearance. Fibrovascular cores are thin and inconspicuous relative to the hypertrophic epithelium. A lymphocytic band is present at the tumor base. B, Large spinous keratinocytes contain abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and bland nuclei. There are occasional dyskeratotic cells, while koilocytes are absent (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×10 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Figure 4 Warty and warty-basaloid high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and squamous cell carcinoma. A, A warty squamous cell carcinoma shows an irregular verruciform architecture with conspicuous fibrovascular cores. B, Koilocytosis and cytologic atypia are readily appreciated in this warty squamous cell carcinoma. Angulated tumor nests infiltrate the underlying stroma. C, Warty-basaloid HSIL is characterized by a verruciform architecture and basaloid epithelium with full-thickness atypia. The basaloid tumor cells display high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and frequent mitoses at all levels of the epithelium (inset). D, There is strong and diffuse p16 immunostaining within the lesion (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [A], ×200 [B], ×40 [C], and ×200 [C, inset]; original magnification ×100 [D]).

Figure 3

Verrucous carcinoma. A, An exophytic and endophytic verrucous squamous proliferation with a bulbous, pushing base. Conspicuous parakeratosis fills many gaps between the verrucous projections, giving rise to a “firm” and “rigid” appearance. Fibrovascular cores are thin and inconspicuous relative to the hypertrophic epithelium. A lymphocytic band is present at the tumor base. B, Large spinous keratinocytes contain abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and bland nuclei. There are occasional dyskeratotic cells, while koilocytes are absent (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×10 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Figure 4 Warty and warty-basaloid high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and squamous cell carcinoma. A, A warty squamous cell carcinoma shows an irregular verruciform architecture with conspicuous fibrovascular cores. B, Koilocytosis and cytologic atypia are readily appreciated in this warty squamous cell carcinoma. Angulated tumor nests infiltrate the underlying stroma. C, Warty-basaloid HSIL is characterized by a verruciform architecture and basaloid epithelium with full-thickness atypia. The basaloid tumor cells display high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and frequent mitoses at all levels of the epithelium (inset). D, There is strong and diffuse p16 immunostaining within the lesion (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [A], ×200 [B], ×40 [C], and ×200 [C, inset]; original magnification ×100 [D]).

Close modal

Immunohistochemistry for p16 does not distinguish verrucous carcinoma from giant condyloma acuminatum, as both display negative or focal staining.30  Nuclear p53 staining is commonly present but mostly confined to the basal and suprabasal layers. Likewise, Ki-67 positivity is mainly observed in the basal layer.28  Absence of HPV may be confirmed by PCR-DNA sequencing, in situ hybridization, or immunohistochemistry.24,25,28,30 

Infection by high-risk HPV, most commonly HPV 16 and less commonly HPV 18, 31, 33, 45, 51, 52, and 59 amongst others, causes undifferentiated intraepithelial neoplasia (-IN) of the vulva, vagina, penis, scrotum, and anus.3842  These HPV-related squamous intraepithelial lesions may be subclassified into warty, basaloid, and warty-basaloid types by histopathologic features. To facilitate unified nomenclature across subspecialties, the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) work group has recommended a 2-tier system for all HPV-associated noninvasive squamous lesions of the lower anogenital tract: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).43  It is optional to further classify LSIL and HSIL as “-IN 1” and “-IN 2 or 3,” respectively, according to the specific sites.43  Although HSIL is synonymous with “SCC in situ” and “Bowen disease,” the latter terminologies are best avoided in pathology reporting for the purpose of consistency. Clinically, warty and warty-basaloid HSIL and invasive SCC may mimic condyloma acuminatum when discrete papillomatous papules or plaques are present.44 

On histopathology, warty HSIL and SCC mimic condyloma acuminatum by their verruciform architecture, conspicuous fibrovascular cores, and koilocytosis (Figure 4, A). Parakeratosis is usually more abundant than in condyloma acuminatum.37  The key distinguishing feature is the presence of cytologic atypia in that the keratinocytes in the lower epithelium are enlarged and pleomorphic (Figure 4, B). The upper keratinocytes acquire a moderate to abundant amount of cytoplasm as they mature toward the surface,45,46  where koilocytosis is readily appreciated (Figure 4, B). In contrast, basaloid HSIL is characterized by a flat surface and minimal maturation from the basal layer to the granular layer. While the basaloid subtype rarely mimics condyloma acuminatum, it shares overlapping features with the warty-basaloid subtype, which has a condyloma-like, verruciform silhouette (Figure 4, C).37  The epithelium is basaloid due to a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear hyperchromasia (Figure 4, C; inset). Occasional koilocytes may be found in the upper layers.37  Mitoses and apoptoses are frequent and found at all levels of the epithelium (Figure 4, C; inset).46  When invasion occurs in the basaloid and warty-basaloid subtypes, the invasive nests often take on a basaloid appearance without keratinization. Occasionally, keratinizing SCC may occur.37,38 

As a surrogate marker for high-risk HPV infection, p16 immunohistochemical stain serves as a helpful tool to distinguish warty, basaloid, and warty-basaloid squamous neoplasms from condyloma acuminatum and HPV-independent (differentiated) squamous neoplasms. Staining in the former is strong and diffuse, and in both cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments (Figure 4, D). This is in contrast with the negative or patchy staining in condyloma acuminatum and differentiated squamous lesions.33,4650  Ki-67 proliferation index is typically high, with staining observed at all levels of the epithelium.49,50  Unlike differentiated squamous lesions, p53 staining in warty, basaloid, and warty-basaloid squamous neoplasms is either negative or patchy.46,49 

HPV-independent (differentiated) squamous neoplasms seldom cause diagnostic confusion with condyloma acuminatum, with the exception of papillary SCC. The latter refers to well-differentiated SCC with a papillary architecture. This tumor type is rarely described in the anogenital region. The most comprehensive study reported 35 cases of penile papillary SCC, most of which occurred on the glans with or without involvement of the coronal sulcus and foreskin.51  The tumors form white-grey, irregular masses with serrated surfaces.

Microscopically, the squamous papillae are of variable lengths and shapes, lined by irregular well-differentiated squamous epithelium with overlying hyperkeratosis (Figure 5, A). Compared to condyloma acuminatum, the fibrovascular cores in papillary SCC are more irregular, and the tumor base is ragged (owing to stromal invasion) as opposed to round.37,51  It also differs from condyloma acuminatum and warty/warty-basaloid squamous neoplasms by the absence of koilocytes (Figure 5, B). Conspicuous fibrovascular cores and an infiltrative, rather than broad pushing, tumor base further distinguish papillary SCC from verrucous carcinoma. Differentiated intraepithelial neoplasia and lichen sclerosus may be found in the adjacent epithelium.37,51 

Figure 5

Papillary squamous cell carcinoma. A, The papillae are of variable lengths and shapes, covered by irregular well-differentiated squamous epithelium. The ragged tumor base is indicative of stromal invasion. B, Fibrovascular cores are present. There is no evidence of koilocytosis (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [A] and ×200 [B]).

Figure 6 Bowenoid papulosis. A, This lesion shows flat acanthosis with full-thickness basaloid atypia. The tumor cells display high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and frequent mitoses (inset). B, The lesion is diffusely positive for p16 (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×200 [A, inset]; original magnification ×100 [B]).

Figure 7 Verruca vulgaris. A, A small verrucous papule with marked hyperkeratosis. Note the convergence of elongated rete ridges at the base. B, Many of the papillae have pointed tips surmounted by “church spire” parakeratosis. Hypergranulosis is accentuated in the “valleys” between papillae. A few koilocytes are present in the granular layer (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [A] and ×200 [B]).

Figure 5

Papillary squamous cell carcinoma. A, The papillae are of variable lengths and shapes, covered by irregular well-differentiated squamous epithelium. The ragged tumor base is indicative of stromal invasion. B, Fibrovascular cores are present. There is no evidence of koilocytosis (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [A] and ×200 [B]).

Figure 6 Bowenoid papulosis. A, This lesion shows flat acanthosis with full-thickness basaloid atypia. The tumor cells display high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and frequent mitoses (inset). B, The lesion is diffusely positive for p16 (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×200 [A, inset]; original magnification ×100 [B]).

Figure 7 Verruca vulgaris. A, A small verrucous papule with marked hyperkeratosis. Note the convergence of elongated rete ridges at the base. B, Many of the papillae have pointed tips surmounted by “church spire” parakeratosis. Hypergranulosis is accentuated in the “valleys” between papillae. A few koilocytes are present in the granular layer (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [A] and ×200 [B]).

Close modal

Bowenoid papulosis is another HPV-associated disease affecting the squamous epithelium. Patients typically present with multiple red-brown or violaceous papules on penile or vulvar skin, although any anogenital sites may be affected. The papules have a median diameter of 0.7 cm according to one study and may be flat-topped or slightly verruciform, commonly mistaken for condyloma acuminatum on clinical examination.5254  Most patients are young adults in the third and fourth decades of life.53,54  Similar to HSIL, bowenoid papulosis is associated with high-risk HPV, particularly HPV 16.53,55  However, as progression to invasive SCC is exceptional, treatment options often include simple excision as well as local destructive modalities such as imiquimod and photodynamic therapy, although recurrence is common.53,5660  A small percentage of cases may regress spontaneously.53  A DNA ploidy study showed an intermediate “malignancy grade” between that of Bowen disease and SK, suggesting it to be a low-grade SCC in situ.61  Patients with bowenoid papulosis are at increased risk of developing external anogenital SCC and cervical neoplasia, and therefore warrant clinical surveillance on a regular basis.62,63 

The histopathologic features of bowenoid papulosis overlap significantly with those of basaloid HSIL (Bowen disease).52  The lesions are acanthotic and may appear psoriasiform or slightly verruciform (Figure 6, A). The keratinocytes are crowded and display high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and impaired maturation toward the surface (Figure 6, A; inset).54  Scattered apoptotic cells and mitotic figures are present at all levels of the epithelium.60  Some cells in the granular layer may resemble koilocytes. Pigmented lesions consist of melanophages in the underlying stroma. In a series of 108 cases, it was concluded that a background of maturing keratinocytes and sparing of the follicular epithelium could distinguish bowenoid papulosis from basaloid HSIL.53  Another morphometric analysis showed significantly larger and more irregular nuclei in basaloid HSIL compared to bowenoid papulosis.64  In practice, however, the histopathologic differences are often subtle, and definitive diagnosis relies heavily on stringent clinical correlation: Presence of multiple small pigmented papules in a young adult, as opposed to a solitary, slowly progressive plaque or erythematous patch in an older patient, would support a diagnosis of bowenoid papulosis over basaloid HSIL.53,60 

High-risk HPV in bowenoid papulosis can be detected by in situ hybridization or PCR-DNA sequencing.6567  Expression of both p16 and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) by immunohistochemistry is associated with high-risk HPV infection and has been demonstrated in bowenoid papulosis.67  Diffuse p16 expression is especially helpful in differentiating occasional cases of bowenoid papulosis with more orderly maturation, subtle cytologic atypia, and koilocyte-like cells from condyloma acuminatum (Figure 6, B).18 

Although VV (common wart) usually occurs on extragenital skin, it can occasionally arise in the anogenital area and may result in diagnostic confusion with condyloma acuminatum. Both condyloma acuminatum and VV are caused by low-risk HPV. However, in contrast with condyloma acuminatum, which is typically caused by HPV types 6 and 11, VV is most commonly induced by HPV 2, followed by HPV 1, 4, 65, 27, and others.68,69  Distinction of VV and condyloma acuminatum has important clinical implication especially in the pediatric population, as condyloma acuminatum would raise suspicion for sexual abuse, whereas VV is nonsexually transmitted. Approximately 40% of warts in the genital area of young girls are VV (positive for HPV 2) while the rest are condylomas (positive for HPV 6 or 11).70  The clinical morphologies of VV and condyloma acuminatum are similar in that both are exophytic and verrucous papules, but VV tends to be more hyperkeratotic than condyloma acuminatum.

Histopathologically, VV is characterized by marked verruciform acanthosis and hyperkeratosis. The elongated rete ridges tend to converge toward the center of the lesion (“in-toeing”) (Figure 7, A). The papillae have pointed tips and fibrovascular cores housing capillaries near the surface (Figure 7, B), which are prone to thrombosis and infarction. These papillae are surmounted by columns of parakeratosis (“church spire” parakeratosis), whereas the “valleys” between the papillae show hypergranulosis (Figure 7, B). Koilocytosis may be subtle but often can be appreciated in a background of hypergranulosis. The constellation of marked hyperkeratosis, “spiky” papillae, and convergence of elongated rete ridges allows for distinction of VV from condyloma acuminatum.

When necessary, diagnosis of VV can be confirmed by HPV genotyping. Demonstration of HPV 2 or other nongenital HPV types in the absence of HPV 6 or 11, either by in situ hybridization or by PCR-DNA sequencing, would support a diagnosis of VV and exclude condyloma acuminatum.6872 

Epidermolytic acanthoma can present as solitary or multiple (disseminated) lesions on the trunk, extremities, or genitalia. The disseminated form most frequently affects genital skin, particularly the scrotum and the vulva.7375  The lesions are skin-colored or whitish papules with a smooth or verruciform surface, frequently confused with condyloma acuminatum clinically.74,76  Multiple reports have confirmed the absence of HPV in epidermolytic acanthomas,73,76,77  although 1 reported case of scrotal epidermolytic acanthoma tested positive for HPV 16 when using a highly sensitive HPV DNA chip.78  It is possible that HPV was an incidental finding, rather than a pathogenic agent, in this isolated case.

The histopathologic features of epidermolytic acanthoma frequently raise suspicion for condyloma acuminatum or VV to the untrained eye. The lesion is acanthotic and hyperkeratotic with variable degree of papillomatosis and/or invagination (Figure 8, A).76,79  The histopathologic pattern is that of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK), in which the keratinocytes in the granular and spinous layers display cytoplasmic vacuolation, reticular degeneration, coarse keratohyalin granules, and perinuclear eosinophilic inclusions (Figure 8, B).73,76,79  Despite superficial resemblance to koilocytosis, these unique characteristics of EHK effectively exclude condyloma acuminatum and VV.

Figure 8

Epidermolytic acanthoma. A, This lesion demonstrates verruciform acanthosis and marked hyperkeratosis. B, Higher magnification reveals features of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: cytoplasmic vacuolation, coarse keratohyalin granules, and perinuclear eosinophilic inclusions in the spinous and granular layers (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Figure 8

Epidermolytic acanthoma. A, This lesion demonstrates verruciform acanthosis and marked hyperkeratosis. B, Higher magnification reveals features of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: cytoplasmic vacuolation, coarse keratohyalin granules, and perinuclear eosinophilic inclusions in the spinous and granular layers (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Close modal

Although a diagnostic hallmark of epidermolytic acanthoma, the EHK pattern is not specific for this diagnosis, as it may also be seen in epidermolytic ichthyosis,80  epidermolytic epidermal nevus,81,82  or as an incidental finding.83,84  These conditions are histologically indistinguishable, and clinical correlation is the key to correct diagnosis. Unlike epidermolytic ichthyosis, which is caused by germline mutation in KRT1 or KRT10, somatic mutations in these genes have not been found in epidermolytic acanthomas.85,86  Interestingly, however, reduced expression of cytokeratin (CK) 1 and CK10 has been demonstrated by immunohistochemistry.85,87  While the exact cause of epidermolytic acanthoma remains unclear, it has been hypothesized that repetitive trauma (scratching) or other stimuli may trigger local disruption of CK1 and CK10 protein synthesis and formation of epidermolytic acanthoma.85 

Verruciform xanthoma is a benign proliferation most commonly occurring in the oral cavity. Extraoral lesions are rare and usually arise on the vulva, penis, scrotum, and extremities.88  Most patients present with a solitary lesion, although coexistence of multiple lesions can occur. Verruciform xanthomas are well-demarcated, yellowish-orange papules or plaques with verruciform surfaces ranging from 0.2 to 2 cm in diameter.89  Not surprisingly, the clinical morphology often raises concern for condyloma acuminatum or verrucous carcinoma.89,90  In a study of 10 vulvar verruciform xanthomas, all were associated with vulvar inflammatory or neoplastic conditions including lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, Paget disease, and radiodermatitis.89  Although HPV has been proposed in the past as the etiologic agent, multiple studies have failed to confirm a causal relationship.9193  Based on its benign nature and association with various diseases, it is now widely believed that verruciform xanthoma represents a mucocutaneous reaction to localized trauma and chronic inflammation.94 

Histopathologic examination confirms an exophytic papillomatous lesion. A diagnostic clue at low magnification is the presence of compact parakeratosis with an orange hue or peach color completely filling the spaces between the papillary projections (Figure 9, A and B).89  Neutrophils are often found in the parakeratotic stratum corneum (Figure 9, B). These features should prompt a closer inspection for xanthomatous (foam) cells, which are confined to the dermal papillae (Figure 9, C). The deeper dermis is remarkable for an inflammatory infiltrate and ectatic vessels. It is hypothesized that the inciting event (trauma or other cutaneous disorder) causes keratinocytic degeneration and release of cellular lipids and chemokines, which then lead to a foam cell response, chemotaxis of neutrophils, and stimulation of epidermal proliferation.93,95  The absence of cytologic atypia or koilocytosis in verruciform xanthoma speaks against condyloma acuminatum, and the presence of xanthomatous cells excludes verrucous carcinoma.

Figure 9

Verruciform xanthoma. A, A papillomatous lesion with parakeratosis completely filling the spaces between the papillary projections. The epithelium remains relatively thin. B, Parakeratosis is compact with a characteristic orange hue or peach color. A few neutrophils are typically present. The keratinocytes are bland and without koilocytic change. C, A defining feature is the presence of xanthomatous (foam) cells in the dermal papillae (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A], ×200 [B], and ×400 [C]).

Figure 9

Verruciform xanthoma. A, A papillomatous lesion with parakeratosis completely filling the spaces between the papillary projections. The epithelium remains relatively thin. B, Parakeratosis is compact with a characteristic orange hue or peach color. A few neutrophils are typically present. The keratinocytes are bland and without koilocytic change. C, A defining feature is the presence of xanthomatous (foam) cells in the dermal papillae (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A], ×200 [B], and ×400 [C]).

Close modal

Besides condyloma acuminatum, a number of cutaneous and mucosal lesions in the anogenital region share a similar verruciform architecture and/or clinical presentation, often representing a common source of diagnostic confusion. Amongst these are relatively rare entities such as bowenoid papulosis, epidermolytic acanthoma, and verruciform xanthoma, which are underrecognized by surgical pathologists. Giant condyloma acuminatum and verrucous carcinoma used to be considered synonymous, but accumulating evidence supports that these are distinct entities with different pathogenetic pathways. Familiarization with the clinicopathologic characteristics and HPV status of various anogenital lesions described in this review should allow for more accurate classification and appropriate management of these conditions.

1
Patel
H
,
Wagner
M
,
Singhal
P
,
Kothari
S.
Systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of genital warts
.
BMC Infect Dis
.
2013
;
13
:
39
.
2
Bauer
HM
,
Wright
G
,
Chow
J.
Evidence of human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness in reducing genital warts: an analysis of California public family planning administrative claims data, 2007-2010
.
Am J Public Health
.
2012
;
102
(
5
):
833
835
.
3
Guerra
FM
,
Rosella
LC
,
Dunn
S
,
Wilson
SE
,
Chen
C
,
Deeks
SL
.
Early impact of Ontario's human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program on anogenital warts (AGWs): a population-based assessment
.
Vaccine
.
2016
;
34
(
39
):
4678
4683
.
4
Canvin
M
,
Sinka
K
,
Hughes
G
,
Mesher
D.
Decline in genital warts diagnoses among young women and young men since the introduction of the bivalent HPV (16/18) vaccination programme in England: an ecological analysis
.
Sex Transm Infect
.
2017
;
93
(
2
):
125
128
.
5
Cong
X
,
Sun
R
,
Zhang
X
,
Wang
Y
,
Wang
L
,
Yu
Y.
Correlation of human papillomavirus types with clinical features of patients with condyloma acuminatum in China
.
Int J Dermatol
.
2016
;
55
(
7
):
775
780
.
6
Maniar
KP
,
Ronnett
BM
,
Vang
R
,
Yemelyanova
A.
Coexisting high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and condyloma acuminatum: independent lesions due to different HPV types occurring in immunocompromised patients
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2013
;
37
(
1
):
53
60
.
7
Erman-Vlahovic
M
,
Vlahovic
J
,
Mrcela
M
,
Hrgovic
Z.
Coexistence of condylomata acuminata with warty squamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma
.
Med Arch
.
2017
;
71
(
1
):
72
75
.
8
Fernández-Nestosa
MJ
,
Guimerà
N
,
Sanchez
DF
, et al.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in condylomas, intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive carcinoma of the penis using laser capture microdissection (LCM)-PCR: a study of 191 lesions in 43 patients
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2017
;
41
(
6
):
820
832
.
9
Nuovo
GJ
,
O'Connell
M
,
Blanco
JS
,
Levine
RU
,
Silverstein
SJ
.
Correlation of histology and human papillomavirus DNA detection in condyloma acuminatum and condyloma-like vulvar lesions
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1989
;
13
(
8
):
700
706
.
10
Leonardi
CL
,
Zhu
WY
,
Kinsey
WH
,
Penneys
NS
.
Seborrheic keratoses from the genital region may contain human papillomavirus DNA
.
Arch Dermatol
.
1991
;
127
(
8
):
1203
1206
.
11
Zhu
WY
,
Leonardi
C
,
Penneys
NS
.
Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in seborrheic keratosis by polymerase chain reaction
.
J Dermatol Sci
.
1992
;
4
(
3
):
166
171
.
12
Bai
H
,
Cviko
A
,
Granter
S
,
Yuan
L
,
Betensky
RA
,
Crum
CP
.
Immunophenotypic and viral (human papillomavirus) correlates of vulvar seborrheic keratosis
.
Hum Pathol
.
2003
;
34
(
6
):
559
564
.
13
Tardío
JC
,
Bancalari
E
,
Moreno
A
,
Martín-Fragueiro
LM
.
Genital seborrheic keratoses are human papillomavirus-related lesions: a linear array genotyping test study
.
APMIS
.
2012
;
120
(
6
):
477
483
.
14
Reutter
JC
,
Geisinger
KR
,
Laudadio
J.
Vulvar seborrheic keratosis: is there a relationship to human papillomavirus?
J Low Genit Tract Dis
.
2014
;
18
(
2
):
190
194
.
15
Li
J
,
Ackerman
AB
.
“Seborrheic keratoses” that contain human papillomavirus are condylomata acuminata
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
1994
;
16
(
4
):
398
405
.
16
Pirog
EC
,
Chen
YT
,
Isacson
C.
MIB-1 immunostaining is a beneficial adjunct test for accurate diagnosis of vulvar condyloma acuminatum
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2000
;
24
(
10
):
1393
1399
.
17
Pirog
EC
,
Quint
KD
,
Yantiss
RK
.
P16/CDKN2A and Ki-67 enhance the detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and condyloma and correlate with human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2010
;
34
(
10
):
1449
1455
.
18
Kazlouskaya
V
,
Shustef
E
,
Allam
SH
,
Lal
K
,
Elston
D.
Expression of p16 protein in lesional and perilesional condyloma acuminata and bowenoid papulosis: clinical significance and diagnostic implications
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
2013
;
69
(
3
):
444
449
.
19
Wititsuwannakul
J
,
Klump
VR
Jr
,
McNiff
JM
,
Ko
CJ
.
Detecting HPV in cutaneous lesions using anti-HPV antibody immunohistochemistry
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
2013
;
35
(
3
):
327
331
.
20
Trombetta
LJ
,
Place
RJ
.
Giant condyloma acuminatum of the anorectum: trends in epidemiology and management: report of a case and review of the literature
.
Dis Colon Rectum
.
2001
;
44
(
12
):
1878
1886
.
21
Chu
QD
,
Vezeridis
MP
,
Libbey
NP
,
Wanebo
HJ
.
Giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke-Lowenstein tumor) of the anorectal and perianal regions: analysis of 42 cases
.
Dis Colon Rectum
.
1994
;
37
(
9
):
950
957
.
22
Nain
PS
,
Sidhu
S
,
Garg
B.
Giant condyloma acuminata of the inguinal region
.
Indian J Surg
.
2015
;
77
(
suppl 2
):
729
730
.
23
Ogrodnik
J
,
Gulati
S
,
Hodge
J
,
Koonce
C.
Giant condyloma acuminatum of the scrotum, bilateral groins, and suprapubic region: a treatment and reconstruction challenge
.
Am Surg
.
2015
;
81
(
5
):
E215
E217
.
24
del Pino
M
,
Bleeker
MC
,
Quint
WG
,
Snijders
PJ
,
Meijer
CJ
,
Steenbergen
RD
.
Comprehensive analysis of human papillomavirus prevalence and the potential role of low-risk types in verrucous carcinoma
.
Mod Pathol
.
2012
;
25
(
10
):
1354
1363
.
25
Zidar
N
,
Langner
C
,
Odar
K
, et al.
Anal verrucous carcinoma is not related to infection with human papillomaviruses and should be distinguished from giant condyloma (Buschke-Löwenstein tumour)
.
Histopathology
.
2017
;
70
(
6
):
938
945
.
26
Diani
M
,
Boneschi
V
,
Ramoni
S
,
Gadda
F
,
Del Gobbo
A
,
Cusini
M.
Rapidly invasive Buschke-Löwenstein tumor associated with human papillomavirus types 6 and 52
.
Sex Transm Dis
.
2015
;
42
(
10
):
547
548
.
27
Bambao
C
,
Nofech-Mozes
S
,
Shier
M.
Giant condyloma versus verrucous carcinoma: a case report
.
J Low Genit Tract Dis
.
2010
;
14
(
3
):
230
233
.
28
Gualco
M
,
Bonin
S
,
Foglia
G
, et al.
Morphologic and biologic studies on ten cases of verrucous carcinoma of the vulva supporting the theory of a discrete clinico-pathologic entity
.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
.
2003
;
13
(
3
):
317
324
.
29
Nascimento
AF
,
Granter
SR
,
Cviko
A
,
Yuan
L
,
Hecht
JL
,
Crum
CP
.
Vulvar acanthosis with altered differentiation: a precursor to verrucous carcinoma?
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2004
;
28
(
5
):
638
643
.
30
Stankiewicz
E
,
Kudahetti
SC
,
Prowse
DM
, et al.
HPV infection and immunochemical detection of cell-cycle markers in verrucous carcinoma of the penis
.
Mod Pathol
.
2009
;
22
(
9
):
1160
1168
.
31
Klima
M
,
Kurtis
B
,
Jordan
PH
Jr
.
Verrucous carcinoma of skin
.
J Cutan Pathol
.
1980
;
7
(
2
):
88
98
.
32
Bain
L
,
Geronemus
R.
The association of lichen planus of the penis with squamous cell carcinoma in situ and with verrucous squamous carcinoma
.
J Dermatol Surg Oncol
.
1989
;
15
(
4
):
413
417
.
33
de Koning
MN
,
Quint
WG
,
Pirog
EC
.
Prevalence of mucosal and cutaneous human papillomaviruses in different histologic subtypes of vulvar carcinoma
.
Mod Pathol
.
2008
;
21
(
3
):
334
344
.
34
Schwartz
RA
.
Verrucous carcinoma of the skin and mucosa
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
1995
;
32
(
1
):
1
21
.
35
Chuanyu
S
,
Ke
X
,
Jie
Z
,
Guowei
X
,
Zujun
F
,
Qiang
D.
Surgical treatment for 11 cases of penile verrucous carcinoma
.
Ann Dermatol
.
2011
;
23
(
suppl 3
):
S346
S349
.
36
Kraus
FT
,
Perezmesa
C.
Verrucous carcinoma: clinical and pathologic study of 105 cases involving oral cavity, larynx and genitalia
.
Cancer
.
1966
;
19
(
1
):
26
38
.
37
Chaux
A
,
Cubilla
AL
.
Diagnostic problems in precancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas of the penis
.
Semin Diagn Pathol
.
2012
;
29
(
2
):
72
82
.
38
Fuste
V
,
del Pino
M
,
Perez
A
, et al.
Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina: human papillomavirus detection, p16(INK4A) overexpression and clinicopathological correlations
.
Histopathology
.
2010
;
57
(
6
):
907
916
.
39
de Sanjosé
S
,
Alemany
L
,
Ordi
J
, et al.
Worldwide human papillomavirus genotype attribution in over 2000 cases of intraepithelial and invasive lesions of the vulva
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2013
;
49
(
16
):
3450
3461
.
40
Matoso
A
,
Fabre
V
,
Quddus
MR
, et al.
Prevalence and distribution of 15 high-risk human papillomavirus types in squamous cell carcinoma of the scrotum
.
Hum Pathol
.
2016
;
53
:
130
136
.
41
Velazquez
EF
,
Chaux
A
,
Cubilla
AL
.
Histologic classification of penile intraepithelial neoplasia
.
Semin Diagn Pathol
.
2012
;
29
(
2
):
96
102
.
42
Bornstein
J
,
Bogliatto
F
,
Haefner
HK
, et al.
The 2015 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) terminology of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesions
.
Obstet Gynecol
.
2016
;
127
(
2
):
264
268
.
43
Darragh
TM
,
Colgan
TJ
,
Cox
JT
, et al.
The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology
.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
.
2012
;
136
(
10
):
1266
1297
.
44
Chaux
A
,
Velazquez
EF
,
Amin
A
, et al.
Distribution and characterization of subtypes of penile intraepithelial neoplasia and their association with invasive carcinomas: a pathological study of 139 lesions in 121 patients
.
Hum Pathol
.
2012
;
43
(
7
):
1020
1027
.
45
Cubilla
AL
,
Velazques
EF
,
Reuter
VE
,
Oliva
E
,
Mihm
MC
Jr
,
Young
RH
.
Warty (condylomatous) squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a report of 11 cases and proposed classification of ‘verruciform' penile tumors
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2000
;
24
(
4
):
505
512
.
46
Dong
F
,
Kojiro
S
,
Borger
DR
,
Growdon
WB
,
Oliva
E.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a subclassification of 97 cases by clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features (p16, p53, and EGFR)
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2015
;
39
(
8
):
1045
1053
.
47
Santos
M
,
Landolfi
S
,
Olivella
A
, et al.
p16 overexpression identifies HPV-positive vulvar squamous cell carcinomas
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2006
;
30
(
11
):
1347
1356
.
48
Chaux
A
,
Pfannl
R
,
Lloveras
B
, et al.
Distinctive association of p16INK4a overexpression with penile intraepithelial neoplasia depicting warty and/or basaloid features: a study of 141 cases evaluating a new nomenclature
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2010
;
34
(
3
):
385
392
.
49
Chaux
A
,
Pfannl
R
,
Rodríguez
IM
, et al.
Distinctive immunohistochemical profile of penile intraepithelial lesions: a study of 74 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2011
;
35
(
4
):
553
562
.
50
Cotter
MB
,
Kelly
ME
,
O'Connell
PR
, et al.
Anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a single centre 19 year review
.
Colorectal Dis
.
2014
;
16
(
10
):
777
782
.
51
Chaux
A
,
Soares
F
,
Rodríguez
I
, et al.
Papillary squamous cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) of the penis: clinicopathologic features, differential diagnosis, and outcome of 35 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2010
;
34
(
2
):
223
230
.
52
Wade
TR
,
Kopf
AW
,
Ackerman
AB
.
Bowenoid papulosis of the penis
.
Cancer
.
1978
;
42
(
4
):
1890
1903
.
53
Patterson
JW
,
Kao
GF
,
Graham
JH
,
Helwig
EB
.
Bowenoid papulosis: a clinicopathologic study with ultrastructural observations
.
Cancer
.
1986
;
57
(
4
):
823
836
.
54
Gimeno
E
,
Vilata
JJ
,
Sanchez
JL
,
Lloret
A
,
Fortea
JM
.
Bowenoid papulosis: clinical and histological study of eight cases
.
Genitourin Med
.
1987
;
63
(
2
):
109
113
.
55
Gross
G
,
Hagedorn
M
,
Ikenberg
H
, et al.
Bowenoid papulosis: presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) structural antigens and of HPV 16-related DNA sequences
.
Arch Dermatol
.
1985
;
121
(
7
):
858
863
.
56
Richter
ON
,
Petrow
W
,
Wardelmann
E
,
Dorn
C
,
Kupka
M
,
Ulrich
U.
Bowenoid papulosis of the vulva-immunotherapeutical approach with topical imiquimod
.
Arch Gynecol Obstet
.
2003
;
268
(
4
):
333
336
.
57
Yang
CH
,
Lee
JC
,
Chen
CH
,
Hui
CY
,
Hong
HS
,
Kuo
HW
.
Photodynamic therapy for bowenoid papulosis using a novel incoherent light-emitting diode device
.
Br J Dermatol
.
2003
;
149
(
6
):
1297
1299
.
58
Ricart
JM
,
Cordoba
J
,
Hernandez
M
,
Esplugues
I.
Extensive genital bowenoid papulosis responding to imiquimod
.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
.
2007
;
21
(
1
):
113
115
.
59
Wu
YH
,
Qiao
JJ
,
Bai
J
,
Fang
H.
Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for bowenoid papulosis
.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol
.
2015
;
81
(
2
):
219
220
.
60
Schwartz
RA
,
Janniger
CK
.
Bowenoid papulosis
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
1991
;
24
(
2 pt 1
):
261
264
.
61
Böcking
A
,
Chatelain
R
,
Salterberg
A
,
Hagedorn
M
,
Gross
G.
Bowenoid papulosis: classification as a low-grade in situ carcinoma of the epidermis on the basis of histomorphologic and DNA ploidy studies
.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol
.
1989
;
11
(
6
):
419
425
.
62
Obalek
S
,
Jablonska
S
,
Beaudenon
S
,
Walczak
L
,
Orth
G.
Bowenoid papulosis of the male and female genitalia: risk of cervical neoplasia
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
1986
;
14
(
3
):
433
444
.
63
Park
KC
,
Kim
KH
,
Youn
SW
, et al.
Heterogeneity of human papillomavirus DNA in a patient with Bowenoid papulosis that progressed to squamous cell carcinoma
.
Br J Dermatol
.
1998
;
139
(
6
):
1087
1091
.
64
Yu
DS
,
Kim
G
,
Song
HJ
,
Oh
CH
.
Morphometric assessment of nuclei in Bowen's disease and bowenoid papulosis
.
Skin Res Technol
.
2004
;
10
(
1
):
67
70
.
65
Pala
S
,
Poleva
I
,
Vocatura
A.
The presence of HPV types 6/11, 16/18, 31/33/51 in Bowenoid papulosis demonstrated by DNA in situ hybridization
.
Int J STD AIDS
.
2000
;
11
(
12
):
823
824
.
66
Hama
N
,
Ohtsuka
T
,
Yamazaki
S.
Detection of mucosal human papilloma virus DNA in bowenoid papulosis, Bowen's disease and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
.
J Dermatol
.
2006
;
33
(
5
):
331
337
.
67
Liu
H
,
Urabe
K
,
Moroi
Y
, et al.
Expression of p16 and hTERT protein is associated with the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus in Bowenoid papulosis
.
J Cutan Pathol
.
2006
;
33
(
8
):
551
558
.
68
Hagiwara
K
,
Uezato
H
,
Arakaki
H
, et al.
A genotype distribution of human papillomaviruses detected by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing analysis in a large sample of common warts in Japan
.
J Med Virol
.
2005
;
77
(
1
):
107
112
.
69
Lei
YJ
,
Gao
C
,
An
R
, et al.
Development of a multiplex PCR method for detecting and typing human papillomaviruses in verrucae vulgaris
.
J Virol Methods
.
2008
;
147
(
1
):
72
77
.
70
Aguilera-Barrantes
I
,
Magro
C
,
Nuovo
GJ
.
Verruca vulgaris of the vulva in children and adults: a nonvenereal type of vulvar wart
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2007
;
31
(
4
):
529
535
.
71
Nuovo
GJ
,
Lastarria
DA
,
Smith
S
,
Lerner
J
,
Comité
SL
,
Eliezri
YD
.
Human papillomavirus segregation patterns in genital and nongenital warts in prepubertal children and adults
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
1991
;
95
(
4
):
467
474
.
72
Lee
HS
,
Lee
JH
,
Choo
JY
,
Byun
HJ
,
Jun
JH
,
Lee
JY
.
Immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction for detection human papilloma virus in warts: a comparative study
.
Ann Dermatol
.
2016
;
28
(
4
):
479
485
.
73
Kukreja
T
,
Krunic
A.
Multiple epidermolytic acanthomas must not be confused with genital human papillomavirus infection
.
Acta Derm Venereol
.
2009
;
89
(
2
):
169
171
.
74
Bogale
SR
,
Chan
CS
,
McIntire
H
,
Hsu
S.
Epidermolytic acanthoma of the scrotum: a rare mimicker of condyloma acuminatum
.
Dermatol Online J
.
2011
;
17
(
1
):
6
.
75
Hijazi
MM
,
Succaria
F
,
Ghosn
S.
Multiple localized epidermolytic acanthomas of the vulva associated with vulvar pruritus: a case report
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
2015
;
37
(
4
):
e49
e52
.
76
Lee
TJ
,
Wu
YH
.
Multiple epidermolytic acanthomas mimicking condyloma: a retrospective study of 8 cases
.
Int J Dermatol
.
2018
;
57
(
1
):
28
33
.
77
Leonardi
C
,
Zhu
W
,
Kinsey
W
,
Penneys
NS
.
Epidermolytic acanthoma does not contain human papillomavirus DNA
.
J Cutan Pathol
.
1991
;
18
(
2
):
103
105
.
78
Jung
JM
,
Lee
SH
,
Won
CH
, et al.
A case of multiple epidermolytic acanthoma of the scrotum: is the human papillomavirus a culprit?
Ann Dermatol
.
2015
;
27
(
5
):
633
634
.
79
Abbas
O
,
Wieland
CN
,
Goldberg
LJ
.
Solitary epidermolytic acanthoma: a clinical and histopathological study
.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
.
2011
;
25
(
2
):
175
180
.
80
Vahlquist
A
,
Fischer
J
,
Törmä
H.
Inherited nonsyndromic ichthyoses: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment
.
Am J Clin Dermatol
.
2018
;
19
(
1
):
51
66
.
81
Su
WP
.
Histopathologic varieties of epidermal nevus: a study of 160 cases
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
1982
;
4
(
2
):
161
170
.
82
Sarifakioglu
E
,
Yenidunya
S.
Linear epidermolytic verrucous epidermal nevus of the male genitalia
.
Pediatr Dermatol
.
2007
;
24
(
4
):
447
448
.
83
Conlin
PA
,
Rapini
RP
.
Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis associated with melanocytic nevi: a report of 53 cases
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
2002
;
24
(
1
):
23
25
.
84
Gaertner
EM
.
Incidental cutaneous reaction patterns: epidermolytic hyperkeratosis, acantholytic dyskeratosis, and hailey-hailey-like acantholysis: a potential marker of premalignant skin change
.
J Skin Cancer
.
2011
;
2011
:
645743
.
85
Adachi
T
,
Tanese
K
,
Ouchi
T
,
Igawa
S
,
Nakano
H
,
Ishiko
A.
Case of isolated epidermolytic acanthoma: Genetic and immunohistochemical analysis
.
J Dermatol
.
2016
;
43
(
8
):
974
975
.
86
Egozi-Reinman
E
,
Avitan-Hersh
E
,
Barzilai
A
,
Indelman
M
,
Bergman
R.
Epidermolytic acanthoma of the genitalia does not show mutations in KRT1 or KRT10
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
2016
;
38
(
2
):
164
165
.
87
Cohen
PR
,
Ulmer
R
,
Theriault
A
,
Leigh
IM
,
Duvic
M.
Epidermolytic acanthomas: clinical characteristics and immunohistochemical features
.
Am J Dermatopathol
.
1997
;
19
(
3
):
232
241
.
88
Stiff
KM
,
Cohen
PR
.
Vegas (verruciform genital-associated) xanthoma: a comprehensive literature review
.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
.
2017
;
7
(
1
):
65
79
.
89
Fite
C
,
Plantier
F
,
Dupin
N
,
Avril
MF
,
Moyal-Barracco
M.
Vulvar verruciform xanthoma: ten cases associated with lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, or other conditions
.
Arch Dermatol
.
2011
;
147
(
9
):
1087
1092
.
90
De Rose
AF
,
Tosi
M
,
Mantica
G
,
Piol
N
,
Toncini
C
,
Terrone
C.
Verruciform xanthoma of the penis: a rare benign lesion that simulates carcinoma
.
Arch Ital Urol Androl
.
2016
;
88
(
4
):
284
285
.
91
Helm
KF
,
Hopfl
RM
,
Kreider
JW
,
Lookingbill
DP
.
Verruciform xanthoma in an immunocompromised patient: a case report and immunohistochemical study
.
J Cutan Pathol
.
1993
;
20
(
1
):
84
86
.
92
Iamaroon
A
,
Vickers
RA
.
Characterization of verruciform xanthoma by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry
.
J Oral Pathol Med
.
1996
;
25
(
7
):
395
400
.
93
Mohsin
SK
,
Lee
MW
,
Amin
MB
, et al.
Cutaneous verruciform xanthoma: a report of five cases investigating the etiology and nature of xanthomatous cells
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1998
;
22
(
4
):
479
487
.
94
Cumberland
L
,
Dana
A
,
Resh
B
,
Fitzpatrick
J
,
Goldenberg
G.
Verruciform xanthoma in the setting of cutaneous trauma and chronic inflammation: report of a patient and a brief review of the literature
.
J Cutan Pathol
.
2010
;
37
(
8
):
895
900
.
95
Zegarelli
DJ
,
Aegarelli-Schmidt
EC
,
Zegarelli
EV
.
Verruciform xanthoma: a clinical, light microscopic, and electron microscopic study of two cases
.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
.
1974
;
38
(
5
):
725
734
.

Author notes

The author has no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.