Pitfall trapping is a long established method for trapping terrestrial vertebrates globally. Many variations in bucket and drift fence arrays are used. Recent survey guidelines have been published for Queensland and the Northern Territory. In Queensland a “T” pattern is recommended, and we used data collected over five years to assess whether the use of this array, with the addition of a central bucket (Pit B), results in more captures, particularly in the central bucket. A total of 263 sites representing 1052 bucket samples were examined and the differences in capture abundance in bucket location was tested using analysis of variance. Pitfall bucket location significantly affected the captures of Dasyuridae, Muridae, Agamidae, Pygopodidae, Scincidae (P<0.1), and mean abundance was highest in the central Pit B except for Agamidae. There was also significant variation in abundance across habitat type for these families, excluding Dasyuridae, but including Gekkonidae. We conclude that having a central bucket where drift fences join can increase trap success, and this is a function of effective trapping area (i.e. catchment of animal activity and length of drift fence per bucket). Increased captures may have some relationship to habitat type (i.e. small mammals more abundant in grassland habitat). Though this particular array has some benefits in increasing trap success, the use of multiple survey techniques is recommended for any thorough fauna inventory.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research-Article|
September 12 2014
Pit B or not Pit B? The pitfall array is the question
A.S. Kutt;
A.S. Kutt
1
School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville Queensland, Australia 4811
2
School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria Australia 3010
Search for other works by this author on:
E.P. Vanderduys
E.P. Vanderduys
3
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Ecology Program, PMB PO, Aitkenvale, Queensland, Australia 4814
Search for other works by this author on:
Australian Zoologist (2014) 37 (2): 129–133.
Citation
A.S. Kutt, E.P. Vanderduys; Pit B or not Pit B? The pitfall array is the question. Australian Zoologist 1 January 2014; 37 (2): 129–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2014.028
Download citation file:
How do RZS NSW members access the full text papers?
If you are a current RZS NSW member (with publications), please access the full text of papers by visiting https://www.rzsnsw.org.au/Australian-Zoologist-access-(Members-Only) (you will be asked to log in to RZS NSW). Do not log in at the top of this current page for access.
Citing articles via
Landscape-scale monitoring for forest fauna is achievable: a case study using remote sensors, artificial intelligence and robust analytics
Leroy Gonsalves, Brad Law, Chris Slade
Towards an integrated approach to amphibian conservation: a case study of the Littlejohn's tree frog (Litoria littlejohni)
Rose Upton, Kaya Klop-Toker, Nadine Nolan, Samantha Wallace, Anne Ibbotson, Sarah Stock, Roshan Patel, Phil Jobling, John Clulow, Michael Mahony, Alex Callen
A call to further understand the role of carrion in food webs: a case study of the Australian Alps
T. Newsome, E. Spencer, R. Cairncross, C. Fust, J. Vandersteen, P. Barton
Reimagining urban habitats to benefit people and nature
Caragh G. Threlfall, Claire Farrell, Manuel E. Lequerica Tamara, Dieter F. Hochuli