We use the Eastern Gas Pipeline (EGP) in southeastern Australia as a case study to examine the value of documenting and retrieving entrapped fauna from open pipeline trenches. Daily inspection of nearly 800 km of open pipeline trenches during construction of the EGP (1999-2000) resulted in the identification of 103 vertebrate species (45 reptiles, 24 mammals, 19 frogs, 14 birds, 1 fish). Of 7438 individuals found in the open trenches, 7125 (97%) were found alive and released. Of the 224 dead animals, 29 (13 %) were of two threatened mammal species, most of which drowned in low flooded sections of trenches following rainfall. Nine threatened species were found in trenches, and an additional 5 threatened species were found along the pipeline route. Importantly, most threatened species were found outside of protected areas. Our findings indicate that wildlife conservation should play an important role in pipeline construction, but more emphasis should also be placed within the broader arena of animal ethics, or the retrieval and release of unlisted species. Despite preventative measures taken to minimise mortality in trenches (e.g., ramped earth known as ‘trench plugs’ positioned every 500 m to allow entrapped animals to escape), smaller (< 75 g), less-mobile animals were unlikely to survive, unless retrieved. There is no current legislation governing the rescue of fauna from trenches during pipeline construction, despite the current increase in pipelines in Australia, although the measure is included as a recommendation in the Australian Pipeline Environmental Code of Practice. Our data indicate that retrieving trench fauna solely within protected areas or sensitive areas (e.g., national parks, nature reserves, selected areas of native vegetation or wetlands), as is sometimes currently practised, will not protect all, or even most, threatened species. Retrieving fauna from the entire trench as standard practice during pipeline construction would be beneficial to native fauna, and therefore to conservation bodies, industry, and the general community.

APIA. 1998. Code of Environmental Practice. Australian Pipeline Industry Association, Canberra. (Section 4. Environmental Management Guidelines, Sub-section 4.1, Part A, Onshore pipeline Construction).
Ayers, D. and Wallace, G. 1997. Pipeline trenches: an underutilised resource for finding fauna. Pp. 349-357 in Conservation Outside Nature Reserves, edited by P. Hale and D. Lamb. Centre for Conservation Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Conservation Outside Nature Reserves
(pg. 
349
-
357
)
Blackburn, T. M., and Gaston, K. J. 1997. A critical assessment of the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in animals. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:233-249.
A critical assessment of the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in animals
Journal of Animal Ecology
, vol. 
66
 (pg. 
233
-
249
)
Burbidge, A. A. 1991. Cost constraints on surveys for nature conservation. Pp. 3-6 in Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis, edited by C. R. Margules and M P. Austin. CSIRO: Australia.
Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis
(pg. 
3
-
6
)
Cogger, H. 2000.Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia. Reed: Sydney.
Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia
Dobson, A. P., Bradshaw, A. D., and Baker, A. J. M. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277:515-522.
Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology
Science
, vol. 
277
 (pg. 
515
-
522
)
Duke Eastern Gas Pipeline. 1999. Environmental Management Plan. Duke Energy International and Ecos Consulting Pty. Ltd. Document No. 599-RP-006.
Faulkner, W. 1999. AGL Central West Project: Marsden- Dubbo gas pipeline. Fauna impact monitoring. Draft report to NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and AGL.
Heyer, W. R., Donnelly, M. A., McDiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L. C., and Foster, M. S. 1994.Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians
Mace, G. M., P. H. Harvey, and Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1983. Vertebrate home-range size and energetic requirements, Pp. 33-53 in The Ecology of Animal Movement, edited by I. R. Swingland and P. J. Greenwood. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
The Ecology of Animal Movement
(pg. 
33
-
53
)
Simpson, K. and Day, N. 1999.Field Guide to the Birds of Australia. Penguin Books Ltd., Ringwood.
Field Guide to the Birds of Australia
Strahan, R. (ed.) 1998.The Mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney.
The Mammals of Australia
Woinarski, J. C. Z., Armstrong, M., Brennan, K., Connors, G., Milne, D., McKenzie, G., and Edwards, K. 2000. A different fauna?: Captures of vertebrates in a pipeline trench, compared with conventional survey techniques; and a consideration of mortality patterns in a pipeline trench. Australian Zoologist 31:421-431.
A different fauna?: Captures of vertebrates in a pipeline trench, compared with conventional survey techniques; and a consideration of mortality patterns in a pipeline trench
Australian Zoologist
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
421
-
431
)
This content is only available as a PDF.