Conservation detection dog is better than human searcher in finding bilby (Macrotis lagotis) scats | Citedby Results | Australian Zoologist

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Conservation detection dog is better than human searcher in finding bilby (Macrotis lagotis) scats

Australian Zoologist (2020) 41 (1): 86–93.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys

Troy Koser
Aimee Hurt
Laura Thompson
Alyson Courtemanch
Benjamin Wise
Paul Cross

Parasites & Vectors (2025) 18 (1)

Enhancing performance of detection dog field surveys through experimental transects

Tim Hofmann
Anne Schmidt‐Küntzel
Stijn Verschueren
S. Francois Jenkins
Stephan Neumann
Johannes Signer
Niko Balkenhol
Laurie Marker

The Journal of Wildlife Management (2025) 89 (5)

Conservation detection dogs: A critical review of efficacy and methodology

Beth McKeague
Caroline Finlay
Nicola Rooney

Ecology and Evolution (2024) 14 (2)

How low can they go: A comparison between dog (Canis familiaris) and environmental DNA detection of invasive koi carp (Cyprinus rubrofuscus)

Melissa A. Collins
Clare M. Browne
Timothy L. Edwards
Nicholas Ling
Grant W. Tempero
Dianne M. Gleeson
Kymberly Crockett
Jesse Quaife

Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2022) 255: 105729.

Detection dogs provide a powerful method for conservation surveys

Emma Bennett
La Toya Jamieson
Stevie Nicole Florent
Nicole Gill
Cindy Hauser
Romane Cristescu

Austral Ecology (2022) 47 (4): 894.

Adding Nuance to Our Understanding of Dog–Wildlife Interactions and the Need for Management

Matthew E Gompper

Integrative and Comparative Biology (2021) 61 (1): 93.