For more than 20 years there has been conflict arising from different points of view concerning the role of the introduced honeybee. There is a strong prima facie argument, and some supporting evidence, that introduced honeybees are likely to adversely affect the environment. Some land management agencies have consequently adopted a policy of removal of hive honeybees from areas devoted primarily to conservation. On the other hand, some argue that the scientific evidence on the issue remains poor, point out the economic benefits that arise from the honeybee industry and suggest that removal of apiaries from such areas is unjustified. It is suggested in this paper that adoption of the Precautionary Principle could Significantly reduce this conflict. Instead of the focus being on obtaining definitive “proof” concerning possible impacts of honeybees, it could shift to finding ways to reduce the density of feral honeybees, and hence their impacts on both the natural environment and honeybees in hives. The focus could also shift to finding sites where reduction in honeybee density is feasible and the likely conservation gains arising from such a reduction are relatively high. In this way both the honeybee industry and the natural environment could benefit.
Research-Article| March 17 2014
The introduced Honeybee Apis mellifera and the Precautionary Principle: reducing the conflict
Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2000
Search for other works by this author on:
Australian Zoologist (1999) 31 (1): 181–186.
Graham Pyke; The introduced Honeybee Apis mellifera and the Precautionary Principle: reducing the conflict. Australian Zoologist 1 June 1999; 31 (1): 181–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.1999.018
Download citation file: