Osteomyelitis caused by Enterococcus cecorum is an emerging disease in broiler chickens in Canada. Other Enterococcus species have been reported as causative agents in certain outbreaks. The epidemiology of this disease is unknown, but contaminated barns are affected by recurring episodes. A broiler chicken flock located in Quebec, Canada, exhibited osteomyelitis lesions positive for E. cecorum and Enterococcus faecalis. Surprisingly, the following lot, in the same barn, revealed the presence of E. faecalis– and Enterococcus raffinosus–positive lesions but no E. cecorum. To better understand the epidemiology of these two outbreaks, verify the persistence of pathogenic isolates in the barn, and identify the possible transfer of genetic material between the Enterococcus species isolated from both events, 16 isolates (1 E. cecorum, 13 E. faecalis, and 2 E. raffinosus isolates) were sequenced, and their genomes were compared. Interestingly, more than one Enterococcus species could be isolated from the same lesion, while other lesions also revealed several nonclonal isolates from the same species. This might suggest the opportunistic nature of Enterococcus spp. as there was no predominant isolate in the lesions. The number of virulence genes varied from 1 to 34 across three Enterococcus species with no common virulence gene. The number and nature of antimicrobial resistance genes among those isolates were worrisome because they indicate the presence of multidrug resistance on the farm. Both plasmids and phages were shared by different Enterococcus species, which suggests potential horizontal gene transfer of mobile genetic elements within this enterococci population.

Comparación genética de especies de Enterococcus aisladas de lesiones de osteomielitis y el entorno de los gallineros de lotes sucesivos de pollos de engorde.

La osteomielitis causada por Enterococcus cecorum es una enfermedad emergente en pollos de engorde en Canadá. Se han reportado otras especies de Enterococcus como agentes causales en ciertos brotes. La epidemiología de esta enfermedad es desconocida, pero las casetas contaminadas se ven afectadas por episodios recurrentes. Un lote de pollos de engorde ubicado en Quebec, Canadá, presentó lesiones de osteomielitis positivas para E. cecorum y Enterococcus faecalis. Sorprendentemente, el siguiente lote, en la misma caseta, reveló la presencia de lesiones positivas por E. faecalis y Enterococcus raffinosus, pero no por E. cecorum. Para entender mejor la epidemiología de estos dos brotes, verificar la persistencia de aislamientos patógenos en la caseta e identificar la posible transferencia de material genético entre las especies de Enterococcus aisladas de ambos eventos, se secuenciaron 16 aislamientos (1 de E. cecorum, 13 de E. faecalis y 2 de E. raffinosus) y se compararon sus genomas. Curiosamente, más de una especie de Enterococcus pudo aislarse de la misma lesión, mientras que otras lesiones también revelaron varios aislamientos no clonales de la misma especie. Esto podría sugerir la naturaleza oportunista de Enterococcus spp. ya que no había un aislamiento predominante en las lesiones. El número de genes de virulencia varió de 1 a 34 en tres especies de Enterococcus sin la presencia de un gene de virulencia común. El número y la naturaleza de los genes de resistencia a los antimicrobianos entre esos aislamientos fueron preocupantes porque indican la presencia de resistencia a múltiples fármacos en la granja. Tanto los plásmidos como los fagos fueron compartidos por diferentes especies de Enterococcus, lo que sugiere una posible transferencia horizontal de genes de elementos genéticos móviles dentro de esta población de enterococos.

Enterococcal osteomyelitis/spondylitis is an emerging disease affecting broiler chickens worldwide (1,2,3,4,5,6). The disease is characterized by an infection of the free thoracic vertebral body (T4), which leads to compression of the spinal cord, lameness, reduced mobility, and typical paralysis. Affected birds often die of dehydration or inanition when not culled (2). Osteomyelitis in various bones as well as septicemic lesions such as polyserositis are also observed, with all clinical presentations resulting in lack of flock uniformity, variable mortality, and increased condemnations rates (7).

Initially identified as Streptococcus cecorum in 1983 (8) and reclassified in 1989 to the Enterococcus genus based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing (9), Enterococcus cecorum has been the bacterium most frequently implicated in outbreaks of vertebral and nonvertebral osteomyelitis in broiler and broiler breeders (2,3,5,10,11). Other species such as Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus casseliflavus, and Enterococcus avium have also been isolated from broiler chickens affected with osteomyelitis and other septicemic lesions (6). Enterococcus spp. are Gram-positive bacteria, and they are facultative anaerobic, nonmotile, non-spore-forming organisms with diverse biochemical properties (7). They are ubiquitous in nature, with a worldwide distribution among avian species, and they are considered part of the normal gut microbiota of chickens commonly found in poultry house environments.

The epidemiology of transmission is unknown. There is no current evidence of vertical transmission (4,12), and experimental infection models suggest early infection of young chicks via an oral route (10,13,14). A contaminated environment, and hence horizontal transmission, would seem to play an important role, one that could be tempered by the cleaning and disinfection of the poultry house (15).

A few comparative genomic analyses of pathogenic E. cecorum strains have been published. Six genes associated with clinical E. cecorum isolates were identified in poultry by Laurentie et al. (16). The presence of two or more of these six genes discriminated 94% of their isolates associated with disease in chickens from other E. cecorum isolates. Borst et al. (17) also described other potential virulence-associated determinants such as a capsular locus as well as cell wall–associated proteins.

Interestingly, recurring outbreaks in the same house have been reported by poultry practitioners, which could suggest persistence of a pathogenic E. cecorum isolate in the environment. Such a house was initially visited in July 2020, and E. cecorum and E. faecalis were isolated from osteomyelitis lesions. Surprisingly, the next flock revealed the presence of E. faecalis and E. raffinosus in the lesions, but no E. cecorum was isolated.

To better understand the epidemiology of these outbreaks, verify the persistence of pathogenic isolates, and identify the possible horizontal transfer of genetic material between Enterococcus species in successive flocks, our objectives were 1) to assess whether the enterococci isolates isolated during the first visit were clonal to those isolated during the second visit, 2) to identify the presence of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), virulence factor genes (VFs), and antimicrobial resistance genes (AMGs) in the enterococci isolates isolated, and 3) to determine whether there were MGEs common to the different enterococci.

Farm description.

The farm comprises four three-story broiler barns housing between 15,000 and 33,000 birds each. All buildings are fully automated, and litter is taken out between each lot with a downtime period of approximately 2 wk. Chicks are from the same hatchery, and they are delivered to the farm and shipped to slaughter on the same day. A first episode of E. cecorum was diagnosed in one barn in May 2019. All barns were affected as of September 2019. Since then, penicillin or amoxicillin has regularly been administered in the first 2 wk of rearing via in-feed supply or via drinking water to control the infection, but any attempt to stop antimicrobial use is eventually met with a resurgence of the disease.

Bacterial isolates.

To identify a potential on-farm reservoir of E. cecorum, we collected multiple samples, using the same protocol, on Visits A and B from a single barn (Barn 4) on July 13, 2020, and August 24, 2020, when birds were 21 days of age. Series of swabs from lesions (vertebra or tibia) and dust from various environmental surfaces (walls, feeders, fans, litter) were submitted on ice to the Chair in Poultry Research Laboratory at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal. On Visit A, one E. cecorum isolate (n = 1) and two E. faecalis isolates (n = 2) were isolated from lesions, whereas one E. faecalis isolate (n = 1) was isolated from the feeder. On Visit B, 12 E. faecalis isolates (n = 12) were isolated from four tibias presenting lytic foci in the proximal physis, and one E. raffinosus isolate (n = 1) was isolated from a vertebral abscess, whereas one E. raffinosus isolate (n = 1) was isolated from dust collected on the wall.

Isolation method.

For the detection of E. cecorum, multiple broth enrichment/selection steps followed by culture on a medium selective for Gram-positive bacteria were done. Briefly, all samples were enriched in 50 ml of Tryptic Soy Broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) and incubated overnight at 37 C with 5% CO2. Two-milliliter aliquots were then put into 18 ml of Todd Hewitt Broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 1% yeast extract (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and amikacin (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) at a final concentration of 64 μg/ml, incubated overnight, and transferred onto Columbia colistin nalidixic acid supplemented with 5% sheep blood agar plates before an overnight incubation in the same conditions. Characteristic colonies were streaked onto brain heart infusion agar plates and incubated overnight at 37 C with 5% CO2, and three catalase-negative colonies per agar plate were transferred onto blood agar plates for species confirmation using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry after incubation.

DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing.

All isolates confirmed by MALDI-TOF to be Enterococcus species were selected. The genomic DNA of one isolate of E. cecorum, 15 isolates of E. faecalis, and two isolates of E. raffinosus was extracted using the Lucigen MasterPure™ Gram Positive DNA purification kit (LGN-MGP04100; Mandel Scientific Company Inc., Guelph, Ontario, Canada) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After adjusting all samples at 50 ng/μl in a final volume of 20 μl, samples were sent to the Genome Quebec Centre (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) sequencing center and sequenced on a NovaSeq6000 SP instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to generate 150-bp paired-end reads.

Bioinformatic analysis.

Genomes were assembled using the following method. Briefly, reads were trimmed to remove Illumina adapters and poor-quality reads using Scythe v0.994 and Sickle v1.33 (18,19). Read quality was assessed before and after trimming using FastQC v0.12.0 (20) to ensure high-quality reads were obtained prior to assembly. Genome assembly was performed using SPAdes v3.15.2 (21), and protein annotation was done using Prokka v.1.14.6 with default parameters (22). Genome size, GC content (guanine-cytosine content), N50 values (average length of a set of sequences), and number of coding sequences (CDS) were evaluated using Quast v5.2.0 (23) and are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Name, bird, sample type, visit, and sequencing and genome assembly statistics for each Enterococcus isolate of this study.

Name, bird, sample type, visit, and sequencing and genome assembly statistics for each Enterococcus isolate of this study.
Name, bird, sample type, visit, and sequencing and genome assembly statistics for each Enterococcus isolate of this study.

Multilocus sequence typing of E. faecalis isolates.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of E. faecalis isolates was achieved using the typing tool of PubMLST (24) with the E. faecalis typing database. Briefly, the nucleotide sequences of seven housekeeping genes (gdh, gyd, pstS, gki, aroE, xpt, and yqiL) from the genome of E. faecalis isolates were compared to the typing database to determine their allelic profile. Sequence types (STs) of isolates were determined according to their allelic profile. Only exact matches (7/7) were considered.

Pangenome analysis and phylogenetic analysis of E. faecalis isolates.

A pangenome analysis of the E. faecalis genomes was performed using the bioinformatic tool Roary v3.12.0 (25). Roary’s pipeline was run using the GFF3 files generated during the protein annotation by Prokka as input with -s (do not split paralogs) and -n (generate a core genome alignment) options. The core, accessory, and unique genomes were defined by genes present in ≥99% isolates, 98% ≥ isolates >1%, and a single isolate of E. faecalis. The alignment of the core genome was done using MAFFT v7.407 (26). A maximum-likelihood tree was then constructed using a general time reversible model of nucleotide substitution with a gamma model of rate heterogeneity based on the core genome alignment mentioned above using the tool raxml-ng v1.2.0 (27). Briefly, 25 random and 25 parsimony trees were constructed by raxml-ng. Then, the tree with the best likelihood value was selected and supported by a bootstrap value of 1000 replicates with a cutoff value of 0.03. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using iTOL v6.8 (28).

Identification of AMGs, VFs, and MGEs.

The genomes of E. cecorum, E. faecalis, and E. raffinosus were screened for the presence of ARGs, VFs, and MGEs. Detection of ARGs among the genomes was performed using the bioinformatic tool Abricate v0.8.10 (29) with the highly curated MEGARes database (30). An additional screening was done at the protein level using the online Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) tool from the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) (31), and detection of mutational resistance was performed using the webtool ResFinder v.4.6.0 with thresholds of 90% and 80% for homology and coverage parameters (32,33). Detection of VFs was achieved by comparing the proteomes of all isolates with the protein sequence of VFs from the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) (34). Briefly, a BLASTp alignment of the annotated proteomes against the protein database of VFDB was performed for all isolates. Another BLASTp analysis was performed to screen the genes associated with avian clinical isolates of E. cecorum identified by Laurentie et al. (16) and a gene part of the capsular locus identified by Borst et al. (17) and referred as the cpsO gene (35) within the genome of E. cecorum isolate CECO0008. For both analyses, only hits with percent identity >90% with a query coverage percentage >80% and an e value <1e−10 were considered as VFs. Detection of MGEs including insertion sequences (IS), plasmids, and prophages was done. Genomes were screened for IS using the bioinformatic tools ISEScan v1.7.2.3 (36) and MobileElementFinder v1.1.2 (37) with default parameters. Plasmid detection was achieved by first separating plasmids from chromosome contigs using the bioinformatic tool Plasmer v0.1 (38) with default parameters. Plasmid contigs were then submitted to the search tool of PLSDB (39) using Mash screen as the search strategy with default parameters and the winner-takes-all option to remove redundancy. Prophage detection was achieved using the command line version of the PHAge Search Tool with Enhanced Sequence Translation (PHASTEST) (40), and only intact prophages (score >90) were considered. The presence of ARGs, the VFs, and the prevalence of MGEs for each isolate are indicated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree built on the core genome alignment of the E. faecalis isolates of this study. From left to right, the ST profile, the sample type, the visit, the bird identifier, the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), virulence factor genes (VFs), and plasmids detected for each E. faecalis isolate are illustrated. Acquired and mutational ARGs are represented by red and blue circles, respectively. Tree scale is indicated at the top-left corner and represents the number of substitutions per site. The bootstrap values are indicated below the tree branches.

Fig. 1.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree built on the core genome alignment of the E. faecalis isolates of this study. From left to right, the ST profile, the sample type, the visit, the bird identifier, the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), virulence factor genes (VFs), and plasmids detected for each E. faecalis isolate are illustrated. Acquired and mutational ARGs are represented by red and blue circles, respectively. Tree scale is indicated at the top-left corner and represents the number of substitutions per site. The bootstrap values are indicated below the tree branches.

Close modal

Genome assembly and diversity.

The total number of reads per isolate ranged between 4.16 and 6.40 million with an average number of 5.02 million reads per isolate. Two E. faecalis isolates were withdrawn from the study because the sequencing reads and the resulting assemblies were of low quality. E. cecorum isolate CECO0008 had a genome of 2.22 Mbp with a GC content of 36.56% and 2161 CDS (Table 1). The average genome size of E. faecalis isolates was 2.34 ± 0.23 Mbp, with the smallest and largest genomes having a genome size of 2.27 Mbp and 3.22 Mbp, respectively. The average GC content of E. faecalis genomes was 37.35 ± 0.43%, whereas the minimum and maximum GC contents observed were 36.89% and 38.57%, respectively. The average CDS observed within E. faecalis genomes was 2863 ± 130 CDS, whereas the least and the greatest numbers of CDS detected were 2697 and 3101 CDS, respectively. The average genome size of E. raffinosus isolates was 4.14 ± 0.28 Mbp, while its average GC content was 40.1 ± 0.64%. The average number of CDS within E. raffinosus genomes was 4448 ± 349 CDS.

According to the phylogenetic analysis, isolates recovered during Visit A were distinct from those of Visit B as no cluster was composed of isolates from both visits was observed (Fig. 1). Moreover, the ST profile of isolates from Visit A (ST 1500) was different from the ST profiles of isolates from Visit B (ST 207, 227, 300, 314, and 841). Nonetheless, isolates from Visit B with the profiles ST 207 and 841 were the closest relatives to isolates from Visit A. Isolates ENT0382, ENT0383, and ENT0384 isolated from the tibia of Bird 7 were clonal based on their core genome, ST profile, and accessory genome (ARGs, VFs, and MGEs). Isolates ENT0380 and ENT0381 isolated from the tibia of Bird 6 were closely related, but ENT0380 lacked the VF fss2. Although the isolates isolated from different sources of Visit A seemed clonal at the core genome level, differences at the accessory genome level were observed, notably the presence of the VFs fliE and fss1, as well as the total number of MGEs detected. Isolates ENT0376, ENT0377, and ENT0379 were clonal based on their core genome, ARGs, and VFs, but the number of identified MGEs among the genomes of these isolates was different. The population of E. faecalis isolates isolated from lesions was mostly heterogenous as nonclonal isolates were isolated from the same lesion. For example, isolates of ST 207 (n = 1) and ST 841(n = 2) recovered from the tibia of Bird 5 and isolates of ST 300 (n = 2) and ST 841 (n = 1) recovered from the tibia of Bird 6 were not clonal.

MGE analyses.

Two plasmids (NZ_CP064416.1 and LR962096.1) were identified in E. cecorum CECO0008, whereas seven plasmids (NZ_CP086561.1, LR962096.1, LR962516.1, NZ_CP135067.1, NZ_KY513281.1, NZ_MW647491.1, and NZ_OP046174.1) and six plasmids (LR962516.1, NZ_CP081847.1, NZ_MW647491.1, LR962096.1, NZ_CP135067.1, and CP101347.1) were identified in E. faecalis and E. raffinosus isolates, respectively. The plasmid LR962096.1 was found in all three Enterococcus species, although it does not appear to encode any genes other than a putative transposase previously identified in E. faecalis (GenBank accession no. AAL05546.1). The plasmids LR962516.1, NZ_CP135067.1, and NZ_MW647491.1 were shared among our E. faecalis and E. raffinosus isolates. Although no ARG was encoded by the plasmid LR962516.1, the plasmids NZ_CP135067.1 and NZ_MW647491.1 encoded the ARGs erm(B) and blaTEM-116, respectively. A single intact phage was detected within the genome of CECO0008, whereas 10 and two intact phages were detected within the genomes of E. faecalis and E. raffinosus, respectively. One phage (PHAGE_Strept_5093_NC_012753) was detected in both E. cecorum and E. faecalis species, and one phage (PHAGE_Entero_vB_IME197_NC_028671) was detected in both E. faecalis and E. raffinosus species.

Multidrug resistance in pathogenic and environmental enterococci species.

In total, three ARGs (lnuC, tetL, and tetM) were detected in isolate CECO0008, potentially conferring resistance to lincomycin and tetracycline, whereas 19 ARGs [ant(6)-Ia, aph(3’)-IIa, aph(3’)-III, blaTEM-116, ble_Tn5, catA1, dfrE, dfrG, efrA, efrB, ermB, gyrA, lsa(A), narA, narB, parC, tet(L), tet(M), tet(O)] were detected among E. faecalis isolates. These ARGs are associated with resistance to aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, glycopeptides, phenicols, disinfectants, macrolides, rifamycin, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, streptogramins, ionophores, and tetracyclines. Eight ARGs [aph(3’)-IIa, blaTEM-116, ble_Tn5, catA1, ermB, marA, narA, and narB] were detected among E. raffinosus isolates. These ARGs are associated with resistance to aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, glycopeptides, phenicols, macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, and ionophores. Interestingly, isolate ENT0071 also carried marA, a gene encoding a transcription regulator of the AraC family that regulates the expression of several proteins leading to an overall reduction of the sensitivity to antibiotics (41,42,43).

VF analyses.

Two VFs, CIRMBP1228_00573 and CIRMBP1228_00586, both identified by Laurentie et al. (16) in their poultry clinical isolates, as well as cpsO, identified in pathogenic strains by Borst et al. (17,35), were detected within the genome of the E. cecorum isolate CECO0008. In total, 39 VFs were detected among the E. faecalis isolates. The average number of VFs detected per E. faecalis isolate was 25 ± 7 VFs, with isolates ENT0373, ENT0383, ENT0383, and ENT0384 having the least VFs (n = 18) and isolates ENT0376, ENT0377, ENT0379, and ENT0381 having the most VFs (n = 34). Two clusters of isolates on the phylogenetic tree with more than 30 VFs were observed (Fig. 1). The first cluster was composed of isolates ENT0380 and ENT0381, whereas the second cluster was composed of isolates ENT0376, ENT0377, and ENT0379. In total, seven VFs were detected among E. raffinosus isolates. The average number of VFs detected per E. raffinosus isolate was 6 ± 1 VFs, with isolate ENT0007 having the least VFs (n = 5) and isolate ENT0071 having the most VFs (n = 7). No VF was common to all Enterococcus species.

E. cecorum osteomyelitis lesions are commonly observed in broiler chicken flocks in Québec, Canada. In one episode of vertebral and nonvertebral osteomyelitis in a broiler chicken flock, E. cecorum and E. faecalis were both isolated from the same vertebral abscess. Surprisingly, during a recurring episode of osteomyelitis in the following lot, housed in the same barn, E. faecalis was the bacteria most isolated from tibial lytic foci, while E. raffinosus was isolated from a vertebral abscess. To verify whether VFs as well as AMGs originating from the original E. cecorum isolate could have been horizontally transferred to other Enterococcus species via MGEs, whole-genome sequencing of 16 Enterococcus species isolates (1 E. cecorum, 13 E. faecalis, and 2 E. raffinosus isolates) from osteomyelitis lesions, feeder surfaces, and litter surfaces from these two consecutive broiler chicken flocks was carried out and compared using various bioinformatic tools.

Intralesion genetic diversity.

Genomic analysis revealed that more than one Enterococcus species could be isolated from the same lesion site. Surprisingly, isolates of the same species isolated from the same lesion were genetically distinct. Indeed, E. faecalis isolates from lesions were mostly heterogeneous, as nonclonal isolates were isolated from the same lesion. This observation suggests that several E. faecalis isolates may be involved in lesion development rather than one dominant pathogenic isolate. E. faecalis is known to be involved in polymicrobial infections and has been shown to enhance the virulence of other pathogens (44). In this study, its presence without other pathogens suggests that E. faecalis might be an opportunistic bacterium when predisposing factors support its colonization and growth.

Although the isolates obtained from different sources during Visit A appeared to be clonal at the core genome level, some differences were observed at the accessory genome level, in particular the VFs fliE and fss1 and the total number of MGEs detected. Genes surrounding fliE are involved with the conjugation machinery, which suggests that this VF is encoded onto a plasmid. Consequently, the differences observed in the accessory genome of these isolates may be explained by a different number of MGEs.

Suggestion of genetic transfer between enterococci species.

The presence of plasmids common to the enterococci species in this study suggested that the horizontal transfer of genetic material between them can happen, but further research is necessary to verify this hypothesis. For example, it has been shown that E. faecium and E. faecalis can exchange conjugative plasmids such as the pheromone-responsive plasmid pMG2200 that encodes vancomycin resistance (45). E. faecalis is notorious for its ability to share genetic content within and across species, which also explains the genomic diversity observed among our isolates (44). Moreover, the fact that the plasmids identified in this study were first identified in bacterial genera other than Enterococcus, such as Salmonella enterica, Streptococcus suis, and Bacillus safiensis, also points to the evidence that enterococci species can acquire foreign DNA from the various species found in the intestinal microbiota of chickens and the barn environment.

Phages were also detected in all three Enterococcus species. Phages are a known source of horizontal gene transfer through transduction, a process during which nonviral DNA is trapped inside a virus particle and transferred from the bacterial host cell to another cell via viral infection (46). Although phages normally infect a narrow host range, some can infect different species and even different genera of bacteria (47), as observed in this study. Phages are likely another passive means by which to exchange genetic material between enterococci species and other organisms present in the intestinal microbiota or the barn environment. Because no ARG or VF was associated with the phages detected in this study, it was not possible to confirm this hypothesis.

Multidrug resistance in pathogenic and environmental enterococci species.

Multidrug resistance has been defined as the acquired nonsusceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories (48). According to that definition, all E. faecalis and E. raffinosus isolates of this study were multidrug-resistant forms, whereas the E. cecorum isolate CECO0008 was not. It is somewhat concerning to observe that enterococci isolated not only from osteomyelitis lesions but also from the barn environment showed up to 11 ARGs in total. The early and preventive administration of penicillin or amoxicillin is regularly used in Quebec, Canada, as a means to control E. cecorum outbreaks. The presence of the blaTEM-116 gene, encoded on plasmid and associated with the resistance to beta-lactams in Clostridium perfringens (49), could potentially see the end of this practice. For example, this plasmid-encoded ARG could be transferred to a larger enterococci population as observed in this study, with the E. faecalis and E. raffinosus isolates sharing this plasmid. However, further studies are necessary to verify if the presence of this gene indeed results in phenotypic resistance.

More worrisome, however, is the large number of ARGs detected in both the pathogenic and environmental E. faecalis isolates. Furthermore, except for dfrE, efrAB, and lsa(A), all the ARGs detected in this study were associated with MGEs and could therefore potentially be disseminated in the environment. The impact of this observation is yet to be assessed, but enterococci species as gram-positive markers for antimicrobial resistance should be considered as an interesting ARGs reservoir, since mostly gram-negative bacteria, i.e., Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., and Escherichia coli, are monitored in national antimicrobial resistance surveillance programs (50,51).

The numbers of VFs vary greatly between Enterococcus isolates.

The numbers of VFs did vary from 1 to 34 between E. faecalis and E. raffinosus isolates. E. cecorum was only isolated once from a lesion swabbed during the first visit. No VF from the VFDB database was detected for E. cecorum CECO0008. However, two of the six genes identified by Laurentie et al. (16), CIRMBP1228_00586 and CIRMBP1228_00573, as well as cpsO identified by Borst et al. (17,35), all associated with clinical poultry E. cecorum isolates, were detected in this study. E. faecalis is a well-characterized pathogen in human medicine, and its extensively studied genome has led to the discovery of multiple VFs (52). Therefore, it was expected that a higher number of VFs would be detected among E. faecalis isolates. Given that E. faecalis, E. raffinosus, and likely E. cecorum are equipped with various virulence and survival mechanisms, it is not surprising to see them adapting to and colonizing various tissues.

In conclusion, persistence of a pathogenic E. cecorum isolate and horizontal transmission of VFs to other Enterococcus species from one broiler chicken lot to a following one were not demonstrated. However, given the number of different MGEs shared between the Enterococcus isolates sequenced and because numerous VFs involved in the pathogenesis of vertebral and nonvertebral osteomyelitis have yet to be identified, this possibility cannot be entirely dismissed.

We wish to thank the Innov’Action Agroalimentaire program from the Quebec Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAPAQ) for financial support (grant no. IA120627).

BioProject ID: PRJNA1208540

Abbreviations:

ARGs =

antimicrobial resistance genes;

CDS =

number of coding sequences;

GC content =

guanine-cytosine content;

IS =

insertion sequences;

MALDI-TOF =

matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight;

MGEs =

mobile genetic elements;

MLST =

multilocus sequence typing;

rRNA =

ribosomal RNA;

ST =

sequence type;

VFs =

virulence factor genes;

VFDB =

virulence factor database

1.
Wood
AM
,
MacKenzie
G
,
McGiliveray
NC
,
Brown
L
,
Devriese
LA
,
Baele
M.
Isolation of Enterococcus cecorum from bone lesions in broiler chickens
.
Vet Rec
.
150
:
27
;
2002
.
2.
Aziz
T
,
Barnes
H.
Is spondylitis an emerging disease of broilers
?
Poult World
.
23
:
44
45
;
2007
.
3.
Stalker
MJ
,
Brash
ML
,
Weisz
A
,
Ouckama
RM
,
Slavic
D.
Arthritis and osteomyelitis associated with Enterococcus cecorum infection in broiler and broiler breeder chickens in Ontario, Canada
.
J Vet Diagn Invest
.
22
:
643
645
;
2010
.
4.
Kense
MJ
,
Landman
WJ.
Enterococcus cecorum infections in broiler breeders and their offspring: molecular epidemiology
.
Avian Pathol
.
40
:
603
612
;
2011
.
5.
Boerlin
P
,
Nicholson
V
,
Brash
M
,
Slavic
D
,
Boyen
F
,
Sanei
B
,
Butaye
P.
Diversity of Enterococcus cecorum from chickens
.
Vet Microbiol
.
157
:
405
411
;
2012
.
6.
Souillard
R
,
Laurentie
J
,
Kempf
I
,
Le Caër
V
,
Le Bouquin
S
,
Serror
P
,
Allain
V.
Increasing incidence of Enterococcus-associated diseases in poultry in France over the past 15 years
.
Vet Microbiol
.
269
:
109426
;
2022
.
7.
Jung
A
,
Chen
LR
,
Suyemoto
MM
,
Barnes
HJ
,
Borst
LB.
A review of Enterococcus cecorum infection in poultry
.
Avian Dis
.
62
:
261
271
;
2018
.
8.
Devriese
LA
,
Dutta
GN
,
Farrow
JAE
,
Van de Kerckhove
A
,
Phillips
BA.
Streptococcus cecorum, a new species isolated from chickens
.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
.
33
:
772
776
;
1983
.
9.
Williams
AM
,
Farrow
JAE
,
Collins
MD.
Reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA from Streptococcus cecorum
.
Lett Appl Microbiol
.
8
:
185
189
;
1989
.
10.
Martin
LT
,
Martin
MP
,
Barnes
HJ.
Experimental reproduction of enterococcal spondylitis in male broiler breeder chickens
.
Avian Dis
.
55
:
273
278
;
2011
.
11.
Aitchison
H
,
Poolman
P
,
Coetzer
M
,
Griffiths
C
,
Jacobs
J
,
Meyer
M
,
Bisschop
S.
Enterococcal-related vertebral osteoarthritis in South African broiler breeders: a case report
.
J S Afr Vet Assoc
.
85
:
1077
;
2014
.
12.
Robbins
KM
,
Suyemoto
MM
,
Lyman
RL
,
Martin
MP
,
Barnes
HJ
,
Borst
LB.
An outbreak and source investigation of enterococcal spondylitis in broilers caused by Enterococcus cecorum
.
Avian Dis
.
56
:
768
773
;
2012
.
13.
Borst
L
,
Suyemoto
MM
,
Sarsour
AH
,
Harris
MC
,
Martin
MP
,
Strickland
JD
,
Oviedo
EO
,
Barnes
HJ.
Pathogenesis of enterococcal spondylitis caused by Enterococcus cecorum in broiler chickens
.
Vet Pathol
.
54
:
61
73
;
2017
.
14.
Schreier
J
,
Rautenschlein
S
,
Jung
A.
Different virulence levels of Enterococcus cecorum strains in experimentally infected meat-type chickens
.
PLoS One
.
16
:
e0259904
;
2021
.
15.
Tessin
J
,
Jung
A
,
Silberborth
A
,
Rohn
K
,
Schulz
J
,
Visscher
C
,
Kemper
N.
Detection of Enterococcus cecorum to identify persistently contaminated locations using faecal and environmental samples in broiler houses of clinically healthy flocks
.
Avian Pathol
.
53
:
312
320
;
2024
.
16.
Laurentie
J
,
Loux
V
,
Hennequet-Antier
C
,
Chambellon
E
,
Deschamps
J
,
Trotereau
A
,
Furlan
S
,
Darrigo
C
,
Kempf
F
,
Lao
J
,et al.
Comparative genome analysis of Enterococcus cecorum reveals intercontinental spread of a lineage of clinical poultry isolates
.
mSphere
.
8
:
e0049522
;
2023
.
17.
Borst
L
,
Suyemoto
MM
,
Scholl
EH
,
Fuller
FJ
,
Barnes
HJ.
Comparative genomic analysis identifies divergent genomic features of pathogenic Enterococcus cecorum including a type IC CRISPR-Cas system, a capsule locus, an epa-like locus, and putative host tissue binding proteins
.
PLoS One
.
10
:
e0121294
;
2015
.
18.
Buffalo
V.
Scythe—a Bayesian adapter trimmer. v0.994
.
Github.
https://github.com/vsbuffalo/scythe;
2011
.
19.
Joshi
NA
,
Fass
JN.
Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files
.
v1.33. Github
. https://github.com/najoshi/sickle;
2011
.
20.
Andrews
S.
FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data
.
v0.12.0. Github.
http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
2010
.
21.
Prjibelski
A
,
Antipov
D
,
Meleshko
D
,
Lapidus
A
,
Korobeynikov
A.
Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler
.
Curr Protoc Bioinform
.
70
:
e102
;
2020
.
22.
Seemann
T.
Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation
.
Bioinformatics
.
30
:
2068
2069
;
2014
.
23.
Mikheenko
A
,
Prjibelski
A
,
Saveliev
V
,
Antipov
D
,
Gurevich
A.
Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG
.
Bioinformatics
.
34
:
i142
i150
;
2018
.
24.
Jolley
KA
,
Bray
JE
,
Maiden
MCJ.
Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications
.
Wellcome Open Res
.
3
:
124
;
2018
.
25.
Page
AJ
,
Cummins
CA
,
Hunt
M
,
Wong
VK
,
Reuter
S
,
Holden
MT
,
Fookes
M
,
Falush
D
,
Keane
JA
,
Parkhill
J.
Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis
.
Bioinformatics
.
31
:
3691
3693
;
2015
.
26.
Katoh
K
,
Rozewicki
J
,
Yamada
KD.
MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization
.
Brief Bioinform
.
20
:
1160
1166
;
2019
.
27.
Kozlov
AM
,
Darriba
D
,
Flouri
T
,
Morel
B
,
Stamatakis
A.
RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference
.
Bioinformatics
.
35
:
4453
4455
;
2019
.
28.
Letunic
I
,
Bork
P.
Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation
.
Nucleic Acids Res
.
49
:
W293
W296
;
2021
.
29.
Seemann
T.
ABRicate: Mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial resistance or virulence genes
.
v0.8.10. Github
. https://github.com/tseeman/abricate/.
30.
Bonin
N
,
Doster
E
,
Worley
H
,
Pinnell
LJ
,
Bravo
JE
,
Ferm
P
,
Marini
S
,
Prosperi
M
,
Noyes
N
,
Morley
PS
,et al.
MEGARes and AMR++, v3.0: an updated comprehensive database of antimicrobial resistance determinants and an improved software pipeline for classification using high-throughput sequencing
.
Nucleic Acids Res
.
51
:
D744
D752
;
2023
.
31.
Alcock
BP
,
Raphenya
AR
,
Lau
TTY
,
Tsang
KK
,
Bouchard
M
,
Edalatmand
A
,
Huynh
W
,
Nguyen
AV
,
Cheng
AA
,
Liu
S
,et al.
CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database
.
Nucleic Acids Res
.
48
:
D517
D525
;
2020
.
32.
Bortolaia
V
,
Kaas
RS
,
Ruppe
E
,
Roberts
MC
,
Schwarz
S
,
Cattoir
V
,
Philippon
A
,
Allesoe
RL
,
Rebelo
AR
,
Florensa
AF
,et al.
ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes
.
J Antimicrob Chemother
.
75
:
3491
3500
;
2020
.
33.
Camacho
C
,
Coulouris
G
,
Avagyan
V
,
Ma
N
,
Papadopoulos
J
,
Bealer
K
,
Madden
TL.
BLAST+: architecture and applications
.
BMC Bioinform
.
10
:
421
;
2009
.
34.
Chen
L
,
Zheng
D
,
Liu
B
,
Yang
J
,
Jin
Q.
VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis—10 years on
.
Nucleic Acids Res
.
44
:
D694
D697
;
2016
.
35.
Borst
L
,
Pulido
M
,
Rhoads
D
,
Jung
A
,
Mountainspring
G
,
Kessler
K.
Enterococcus cecorum: When good bugs go bad. In:
Enterococcus: an old dog with new tricks; American College of Poultry Veterinarians Workshop. 2023
;
Sacramento (CA). Jacksonville (FL)
:
American Association of Avian Pathologists
. https://www.aaap.info/virtual-education;
2023
.
36.
Xie
Z
,
Tang
H.
ISEScan: automated identification of insertionsequence elements in prokaryotic genomes
.
Bioinformatics
.
33
:
3340
3347
;
2017
.
37.
Durrant
MG
,
Li
MM
,
Siranosian
BA
,
Montgomery
SB
,
Bhatt
AS.
A bioinformatic analysis of integrative mobile genetic elements highlights their role in bacterial adaptation
.
Cell Host Microbe
.
28
:
767
;
2020
.
38.
Zhu
Q
,
Gao
S
,
Xiao
B
,
He
Z
,
Hu
S.
Plasmer: an accurate and sensitive bacterial plasmid prediction tool based on machine learning of shared k-mers and genomic features
.
Microbiol Spectr
.
11
:
e0464522
;
2023
.
39.
Schmartz
GP
,
Hartung
A
,
Hirsch
P
,
Kern
F
,
Fehlmann
T
,
Müller
R
,
Keller
A.
PLSDB: advancing a comprehensive database of bacterial plasmids
.
Nucleic Acids Res
.
50
:
D273
D278
;
2022
.
40.
Wishart
DS
,
Han
S
,
Saha
S
,
Oler
E
,
Peters
H
,
Grant
JR
,
Stothard
P
,
Gautam
V.
PHASTEST: faster than PHASTER, better than PHAST
.
Nucleic Acids Res
.
51
:
W443
W450
;
2023
.
41.
Godsey
MH
,
Zheleznova Heldwein
EE
,
Brennan
RG.
Structural biology of bacterial multidrug resistance gene regulators
.
J Biol Chem
.
277
:
40169
40172
;
2002
.
42.
Cohen
SP
,
McMurry
LM
,
Levy
SB.
marA locus causes decreased expression of OmpF porin in multiple-antibiotic-resistant (Mar) mutants of Escherichia coli
.
J Bacteriol
.
170
:
5416
5422
;
1988
.
43.
Duval
V
,
Lister
IM.
MarA, SoxS and Rob of Escherichia coli—Global regulators of multidrug resistance, virulence and stress response
.
Int J Biotechnol Wellness Ind
.
2
:
101
124
;
2013
.
44.
Hochstedler-Kramer
BR
,
Ene
A
,
Putonti
C
,
Wolfe
AJ.
Comparative genomic analysis of clinical Enterococcus faecalis distinguishes strains isolated from the bladder
.
BMC Genomics
.
24
:
752
;
2023
.
45.
Dubin
K
,
Pamer
EG.
Enterococci and their interactions with the intestinal microbiome
.
Microbiol Spectr
.
5
;
2017
.
46.
Chevallereau
A
,
Pons
BJ
,
van Houte
S
,
Westra
ER.
Interactions between bacterial and phage communities in natural environments
.
Nat Rev Microbiol
.
20
:
49
62
;
2022
.
47.
Ross
A
,
Ward
S
,
Hyman
P.
More is better: selecting for broad host range bacteriophages
.
Front Microbiol
.
7
:
1352
;
2016
.
48.
Magiorakos
AP
,
Srinivasan
A
,
Carey
RB
,
Carmeli
Y
,
Falagas
ME
,
Giske
CG
,
Harbarth
S
,
Hindler
JF
,
Kahlmeter
G
,
Olsson-Liljequist
B
,et al.
Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance
.
Clin Microbiol Infect
.
18
:
268
281
;
2012
.
49.
Li
J
,
Zhou
Y
,
Yang
D
,
Zhang
S
,
Sun
Z
,
Wang
Y
,
Wang
S
,
Wu
C.
Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens in chickens and pigs from Beijing and Shanxi, China
.
Vet Microbiol
.
252
:
108932
;
2020
.
50.
Karp
BE
,
Tate
H
,
Plumblee
JR
,
Dessai
U
,
Whichard
JM
,
Thacker
EL
,
Hale
KR
,
Wilson
W
,
Friedman
CR
,
Griffin
PM
,et al.
National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System: two decades of advancing public health through integrated surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
.
Foodborne Pathog Dis
.
14
:
545
557
;
2017
.
51.
Bosman
AL
,
Uhland
F
,
Agunos
A
,
Carson
CA.
One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and use by the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS)
.
Can Vet J
.
65
:
1081
1085
;
2024
.
52.
Krawczyk
B
,
Wityk
P
,
Galecka
M
,
Michalik
M.
The many faces of Enterococcus spp.—commensal, probiotic and opportunistic pathogen
.
Microorganisms
.
9
:
1900
;
2021
.