Context.—

Cartilaginous tumors represent one of the most common tumors of bone. Management of these tumors includes observation, curettage, and surgical excision or resection, depending on their locations and whether they are benign or malignant. They can be diagnostically challenging, particularly in small biopsies. In rare cases, benign tumors may undergo malignant transformation.

Objective.—

To review common cartilaginous tumors, including in patients with multiple hereditary exostosis, Ollier disease, and Maffucci syndrome, and to discuss problems in the interpretation of well-differentiated cartilaginous neoplasms of bone. Additionally, the concept of atypical cartilaginous tumor/chondrosarcoma grade 1 will be discussed and its use clarified.

Data Sources.—

PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) literature review, case review of archival cases at the Massachusetts General Hospital, and personal experience of the authors.

Conclusions.—

This review has examined primary well-differentiated cartilaginous lesions of bone, including their differential diagnosis and approach to management. Because of the frequent overlap in histologic features, particularly between low-grade chondrosarcoma and enchondroma, evaluation of well-differentiated cartilaginous lesions should be undertaken in conjunction with thorough review of the imaging studies.

Cartilage-forming tumors comprise one of the most common bone tumors, with enchondroma and osteochondroma encompassing the overwhelming majority of benign cartilaginous lesions and low-grade chondrosarcoma being the most common malignant cartilaginous tumor.1  These tumors are characterized by the formation of a cartilaginous matrix and can sometimes display overlapping histologic features, which may pose a problem for diagnosis, especially in cases where histologic material is limited.

In the World Health Organization (WHO) fourth edition (2013) classification,1  cartilaginous tumors were classified as either benign (such as osteochondroma and enchondroma), intermediate (locally aggressive/rarely metastasizing, such as chondromyxoid fibroma, chondroblastoma, and atypical cartilaginous tumor/chondrosarcoma grade 1), or malignant (chondrosarcoma grades 2 and 3 and other high-grade chondrosarcomas). In the upcoming WHO classification, chondroblastoma and chondromyxoid fibroma have been moved into the benign category. No cartilaginous tumor belongs to the intermediate category. Additionally, the use of the term atypical cartilaginous tumor is further delineated.

Overall, benign cartilaginous lesions behave in an indolent fashion and do not require treatment, unless they are symptomatic or cause functional impairment, such as restricted movement or complications from fractures. The clinical management and prognosis depend heavily on the location and the pathologic diagnosis.2  With limited tissue, the differential diagnosis may be problematic, particularly with regard to distinguishing enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma. These tumors may display characteristic clinical and radiologic features that allow for this distinction; however, the histologic overlap in the well-differentiated lesions can preclude a definitive diagnosis, and some studies have shown significant interobserver variability even among orthopedic pathologists.3  In a study by Eefting et al4  assessing interobserver variability, considerable variation in the histologic assessment of cartilaginous tumors was demonstrated (κ coefficient = 0.78). The greatest variability occurred in the distinction between enchondroma and grade 1 chondrosarcoma (κ coefficient = 0.54).4 

This review discusses some of the more common benign and malignant cartilaginous tumors as listed above. Furthermore, relevant clinical syndromes, including multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE), Ollier disease, and Maffucci syndrome, are discussed, as the risks of malignant transformation of benign cartilage tumors in these patients are increased.

Osteochondroma is a benign cartilage-capped tumor arising on the surface of bones and is the most common benign cartilage tumor of bone. More than 80% of osteochondromas are solitary; they are usually diagnosed by the second decade of life. There is a slight male predominance. They typically arise in the area of the metaphysis of long bones derived from endochondral ossification, most commonly the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus, but they can also arise on the surface of flat bones, such as the ilium or scapula.1,2,57 

Although initially believed to be a developmental anomaly, it has been shown subsequently that sporadic osteochondromas harbor homozygous EXT1 and EXT2 deletions within a subset of chondrocytes within the cartilaginous cap, indicating that it is a neoplastic process.3  Additionally, families with MHE have been shown to harbor germline mutations in the EXT1 or EXT2 genes.8,9 

Radiographic findings in osteochondroma show that osteochondroma arises from the surface of the bone with continuity of the cortices and of the medullary cavities (Figure 1, A and B), often pointing away from the nearest joint. Rarely, osteochondroma is sessile with a broad-based stalk.10  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most useful imaging modality for assessing the thickness of the cartilaginous cap, which can be variable.11,12 

Figure 1

A, Plain film radiograph demonstrating a well-defined exostosis in continuity with the marrow cavity, extending from the cortex of the distal tibial diaphysis and growing away from the nearby joint. B, Axial computed tomography scan of the distal tibia shows an osteochondroma with a pedunculated shape, thin stalk, and marrow space and cortical continuity. C, Gross photograph of an osteochondroma demonstrates a well-formed hyaline cartilage cap with underlying newly formed cancellous bone. D, Microscopic image of an osteochondroma showing a dome-shaped cartilaginous cap with underlying endochondral ossification. A thin fibrous sheath of periosteum overlying the cartilaginous cap can be seen (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20 [D]).

Figure 1

A, Plain film radiograph demonstrating a well-defined exostosis in continuity with the marrow cavity, extending from the cortex of the distal tibial diaphysis and growing away from the nearby joint. B, Axial computed tomography scan of the distal tibia shows an osteochondroma with a pedunculated shape, thin stalk, and marrow space and cortical continuity. C, Gross photograph of an osteochondroma demonstrates a well-formed hyaline cartilage cap with underlying newly formed cancellous bone. D, Microscopic image of an osteochondroma showing a dome-shaped cartilaginous cap with underlying endochondral ossification. A thin fibrous sheath of periosteum overlying the cartilaginous cap can be seen (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20 [D]).

Close modal

Grossly, osteochondroma contains a cartilaginous cap and an underlying stalk. The outer layer consists of a thin fibrous sheath overlying the bluish gray cartilaginous cap (Figure 1, C). It is important to document the maximum thickness of this cap. Microscopically, this outer fibrous layer is the perichondrium. The cartilage cap is of variable thickness and at the base undergoes endochondral ossification (Figure 1, D).1,2,11  The chondrocytes within the cap are usually organized in a similar fashion to the normal growth plate. Both the cellularity of the cartilage and the size of the chondrocytes increase within the deeper layers of the cap, with the chondrocytes arranged in a vaguely columnar fashion. The cartilaginous matrix at the base of the cap often shows calcifications with residual columns of cartilage upon which new bone deposition occurs.2 

The pathologic diagnosis of osteochondroma is generally straightforward, with a differential diagnosis that includes bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation, surface chondroma, and parosteal osteosarcoma. None of these lesions have a medullary connection to underlying bone; thus, radiologic correlation can differentiate among these tumors.1315 

The rate of malignant transformation of an osteochondroma into a low-grade chondrosarcoma is very low (<2%). Some authors consider an increased size of the cartilaginous cap a worrisome feature of malignancy; however, a thickened cartilage cap alone is not sufficient for the diagnosis of a malignant transformation. In addition to a thick cartilage cap with prominent calcifications, soft tissue invasion, infiltration of the stalk, erosion of bone, and tumor invasion of the underlying bone are features of malignant transformation (Table 1).1,2,9,11,16,17 

Table 1

Comparison of Features Distinguishing Osteochondroma From Secondary Chondrosarcoma Arising in Osteochondroma

Comparison of Features Distinguishing Osteochondroma From Secondary Chondrosarcoma Arising in Osteochondroma
Comparison of Features Distinguishing Osteochondroma From Secondary Chondrosarcoma Arising in Osteochondroma

Osteochondromas are usually observed or resected in symptomatic patients. Symptoms may be due to mechanical issues, impingement on adjacent nerves, development of a bursa on the surface of the cap, or a pathologic fracture through the stalk.

Multiple hereditary exostosis is an autosomal dominant condition in which patients develop multiple osteochondromas by the second decade of life. Approximately 60% of patients have a family history. Multiple hereditary exostosis has an incidence of approximately 1 in 50 000 and, in rare patients, presents as part of a separate genetic syndrome, such as trichorhinophalangeal syndrome or Potocki-Shaffer syndrome.1  It is now known that germline alterations in the EXT1 (8q24) or EXT2 (11p11-p12) gene drive the disease. Similar to nonhereditary osteochondromas, aberrations of the EXT genes lead to dysfunctional proteins exostosin 1 and exostosin 2 and the subsequent failure of heparin sulfate polymerization required for normal cartilaginous development.4,5,9,18 

From an early age, these patients present with multiple osteochondromas, which continue to grow in size until skeletal maturity with the closure of the growth plates. Similar to solitary osteochondromas, the majority of these tumors are asymptomatic; however, patients with increased numbers of osteochondromas can develop various bone deformities, leading to functional impairment that may require surgical correction.19 

Radiographically, the presence of multiple osteochondromas can be confirmed with conventional radiographs (Figure 2, A), and the size of the cartilage cap can be assessed with MRI. Grossly and microscopically, the osteochondromas of MHE are identical to solitary osteochondromas, only more numerous.

Figure 2

A, Plain film radiograph demonstrating numerous osteochondromas centered about the distal femur and proximal tibia in a patient with multiple hereditary exostoses. B, Gross photograph demonstrating a secondary chondrosarcoma arising in association with a preexisting osteochondroma of the ilium in a patient with multiple hereditary exostoses. The residual osteochondroma is difficult to identify as it has been replaced by a large lobulated cartilaginous lesion bulging into the surrounding soft tissue.

Figure 2

A, Plain film radiograph demonstrating numerous osteochondromas centered about the distal femur and proximal tibia in a patient with multiple hereditary exostoses. B, Gross photograph demonstrating a secondary chondrosarcoma arising in association with a preexisting osteochondroma of the ilium in a patient with multiple hereditary exostoses. The residual osteochondroma is difficult to identify as it has been replaced by a large lobulated cartilaginous lesion bulging into the surrounding soft tissue.

Close modal

Multiple hereditary exostosis carries an increased risk of malignant transformation reportedly ranging from 0.2% to 25% (Figure 2, B).9,19,20  As with solitary osteochondromas, the same clinicopathologic features are used to evaluate patients for possible malignant transformation (Table 1).

Studies have shown that there is significant interobserver variability in the histologic diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors,21  especially grade 1 chondrosarcoma, in patients with MHE. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of these patients with clinical and radiologic correlation is recommended, especially in cases in which malignant transformation is suspected.

Enchondroma is the second most common benign primary hyaline cartilage–forming tumor of bone, accounting for 12% to 24% of primary bone tumors. These tumors typically present during the third to fourth decade of life and are most frequently located within the distal appendicular skeleton. They arise in bones that form by endochondral ossification. Approximately 90% of enchondromas are solitary; they are frequently detected as incidental findings during radiologic workup for pain associated with other adjacent lesions such as osteoarthritis or tendon/ligamental tears.1,2,22  Most enchondromas are asymptomatic; however, they may be associated with pain in the setting of a gross or microscopic pathologic fracture.23  If they are painful, the possibility of a chondrosarcoma should be considered and excluded.

Genetic aberrations described in enchondromas include mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase IDH1 (R132C; R132H) or IDH2 (R172S), which are found in approximately 40% of solitary lesions, with even higher rates in patients with multiple enchondromas.5,24  Rare cases have been described to harbor aberrations in PTHR1; cytogenetic abnormalities involving chromosomes 5, 6, 7, 12, and 17 have also been reported.2527 

Radiographically, x-rays show spherical or oblong, sometimes elongated, well-circumscribed lucent lesions with scattered radiodensities, which represent irregular calcifications of the cartilage matrix. These calcifications are sometimes present at the periphery of the lobules and are seen as rings or arches (Figure 3, A and B). Scalloping and thinning of the cortex may be present, especially in small tubular bones; however, extension into soft tissues or overt bone destruction is not seen. Computed tomography scan often shows a well-circumscribed, lobulated lesion with similar calcifications to those seen on the x-rays. On MRI, enchondromas are hyperintense on T2-weighted images.2,7 

Figure 3

A, Plain film radiograph of the distal femur showing an enchondroma with a uniform distribution of calcifications and well-formed arclike pattern. B, Plain film radiograph of the right hand showing a well-circumscribed ovoid lesion with a ring-and-arc pattern, corresponding to reactive bone rimming individual nodules of cartilage. A small fracture can be seen associated with the tumor. C, Gross photograph of an enchondroma shows a tan-white cartilaginous lesion with clear demarcation from the residual normal cortex. There is focal thinning of the cortex overlying the lesion. D, Microscopic image showing a variable number of benign-appearing chondrocytes, with focal areas of scattered calcifications and bone deposition on the periphery of the nodule. E, Microscopic image of an enchondroma of the finger demonstrating increased cellularity with prominent variation in the size of the chondrocytes (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [D] and ×200 [E]).

Figure 3

A, Plain film radiograph of the distal femur showing an enchondroma with a uniform distribution of calcifications and well-formed arclike pattern. B, Plain film radiograph of the right hand showing a well-circumscribed ovoid lesion with a ring-and-arc pattern, corresponding to reactive bone rimming individual nodules of cartilage. A small fracture can be seen associated with the tumor. C, Gross photograph of an enchondroma shows a tan-white cartilaginous lesion with clear demarcation from the residual normal cortex. There is focal thinning of the cortex overlying the lesion. D, Microscopic image showing a variable number of benign-appearing chondrocytes, with focal areas of scattered calcifications and bone deposition on the periphery of the nodule. E, Microscopic image of an enchondroma of the finger demonstrating increased cellularity with prominent variation in the size of the chondrocytes (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×20 [D] and ×200 [E]).

Close modal

Grossly, enchondromas are composed of well-circumscribed, gray, glistening nodules (Figure 3, C). Microscopically, the tumors are composed of variably sized nodules of hyaline-type cartilage, which are well circumscribed, sharply demarcated from the surrounding bone, and often encased by reactive bone formation (corresponding to the rings and arches seen radiographically). Variable numbers of benign-appearing chondrocytes are present, with frequent scattered calcifications of the hyaline matrix and associated necrosis of chondrocytes in these areas (Figure 3, D). Rare binucleated chondrocytes may be present. Enchondromas in the digits or in patients with multiple enchondromatosis may demonstrate increased cellularity and cytologic atypia (Figure 3, E).2 

Immunohistochemistry is largely unhelpful in the diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors, as most are positive for S100 protein and ERG. The diagnosis relies mainly on histologic examination with close clinical and radiologic correlation. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations represent by far the most common genetic aberrations in enchondromas, a finding that is shared with chondrosarcomas, thus preventing these alterations from being used diagnostically as a discriminator among these differential diagnoses. The main differential diagnosis is low-grade chondrosarcoma. In our experience, the most useful approach for the diagnosis of enchondroma even in problematic cases is strict radiologic correlation in conjunction with the histologic assessment, with a permeative growth pattern seen in chondrosarcoma but not in enchondroma.

Multiple enchondromas present typically as a manifestation of either of 2 related clinical syndromes, Ollier disease or Maffucci syndrome, or as part of an unrelated syndrome, metachondromatosis. These disorders are rare; although the tumors developed by these patients are benign, there is an increased risk of malignant transformation.28,29  In all 3 syndromes, patients present at an early age, frequently being diagnosed with multiple enchondromas during early childhood.

Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are 2 related sporadic disorders that are characterized by the presence of multiple enchondromas from a young age. Maffucci syndrome differs from Ollier disease by the presence of vascular lesions, most commonly spindle cell hemangiomas.30  Both disorders are caused by somatic mosaic mutations of IDH1 or IDH2.31,32  The short tubular bones of the hands and feet are frequently involved, although the tumors may be found within long bones, scapulae, pelvis, or some flat bones.2  The large number of lesions can lead to deformation and functional impairment.

Radiographically, patients with Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome present with multiple enchondromas, and the severely affected bones will appear shortened and deformed (Figure 4, A). In long bones, columns of dysplastic cartilage that originate in the growth plate produce linear radiolucencies that extend from the metaphysis into the diaphysis; this radiologic finding is characteristic for both Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome.2 

Figure 4

A, Plain film radiograph of the bilateral feet in a patient with Ollier disease showing multiple enchondromas with prominent deformation of the digits. B, Gross photograph from a patient with Ollier disease showing a secondary chondrosarcoma arising in association with multiple enchondromas within the medullary cavity. The larger nodules of gray-white hyaline type cartilage have eroded through the cortex into the surrounding soft tissue. C, Microscopic image showing a secondary chondrosarcoma arising in a patient with Ollier disease. There is increased chondrocyte cellularity, and the tumor shows a permeative growth pattern that entraps preexisting bony trabeculae (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40 [C]).

Figure 4

A, Plain film radiograph of the bilateral feet in a patient with Ollier disease showing multiple enchondromas with prominent deformation of the digits. B, Gross photograph from a patient with Ollier disease showing a secondary chondrosarcoma arising in association with multiple enchondromas within the medullary cavity. The larger nodules of gray-white hyaline type cartilage have eroded through the cortex into the surrounding soft tissue. C, Microscopic image showing a secondary chondrosarcoma arising in a patient with Ollier disease. There is increased chondrocyte cellularity, and the tumor shows a permeative growth pattern that entraps preexisting bony trabeculae (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40 [C]).

Close modal

Malignant transformation has been reported to occur in up to 40% of patients. The most common malignant tumor is conventional-type chondrosarcoma (Figure 4, B and C); however, rarely patients can develop dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma.33,34  In addition, both Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome have been associated with the development of other tumor types, such as ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumors.2,35 

Metachondromatosis is an inherited autosomal dominant disease caused by loss of function mutations in the PTPN11 gene.36  Patients with metachondromatosis present early with the development of numerous enchondromas as well as osteochondromas. Unlike patients with Ollier disease or Maffucci syndrome, patients with metachondromatosis do not appear to have an increased risk of malignant transformation, though it has rarely been reported.37 

Although pathologic assessment may play a limited role in the initial diagnosis of these syndromes, as they are primarily diagnosed on clinical-radiologic grounds, it can be crucial to guide clinical management, particularly in patients for whom there is a concern for malignant transformation. When evaluating biopsies from these patients, it is important to remember that enchondromas in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome can show increased cellularity and cytologic atypia, histologically mimicking chondrosarcoma. Given the propensity for malignant transformation as well as the association with other rare nonskeletal tumor types, these patients are closely followed by imaging and screened for any signs of malignant transformation.38,39 

Chondromyxoid fibroma is a rare cartilaginous tumor (<1% of primary bone tumors)40  that was previously classified as an intermediate biologic potential (locally aggressive) tumor,1  but will be reclassified as a benign neoplasm in the upcoming WHO classification of bone tumors. Microscopically, it is characterized by lobulated chondromyxoid areas, multinucleated giant cells, and, in approximately 25% of tumors, scattered coarse calcifications. These tumors usually arise in the second to third decade of life, show a slight male predilection, and typically involve the long bones but also occasionally flat bones including the ilium, ribs, vertebral bodies, scapula, and the small bones of the foot. Patients often present with pain, which may be of long duration. The treatment is surgical with curettage or conservative resection. Local recurrence rate is 10% to 20%.1,2,4144 

Clonal rearrangements of chromosome 6 including t(6;9)(q25;q22) and inv(6)(p25q13) have been described as either an isolated genetic aberration or in concert with other karyotypic abnormalities including deletions of 6q24.25,4548  Recurrent fusions of the GRM1 gene have been implicated in the pathogenesis of chondromyxoid fibroma; upregulation of the glutamate metabotropic receptor 1 (GRM1) through promoter swapping and gene fusion events has been shown to be a specific driver event in the development of these tumors.49  DNA microarray studies comparing chondromyxoid fibroma to chondroblastoma did not show any differential gene expression in cartilage-related genes; however, higher expression levels of CD166, cyclin D1, and p16INK4A were seen in these tumors as compared to high-grade central chondrosarcoma.50 

Radiographically, chondromyxoid fibromas are expansile, lytic, radiolucent, and multilobulated, with internal septations and sharply demarcated sclerotic borders (Figure 5, A). When they arise in long bones, they are often eccentrically located. Some cases show prominent calcifications that are evident on imaging modalities, particularly computed tomography scans. Geographic bone destruction and scalloped borders can be seen as well. On MRI, chondromyxoid fibromas are hypointense on T1- and hyperintense on T2-weighted images.45 

Figure 5

A, Plain film radiograph of chondromyxoid fibroma of the ulna, showing an eccentric, expansile, radiolucent, and multilobulated lesion with internal septations and sharply demarcated borders. B, Microscopic image of chondromyxoid fibroma showing a bland-appearing population of stellate to spindled cells that are embedded within a gray chondromyxoid stroma. Focal lobular areas of chondroid tissue are present with an area of adjacent increased cellularity. A few small, irregularly shaped vessels are present within the lesion. C, Microscopic image showing a chondromyxoid fibroma with characteristic coarse purple calcifications within the chondroid tissue (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100 [B and C]).

Figure 5

A, Plain film radiograph of chondromyxoid fibroma of the ulna, showing an eccentric, expansile, radiolucent, and multilobulated lesion with internal septations and sharply demarcated borders. B, Microscopic image of chondromyxoid fibroma showing a bland-appearing population of stellate to spindled cells that are embedded within a gray chondromyxoid stroma. Focal lobular areas of chondroid tissue are present with an area of adjacent increased cellularity. A few small, irregularly shaped vessels are present within the lesion. C, Microscopic image showing a chondromyxoid fibroma with characteristic coarse purple calcifications within the chondroid tissue (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100 [B and C]).

Close modal

Grossly, chondromyxoid fibromas are solid, lobulated, and well circumscribed, with a gelatinous cut surface that may have gritty calcifications. Histologically, the tumor displays a lobulated architecture, with central areas composed of a chondromyxoid matrix with bland-appearing spindle- and stellate-shaped cells. The cells tend to become more condensed near the periphery of the lobules and are often cuffed by areas of bland round or spindle-shaped cells with osteoclast-type giant cells and prominent hemangiopericytoma-like staghorn vessels (Figure 5, B). Coarse calcifications and degenerative changes can be seen within the areas of chondromyxoid stroma (Figure 5, C).1,2  The tumor may undergo secondary cystic changes (aneurysmal bone cyst–like).

The tumors may show areas with pseudomalignant cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei, which resemble the degenerative atypia seen in benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors; mitotic activity, however, should be absent. In small core biopsies, a distinguishing feature for chondromyxoid fibroma from other cartilaginous lesions is the character of the chondroid matrix, which is usually less well formed and has a more myxoid quality than the mature hyaline matrix present in other cartilage tumors.

Immunohistochemistry is unhelpful, as the chondrocytic cells in chondromyxoid fibroma are positive for markers such as S100 protein, Sox9, and ERG, similar to other cartilaginous lesions. The peripheral myofibroblastic areas stain diffusely for smooth muscle actin, whereas desmin, h-caldesmon, and calponin show negative staining. CD34 immunohistochemical stain strongly highlights the peripherally located blood vessels.5153 

The diagnosis of chondromyxoid fibroma can be a challenge, because of its variegated morphology as well as the rarity of the lesion itself. The differential diagnosis includes chondroblastoma, enchondroma, low-grade chondrosarcoma, and the exceedingly rare chondromyxoid fibroma–like osteosarcoma.54  Given the broad differential diagnosis, careful clinical and radiologic correlation is required (Table 2).

Table 2

Useful Distinguishing Features for the Differential Diagnosis of Chondromyxoid Fibroma, Chondroblastoma, and Other Low-Grade Chondroid Lesions

Useful Distinguishing Features for the Differential Diagnosis of Chondromyxoid Fibroma, Chondroblastoma, and Other Low-Grade Chondroid Lesions
Useful Distinguishing Features for the Differential Diagnosis of Chondromyxoid Fibroma, Chondroblastoma, and Other Low-Grade Chondroid Lesions

Chondroblastoma is a rare tumor with chondrogenic differentiation and was previously classified as having intermediate biologic potential (rarely metastasizing)1 ; however, in the upcoming WHO classification, it is reclassified as benign. It typically affects young, skeletally immature individuals. Among the well-differentiated cartilaginous lesions, chondroblastoma can show the least amount of apparent cartilaginous differentiation. Chondroblastomas are more common in males and typically arise in the epiphysis of long tubular bones.2  The peak incidence is during the second decade of life. Although chondroblastoma can occur in adults, primarily in flat bones and short tubular bones of the foot, it is rare to see a chondroblastoma in patients older than 30 years.55  Chondroblastomas follow a benign course and are generally cured with curettage or ablative techniques; however, 5% to 12% of tumors locally recur.56,57 

K36M mutations of the H3F3B gene (and rarely of the H3F3A gene), which encodes for histone H3.3, have recently been described in chondroblastomas and can help distinguish these lesions among histologic mimics.58  Behjati et al59  reported the presence of histone H3.3 mutations in 73 of 77 cases (95%); the H3.3 mutations in the 73 chondroblastomas were all K36M, with 68 identified in the H3F3B gene and 5 in the H3F3A gene. A mutation-specific antibody against the H3F3B K36M mutation as found in most chondroblastomas has been shown to be diagnostically helpful in separating this lesion from other primary bone tumors.60,61 

Radiologically, chondroblastoma appears as a radiolucent lesion that shows well-defined sclerotic borders and is centered about the epiphysis (Figure 6, A and B). Scattered calcifications may be present. Chondroblastoma commonly undergoes secondary aneurysmal bone cyst–like changes and can show fluid-fluid levels on MRI. These secondary changes may cause a periosteal expansion that gives the appearance of a more aggressive lesion.2 

Figure 6

A, Plain film radiograph of chondroblastoma of the proximal tibia with a well-circumscribed lytic lesion with sclerotic margins. B, Corresponding coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal tibia shows a small circular mass with low signal intensity, vaguely lobular architecture, and well-circumscribed margins that extend to the base of the articular surface. C, Microscopic image showing a monotonous cell population with admixed multinucleated giant cells and characteristic eosinophilic matrix. D, Microscopic image showing an epithelioid cell population with eosinophilic cytoplasm, scattered reniform nuclei, and prominent nuclear folds (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×200 [C] and ×400 [D]).

Figure 6

A, Plain film radiograph of chondroblastoma of the proximal tibia with a well-circumscribed lytic lesion with sclerotic margins. B, Corresponding coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal tibia shows a small circular mass with low signal intensity, vaguely lobular architecture, and well-circumscribed margins that extend to the base of the articular surface. C, Microscopic image showing a monotonous cell population with admixed multinucleated giant cells and characteristic eosinophilic matrix. D, Microscopic image showing an epithelioid cell population with eosinophilic cytoplasm, scattered reniform nuclei, and prominent nuclear folds (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×200 [C] and ×400 [D]).

Close modal

Grossly, chondroblastoma is well circumscribed, red to white, and gritty and may have areas of hemorrhage and cystic degeneration. Histologically, it is composed of an admixture of mononuclear chondroblastic cells and multinucleated osteoclast-type giant cells, with associated calcifications and deposition of poorly formed eosinophilic chondroid matrix.1,2  The mononuclear neoplastic cells tend to grow in sheets and have eccentric eosinophilic cytoplasm with well-demarcated cell borders; the nuclei frequently have prominent nuclear grooves (coffee bean–like) (Figure 6, C and D). The calcifications are characteristically present in a fine reticular pattern (“chicken-wire” calcifications) surrounding individual mononuclear cells that may undergo necrosis. Rare mitotic figures may be seen. Immunohistochemistry for chondroblastoma shows expression of cartilaginous markers such as S100 and Sox9, as well as variable expression of keratin and p63 and scattered strong membranous DOG1 staining.52,62,63 

Usually, the diagnosis of chondroblastoma is straightforward, with the differential diagnosis including other giant cell–rich tumors such as giant cell tumor of bone, aneurysmal bone cyst, chondromyxoid fibroma, and rarely chondroblastoma-like osteosarcoma. Radiologic and pathologic correlation can be particularly helpful in distinguishing chondroblastoma-like osteosarcoma, as it shows aggressive radiologic and pathologic features such as cortical destruction, infiltration, and focal malignant osteoid deposition.64  Furthermore, immunohistochemistry for the H3F3B K36M mutation may be helpful in differentiating chondroblastoma from other giant cell–rich lesions and cartilage-producing tumors.

Chondrosarcoma is defined as a malignant cartilage matrix-producing tumor and comprises a heterogenous family of tumors, which includes conventional chondrosarcoma, secondary chondrosarcoma, periosteal chondrosarcoma, clear cell chondrosarcoma, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma.1  For simplicity, this review will focus on the differential diagnosis between benign cartilaginous lesions and low-grade conventional or secondary chondrosarcoma. Conventional chondrosarcoma is a primary chondrosarcoma, which arises in the absence of a precursor lesion, whereas secondary chondrosarcoma is associated with a preexisting bone tumor, such as enchondroma or osteochondroma.2 

Since the fourth edition of the WHO classification1  in 2013, the term atypical cartilaginous tumor has emerged as a new concept that is used to denote a low-grade cartilaginous neoplasm that is microscopically identical to a grade 1 chondrosarcoma and is located in the appendicular skeleton. The concept of atypical cartilaginous tumor is akin to the concept of atypical lipomatous tumor used to denote peripheral adipocytic tumors that are histologically identical to well-differentiated liposarcoma in deep-seated locations. As atypical cartilaginous tumors/low-grade chondrosarcoma are clinically relatively indolent as compared to other types of chondrosarcomas, they can be treated by surgical curettage for sufficient local control, rather than other more extensive/morbid procedures as were done in the past. The term atypical cartilaginous tumor should be used for tumors of the appendicular skeleton, whereas the term chondrosarcoma grade 1 should be reserved for tumors of the axial skeleton, including the pelvis, scapula, and base of skull.

Primary central chondrosarcoma accounts for approximately 20% of malignant bone tumors and is the most common malignant cartilage-forming tumor of bone.65  Primary central chondrosarcoma makes up approximately 90% of all chondrosarcomas, with the other 10% being of the several histologic variants mentioned above. Primary central chondrosarcoma usually develops during the fifth to seventh decade of life and shows a slight male predominance. The tumors can arise in any bone that forms by endochondral ossification, with the most common locations being the pelvis, followed by the proximal and distal femur, proximal humerus, and ribs. In rare cases, primary chondrosarcomas can arise in the small bones of the hands and feet.2  Patients typically present with pain and an enlarging mass. Radiographically, the tumors are lytic with scattered radiodensities and irregular spiculations, which can often show cortical changes including thinning and scalloping (Figure 7, A and B). Magnetic resonance imaging can be helpful in identifying the extent of the tumor.66,67  The histologic grading of chondrosarcoma is the most important prognostic factor; grade 1 lesions act in a locally aggressive manner, with a 5-year survival of ∼80% and a very low (if any) rate of metastasis. The treatment for tumors in the appendicular skeleton is by surgical curettage; however, for tumors located in some deep-seated sites such as the pelvis, wide resection is needed, as recurrences are common and can be difficult to control.2,68,69 

Figure 7

A, Plain film radiograph shows a central chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. There is a mixed lytic and sclerotic lesion of the right ileum with expansion of the bone and irregular borders. B, Corresponding coronal computed tomography image demonstrates the expansive lesion with thinning of the cortex and focal area of central mineralization. C, Gross photograph of the low-grade chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. There is a lobulated, gray-white, glistening tumor located within the medullary space with focal thinning of the adjacent cortical bone. D, Microscopic image showing the infiltrative appearance of a low-grade chondrosarcoma with encasement of preexisting bony trabeculae and focal extension through the cortex into the surrounding soft tissue (bottom of image) (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20 [D]).

Figure 7

A, Plain film radiograph shows a central chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. There is a mixed lytic and sclerotic lesion of the right ileum with expansion of the bone and irregular borders. B, Corresponding coronal computed tomography image demonstrates the expansive lesion with thinning of the cortex and focal area of central mineralization. C, Gross photograph of the low-grade chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. There is a lobulated, gray-white, glistening tumor located within the medullary space with focal thinning of the adjacent cortical bone. D, Microscopic image showing the infiltrative appearance of a low-grade chondrosarcoma with encasement of preexisting bony trabeculae and focal extension through the cortex into the surrounding soft tissue (bottom of image) (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20 [D]).

Close modal

Secondary chondrosarcoma is subdivided into secondary central chondrosarcoma (which arises from an enchondroma) and secondary peripheral chondrosarcoma (which arises from the cartilaginous cap of an osteochondroma).1,2  Secondary chondrosarcomas have a bimodal age distribution, as they can arise at an earlier age in syndromic patients with Ollier disease, Maffucci syndrome, or MHE, but can also occur later.2  As mentioned previously, syndromic patients have a higher incidence of malignant transformation, as noted in up to 40% in patients with Ollier disease or Maffucci syndrome and up to 25% of patients with MHE.28,32  Radiologically, secondary chondrosarcoma displays similar characteristics to primary chondrosarcoma; furthermore, the primary underlying associated lesion may be apparent radiographically or histologically.2,70  The tumors are usually low grade, although rarely higher-grade chondrosarcomas (grades 2 and 3) and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma can arise in association with an underlying benign cartilage lesion. Secondary chondrosarcomas are treated in the same fashion as primary chondrosarcomas; when the lesions are low grade, they have a very good prognosis.

Genetically, chondrosarcomas of primary and secondary types are characterized by mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase isoforms IDH1 and IDH2, which have been detected in approximately 50% to 60% of primary and secondary central chondrosarcomas.71,72  Peripheral chondrosarcomas appear to show similar EXT1 and EXT2 aberrations to solitary and hereditary osteochondromas.73  The genetic underpinnings mediating the transformation from benign cartilaginous lesions to malignant lesions are not entirely elucidated; however, complex karyotypic abnormalities, mutations in TP53, and defects in the RB1 pathway have been described in these lesions as they transform into higher-grade chondrosarcomas.74 

Grossly, these tumors are often large and composed of gray, glistening lobules of cartilage. They often fill the medullary cavity, showing changes in the overlying cortical bone such as scalloping or thinning and extension into adjacent soft tissue (Figure 7, C). In secondary lesions arising from enchondroma, there may be a transition from the well-formed cartilage representing the enchondroma to a more ill-defined gelatinous area representing the chondrosarcoma.2  Lesions arising from the cartilaginous cap of an osteochondroma may show increased thickness of the cartilaginous cap with irregular borders and soft tissue extension, features that can be apparent radiographically. In addition, evaluation of contrast-enhancement characteristics on MRI has been used to aid distinction between osteochondroma and its transformed malignant counterpart.66 

Microscopically, both primary and secondary low-grade chondrosarcomas are characterized by a neoplastic chondrocyte population that is embedded within a cartilaginous matrix. This matrix may be of the myxoid or hyaline type. The neoplastic chondrocytes vary in size, although they often appear bland in low-grade chondrosarcoma and show a lower cellularity than grades 2 and 3 chondrosarcoma. The nuclei of the cells are usually small and dark with fine chromatin. Mitotic activity is limited for low-grade tumors. Extension into the surrounding soft tissue may be seen, and infiltration of preexisting bony trabeculae is a helpful histologic feature for identifying the malignancy (Figure 7, D).2 

The diagnostic distinction of low-grade chondrosarcomas from other cartilaginous lesions in this review requires strict clinical and radiologic correlation combined with histologic examination, with the most important histologic feature being infiltration and encasement of preexisting trabecular bone. Distinction between secondary chondrosarcoma and a benign cartilage lesion can nonetheless be problematic and challenging in some patients, in which a multidisciplinary approach is required for optimal management.

1
Fletcher
CDM
,
Bridge
JA
,
Hogendoorn
PCW
,
Mertens
F
,
eds
.
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone
.
Lyon, France
:
International Agency for Research on Cancer Press;
2013
.
2
Nielsen
GP
,
Rosenberg
AE
,
Deshpande
V
,
Hornicek
FJ
,
Kattapuram
SV
,
Rosenthal
DI
.
Diagnostic Pathology: Bone. 2nd ed
.
Philadelphia, PA
:
Elsevier;
2017
.
3
de Andrea
CE
,
Kroon
HM
,
Wolterbeek
R
, et al.
Interobserver reliability in the histopathological diagnosis of cartilaginous tumors in patients with multiple osteochondromas
.
Mod Pathol
.
2012
;
25
(
9
):
1275
1283
.
4
Eefting
D
,
Schrage
YM
,
Geirnaerdt
MJA
, et al.
Assessment of interobserver variability and histologic parameters to improve reliability in classification and grading of central cartilaginous tumors
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2009
;
33
(
1
):
50
57
.
5
de Andrea
CE
,
San-Julian
M
,
Bovée
JV
.
Integrating morphology and genetics in the diagnosis of cartilage tumors
.
Surg Pathol Clin
.
2017
;
10
(
3
):
537
552
.
6
Romeo
S
,
Hogendoorn
PCW
,
Dei Tos
AP
.
Benign cartilaginous tumors of bone: from morphology to somatic and germ-line genetics
.
Adv Anat Pathol
.
2009
;
16
(
5
):
307
315
.
7
Brien
EW
,
Mirra
JM
,
Luck
JV
.
Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology, II: juxtacortical cartilage tumors
.
Skeletal Radiol
.
1999
;
28
(
1
):
1
20
.
8
Hameetman
L
,
Szuhai
K
,
Yavas
A
, et al.
The role of EXT1 in nonhereditary osteochondroma: identification of homozygous deletions
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
.
2007
;
99
(
5
):
396
406
.
9
Bovée
JV
.
Multiple osteochondromas
.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
.
2008
;
3
(
1
):
3
.
10
Kumar
CY
,
Shervegar
S
,
Gadi
D
,
Rahul
P.
Solitary sessile osteochondroma of scapula, a rare case report
.
J Clin Diagn Res
.
2014
;
8
(
3
):
174
175
.
11
Kitsoulis
P
,
Galani
V
,
Stefanaki
K
, et al.
Osteochondromas: review of the clinical, radiological and pathological features
.
In Vivo
.
2008
;
22
(
5
):
633
646
.
12
Bernard
SA
,
Murphey
MD
,
Flemming
DJ
,
Kransdorf
MJ
.
Improved differentiation of benign osteochondromas from secondary chondrosarcomas with standardized measurement of cartilage cap at CT and MR imaging
.
Radiology
.
2010
;
255
(
3
):
857
865
.
13
Michelsen
H
,
Abramovici
L
,
Steiner
G
,
Posner
MA
.
Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora's lesion) in the hand
.
J Hand Surg Am
.
2004
;
29
(
3
):
520
525
.
14
Ruengwanichayakun
P
,
Gambarotti
M
,
Frisoni
T
, et al.
PAROSTEAL osteosarcoma: a monocentric retrospective analysis of 195 patients
.
Hum Pathol
.
2019
;
91
:
11
18
.
15
Gholamrezanezhad
A
,
Basques
K
,
Kosmas
C.
Peering beneath the surface: juxtacortical tumors of bone (part I)
.
Clin Imaging
.
2018
;
51
:
1
11
.
16
Zheng
L
,
Zhang
HZ
,
Huang
J
,
Tang
J
,
Liu
L
,
Jiang
ZM
.
Clinicopathologic features of osteochondroma with malignant transformation
.
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi
.
2009
;
38
(
9
):
609
613
.
17
de Souza
AMG
,
Bispo Júnior RZ
.
Osteochondroma: ignore or investigate? Rev Bras Ortop
.
2014
;
49
(
6
):
555
564
.
18
Long
X
,
Li
Z
,
Huang
Y
, et al.
Identification of pathogenic mutations in 6 Chinese families with multiple exostoses by whole-exome sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
.
2019
;
98
(
20
):
e15692
.
19
Wicklund
CL
,
Pauli
RM
,
Johnson
D
,
Hecht
JT
.
Natural history study of hereditary multiple exostoses
.
Am J Med Genet
.
1995
;
55
(
1
):
43
46
.
20
Legeai-Mallet
L
,
Munnich
A
,
Maroteaux
P
,
Le Merrer
M.
Incomplete penetrance and expressivity skewing in hereditary multiple exostoses
.
Clin Genet
.
1997
;
52
(
1
):
12
16
.
21
Scheitza
P
,
Uhl
M
,
Hauschild
O
, et al.
Interobserver variability in the differential diagnosis of benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions
.
Rofo
.
2016
;
188
(
5
):
479
487
.
22
Donthineni
R
,
Ofluoglu
O.
Solitary enchondromas of long bones: pattern of referral and outcome
.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc
.
2010
;
44
(
5
):
397
402
.
23
Riester
S
,
Ramaesch
R
,
Wenger
D
,
van Wijnen
A
,
Kakar
S.
Predicting fracture risk for enchondroma of the hand
.
Hand (N Y)
.
2016
;
11
(
2
):
206
210
.
24
Bell
WC
,
Klein
MJ
,
Pitt
MJ
,
Siegal
GP
.
Molecular pathology of chondroid neoplasms, part 1: benign lesions
.
Skeletal Radiol
.
2006
;
35
(
11
):
805
813
.
25
Sjögren
H
,
Orndal
C
,
Tingby
O
,
Meis-Kindblom
JM
,
Kindblom
LG
,
Stenman
G.
Cytogenetic and spectral karyotype analyses of benign and malignant cartilage tumours
.
Int J Oncol
.
2004
;
24
(
6
):
1385
1391
.
26
Buddingh
EP
,
Naumann
S
,
Nelson
M
,
Neffa
JR
,
Birch
N
,
Bridge
JA
.
Cytogenetic findings in benign cartilaginous neoplasms
.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
.
2003
;
141
(
2
):
164
168
.
27
Dal Cin
P
,
Qi
H
,
Sciot
R
,
Van den Berghe
H.
Involvement of chromosomes 6 and 11 in a soft tissue chondroma
.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
.
1997
;
93
(
2
):
177
178
.
28
Mazabraud
A.
Osteogenic exostosis (osteochondroma), multiple exostoses, subungual exostosis, metachondromatosis
.
In
:
Mazabraud
A.
Pathology of Bone Tumours
.
Paris, France
:
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
;
1998
:
63
75
.
29
Silve
C
,
Jüppner
H.
Ollier disease
.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
.
2006
;
1
:
37
.
30
Fanburg
JC
,
Meis-Kindblom
JM
,
Rosenberg
AE
.
Multiple enchondromas associated with spindle-cell hemangioendotheliomas: an overlooked variant of Maffucci's syndrome
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1995
;
19
(
9
):
1029
1038
.
31
Pansuriya
TC
,
van Eijk
R
,
d'Adamo
P
, et al.
Somatic mosaic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are associated with enchondroma and spindle cell hemangioma in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome
.
Nat Genet
.
2011
;
43
(
12
):
1256
1261
.
32
Amary
MF
,
Damato
S
,
Halai
D
, et al.
Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are caused by somatic mosaic mutations of IDH1 and IDH2
.
Nat Genet
.
2011
;
43
(
12
):
1262
1265
.
33
Verdegaal
SHM
,
Bovée
JV
,
Pansuriya
TC
, et al.
Incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of chondrosarcoma in patients with Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome: an international multicenter study of 161 patients
.
Oncologist
.
2011
;
16
(
12
):
1771
1779
.
34
Herget
GW
,
Strohm
P
,
Rottenburger
C
, et al.
Insights into enchondroma, enchondromatosis and the risk of secondary chondrosarcoma: review of the literature with an emphasis on the clinical behaviour, radiology, malignant transformation and the follow up
.
Neoplasma
.
2014
;
61
(
4
):
365
378
.
35
Burgetova
A
,
Matejovsky
Z
,
Zikan
M
, et al.
The association of enchondromatosis with malignant transformed chondrosarcoma and ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor (Ollier disease)
.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
.
2017
;
56
(
2
):
253
257
.
36
Yang
W
,
Wang
J
,
Moore
DC
, et al.
Ptpn11 deletion in a novel progenitor causes metachondromatosis by inducing hedgehog signaling
.
Nature
.
2013
;
499
(
7459
):
491
495
.
37
Jamshidi
K
,
Shooshtarizadeh
T
,
Bahrabadi
M.
Chondrosarcoma in metachondromatosis: a rare case report
.
Acta Med Iran
.
2017
;
55
(
12
):
793
799
.
38
Vaz
RM
,
Turner
C.
Ollier disease (enchondromatosis) associated with ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor and precocious pseudopuberty
.
J Pediatr
.
1986
;
108
(
6
):
945
947
.
39
Kenny
SL
,
Patel
K
,
Humphries
A
,
Davis
M
,
Flanagan
AM
,
McCluggage
WG
.
Ovarian cellular fibroma harbouring an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation in a patient with Ollier disease: evidence for a causal relationship
.
Histopathology
.
2013
;
62
(
4
):
667
670
.
40
Bernd
L
,
Ewerbeck
V
,
Mau
H
,
Cotta
H.
Characteristics of chondromyxoid fibroma: are malignant courses possible? Presentation of personal cases and review of the literature
.
Unfallchirurg
.
1994
;
97
(
6
):
332
335
.
41
Engels
C
,
Priemel
M
,
Möller
G
,
Werner
M
,
Delling
G.
Chondromyxoid fibroma: morphological variations, site, incidence, radiologic criteria and differential diagnosis
.
Pathologe
.
1999
;
20
(
4
):
224
229
.
42
Sono
T
,
Ware
AD
,
McCarthy
EF
,
James
AW
.
Chondromyxoid fibroma of the pelvis: institutional case series with a focus on distinctive features
.
Int J Surg Pathol
.
2019
;
27
(
4
):
352
359
.
43
Romeo
S
,
Bovée
JV
,
Grogan
SP
, et al.
Chondromyxoid fibroma resembles in vitro chondrogenesis, but differs in expression of signaling molecules
.
J Pathol
.
2005
;
206
(
2
):
135
142
.
44
Gherlinzoni
F
,
Rock
M
,
Picci
P.
Chondromyxoid fibroma: the experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
.
1983
;
65
(
2
):
198
204
.
45
Wu
CT
,
Inwards
CY
,
O'Laughlin
S
,
Rock
MG
,
Beabout
JW
,
Unni
KK
.
Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: a clinicopathologic review of 278 cases
.
Hum Pathol
.
1998
;
29
(
5
):
438
446
.
46
Granter
SR
,
Renshaw
AA
,
Kozakewich
HP
,
Fletcher
JA
.
The pericentromeric inversion, inv (6)(p25q13), is a novel diagnostic marker in chondromyxoid fibroma
.
Mod Pathol
.
1998
;
11
(
11
):
1071
1074
.
47
Safar
A
,
Nelson
M
,
Neff
JR
, et al.
Recurrent anomalies of 6q25 in chondromyxoid fibroma
.
Hum Pathol
.
2000
;
31
(
3
):
306
311
.
48
Halbert
AR
,
Harrison
WR
,
Hicks
MJ
,
Davino
N
,
Cooley
LD
.
Cytogenetic analysis of a scapular chondromyxoid fibroma
.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
.
1998
;
104
(
1
):
52
56
.
49
Nord
KH
,
Lilljebjörn
H
,
Vezzi
F
, et al.
GRM1 is upregulated through gene fusion and promoter swapping in chondromyxoid fibroma
.
Nat Genet
.
2014
;
46
(
5
):
474
477
.
50
Romeo
S
,
Oosting
J
,
Rozeman
LB
, et al.
The role of noncartilage-specific molecules in differentiation of cartilaginous tumors: lessons from chondroblastoma and chondromyxoid fibroma
.
Cancer
.
2007
;
110
(
2
):
385
394
.
51
Nielsen
GP
,
Keel
SB
,
Dickersin
GR
,
Selig
MK
,
Bhan
AK
,
Rosenberg
AE
.
Chondromyxoid fibroma: a tumor showing myofibroblastic, myochondroblastic, and chondrocytic differentiation
.
Mod Pathol
.
1999
;
12
(
5
):
514
517
.
52
Konishi
E
,
Nakashima
Y
,
Iwasa
Y
,
Nakao
R
,
Yanagisawa
A.
Immunohistochemical analysis for Sox9 reveals the cartilaginous character of chondroblastoma and chondromyxoid fibroma of the bone
.
Hum Pathol
.
2010
;
41
(
2
):
208
213
.
53
Romeo
S
,
Eyden
B
,
Prins
FA
,
Briaire-de Bruijn
IH
,
Taminiau
AH
,
Hogendoorn
PCW
.
TGF-beta1 drives partial myofibroblastic differentiation in chondromyxoid fibroma of bone
.
J Pathol
.
2008
;
208
(
1
):
26
34
.
54
Chow
LT
,
Lin
J
,
Yip
KM
, et al.
Chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma: a distinct variant of low-grade osteosarcoma
.
Histopathology
.
1996
;
29
(
5
):
429
436
.
55
Angelini
A
,
Hassani
M
,
Mavrogenis
AF
, et al.
Chondroblastoma in adult age
.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
.
2017
;
27
(
6
):
843
849
.
56
Xie
C
,
Jeys
L
,
James
SL
.
Radiofrequency ablation of chondroblastoma: long-term clinical and imaging outcomes
.
Eur Radiol
.
2015
;
25
(
4
):
1127
1134
.
57
Ebeid
WA
,
Hasan
BZ
,
Badr
IT
,
Mesregah
MK
.
Functional and oncological outcome after treatment of chondroblastoma with intralesional curettage
.
J Pediatr Orthop
.
2019
;
39
(
4
):
312
317
.
58
Kervarrec
T
,
Collin
C
,
Larousserie
F
, et al.
H3F3 mutation status of giant cell tumors of the bone, chondroblastomas and their mimics: a combined high resolution melting and pyrosequencing approach
.
Mod Pathol
.
2017
;
30
(
3
):
393
406
.
59
Behjati
S
,
Tarpey
PS
,
Presneau
N
, et al.
Distinct H3F3A and H3F3B driver mutations define chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor of bone
.
Nat Genet
.
2013
;
45
(
12
):
1479
1482
.
60
Cleven
AHG
,
Höcker
S
,
Briaire-de Bruijn
I
,
Szuhai
K
,
Cleton-Jansen
AM
,
Bovée
JV
.
Mutation analysis of H3F3A and H3F3B as a diagnostic tool for giant cell tumor of bone and chondroblastoma
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2015
;
39
(
11
):
1576
1583
.
61
Amary
MF
,
Berisha
F
,
Mozela
R
, et al.
The H3F3 K36M mutant antibody is a sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of chondroblastoma
.
Histopathology
.
2016
;
69
(
1
):
121
127
.
62
de la Roza
G.
p63 expression in giant-cell containing lesions of bone and soft tissue
.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
.
2011
;
135
(
6
):
776
779
.
63
Akpalo
H
,
Lange
C
,
Zustin
J.
Discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumour 1 (DOG1): a useful immunohistochemical marker for diagnosing chondroblastoma
.
Histopathology
.
2012
;
60
(
7
):
1099
1106
.
64
Aycan
OE
,
Vanel
D
,
Righi
A
,
Arikan
Y
,
Manfrini
M.
Chondroblastoma-like osteosarcoma: a case report and review
.
Skeletal Radiol
.
2015
;
44
(
6
):
869
873
.
65
Unni
KK
,
Inwards
CY
.
Chondrosarcoma (primary, secondary, dedifferentiated, and clear cell)
.
In
:
Dahlin's Bone Tumors: General Aspects and Data on 10,165 Cases. 6th ed
.
Philadelphia, PA
:
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;
2009
:
73
110
.
66
Vanel
D
,
Kreshak
J
,
Larousserie
F
, et al.
Enchondroma vs. chondrosarcoma: a simple, easy-to-use, new magnetic resonance sign
.
Eur J Radiol
.
2013
;
82
(
12
):
2154
2160
.
67
Geirnaerdt
JA
,
Hogendoorn
PC
,
Bloem
JL
,
Taminiau
AH
,
van der Woude
HJ
.
Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging
.
Radiology
.
2000
;
214
(
2
):
539
546
.
68
Gelderblom
H
,
Hogendoorn
PC
,
Dijkstra
SD
, et al.
The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma
.
Oncologist
.
2008
;
13
(
3
):
320
329
.
69
Andreou
D
,
Gilg
MM
,
Gosheger
G
, et al.
Metastatic potential of grade I chondrosarcoma of bone: results of a multi-institutional study
.
Ann Surg Oncol
.
2016
;
23
(
1
):
120
125
.
70
Horvai
A
,
Link
T.
Secondary chondrosarcoma
.
In
:
Horvai
A
,
Link
T
.
Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology
.
Philadelphia, PA
:
Saunders
;
2011
:
101
102
.
High-Yield Pathology
.
71
Amary
MF
,
Bacsi
K
,
Maggiani
F
, et al.
IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours
.
J Pathol
.
2011
;
224
(
3
):
334
343
.
72
Lugowska
I
,
Teterycz
P
,
Mikula
M
, et al.
IDH1/2 mutations predict shorter survival in chondrosarcoma
.
J Cancer
.
2018
;
9
(
6
):
998
1005
.
73
de Andrea
C
,
Wiweger
M
,
Bovée
JM
,
Romeo
S
,
Hogendoorn
P.
Peripheral chondrosarcoma progression is associated with increased type X collagen and vascularization
.
Virchows Arch
.
2012
;
460
(
1
):
95
102
.
74
Totoki
Y
,
Yoshida
A
,
Hosoda
F
, et al.
Unique mutation portraits and frequent COL2A1 gene alteration in chondrosarcoma
.
Genome Res
.
2014
;
24
(
9
):
1411
1420
.

Author notes

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Presented in part at the 11th Annual Midwestern Conference: Update Course in Surgical Pathology; September 14–16, 2018; Milwaukee, Wisconsin.