Context.—

Chordomas are uncommon malignant neoplasms with notochordal differentiation encountered by neuropathologists, bone/soft tissue pathologists, and general surgical pathologists. These lesions most commonly arise in the axial skeleton. Optimal therapy typically involves complete surgical resection, which is often technically difficult owing to the anatomic location, leading to a high rate of recurrence. Lesions have been generally resistant to radiation and chemotherapy; however, experimental studies involving targeted therapy and immunotherapy are currently underway.

Objective.—

To summarize the clinical and pathologic findings of the various types of chordoma (conventional chordoma, dedifferentiated chordoma, and poorly differentiated chordoma), the differential diagnosis, and recent advances in molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic modalities that are reliant on accurate diagnosis.

Data Sources.—

Literature review based on PubMed searches containing the term “chordoma” that address novel targeted and immunomodulatory therapeutic modalities; ongoing clinical trials involved in treating chordoma with novel therapeutic modalities identified through the Chordoma Foundation and ClinicalTrials.gov; and the authors' practice experience combined with various authoritative texts concerning the subject.

Conclusions.—

Chordoma is a clinically and histologically unique malignant neoplasm, and numerous diagnostic considerations must be excluded to establish the correct diagnosis. Treatment options have largely been centered on surgical excision with marginal results; however, novel therapeutic options including targeted therapy and immunotherapy are promising means to improve prognosis.

The history of notochordal lesions has its origin in 1846, when Virchow observed a small slimy excrescence on the surface of the clivus. He published these findings using the term ecchondrosis physaliphora spheno-occipitalis in 1857.1,2  Luschka3  also independently described a similar structure in 1856. As the name implies, at that time it was erroneously believed that the lesion originated from cartilage. The true notochordal nature was pointed out by Müller in 1858, but his theory was disputed until 1895 when it was proved by Ribbert through convincing animal experiments.2,4,5  In 1894 Ribbert suggested using the term chordoma, which has been used ever since.58 

Today, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes 3 distinct types of chordoma: conventional chordoma, dedifferentiated chordoma, and poorly differentiated chordoma.9  All 3 tumor types are malignant, with a high rate of local recurrence and metastasis. The metastatic rate approaches 40% in noncranial cases of chordoma,9  with the highest rates and the worst prognosis in the dedifferentiated chordoma type.911 

The common axial skeletal location of chordoma often results in incomplete surgical resection. Attempts at treatment with radiation, proton therapy, and/or conventional chemotherapy have shown limited efficacy, including limited success with intratumoral chemotherapy.12  Recent and ongoing studies have improved our understanding of the molecular abnormalities in chordoma, leading to novel clinical trials.1317 

Chordomas are uncommon malignant neoplasms (0.8 cases per 1 million population/year),9,12,18  with a rate much lower than osteosarcoma (1.7–4.4 cases per 1 million population/year depending on the age group9), Ewing sarcoma (∼3 cases per 1 million population/year9,19), and chondrosarcoma (2.9–8.8 cases per 1 million population/year9,20).

Chordomas may present at any age, but most arise in patients between 40 and 60 years of age; less than 5% of cases occur before the age of 20 years, and these lesions are usually skull based.21  Most chordomas (~95%) are intraosseous tumors involving the axial skeleton, with the base of the skull/clivus, vertebral bodies, and sacrococcygeal bones affected in roughly equal proportions.9,18,22,23  There appears to be a male predominance (2:1) in sacrococcygeal and vertebral body cases, but no sex difference in tumors involving the skull base.24  Rare cases may involve the appendicular skeleton or arise in the soft tissue; the term chordoma periphericum is used in this latter situation. These soft tissue chordomas are histologically and immunophenotypically identical to osseous lesions and have a similar metastatic rate.25 

Clinical presentation depends on the lesion's anatomic location. Skull-based chordomas often present with headache, neck pain, and cranial nerve palsies, whereas lesions of the mobile spine and sacrum typically result in chronic back pain or urinary/bowel dysfunction due to nerve root compression.9 

Computed tomography imaging usually demonstrates a midline, expansile, destructive lobulated mass that invades the adjacent tissues, with lytic bone destruction and soft tissue extension.26  Calcifications within the lesion typically represent entrapped fragments of native bone, not matrix mineralization.27  On T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) chordomas show a predominantly isointense signal relative to muscle with focal areas of hyperintensity (Figure 1, A).26,28  High signal intensity is present on T2-weighted MRI due to the lesion's myxoid matrix, and a lobular appearance may be seen due to septa of low signal intensity (Figure 1, B).12,27  Chordomas characteristically show moderate to marked gadolinium contrast enhancement with honeycomb appearance,26,29  have isointense or intermediate signal on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, and have only limited radioisotope uptake on bone scans.27,30 

Figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and gross appearance of a thoracic chordoma. A, T1-weighted MRI showing a hypointense to isointense thoracic mass. B, The tumor is hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI. C, Gross appearance of same thoracic chordoma shown in (A) and (B). D, Cross section after fixation showing bone invasion and soft tissue invasion.

Figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and gross appearance of a thoracic chordoma. A, T1-weighted MRI showing a hypointense to isointense thoracic mass. B, The tumor is hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI. C, Gross appearance of same thoracic chordoma shown in (A) and (B). D, Cross section after fixation showing bone invasion and soft tissue invasion.

Close modal

Notochord Development and Tumor Formation

Chordomas have notochordal differentiation; therefore, understanding notochord development is helpful in understanding tumor characteristics. Animals from the phylum Chordata possess a notochord during embryologic development.31  The notochord is a rodlike axial structure of mesenchymal origin that serves as the primitive axial skeleton and has an important role in structural support and patterning of ectodermal and mesodermal tissues, including the neural tube and somitic derivatives.32,33  The notochord is composed of notochordal cells, with large intracytoplasmic vacuoles, surrounded by an acellular notochord sheath rich in collagens, laminins, and proteoglycans, which contributes to its mechanical properties.33,34  The mesenchyme around the notochord undergoes segmentation and condensation to form future vertebral bodies.35  The notochord slowly disappears at the levels of vertebral body formation, but notochordal cells are retained within the developing nucleus pulposus. After birth, notochordal cells in the nucleus pulposus are gradually replaced by small cartilage-like nucleus pulposus cells, a process usually complete by early adulthood.34,36,37  Notochordal remnants within the vertebral bodies have been reported in many species, including humans, and it has been suggested that residual dormant notochordal cells may be the source of notochordal rests and tumors.32,3740  In addition, persistent segments of the notochord have been reported in a few patients.41  Conversely, soft tissue chordomas do not arise in regions of notochord formation, and notochordal remnants have not been found associated with them, thus questioning whether notochordal remnants are the precursor for notochordal tumor development.25 

Gross Pathology

Grossly, chordoma is an expansile, lobulated intraosseous mass that permeates the bony cortex and invades the adjacent tissues (Figure 1, C and D). Lesions are variable in size, ranging from 4 to 22 cm in one study,42  and have a gelatinous tan-grey cut surface (Figure 1, D).9 

Histopathology

Currently the WHO histologically defines 3 types of chordoma: conventional chordoma, dedifferentiated chordoma, and poorly differentiated chordoma; chordoid chordoma is considered a subtype of conventional chordoma.9 

Chordomas demonstrate an infiltrative, lobulated low-power appearance, with lobules separated by fibrous bands (Figure 2, A). Within the lobules reside short chords, nests, and single large epithelioid cells with clear to light eosinophilic cytoplasm in an abundant myxoid matrix (Figure 2, B; Figure 3, A and B); in some areas lesional cells may become sheeted. Tumor cell nuclear features are often heterogeneous throughout the neoplasm, with areas containing low-grade–appearing nuclei and other areas with high-grade pleomorphic to spindled nuclei. Nuclear pseudoinclusions may be present, and large cells with bubbly clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm (physaliphorous cells) are characteristic (Figure 2, B). Necrosis is often present and may be extensive. In most cases mitotic figures are readily identifiable, particularly in high-grade–appearing areas (see Figure 3, B).9 

Figure 2

Conventional chordoma, histology. A, Chordoma demonstrates a lobulated architecture on low-power examination. Lobules consist of trabeculae, nests, and sheets of tumor cells within a myxoid matrix. B, High-power demonstrates cells with clear, bubbly cytoplasm (physaliphorous cells), many of which demonstrate nucleoli (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Figure 2

Conventional chordoma, histology. A, Chordoma demonstrates a lobulated architecture on low-power examination. Lobules consist of trabeculae, nests, and sheets of tumor cells within a myxoid matrix. B, High-power demonstrates cells with clear, bubbly cytoplasm (physaliphorous cells), many of which demonstrate nucleoli (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Close modal
Figure 3

Conventional chordoma, histology. A, Chordoma infiltrates and destroys the native bone. B, Mitoses (see arrow) are often readily apparent (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Figure 3

Conventional chordoma, histology. A, Chordoma infiltrates and destroys the native bone. B, Mitoses (see arrow) are often readily apparent (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×40 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Close modal

Chondroid chordoma, a variant of conventional chordoma, contains areas in which the matrix has the appearance of hyaline cartilage. This may be focally identified or diffusely present throughout the lesion. Nearly all cases of chondroid chordoma arise in the base of the skull (Figure 4, A and B).43 

Figure 4

Conventional chordoma (chondroid subtype) histology. A and B, This case of chondroid chordoma arose in the clivus. Notice chondroid areas with a hyaline cartilage matrix (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×200 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Figure 4

Conventional chordoma (chondroid subtype) histology. A and B, This case of chondroid chordoma arose in the clivus. Notice chondroid areas with a hyaline cartilage matrix (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×200 [A] and ×400 [B]).

Close modal

Dedifferentiated chordoma is a biphasic neoplasm with 2 distinct components: a conventional chordoma component and a high-grade sarcoma component (Figure 5, A through C). The high-grade sarcomatous component typically has the appearance of a high-grade undifferentiated spindle cell to pleomorphic sarcoma or a high-grade osteosarcoma.9  There is usually an abrupt transition between the 2 components, but they may be intermixed.9  A few studies have found TP53 mutations in the dedifferentiated component, suggesting a role for aberrant p53 inactivation in chordoma dedifferentiation.44  The dedifferentiated component is more commonly diagnosed post radiotherapy and in recurrent chordomas after surgical resection, but de novo cases with dedifferentiated chordoma diagnosed on primary excision have been reported.45,46  Both the conventional chordoma and high-grade sarcomatous components should be present for diagnosis, but some cases with only the sarcomatous component have been reported post radiotherapy at a site of the previously treated conventional chordoma.47 

Figure 5

Dedifferentiated chordoma histology. A, This case of a de novo dedifferentiated chordoma contains a conventional chordoma component (left side of image). B, Brachyury immunohistochemical stain is positive in the conventional chordoma component but is lost in the dedifferentiated component. C, Higher-power view of the high-grade spindle cell component (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×100 [A] and ×400 [C]; original magnification ×100 [B]).

Figure 5

Dedifferentiated chordoma histology. A, This case of a de novo dedifferentiated chordoma contains a conventional chordoma component (left side of image). B, Brachyury immunohistochemical stain is positive in the conventional chordoma component but is lost in the dedifferentiated component. C, Higher-power view of the high-grade spindle cell component (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×100 [A] and ×400 [C]; original magnification ×100 [B]).

Close modal

Poorly differentiated chordoma is a rare type of chordoma (∼60 cases in the English language literature) that was included as a distinct entity in the most recent (5th) edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone.9  These lesions are seen in children and young adults, with a slight (∼2-fold) female predominance, and most commonly involve the skull base (clivus) or cervical spine, with only rare cases reported in the sacrococcygeal region. These tumors are characterized by loss of SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1/INI) expression, usually due to heterozygous or homozygous deletions involving SMARCB1.9,48,49  Histologically, these tumors contain cohesive sheets or nests of epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and scattered intracytoplasmic vacuoles imparting a signet ring appearance. Nuclei are round to ovoid with mild-moderate atypia, and a focal rhabdoid morphology is often seen, typical of tumors with loss of SMARCB1/INI expression. Numerous mitotic figures and geographic necrosis are common. Physaliphorous cells, typical of conventional chordoma, are absent, and extracellular myxoid stroma is absent or only focally present. An essential diagnostic criterion is loss of SMARCB1 (INI1) expression.9,50  This subtype of chordoma is associated with a poor prognosis, worse than conventional chordoma.9 

Immunohistochemistry

Like the fetal notochord, chordomas express certain keratins (cytokeratin [CK] 8, CK18, and CK19)51  and are often positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and S100 protein52  and negative for CK7 and CK20 (Table 1).53  Brachyury, a T-box transcription factor encoded by the TBXT gene on chromosome 6, is involved in embryonic notochord development.52  Brachyury shows nuclear expression in both the fetal notochord and chordomas, but not in many other types of neoplasms including chondroid tumors and myoepithelial tumors, making it a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for chordoma (Table 1).52 

Table 1

Immunohistochemical Findings in Chordoma and Morphologically Similar Lesions

Immunohistochemical Findings in Chordoma and Morphologically Similar Lesions
Immunohistochemical Findings in Chordoma and Morphologically Similar Lesions

Any or all of these markers may be lost in the sarcomatoid component of a dedifferentiated chordoma (Figure 5, B).9,52,54  In poorly differentiated chordomas, tumor cells are positive for broad-spectrum CKs and brachyury; they show loss of SMARCB1/INI1, and S100 protein is rarely expressed.9,14,15,50,55 

Molecular Pathology

Most chordomas are sporadic, but several familial cases have been identified.5658  Somatic duplication of TBXT was identified in 27% of sporadic cases.16  Germline tandem duplication of TBXT was identified in 3 families with chordoma (in 16 family members) with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance.57  In one study a common genetic variant of TBXT, rs2305089, was observed in all familial cases evaluated and it was associated with an increased risk of developing sporadic chordomas in nonfamilial cases.57,59  Monosomy of chromosome 1 and gain of chromosomes 2, 6, and 7 are frequent cytogenetic abnormalities seen in chordoma.9,60,61 

Comparative genomic hybridization has demonstrated homozygous or heterozygous loss of CDKN2A and CDKN2B in ∼70% of cases.9,62  Amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) is a common finding with 40% of chordomas harboring copy number gains of 7p12, where EGFR is located.63  In addition, aberrant EGFR expression and signaling have been identified in a high number of chordomas, with increased EGFR protein expression in 69% of tumors and EGFR phosphorylation in 51% of tumors. The EGFR inhibitor tyrphostin has been shown to inhibit growth of a chordoma-derived cell line.63  A high percentage of chordomas have also been shown to overexpress MET proto-oncogene (MET), another tyrosine kinase.64 

Driver events in PI3K signaling genes, such as activating mutations in PIK3CA and truncating variants of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), were identified in ∼16% of chordomas, providing a rationale for therapeutically targeting the PI3K pathway in these cases. Some promising activity has been observed in patients with chordoma undergoing therapy with imatinib and tacrolimus, the latter targeting the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.16,65  In 17% of the tumors, driver events were also identified in chromatin-remodeling genes, such as ARID1A and PBRM1 (SWI/SNF complex genes) and SETD2.16  Other epigenetic modifications such as DNA hypomethylation/hypermethylation and microRNA (miRNA) regulation have also been investigated in chordomas. Specifically, 9 hypermethylated/hypomethylated regions were identified: C3, XIST, TACSTD2, FMR1, HIC1, RARB, DLEC1, KL, and RASSF1.66,67  A separate study64  showed that the gene copy number of miR-608 and miR-34a is reduced in most chordoma cells and correlates with the downregulated expression levels of miR-608 and miR-34a. These miRNAs inversely correlate with EGFR and MET levels.64 

Thirteen pediatric chordoma cases have been reported in association with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). The cases analyzed showed biallelic inactivation of either TSC1 or TSC2 in chordoma cells. Children with TSC appear to be diagnosed with chordomas at an earlier age (including prenatal or neonatal presentations) than children without TSC. The clinical outcome for TSC patients with chordoma appears to be relatively favorable, with an estimated 5-year survival of 83% (median follow-up of 5 years); however, the study numbers were small. mTOR inhibitors have shown activity against other TSC-associated tumors, but studies are needed to investigate their role as a treatment option for TSC-associated chordoma.6870 

Tissue microarray immunohistochemistry demonstrated absent or reduced protein expression of the tumor suppressor fragile histidine triad (FHIT) in 98% of sacral chordomas and 67% of skull base chordomas.71  Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) mutations are absent in chordomas, aiding in the distinction from chondrosarcoma.72,73 

The differential diagnosis of chordoma includes various benign and malignant entities. Benign lesions with morphologic similarity include ecchordosis physaliphora (EP) and benign notochordal cell tumor (BNCT). EP often presents as a polypoid mass arising on the clivus (ecchordosis physaliphora spheno-occipitalis), but may be found in the dura anywhere from the skull base to the sacrum. EP is considered a hamartomatous extraskeletal lesion derived from notochordal remnants. BNCT is a benign intraosseous neoplasm with notochordal differentiation. Both EP and BNCT are usually small, asymptomatic lesions incidentally discovered at autopsy.12  In an autopsy study from Japan, foci of BNCT were identified within the axial skeleton in 20% of cadavers.74  On computed tomography studies, BNCT is usually occult or shows minimal sclerosis without bone destruction. On T2-weighted MRI, like chordoma, EP and BNCT show intermediate to high signal intensity; however, unlike chordomas, they usually lack contrast enhancement and soft tissue extension on imaging studies.9,26,7578  Both EP and BNCT contain cells with abundant vacuolated clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm and the immunoprofile is identical to chordoma. EP and BNCT have well-delineated borders (BNCT is confined to the bone without cortical permeation) and lack a lobular architecture, necrosis, conspicuous mitoses, and high-grade nuclei. Additionally, BNCT lacks extracellular myxoid matrix.9,12,79  In contrast, chordoma is frankly invasive and often demonstrates necrosis, conspicuous mitoses, and high-grade nuclei (Table 2).9 

Table 2

Pathologic and Radiographic Features of Benign and Malignant Notochordal Tumors

Pathologic and Radiographic Features of Benign and Malignant Notochordal Tumors
Pathologic and Radiographic Features of Benign and Malignant Notochordal Tumors

BNCTs were identified in 7.3% of sacral/coccygeal resections performed for chordoma, suggesting that they may represent a precursor lesion.9  Furthermore, some studies have shown BNCT with areas of atypia and even cases of BNCT recurring as chordoma. Alternatively, based on the distinct separation between the BNCT and chordoma within the same specimen, the possibility that a chordoma developed coincidentally in the vicinity of a BNCT remains a possibility.77 

Carter et al80  proposed atypical notochordal cell tumor (ANCT) terminology that could be applied to notochordal tumors when the criteria for either BNCT or chordoma are not met. The authors showed that all 4 cases of ANCT investigated had imaging characteristics most consistent with BNCT, except for minimal cortical permeation, mild gadolinium enhancement, and soft tissue extension in 3 cases, with typical BNCT morphology. The fourth case had typical BNCT imaging and histologic features, with the exception of a myxoid matrix (Table 2).80  ANCT is not currently widely used as diagnostic terminology, but such lesions could represent a transitional stage from BNCT to chordoma.9,77,80 

Chondrosarcomas may enter the radiographic and microscopic differential diagnosis of chordoma. Both chordoma and chondrosarcoma entrap bony trabeculae as they infiltrate the marrow, which may have a similar radiographic appearance to true peripheral ossification of the lobules of a cartilaginous neoplasm (“ring and arc” pattern).12,81  Chondroid chordomas by definition contain areas in which the matrix has the appearance of hyaline cartilage; however, areas of nonchondroid chordoma are often present, pointing to the correct diagnosis. Additionally, chondrosarcomas are negative for epithelial markers (CKs and EMA) and brachyury and may contain mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 (Table 1). These mutations are not seen in chordoma.9,72,73 

Myoepithelial tumors of the soft tissue (and less commonly bone) are usually positive for epithelial markers (CK8, CK18, and EMA) and S100 protein, negative for CK7 and CK20,53  often contain a myxoid matrix, and may have epithelioid cells with clear to bubbly cytoplasm. These features resulted in the older term parachordoma for myoepithelial tumors of soft tissue. Unlike chordoma, myoepithelial tumors typically demonstrate architectural heterogeneity, with areas of solid and reticular growth, and they always lack brachyury expression, allowing for differentiation from chordoma. In addition, unlike chordomas, ∼50% of myoepithelial tumors harbor an Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) gene rearrangement (Table 2).82 

Chordoid meningioma is a rare type of WHO grade II meningioma, characterized by strands and cords of eosinophilic to clear meningothelial cells in a mucinous stroma. These chordoid areas are usually accompanied by a more typical-appearing, nonchondroid component; pure chordoid lesions are uncommon.83  Tumors are usually large and supratentorial. When located at anatomic sites similar to chordoma (eg, clivus), differentiating these entities by imaging characteristics is difficult, as chordoid meningiomas often show hypointense to isointense signal on T1-weighted images with strong, mostly homogeneous enhancement and with high T2 signal intensity. Like other types of meningiomas, they are positive for CK7, EMA, somatostatin receptor 2A, progesterone receptor, and focal S100 protein, but negative for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and brachyury (Table 1).83,84 

Chordoid glioma is a variant of glioma that arises in the third ventricle and consists of clusters and cords of oval to polygonal epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, embedded in a mucinous matrix with a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. The tumor is noninvasive, and lesional cells are diffusely positive for GFAP and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1). There is variable expression of CK, EMA, and S100 protein, whereas brachyury shows negativity (Table 1).83,84 

Myxopapillary ependymoma is a slow-growing neoplasm that arises in the sacral region (conus medullaris, cauda equina, and filum terminale) of young adults. Most cases have a papillary appearance, in which cuboidal to elongated tumor cells radially surround hyalinized to myxoid vascular cores; however, there are cases that lack a papillary architecture, instead containing sheets of polygonal cells with associated myxoid matrix, which may be confused with chordoma. Myxopapillary ependymoma lacks atypia and the mitotic rate is low. Tumor cells are positive for GFAP, S100, and vimentin and negative for CK and brachyury (Table 1).83 

Carcinomas often metastasize to bone and are positive for epithelial markers, potentially mimicking chordoma. Most types of carcinoma are negative for S100 protein and brachyury and express markers that will aid in the identification of a primary site of carcinoma (eg, paired box gene 8 [PAX8], TTF1, GATA-binding protein 3 [GATA3], caudal type homeobox 2 [CDX2]). Morphology, immunohistochemical analysis, and correlation with chest, abdomen, and pelvic imaging usually point to a primary site.

Currently, the mainstay of chordoma treatment is en bloc resection, but the axial location of most cases often makes it difficult to completely resect the tumor. Most unresectable cases receive radiation therapy, while adjuvant radiation may be added in some cases. High-dose photon/proton radiation therapy performed on unresectable chordomas yields a 5-year local control rate of ∼85%, with ∼89% disease-specific survival and ∼20% rate of distant failure.85  Chordomas are highly resistant to conventional chemotherapy, but clinical trials are currently underway that aim to treat chordoma with targeted therapy.

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A; p16INK4A) deletion in chordoma cells results in increased cyclin-dependant kinase 4 (CDK4) activity. In one study, CDK4 expression was analyzed via Western blot in chordoma cell lines and 10 freshly isolated primary chordoma specimens; 7 of the 10 primary chordoma specimens demonstrated high CDK4 expression levels and none of the 10 patient samples showed p16INK4A expression. This study also found that high CDK4 levels were associated with metastasis and recurrence, and treatment with palbociclib, a small-molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor, decreased cell growth and proliferation.13  There is currently an open phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03110744) evaluating the efficacy of palbociclib in cases of locally advanced/metastatic chordoma in patients who are not candidates for standard therapy.86 

Another open phase II clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of tazemetostat, a small-molecule inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), an enzyme involved in chromatin remodeling, is being conducted in solid tumors with INI1 loss, including INI1-negative chordomas, as determined by immunohistochemistry or molecular testing (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02601950).87 

Although EGFR gene mutation is almost never present in chordomas, as previously mentioned, EGFR protein is often overexpressed. Sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor afatinib in chordoma cell lines has been reported as well as its efficacy in mouse models.88  It was found that afatinib had the ability to promote degradation of EGFR and brachyury. An open phase II European study is currently assessing the efficacy of afatinib in cases of inoperable, recurrent, or metastatic chordoma.89 

In one study, increased PDGFRB expression was seen in all 18 analyzed chordomas. Six patients with advanced disease were treated with imatinib mesylate, which demonstrated antitumor activity.67,90  Efficacy of imatinib was evaluated in a phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00150072) with 32.4% of patients showing some clinical benefit; however, the tumor objective response rate was 0%.91  A related treatment, nilotinib, is currently under investigation in combination with radiation therapy in a phase I study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01407198).67,92 

Studies assessing immune regulation have shown that chordoma cell lines and tissue specimens express high levels of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and the expression of PD-L1 is correlated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.93  There is currently a phase II study assessing the benefit of combing the monoclonal antibodies nivolumab (anti–programmed cell death-1 [PD-1]) and relatlimab (anti–lymphocyte activation gene-3 [LAG-3]) in patients with advanced chordomas.94  Additionally, there is a separate phase I study assessing the safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with stereotactic radiotherapy in recurrent or metastatic chordoma.95 

Two phase II trials are currently investigating the use of brachyury therapeutic vaccines (Yeast-Brachyury Vaccine, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02383498 or MVA-BN/FPV-Brachyury, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03595228) in combination with radiotherapy.96,97 

The prognosis of chordoma depends on tumor location (which correlates with resectability), the presence or absence of metastases, patient age, and the presence or absence of dedifferentiation. A study using data from 357 spinal chordomas in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry found 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates of 80.5%, 68.4%, and 39.2%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 89.0%, 80.9%, and 60.1%, respectively. Overall survival was decreased in the setting of nonsurgical therapy, distant metastasis, and age 60 years or older.22  The median survival time for patients with all types of chordomas is 6.3 years.18  In contrast, overall survival in dedifferentiated chordoma of the spine is only ∼16 months.98 

Poorly differentiated chordoma type with SMARCB1/INI1 loss has a worse prognosis than conventional chordoma.9  Expression of brachyury and copy number gain of the T gene, gain of chromosome arm 2p, and lack of irradiation were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival.99  Increased expression of PDGFRB has been associated with increased dural invasion in clival chordomas and worse prognosis.67,100 

Tauziede-Espariat et al11  assessed 108 cases of chordoma and proposed a histopathologic and immunohistochemical grading system that correlates with patient progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A point was awarded for the presence of each of the following parameters: (1) Ki-67 labeling index of 6% or greater, (2) p53 labeling index of 25% or greater, (3) a poorly differentiated component (defined as containing sarcomatous cells or epithelioid cells arranged in a solid pattern), (4) necrosis, (5) prominent nucleoli, (6) apoptosis, or (7) 3 or more mitoses per 10 high-power fields. Based on cumulative score, tumors were considered low-grade (scores <4) or high-grade (scores ≥4). Tumor grade significantly correlated with PFS and OS (median PFS = 75.0 months for low-grade tumors and 26.0 months for high-grade; median OS = 146.5 months for low-grade and 11.2 months for high-grade). While this grading system is not widely used in clinical practice, it is mentioned owing to the significant number of chordoma cases analyzed in the study.11 

Chordomas are malignant neoplasms with notochordal differentiation that primarily involve the axial skeleton, often making complete surgical resection difficult or impossible. Most cases have the classic morphology of conventional chordoma, but a subset of cases have undergone dedifferentiation or lost INI1, resulting in more biologically aggressive neoplasms. Treatment of chordoma has largely been predicated on surgical excision, which is often incomplete, thus yielding poor results; however, several fairly recently identified molecular alterations have led to ongoing clinical trials using targeted therapy.

1.
Virchow
R,
ed.
Untersuchungen ueber die Entwicklung des Schaedelgrundes im gesunden und krankhaften Zustande und uber den Einfluss derselben auf Schadelform, Gesichtsbildung und Gehirnban
.
Berlin;
1857
.
2.
Bailey
P,
Bagdasar
D.
Intracranial chordoblastoma
.
Am J Pathol
.
1929
;
5
(5)
:
439
450
.
3.
Luschka
H.
Die Altersveranderungen der Zwischenwirbelknorpel
.
Virchows Arch (Path Anat)
.
1856
;
9
:
311
327
.
4.
Müller
H.
Ueber das Vorkommen von Resten der Chorda dorsalis bei Menschen nach der Geburt und uber ihr Verhaltniss zu den Gallertgeschwulsten am Clivus
.
Zeitschrift fur ration Medic
.
1858
;
2
:
202
229
.
5.
Ribbert
H.
Über die experimentelle Erzeugung einer Ecchondrosis physalifora
.
Verhandl Kong inn Med
.
1895
;
13
:
455
464
.
6.
Ribbert
H.
Über die Ecchondrosis Physalifora Sphenooccipitalis
.
Zentralbl Allg Path
.
1894
;
5
:
457
461
.
7.
Ribbert
H.
Geschwulstlehre für Aerzte und Studierende
.
Bonn;
1904
.
8.
Sahyouni
R,
Goshtasbi
K,
Mahmoodi
A,
Chen
JW.
A historical recount of chordoma
.
J Neurosurg Spine
.
2018
;
28
(4)
:
422
428
.
9.
Fletcher
CDM,
Bridge
JA,
Hogendoorn
P,
Mertens
F,
eds.
WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 5th ed
.
Lyon, France
:
International Agency for Research on Cancer;
2020
.
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours; vol 3.
10.
Rosenberg
AE,
Nielsen
GP,
eds.
Diagnostic Pathology: Bone. 2nd ed
.
Salt Lake City, UT
:
Elsevier Health Sciences;
2017
.
11.
Tauziede-Espariat
A,
Bresson
D,
Polivka
M,
et al
Prognostic and therapeutic markers in chordomas: a study of 287 tumors
.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol
.
2016
;
75
(2)
:
111
120
.
12.
George
B,
Bresson
D,
Herman
P,
Froelich
S.
Chordomas: a review
.
Neurosurg Clin N Am
.
2015
;
26
(3)
:
437
452
.
13.
Liu
T,
Shen
JK,
Choy
E,
et al
CDK4 expression in chordoma: a potential therapeutic target
.
J Orthop Res
.
2018
;
36
(6)
:
1581
1589
.
14.
Mobley
BC,
McKenney
JK,
Bangs
CD,
et al
Loss of SMARCB1/INI1 expression in poorly differentiated chordomas
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2010
;
120
(6)
:
745
753
.
15.
Antonelli
M,
Raso
A,
Mascelli
S,
et al
SMARCB1/INI1 involvement in pediatric chordoma: a mutational and immunohistochemical analysis
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2017
;
41
(1)
:
56
61
.
16.
Tarpey
PS,
Behjati
S,
Young
MD,
et al
The driver landscape of sporadic chordoma
.
Nat Commun
.
2017
;
8
(1)
:
890
.
17.
Liang
WS,
Dardis
C,
Helland
A,
et al
Identification of therapeutic targets in chordoma through comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analyses
.
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud
.
2018
;
4
(6)
:
a003418
.
18.
McMaster
ML,
Goldstein
AM,
Bromley
CM,
Ishibe
N,
Parry
DM.
Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973-1995
.
Cancer Causes Control
.
2001
;
12
(1)
:
1
11
.
19.
Esiashvili
N,
Goodman
M,
Marcus
RB
Changes in incidence and survival of Ewing sarcoma patients over the past 3 decades: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data
.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol
.
2008
;
30
(6)
:
425
430
.
20.
van Praag Veroniek
VM,
Rueten-Budde
AJ,
Ho
V,
et al
Incidence, outcomes and prognostic factors during 25 years of treatment of chondrosarcomas
.
Surg Oncol
.
2018
;
27
(3)
:
402
408
.
21.
Hoch
BL,
Nielsen
GP,
Liebsch
NJ,
Rosenberg
AE.
Base of skull chordomas in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2006
;
30
(7)
:
811
818
.
22.
Pan
Y,
Lu
L,
Chen
J,
Zhong
Y,
Dai
Z.
Analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with primary spinal chordoma using the SEER Registry from 1973 to 2014
.
J Orthop Surg Res
.
2018
;
13
(1)
:
76
.
23.
Mukherjee
D,
Chaichana
KL,
Gokaslan
ZL,
Aaronson
O,
Cheng
JS,
McGirt
MJ.
Survival of patients with malignant primary osseous spinal neoplasms: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2003
.
J Neurosurg Spine
.
2011
;
14
(2)
:
143
150
.
24.
Wasserman
JK,
Gravel
D,
Purgina
B.
Chordoma of the head and neck: a review
.
Head Neck Pathol
.
2018
;
12
(2)
:
261
268
.
25.
Lauer
SR,
Edgar
MA,
Gardner
JM,
Sebastian
A,
Weiss
SW.
Soft tissue chordomas: a clinicopathologic analysis of 11 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2013
;
37
(5)
:
719
726
.
26.
Santegoeds
RGC,
Temel
Y,
Beckervordersandforth
JC,
Van Overbeeke
JJ,
Hoeberigs
CM.
State-of-the-art imaging in human chordoma of the skull base
.
Curr Radiol Rep
.
2018
;
6
(5)
:
16
.
27.
Golden
L,
Pendharkar
A,
Fischbein
N.
Imaging cranial base chordoma and chondrosarcoma
.
In:
Harsh
GR,
Vaz-Guimaraes
F,
eds.
Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base and Spine. 2nd ed
.
Cambridge, MA
:
Academic Press;
2017
:
67
78
.
28.
Farsad
K,
Kattapuram
SV,
Sacknoff
R,
Ono
J,
Nielsen
GP.
Sacral chordoma
.
Radiographics
.
2009
;
29
(5)
:
1525
1530
.
29.
Vasudeva
VS,
Groff
MW.
Assessment and treatment of malignant primary spinal tumors
.
In:
Winn
HR,
ed.
Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery. 7th ed
.
Philadelphia, PA
:
Elsevier;
2017
:
2447
2454
.
30.
Thomas
JG,
Tatsui
CE,
Rhines
LD.
Surgical management of the chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the thoracic spine
.
In:
Harsh
GR,
Vaz-Guimaraes
F,
eds.
Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base and Spine. 2nd ed
.
Cambridge, MA
:
Academic Press;
2017
:
301
307
.
31.
Cleaver
O,
Krieg
PA.
Notochord patterning of the endoderm
.
Dev Biol
.
2001
;
234
(1)
:
1
12
.
32.
Risbud
MV,
Schaer
TP,
Shapiro
IM.
Toward an understanding of the role of notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: from discord to accord
.
Dev Dyn
.
2010
;
239
(8)
:
2141
2148
.
33.
Stemple
DL.
Structure and function of the notochord: an essential organ for chordate development
.
Development
.
2005
;
132
(11)
:
2503
2512
.
34.
McCann
MR,
Seguin
CA.
Notochord cells in intervertebral disc development and degeneration
.
J Dev Biol.
2016
;
4(1).
35.
Jurand
A.
Some aspects of the development of the notochord in mouse embryos
.
J Embryol Exp Morphol
.
1974
;
32
(1)
:
1
33
.
36.
McCann
MR,
Tamplin
OJ,
Rossant
J,
Seguin
CA.
Tracing notochord-derived cells using a Noto-cre mouse: implications for intervertebral disc development
.
Dis Model Mech
.
2012
;
5
(1)
:
73
82
.
37.
Risbud
MV,
Shapiro
IM.
Notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: new perspective on an old question
.
Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr
.
2011
;
21
(1)
:
29
41
.
38.
Kyriakos
M.
Benign notochordal lesions of the axial skeleton: a review and current appraisal
.
Skeletal Radiol
.
2011
;
40
(9)
:
1141
1152
.
39.
Kyriakos
M,
Totty
WG,
Lenke
LG.
Giant vertebral notochordal rest: a lesion distinct from chordoma: discussion of an evolving concept
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2003
;
27
(3)
:
396
406
.
40.
Choi
KS,
Cohn
MJ,
Harfe
BD.
Identification of nucleus pulposus precursor cells and notochordal remnants in the mouse: implications for disk degeneration and chordoma formation
.
Dev Dyn
.
2008
;
237
(12)
:
3953
3958
.
41.
Chrzan
R,
Podsiadlo
L,
Herman-Sucharska
I,
Urbanik
A,
Bryll
A.
Persistent notochordal canal imitating compression fracture—plain film, CT and MR appearance
.
Med Sci Monit.
2010
;
16(6):CS76-CS79.
42.
Radaelli
S,
Stacchiotti
S,
Ruggieri
P,
et al
Sacral chordoma: long-term outcome of a large series of patients surgically treated at two reference centers
.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
.
2016
;
41
(12)
:
1049
1057
.
43.
Oakley
GJ,
Fuhrer
K,
Seethala
RR.
Brachyury, SOX-9, and podoplanin, new markers in the skull base chordoma vs chondrosarcoma differential: a tissue microarray-based comparative analysis
.
Mod Pathol
.
2008
;
21
(12)
:
1461
1469
.
44.
Hung
YP,
Diaz-Perez
JA,
Cote
GM,
et al
Dedifferentiated chordoma: clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics with integrative analysis
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2020
;
44
(9)
:
1213
1223
.
45.
Meis
JM,
Raymond
AK,
Evans
HL,
Charles
RE,
Giraldo
AA.
“Dedifferentiated” chordoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of three cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1987
;
11
(7)
:
516
525
.
46.
Hanna
SA,
Tirabosco
R,
Amin
A,
et al
Dedifferentiated chordoma: a report of four cases arising ‘de novo'
.
J Bone Joint Surg Br
.
2008
;
90
(5)
:
652
656
.
47.
Halpern
J,
Kopolovic
J,
Catane
R.
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma developing in irradiated sacral chordoma
.
Cancer
.
1984
;
53
(12)
:
2661
2662
.
48.
Owosho
AA,
Zhang
L,
Rosenblum
MK,
Antonescu
CR.
High sensitivity of FISH analysis in detecting homozygous SMARCB1 deletions in poorly differentiated chordoma: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of nine cases
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2018
;
57
(2)
:
89
95
.
49.
Huang
SC,
Zhang
L,
Sung
YS,
et al
Secondary EWSR1 gene abnormalities in SMARCB1-deficient tumors with 22q11-12 regional deletions: potential pitfalls in interpreting EWSR1 FISH results
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2016
;
55
(10)
:
767
776
.
50.
Shih
AR,
Cote
GM,
Chebib
I,
et al
Clinicopathologic characteristics of poorly differentiated chordoma
.
Mod Pathol
.
2018
;
31
(8)
:
1237
1245
.
51.
Lehtonen
E,
Stefanovic
V,
Saraga-Babic
M.
Changes in the expression of intermediate filaments and desmoplakins during development of human notochord
.
Differentiation
.
1995
;
59
(1)
:
43
49
.
52.
Vujovic
S,
Henderson
S,
Presneau
N,
et al
Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas
.
J Pathol
.
2006
;
209
(2)
:
157
165
.
53.
Folpe
AL,
Agoff
SN,
Willis
J,
Weiss
SW.
Parachordoma is immunohistochemically and cytogenetically distinct from axial chordoma and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1999
;
23
(9)
:
1059
1067
.
54.
Frankl
J,
Grotepas
C,
Stea
B,
Lemole
GM,
Chiu
A,
Khan
R.
Chordoma dedifferentiation after proton beam therapy: a case report and review of the literature
.
J Med Case Rep
.
2016
;
10
(1)
:
280
.
55.
Hasselblatt
M,
Thomas
C,
Hovestadt
V,
et al
Poorly differentiated chordoma with SMARCB1/INI1 loss: a distinct molecular entity with dismal prognosis
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2016
;
132
(1)
:
149
151
.
56.
Kelley
MJ,
Korczak
JF,
Sheridan
E,
Yang
X,
Goldstein
AM,
Parry
DM.
Familial chordoma, a tumor of notochordal remnants, is linked to chromosome 7q33
.
Am J Hum Genet
.
2001
;
69
(2)
:
454
460
.
57.
Kelley
MJ,
Shi
J,
Ballew
B,
et al
Characterization of T gene sequence variants and germline duplications in familial and sporadic chordoma
.
Hum Genet
.
2014
;
133
(10)
:
1289
1297
.
58.
Wang
KE,
Wu
Z,
Tian
K,
et al
Familial chordoma: a case report and review of the literature
.
Oncol Lett
.
2015
;
10
(5)
:
2937
2940
.
59.
Pillay
N,
Plagnol
V,
Tarpey
PS,
et al
A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma
.
Nat Genet
.
2012
;
44
(11)
:
1185
1187
.
60.
Presneau
N,
Shalaby
A,
Ye
H,
et al
Role of the transcription factor T (brachyury) in the pathogenesis of sporadic chordoma: a genetic and functional-based study
.
J Pathol
.
2011
;
223
(3)
:
327
335
.
61.
Brandal
P,
Bjerkehagen
B,
Danielsen
H,
Heim
S.
Chromosome 7 abnormalities are common in chordomas
.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
.
2005
;
160
(1)
:
15
21
.
62.
Le
LP,
Nielsen
GP,
Rosenberg
AE,
et al
Recurrent chromosomal copy number alterations in sporadic chordomas
.
PLoS One
.
2011
;
6
(5)
:
e18846
.
63.
Shalaby
A,
Presneau
N,
Ye
H,
et al
The role of epidermal growth factor receptor in chordoma pathogenesis: a potential therapeutic target
.
J Pathol
.
2011
;
223
(3)
:
336
346
.
64.
Zhang
Y,
Schiff
D,
Park
D,
Abounader
R.
MicroRNA-608 and microRNA-34a regulate chordoma malignancy by targeting EGFR, Bcl-xL and MET
.
PLoS One
.
2014
;
9
(3)
:
e91546
.
65.
Stacchiotti
S,
Marrari
A,
Tamborini
E,
et al
Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma
.
Ann Oncol
.
2009
;
20
(11)
:
1886
1894
.
66.
Rinner
B,
Weinhaeusel
A,
Lohberger
B,
et al
Chordoma characterization of significant changes of the DNA methylation pattern
.
PLoS One
.
2013
;
8
(3)
:
e56609
.
67.
Gill
CM,
Fowkes
M,
Shrivastava
RK.
Emerging therapeutic targets in chordomas: a review of the literature in the genomic era
.
Neurosurgery
.
2020
;
86
(2)
:
E118
E123
.
68.
Dahl
NA,
Luebbert
T,
Loi
M,
et al
Chordoma occurs in young children with tuberous sclerosis
.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol
.
2017
;
76
(6)
:
418
423
.
69.
McMaster
ML,
Goldstein
AM,
Parry
DM.
Clinical features distinguish childhood chordoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) from chordoma in the general paediatric population
.
J Med Genet
.
2011
;
48
(7)
:
444
449
.
70.
Lee-Jones
L,
Aligianis
I,
Davies
PA,
et al
Sacrococcygeal chordomas in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex show somatic loss of TSC1 or TSC2
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2004
;
41
(1)
:
80
85
.
71.
Diaz
RJ,
Guduk
M,
Romagnuolo
R,
et al
High-resolution whole-genome analysis of skull base chordomas implicates FHIT loss in chordoma pathogenesis
.
Neoplasia
.
2012
;
14
(9)
:
788
798
.
72.
Arai
M,
Nobusawa
S,
Ikota
H,
Takemura
S,
Nakazato
Y.
Frequent IDH1/2 mutations in intracranial chondrosarcoma: a possible diagnostic clue for its differentiation from chordoma
.
Brain Tumor Pathol
.
2012
;
29
(4)
:
201
206
.
73.
Amary
MF,
Bacsi
K,
Maggiani
F,
et al
IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours
.
J Pathol
.
2011
;
224
(3)
:
334
343
.
74.
Yamaguchi
T,
Suzuki
S,
Ishiiwa
H,
Ueda
Y.
Intraosseous benign notochordal cell tumours: overlooked precursors of classic chordomas?
Histopathology
.
2004
;
44
(6)
:
597
602
.
75.
Yuh
SJ,
Woulfe
J,
Corsten
MJ,
Carrau
RL,
Prevedello
DM,
Kassam
AB.
Diagnostic imaging dilemma of a clival lesion and its clinical management implications
.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
.
2014
;
75
(3)
:
177
182
.
76.
Nishiguchi
T,
Mochizuki
K,
Ohsawa
M,
et al
Differentiating benign notochordal cell tumors from chordomas: radiographic features on MRI, CT, and tomography
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2011
;
196
(3)
:
644
650
.
77.
Kreshak
J,
Larousserie
F,
Picci
P,
et al
Difficulty distinguishing benign notochordal cell tumor from chordoma further suggests a link between them
.
Cancer Imaging
.
2014
;
14
:
4
.
78.
Yamaguchi
T,
Iwata
J,
Sugihara
S,
et al
Distinguishing benign notochordal cell tumors from vertebral chordoma
.
Skeletal Radiol
.
2008
;
37
(4)
:
291
299
.
79.
Lagman
C,
Varshneya
K,
Sarmiento
JM,
Turtz
AR,
Chitale
RV.
Proposed diagnostic criteria, classification schema, and review of literature of notochord-derived ecchordosis physaliphora
.
Cureus
.
2016
;
8
(3)
:
e547
.
80.
Carter
JM,
Wenger
DE,
Rose
PS,
Inwards
CY.
Atypical notochordal cell tumors: a series of notochordal-derived tumors that defy current classification schemes
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2017
;
41
(1)
:
39
48
.
81.
Subhawong
TK,
Fishman
EK,
Swart
JE,
Carrino
JA,
Attar
S,
Fayad
LM.
Soft-tissue masses and masslike conditions: what does CT add to diagnosis and management?
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2010
;
194
(6)
:
1559
1567
.
82.
Antonescu
CR,
Zhang
L,
Chang
NE,
et al
EWSR1-POU5F1 fusion in soft tissue myoepithelial tumors: a molecular analysis of sixty-six cases, including soft tissue, bone, and visceral lesions, showing common involvement of the EWSR1 gene
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2010
;
49
(12)
:
1114
1124
.
83.
Louis
DN,
Ohgaki
H,
Wiestler
OD,
Cavenee
WK,
eds.
WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
.
4th ed. Lyon, France; IARC Press;
2016
.
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours; vol 1.
84.
Sangoi
AR,
Dulai
MS,
Beck
AH,
Brat
DJ,
Vogel
H.
Distinguishing chordoid meningiomas from their histologic mimics: an immunohistochemical evaluation
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2009
;
33
(5)
:
669
681
.
85.
Kabolizadeh
P,
Chen
YL,
Liebsch
N,
et al
Updated outcome and analysis of tumor response in mobile spine and sacral chordoma treated with definitive high-dose photon/proton radiation therapy
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
.
2017
;
97
(2)
:
254
262
.
86.
US National Library of Medicine.
CDK4/6 Inhibition in Locally Advanced/Metastatic Chordoma
.
2017
.
87.
US National Library of Medicine.
A Phase II, Multicenter Study of the EZH2 Inhibitor Tazemetostat in Adult Subjects With INI1-Negative Tumors or Relapsed/Refractory Synovial Sarcoma
.
2015
.
88.
Magnaghi
P,
Salom
B,
Cozzi
L,
et al
Afatinib Is a new therapeutic approach in chordoma with a unique ability to target EGFR and brachyury
.
Mol Cancer Ther
.
2018
;
17
(3)
:
603
613
.
89.
US National Library of Medicine.
Afatinib in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Chordoma
.
2017
.
90.
Casali
PG,
Messina
A,
Stacchiotti
S,
et al
Imatinib mesylate in chordoma
.
Cancer
.
2004
;
101
(9)
:
2086
2097
.
91.
US National Library of Medicine.
Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib in Chordoma
.
2004
.
92.
US National Library of Medicine.
Nilotinib With Radiation for High Risk Chordoma
.
2011
.
93.
Feng
Y,
Shen
J,
Gao
Y,
et al
Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prevalence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in chordoma
.
Oncotarget
.
2015
;
6
(13)
:
11139
11149
.
94.
US National Library of Medicine.
Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Treating Participants With Advanced Chordoma
.
2018
.
95.
US National Library of Medicine.
Nivolumab With or Without Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Recurrent, Advanced, or Metastatic Chordoma
.
2016
.
96.
US National Library of Medicine.
QUILT-3.011 Phase 2 Yeast-Brachyury Vaccine Chordoma
.
2015
.
97.
US National Library of Medicine.
BN Brachyury and Radiation in Chordoma
.
2018
.
98.
Zhou
J,
Sun
J,
Bai
HX,
et al
Prognostic factors in patients with spinal chordoma: an integrative analysis of 682 patients
.
Neurosurgery
.
2017
;
81
(5)
:
812
823
.
99.
Kitamura
Y,
Sasaki
H,
Kimura
T,
et al
Molecular and clinical risk factors for recurrence of skull base chordomas: gain on chromosome 2p, expression of brachyury, and lack of irradiation negatively correlate with patient prognosis
.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol
.
2013
;
72
(9)
:
816
823
.
100.
Zhai
Y,
Bai
J,
Wang
S,
et al
Differences in dural penetration of clival chordomas are associated with different prognosis and expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta
.
World Neurosurg
.
2017
;
98
:
288
295
.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.