The effectiveness of various pitfall trap designs and pitfall/drift fence systems for sampling small ground-dwelling lizards and frogs in the forests of southeastern Australia was examined. Pitfall/drift fence systems employing long drift fences were more effective than short or no-fence systems in terms of the number of individuals and species caught, but were time consuming and caused considerable habitat disturbance. Various pitfall trap designs were compared. Generally, simple open-necked and funnel traps were more effective than traps with shelter and shelter/drift arm traps. It is suggested that in forested habitats, groups of individual open necked pitfall traps or short-fence systems may be just as effective and no more costly in installation time than systems employing long drift fences and more complex bap types.
Skip Nav Destination
Research-Article| March 17 2014
Effectiveness of pitfall/drift-fence systems for sampling small ground-dwelling lizards and frogs in southeastern Australian forests
State Forests of New South Wales, P.O. Box 100, Beecroft, New South Wales 2119
Search for other works by this author on:
Australian Zoologist (1999) 31 (1): 118–126.
Garry Webb; Effectiveness of pitfall/drift-fence systems for sampling small ground-dwelling lizards and frogs in southeastern Australian forests. Australian Zoologist 1 June 1999; 31 (1): 118–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.1999.012
Download citation file:
How do RZS NSW members access the full text papers?
If you are a current RZS NSW member (with publications), please access the full text of papers by visiting https://www.rzsnsw.org.au/member-centre/publications (you will be asked to log in to RZS NSW). Do not log in at the top of this current page for access.
Professional kangaroo population control leads to better animal welfare, conservation outcomes and avoids waste
George R Wilson, Melanie Edwards
What is a dingo – origins, hybridisation and identity
Kylie M Cairns