Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallapovo silvestris) in Louisiana have not fully recovered since their decline in the mid-20th century, despite multiple conservation management efforts. Wild turkeys are susceptible to Leucocytozoon infection and also serve as reservoirs of Leucocytozoon parasites. In this study, we tested for Haemosporidian infections (Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon) in 106 different blood samples collected from hunted and live-trapped turkeys in Louisiana using PCR and sequencing of amplicons. Haemoproteus was the most prevalent genus (92%) and had the highest species diversity among the three genera. One-third of our samples were positive for Leucocytozoon infection, significantly less than Haemoproteus but similar to Plasmodium. Male turkeys were more likely to be infected by Leucocytozoon parasites than females. We detected two Leucocytozoon species, Leucocytozoon schoutedeni and Leucocytozoon sabrazesi, the latter possibly being the first detection in North America. There were four times as many turkeys infected with all three genera of Haemosporidia than uninfected turkeys. Last, we present a case study of an emaciated wild turkey in Louisiana; its death was attributed to Leucocytozoon infection. Future research into the pathology of Leucocytozoon infections will clarify whether Leucocytozoon parasites may contribute to population declines in turkeys through mortality or negative reproduction impacts, and whether one sex is more tolerant to Leucocytozoon infection than the other.

La prevalencia de Leucocytozoon difiere según el sexo de pavos silvestres de Luisiana (Meleagris gallopavo).

La población de pavos silvestres del este (Meleagris gallapovo silvestris) en Luisiana no se ha recuperado completamente desde su declive a mediados del siglo XX, a pesar de múltiples esfuerzos de conservación. Los pavos silvestres son susceptibles a la infección por Leucocytozoon y también sirven como reservorios de parásitos Leucocytozoon. En este estudio, se analizó la presencia de infecciones por Haemosporidios (Haemoproteus, Plasmodium y Leucocytozoon) en 106 muestras de sangre diferentes recolectadas de pavos cazados y capturados vivos en Luisiana que fueron analizadas mediante PCR y secuenciación de los amplicones. Haemoproteus fue el género más prevalente (92%) y presentó la mayor diversidad de especies entre los tres géneros. Un tercio de las muestras resultaron positivas para la infección por Leucocytozoon, significativamente menos que Haemoproteus, pero similar a Plasmodium. Los pavos machos fueron más propensos a ser infectados por parásitos Leucocytozoon que las hembras. Se detectaron dos especies de Leucocytozoon, Leucocytozoon schoutedeni y Leucocytozoon sabrazesi, siendo esta última posiblemente la primera detección en Norteamérica. Hubo cuatro veces más pavos infectados con los tres géneros de Haemosporidia en comparación con pavos no infectados. Por último, Se presentó un estudio de caso de un pavo salvaje con emaciación en Luisiana; su muerte se atribuyó a la infección por Leucocytozoon. Las investigaciones futuras sobre la patología de las infecciones por Leucocytozoon aclararán si los parásitos Leucocytozoon pueden contribuir a la disminución de las poblaciones de pavos a través de la mortalidad o impactos negativos en la reproducción, y si un sexo es más tolerante a la infección por Leucocytozoon que el otro.

Avian malaria parasites (Plasmodium) and related Haemosporidia (Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon) are arthropod-borne pathogens that represent a major threat to avifauna worldwide, including zoo, agricultural, and free-living bird populations (1,2,3,4,5,6). Plasmodium is transmitted by Culicidae mosquitos (7,8), Haemoproteus by louse flies (Hippoboscidae), and biting midges (Culicoides) (9,10), and Leucocytozoon by black flies (Simuliidae), and biting midges (11,12,13). Sexual reproduction of these parasites occurs in their respective insect vectors, while birds serve as intermediate hosts for asexual amplification that bolsters their geographic spread (14). Much progress has been made in recent years in understanding the biology of Haemosporidian parasites and the diseases they cause in wild birds, but knowledge on Leucocytozoon parasites lags in comparison to Plasmodium and Haemoproteus species (12).

The disease caused by Leucocytozoon species (leucocytozoonosis) is similar to that caused by Plasmodium and Haemoproteus species, with symptoms including anemia, appetite loss, lethargy, debilitation, and loss of muscle coordination (12,14,15). These parasites can sequester in host organs, more severely in the brain, where they can cause convulsions and paralysis before death (12). However, adult birds usually survive acute Leucocytozoon infection, and exo-erythrocytic parasites can remain dormant in the host tissues, with seasonal relapses and disease emergence in and from reservoir hosts (16).

Wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in North America are susceptible to infection by some Leucocytozoon species (i.e., Leucocytozoon andrewsi, also known as Leucocytozoon schoutedeni; and Leucocytozoon smithi). This has frequently been observed through 100% infection prevalence in turkeys (17,18,19,20,21), often higher than in nearby domestic fowl (18,22). Likewise, wild turkeys were the only species among six land birds and waterfowl to have 100% infection success during natural and experimental inoculations (19,23,24). Leucocytozoon outbreaks in domestic turkey farms historically had high mortality rates as well as reduced egg production, egg fertility, and hatching success for turkey hens (25) before production was moved indoors to eliminate disease transmission (22,26,27). However, turkeys have historically not been infected by some Leucocytozoon species (notably, Leucocytozoon sabrazesi (28), also known as Leucocytozoon macleani; Leucocytozoon caulleryi and have resisted infection by others (e.g., Leucocytozoon anseris, also known as Leucocytozoon simondi (29,30)), suggesting avian host specificity of some Leucocytozoon species. The high prevalence of some Leucocytozoon infections in wild and domestic turkeys and the long-term persistence of gametocytes in the peripheral blood (e.g., L. smithi (31)) strongly suggests that wild turkey populations serve as reservoirs of Leucocytozoon species in North America (26,32,33,34,35).

From a pre-European settlement estimate of one million Eastern wild turkeys in Louisiana (36,37), populations declined in the late 1800s because of clear-cutting of virgin longleaf pine forests and turkey overharvesting, leaving only 14 isolated flocks comprising ∼1500 individuals in North America after World War II (38,39). Population restoration began in 1962 (40), and the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF) has released 3913 captive-bred turkeys to the wild since 1962 (38). Conservation efforts were initially successful, increasing Louisiana turkey populations to 5000 individuals in 1969, 6500 in 1973, and 90,000 turkeys in 1995 (41). A mere four years later, this estimate decreased to 60,000 and Louisiana’s 2023 population estimate was 40,000 wild turkeys. Overall, despite multifaceted conservation management techniques employed by the LDWF, including captive breeding and release, relocation, reduced hunting season lengths, and population monitoring, Louisiana wild turkey populations have generally decreased since a peak in the mid-1990s (38; Fig. 1). Indeed, when restoration effort and population productivity were compared, Louisiana was the only of eight southeastern states with reduced wild turkey productivity (poults-per-hen) after restoration was 95% complete (44); however, the cause for the recent population declines is unknown.

Fig. 1.
Wild turkey population trends in Louisiana. (A) Christmas Bird Counts (CBC; solid circles and lines; 42) and Breeding Bird Survey (BBS; open circles and dashed lines; 43). Both present the number of wild turkey observations and corroborate the decline of wild turkeys in Louisiana (CBC aligns with 1980 decline; BBS more recently, mid-2000s. (B) BBS observations corrected for observation effort. (C) Estimated (open circles and dotted line) and validated wild turkey harvest (solid circles and dash-dot line) in Louisiana (38). Harvest estimates are considered the most reliable method to estimate population trends, and have shown an average negative trend since 1980, despite an increase in the number of hunters. (D) The number of poults-per-hen for the five management regions in Louisiana as an index of reproduction (38). All management regions except Southeast Loblolly Pine (red) depict a negative trend; North Mississippi Delta (blue), Northwest Loblolly/Shortleaf/Hardwood (green), Atchafalaya and South Mississippi Delta (gray), and Western Longleaf Pine (violet).Four line graphs labeled A through D illustrate trends in wild turkey populations in Louisiana. Graph A shows the number of observations from 1935 to 2025 using Christmas Bird Counts and Breeding Bird Survey data. The vertical axis is labeled number of observations, and the horizontal axis is labeled year. Observations increase gradually until around 2000 and then fluctuate widely. Graph B shows observation rate per party hour using Breeding Bird Survey data from 1935 to 2025. The vertical axis is labeled observation per party hours, and the curve declines steadily from about 0.15 in the 1950s to near zero by 2000, remaining low through 2025. A diagonal line sharply rises from 0 to 0.4 before 1950. Graph C presents harvest estimates from 1980 to 2025. The vertical axis is labeled harvest estimate validated, and the horizontal axis is labeled year. The harvest curve rises to a peak between 1995 and 2000, followed by a decline and then a modest rise after 2020. Graph D shows the number of poults per hen from 1990 to 2025 across five management regions. The vertical axis is labeled poults per hen, and the horizontal axis is labeled year. The five regions are represented by separate fitted trend lines with shaded confidence intervals. All regions show a peak between 1999 and 2010, followed by a decline and relative stabilization by 2020. Data across all graphs are shown as points with fitted trend lines and shaded bands indicating confidence intervals. All values are approximate and based on observational and survey data.

Wild turkey population trends in Louisiana. (A) Christmas Bird Counts (CBC; solid circles and lines; 42) and Breeding Bird Survey (BBS; open circles and dashed lines; 43). Both present the number of wild turkey observations and corroborate the decline of wild turkeys in Louisiana (CBC aligns with 1980 decline; BBS more recently, mid-2000s. (B) BBS observations corrected for observation effort. (C) Estimated (open circles and dotted line) and validated wild turkey harvest (solid circles and dash-dot line) in Louisiana (38). Harvest estimates are considered the most reliable method to estimate population trends, and have shown an average negative trend since 1980, despite an increase in the number of hunters. (D) The number of poults-per-hen for the five management regions in Louisiana as an index of reproduction (38). All management regions except Southeast Loblolly Pine (red) depict a negative trend; North Mississippi Delta (blue), Northwest Loblolly/Shortleaf/Hardwood (green), Atchafalaya and South Mississippi Delta (gray), and Western Longleaf Pine (violet).

Fig. 1.
Wild turkey population trends in Louisiana. (A) Christmas Bird Counts (CBC; solid circles and lines; 42) and Breeding Bird Survey (BBS; open circles and dashed lines; 43). Both present the number of wild turkey observations and corroborate the decline of wild turkeys in Louisiana (CBC aligns with 1980 decline; BBS more recently, mid-2000s. (B) BBS observations corrected for observation effort. (C) Estimated (open circles and dotted line) and validated wild turkey harvest (solid circles and dash-dot line) in Louisiana (38). Harvest estimates are considered the most reliable method to estimate population trends, and have shown an average negative trend since 1980, despite an increase in the number of hunters. (D) The number of poults-per-hen for the five management regions in Louisiana as an index of reproduction (38). All management regions except Southeast Loblolly Pine (red) depict a negative trend; North Mississippi Delta (blue), Northwest Loblolly/Shortleaf/Hardwood (green), Atchafalaya and South Mississippi Delta (gray), and Western Longleaf Pine (violet).Four line graphs labeled A through D illustrate trends in wild turkey populations in Louisiana. Graph A shows the number of observations from 1935 to 2025 using Christmas Bird Counts and Breeding Bird Survey data. The vertical axis is labeled number of observations, and the horizontal axis is labeled year. Observations increase gradually until around 2000 and then fluctuate widely. Graph B shows observation rate per party hour using Breeding Bird Survey data from 1935 to 2025. The vertical axis is labeled observation per party hours, and the curve declines steadily from about 0.15 in the 1950s to near zero by 2000, remaining low through 2025. A diagonal line sharply rises from 0 to 0.4 before 1950. Graph C presents harvest estimates from 1980 to 2025. The vertical axis is labeled harvest estimate validated, and the horizontal axis is labeled year. The harvest curve rises to a peak between 1995 and 2000, followed by a decline and then a modest rise after 2020. Graph D shows the number of poults per hen from 1990 to 2025 across five management regions. The vertical axis is labeled poults per hen, and the horizontal axis is labeled year. The five regions are represented by separate fitted trend lines with shaded confidence intervals. All regions show a peak between 1999 and 2010, followed by a decline and relative stabilization by 2020. Data across all graphs are shown as points with fitted trend lines and shaded bands indicating confidence intervals. All values are approximate and based on observational and survey data.

Wild turkey population trends in Louisiana. (A) Christmas Bird Counts (CBC; solid circles and lines; 42) and Breeding Bird Survey (BBS; open circles and dashed lines; 43). Both present the number of wild turkey observations and corroborate the decline of wild turkeys in Louisiana (CBC aligns with 1980 decline; BBS more recently, mid-2000s. (B) BBS observations corrected for observation effort. (C) Estimated (open circles and dotted line) and validated wild turkey harvest (solid circles and dash-dot line) in Louisiana (38). Harvest estimates are considered the most reliable method to estimate population trends, and have shown an average negative trend since 1980, despite an increase in the number of hunters. (D) The number of poults-per-hen for the five management regions in Louisiana as an index of reproduction (38). All management regions except Southeast Loblolly Pine (red) depict a negative trend; North Mississippi Delta (blue), Northwest Loblolly/Shortleaf/Hardwood (green), Atchafalaya and South Mississippi Delta (gray), and Western Longleaf Pine (violet).

Close modal

We hypothesize that Leucocytozoon infection might have played a role in Louisiana turkey population declines because of an April – May 2010 outbreak of the black flies (Simulium meridionale), also known as turkey gnats, which caused at least 225 backyard poultry deaths throughout the state (45). Further, collections in nearby Mississippi from 2009 to 2018 identified Leucocytozoon in turkey gnats (46) and reports of backyard poultry deaths in this state have also been linked to turkey gnat incidence. The historical sensitivity of turkeys to Leucocytozoon infection and potential role of wild turkeys as a reservoir of Leucocytozoon also support the hypothesis that Leucocytozoon infections may be partly responsible for the decline of Eastern wild turkeys (M. g. silvestris) in Louisiana. To test this hypothesis, we extracted DNA from 106 wild turkey blood samples collected in Louisiana over two years and used PCR to evaluate the prevalence and species identities of Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon. Our objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of specific Leucocytozoon species in wild turkeys in Louisiana and identify host traits (i.e., sex and location) that predict Leucocytozoon prevalence in wild turkeys.

Although our investigation focused on Leucocytozoon specifically, we also tested for the prevalence of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus. This allowed us to evaluate whether one Haemosporidian genus occurred more frequently than others and quantify the frequency of co-infections. In addition, we report a case study of an emaciated wild turkey heavily infected with Haemosporidian parasites that was presented to us during our investigation. The results of this study will inform wildlife management practices to conserve the declining wild turkey populations of Louisiana and further our understanding of wild turkeys as disease reservoirs.

Sample collection

Wild turkey blood samples were collected in 2019 from harvested turkeys (n = 8, all male) and in 2020 from turkeys (n = 98, 44 males and 54 females) trapped by Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries personnel using cannon nets (note that Wildlife and Fisheries Department personnel are exempt from requiring Scientific Collection Permits in Louisiana). Nobuto filter paper strips were dipped into the blood of hunter-harvested turkeys in 2019 and stored at 4°C (47) in individually labeled envelopes to avoid contamination. Blood samples were collected from captured turkeys by venipuncture of the medial metatarsal vein using a 22G hypodermic needle and 3 cc syringe. Approximately 0.1 ml of blood was deposited onto Nobuto filter paper strips for absorption. Netted turkeys were released within 10 min of capture. All filter-strip blood samples were stored at −20°C and protected from light until DNA extraction.

Case study: emaciated wild turkey report

On November 17, 2020, a private landowner in Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana, reported a lethargic wild turkey that was unable to fly. Personnel from the LDWF detected lice and severe emaciation. The animal was euthanized and the carcass shipped to the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study (SCWDS), at the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Georgia for postmortem analyses. Postmortem findings included serous atrophy of fat, esophageal/crop mucosal retention, and early urate stasis in kidneys, all indicative of decreased food and water intake that resulted in emaciation. SCWDS determined that debilitation of this turkey was from Leucocytozoon infection.

A blood smear was obtained from this turkey, stained with Wright-Giemsa (Harleco, Sigma Aldrich. Germany), and parasitemia as the number of infected red blood cells out of the 10,000 examined was quantified with an oil-immersive 100× objective lens using an Olympus TH4-100 light microscope. In addition, the first 100 leucocytes were classified as either lymphocytes, monocytes, heterophils, or eosinophils.

Haemosporidian PCR and sequencing

DNA was extracted from turkey blood blots using an ammonium acetate precipitation protocol (48). Nested PCR was conducted with the extracted DNA at a concentration of 20 ng/μl, according to previously established protocols (48,49,50,51). In the first round of PCR, primers Haem NF1 and Haem NR3 amplify parasite mitochondrial DNA found in all three genera (52); the second round of PCR targeted regions of cytochrome B specific to Haemoproteus and Plasmodium (primers HaemF and HaemR2) and Leucocytozoon (primers HaemFL and HaemR2L) (53). The first round of PCR reactions used 10-μl volumes with 5 μl DreamTaq (2x; ThermoFisher), 0.12 μl of 50 μM HaemNF1, 0.12 μl of 50 μM HaemNR3, 2.5 μl of 20 ng/μl (50 ng) template DNA, and 2.26 μl ddH2O. The second round of PCR reactions included 0.06 μl of 50 μM forward and 0.06 μl 50 μM reverse primers for the respective parasites, 1 μl of round one amplicons as template DNA, and 3.88 μl ddH2O. The PCR amplicons of round two (5 μl) were loaded onto a 1% agarose gel stained with RedSafe (iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea), run at 100 V for 90 min, and visualized under UV light. Each round of PCR included a positive control: DNA from a house sparrow (Passer domesticus) co-infected with Haemoproteus and Plasmodium for HaemF and HaemR2 primers, and DNA from a Leucocytozoon-infected turkey for HaemFL and HaemRL2 primers. We submitted the remaining 5 μl of PCR product for samples that tested positive for Haemosporidian infection (revealed by gel bands) to Louisiana State University’s (LSU) Genomics Core Facility for PCR cleanup and Sanger sequencing on a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Co-infections with Haemoproteus and Plasmodium resulted in double bands that were incompatible with Sanger sequencing, so we did not obtain species-level resolution for co-infected samples. Sequences were queried against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)’s Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) for species-level resolution of the Haemosporidian parasites found in wild turkeys (54). None of the top matches for Leucocytozoon sequences were resolved to species, so we also consulted the MalAvi database for this genus (55).

Statistical analysis

χ-square tests of independence were used to compare the frequency of infection by each genus (Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon). We first tested whether the frequency of infection by genus differed overall, and if so, which genera significantly differed (n = 4, including the latter post hoc χ-square tests). We next assessed whether the frequency of being uninfected, singly infected, co-infected, and tri-infected differed overall, and if so, which infection categories significantly differed from each other (n = 7, including post hoc χ-square tests). Finally, we examined whether the frequency of co-infection types (genus combinations) differed overall, and if so, which combinations significantly differed from one another (n = 4, including post hoc χ-square tests) for a total of 15 tests.

χ-square tests of independence were also used to compare the frequency of infection by species of each genus to test whether the prevalence of each species was more or less than expected by chance. We tested whether the prevalence of each species within respective genera differed overall (n = 3) and, if significant differences were detected, performed post hoc χ-square contrasts to determine which species significantly differed (n = 10), for a total of 13 tests. To control Type I error (false positives), we divided the conventional α by the total number of tests (i.e., 28) and considered P < 0.0018 as statistically significant (56).

We used three binary logistic regressions that differed by the presence (infected or not) of infection by Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon as the dependent variable to test whether sex and location (independent variables) affected the likelihood of a wild turkey being infected by each genus. We did not test for a year effect because of limited sampling efforts in 2019 (n = 8; in 2020, n = 98). Next, we categorized the number of infections per individual as a number (i.e., 0, 1, 2, or 3) and included it as the dependent variable of a generalized linear model with a Poisson distribution for right-skewed data to test whether sex and location (independent variables) affected the likelihood of co-infection.

Genus-level prevalence and co-infections

The frequency of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon significantly differed from one another (Fig. 2a–c; Table 1a). Post hoc χ-square tests revealed that Haemoproteus infections occur more frequently than Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon (Table 1a). The frequency of turkeys infected with either zero, one, two, and three infections significantly differed from one another (Table 1b, Fig. 2d), and post hoc χ-square tests indicated that only the frequency of uninfected and triply infected turkeys did not significantly differ from each other (Table 1b). The frequency of genera co-infection types significantly differed from one another overall (Table 1c). There were no Plasmodium-Leucocytozoon co-infections present in our turkey samples (Fig. 2e). Post hoc tests revealed that there were more Haemoproteus-Leucocytozoon co-infections than Plasmodium-Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium-Haemoproteus co-infections (Table 1c).

Fig. 2.
Haemosporidian infection prevalence in 106 Louisiana wild turkeys, confirmed by PCR.Chart A shows Haemoproteus infection with 92 percent infected and 8 percent not infected. Chart B shows Plasmodium infection with 19 percent infected and 81 percent not infected. Chart C shows Leucocytozoon infection with 34 percent infected and 66 percent not infected. Chart D illustrates overall infection distribution with 60 percent having a single infection, 30 percent showing co-infection, 8 percent showing tri-infection, and 2 percent having no infection. Chart E details the co-infection types among the 30 percent co-infected birds: 25 percent had Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus co-infection, 5 percent had Haemoproteus and Plasmodium co-infection, and 0 percent had Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium co-infection.

Haemosporidian infection prevalence in 106 Louisiana wild turkeys, confirmed by PCR.

Fig. 2.
Haemosporidian infection prevalence in 106 Louisiana wild turkeys, confirmed by PCR.Chart A shows Haemoproteus infection with 92 percent infected and 8 percent not infected. Chart B shows Plasmodium infection with 19 percent infected and 81 percent not infected. Chart C shows Leucocytozoon infection with 34 percent infected and 66 percent not infected. Chart D illustrates overall infection distribution with 60 percent having a single infection, 30 percent showing co-infection, 8 percent showing tri-infection, and 2 percent having no infection. Chart E details the co-infection types among the 30 percent co-infected birds: 25 percent had Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus co-infection, 5 percent had Haemoproteus and Plasmodium co-infection, and 0 percent had Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium co-infection.

Haemosporidian infection prevalence in 106 Louisiana wild turkeys, confirmed by PCR.

Close modal

Haemosporidian prevalence by species

Haemoproteus infections comprised of five species: Haemoproteus sacharovi (62%), Haemoproteus plataleae (22%), Haemoproteus noctuae (13%), Haemoproteus enucleator (3%), and Haemoproteus syrnii (1%; Fig. 3a). Within Haemoproteus-infected samples, the different species’ infection frequencies significantly differed from one another (Table 2a). Post hoc comparisons revealed that the frequency of H. sacharovi infections was significantly higher than all other Haemoproteus species, and H. plataleae infections were significantly more frequent than H. enucleator and H. syrnii (Table 2a).

Fig. 3.
Species-level prevalence of Haemosporidian infections in Louisiana wild turkeys, split by genus (n = 79 Haemoproteus, 6 Plasmodium, and 36 Leucocytozoon). Haemoproteus had the highest species diversity, dominated by H. sacharovi. The most frequent Leucocytozoon species was L. schoutedeni.Chart A shows Haemoproteus infections with H sacharovi at 62.0 percent, H plataleae at 21.5 percent, H noctuae at 12.7 percent, H enucleator at 2.5 percent, and H syrnii at 1.3 percent. Chart B shows Plasmodium infections equally divided between P elongatum and P cuculus, each at 50 percent. Chart C shows Leucocytozoon infections with L schoutedeni at 74.1 percent, L sabrazesi at 22.2 percent, and Leucocytozoon species unclassified at 3.7 percent.

Species-level prevalence of Haemosporidian infections in Louisiana wild turkeys, split by genus (n = 79 Haemoproteus, 6 Plasmodium, and 36 Leucocytozoon). Haemoproteus had the highest species diversity, dominated by H. sacharovi. The most frequent Leucocytozoon species was L. schoutedeni.

Fig. 3.
Species-level prevalence of Haemosporidian infections in Louisiana wild turkeys, split by genus (n = 79 Haemoproteus, 6 Plasmodium, and 36 Leucocytozoon). Haemoproteus had the highest species diversity, dominated by H. sacharovi. The most frequent Leucocytozoon species was L. schoutedeni.Chart A shows Haemoproteus infections with H sacharovi at 62.0 percent, H plataleae at 21.5 percent, H noctuae at 12.7 percent, H enucleator at 2.5 percent, and H syrnii at 1.3 percent. Chart B shows Plasmodium infections equally divided between P elongatum and P cuculus, each at 50 percent. Chart C shows Leucocytozoon infections with L schoutedeni at 74.1 percent, L sabrazesi at 22.2 percent, and Leucocytozoon species unclassified at 3.7 percent.

Species-level prevalence of Haemosporidian infections in Louisiana wild turkeys, split by genus (n = 79 Haemoproteus, 6 Plasmodium, and 36 Leucocytozoon). Haemoproteus had the highest species diversity, dominated by H. sacharovi. The most frequent Leucocytozoon species was L. schoutedeni.

Close modal

Plasmodium infections were comprised of two species, Plasmodium cuculus and Plasmodium elongatum that were equally prevalent (n = 3 each; Table 2b; Fig. 3b). Leucocytozoon infections were comprised of L. schoutedeni (74%), L. sabrezesi (22%), and one sample that could not be identified to species (4%; Fig. 3c). Within the subset of Leucocytozoon-infected samples, L. schoutedeni infections occurred significantly more frequently than L. sabrezesi infections (Table 2c). Queries for both databases (NCBI and MalAvi) were consistent: neither database’s top match for a sequence provided species-level resolution; however, the top match to a species for each database returned the same species (see Supplementary Material).

Risk factors associated with Haemosporidian prevalence and co-infection

Haemoproteus infections were not predicted by sex or location (all P > 0.99), nor were Plasmodium infections (all P > 0.35; Table 3). Notably, all male turkey samples in this study tested positive for Haemoproteus infection, as did all but two females. Year was not a significant predictor of Leucocytozoon infections (P = 0.99), but sex was (z = 3.1, df = 105, P = 0.001); 50% of male turkeys were infected with Leucocytozoon compared to only 18% of females (Table 3). Neither sex nor location were significant predictors of co-infection (all P > 0.14; Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
Summary of Haemosporidian infection prevalence by wild turkey management regions as defined by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. With respect to Leucocytozoon infections, only L. schoutedeni was detected in the Southeast Loblolly region (n = 17) while a near even split of L. schoutedeni (n = 9) and L. sabrazesi (n = 7) were detected in the Western Longleaf Pine region. Figure adapted from (57).The Western Longleaf Pine region includes 35 samples with 94.3 percent Haemoproteus, 22.9 percent Plasmodium, and 45.7 percent Leucocytozoon infections. Co-infections occur in 38.2 percent of cases and tri-infections in 14.7 percent. The Southeast Loblolly region includes 69 samples with 89.8 percent Haemoproteus, 17.4 percent Plasmodium, and 27.5 percent Leucocytozoon infections, with 24.6 percent co-infections and 5.8 percent tri-infections. County-level data indicate 64 samples from Tangipahoa and 5 from Livingston. The Northwest Loblolly, Shortleaf, and North Mississippi Delta regions include minimal samples, such as one each from Bienville and Union, showing Haemoproteus or mixed Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon infections. The Kisatche area contributes 34 samples and Vernon 1, both within the Western Longleaf Pine region. No samples were reported from the Atchafalaya and Lower Mississippi Delta region. All data are expressed as percentages and sample sizes.

Summary of Haemosporidian infection prevalence by wild turkey management regions as defined by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. With respect to Leucocytozoon infections, only L. schoutedeni was detected in the Southeast Loblolly region (n = 17) while a near even split of L. schoutedeni (n = 9) and L. sabrazesi (n = 7) were detected in the Western Longleaf Pine region. Figure adapted from (57).

Fig. 4.
Summary of Haemosporidian infection prevalence by wild turkey management regions as defined by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. With respect to Leucocytozoon infections, only L. schoutedeni was detected in the Southeast Loblolly region (n = 17) while a near even split of L. schoutedeni (n = 9) and L. sabrazesi (n = 7) were detected in the Western Longleaf Pine region. Figure adapted from (57).The Western Longleaf Pine region includes 35 samples with 94.3 percent Haemoproteus, 22.9 percent Plasmodium, and 45.7 percent Leucocytozoon infections. Co-infections occur in 38.2 percent of cases and tri-infections in 14.7 percent. The Southeast Loblolly region includes 69 samples with 89.8 percent Haemoproteus, 17.4 percent Plasmodium, and 27.5 percent Leucocytozoon infections, with 24.6 percent co-infections and 5.8 percent tri-infections. County-level data indicate 64 samples from Tangipahoa and 5 from Livingston. The Northwest Loblolly, Shortleaf, and North Mississippi Delta regions include minimal samples, such as one each from Bienville and Union, showing Haemoproteus or mixed Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon infections. The Kisatche area contributes 34 samples and Vernon 1, both within the Western Longleaf Pine region. No samples were reported from the Atchafalaya and Lower Mississippi Delta region. All data are expressed as percentages and sample sizes.

Summary of Haemosporidian infection prevalence by wild turkey management regions as defined by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. With respect to Leucocytozoon infections, only L. schoutedeni was detected in the Southeast Loblolly region (n = 17) while a near even split of L. schoutedeni (n = 9) and L. sabrazesi (n = 7) were detected in the Western Longleaf Pine region. Figure adapted from (57).

Close modal

Case study: emaciated wild turkey report

Sanger sequencing of the PCR product from this turkey’s blood revealed the specific species of Leucocytozoon to be L. schoutedeni, with 97% identity to GenBank KT290937.1, Gallus gallus, Malaysia (unpublished) and 96% identity to GenBank MW043728.1, G. gallus, Thailand (58). In addition to Leucocytozoon infection, SCWDS also detected lymphoproliferative disease virus, known to cause tumors in the skin and organs, and Parahaemoproteus/Haemoproteus infection, which we identified as H. sacharovi. We did not detect Plasmodium from this turkey. Blood smear quantification revealed 82 Haemoproteus-infected cells and 88 Leucocytozoon-infected cells, both indicative of acute infections (Fig. 5). This turkey’s blood also had a high proportion of eosinophils (77%), followed by 20% lymphocytes and 3% monocytes; 0%–2% is the typical range for eosinophils for a healthy bird (59).

Fig. 5.

Case study blood smear from an emaciated turkey reported in Tangipahoa Parish; sample is viewed under a 10× objective lens. Large, flagellate parasitic bodies are Leucocytozoon schoutedeni parasites (outlined by square; determined by Sanger sequencing of PCR product). Circles identify Haemoproteus sacharovi parasites; the diamond identifies eosinophils.

Fig. 5.

Case study blood smear from an emaciated turkey reported in Tangipahoa Parish; sample is viewed under a 10× objective lens. Large, flagellate parasitic bodies are Leucocytozoon schoutedeni parasites (outlined by square; determined by Sanger sequencing of PCR product). Circles identify Haemoproteus sacharovi parasites; the diamond identifies eosinophils.

Close modal

Leucocytozoon infections were detected in 34% of blood samples from eastern wild turkeys of Louisiana; only two species were found: L. sabrazesi and L. schoutedeni. Leucocytozoon sabrazesi occurred less frequently than L. schoutedeni, and it was found exclusively in the Southeast Loblolly management region. We consider this a conservative estimate of Leucocytozoon prevalence, because our sampling may have overlooked individuals that died from infection before capture, underestimating the actual prevalence of infection. Our understanding of Leucocytozoon mortality rates in wild turkeys relies upon studies nearly a century old (22,26,27), which is enough time for host-parasite coevolution to have altered the high mortality rates that were previously observed in turkeys. Indeed, wild turkeys have historically not been infected by L. sabrazesi (28), although we detected this species in seven of our samples. The 2020 turkey case study may suggest high pathogenicity of Leucocytozoon infection in turkeys but the co-occurrence of H. sacharovi infection and lymphoproliferative disease virus limits our ability to conclude that symptoms were specific to Leucocytozoon infection. Further experimental studies will be needed to clarify the pathology of Leucocytozoon infections in different populations of wild turkeys.

Inoculation experiments would also help clarify why Leucocytozoon infections were found more frequently in male turkeys than in females; for example, whether males are more susceptible to Leucocytozoon infection because of sex differences in habitat use, or whether females have higher Leucocytozoon mortality rates that result in the observed lower frequency of infection. Eastern wild turkeys have mating systems of harem defense or male dominance polygyny, where males form dominance hierarchies that grant access to moving female groups, and females are the sole providers of parental care (60). This mating structure may differentially affect habitat preference (61) and movement (62) in males and females. For example, males are hypothesized to have larger home ranges in the spring to increase access to hens (63,64), and females decrease their home range size to areas of high food abundance during brood rearing (65). It is possible, then, that these sex differences in habitat use may translate to differential vector exposure and subsequent disease incidence. Alternatively, male turkeys are typically larger (66) and may emit more carbon dioxide than females, thereby increasing the “attractiveness” of males to black fly vectors (67). Although the higher incidence of Leucocytozoon infection in males than females may suggest that the former is a more effective disease reservoir, our investigation only presents one year of data with a robust sample size; observing this pattern over multiple years should test this hypothesis.

Historical records of L. schoutedeni (also called L. andrewsi), the most common Leucocytozoon species we found in Louisiana wild turkeys, are few in North America. The first recorded incidence dates to 1950 in chickens in South Carolina (18) and the species was not reported again until the new century (30), with examples in the literature from 2009 in poultry in Mississippi (6) and from 2018 to 2020 in Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) in western Oklahoma (68). Thus, L. schoutedeni appears to have been uncommon in North America until recently and was perhaps introduced from its common range in Africa and southeast Asia (59,69,70,71,72,73,74). Leucocytozoon schoutedeni typically causes mild disease, including long-term chronic parasitaemia and reduced laying in chickens and turkeys (12,14,30).

Like L. schoutedeni, L. sabrazesi (also called L. macleani), the other Leucocytozoon species we found in Louisiana wild turkeys, typically results in mild pathology and is most frequently found in Africa and southeast Asia (12,14,74,75,76). Historically, turkeys were not infected by L. sabrazesi (28), and we were unable to find any previous record of it occurring in North America. However, it is important to note that although 45 Leucocytozoon morphospecies can be visually distinguished, only 13 can be characterized using molecular methods (12) and lineage detection may be biased by the primers used (77). For example, the fact that L. schoutedeni had the closest sequence similarity (96%) to the case study turkey does not unequivocally confirm this strain; indeed, L. schoutedeni is morphologically characterized by round host cells, but the blood smear showed an elongated parasite. Therefore, it is possible this was another species that has not been described, and which was not present in the NCBI database but had the highest genetic similarity to L. schoutedeni. Alternatively, a co-infection of two Leucocytozoon species may have interfered with sequencing. Thus, whether our investigation represents the first incidence of L. sabrazesi in North America and the first detection in wild turkeys as a host, or an entirely new species, will require additional surveys and genetic analyses.

Haemoproteus parasites had the highest frequency of detection (92%) out of all genera and the highest species diversity. Only one of the five Haemoproteus species, H. sacharovi, occurred more frequently than expected by chance. Our observation of Haemoproteus infections exceeding the prevalence of Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon is consistent with some historical (21,78) and recent (79,80) observations in wild turkeys of North America, but others have noted a higher prevalence of Leucocytozoon (17,34). Variable prevalence of different Haemosporidian species from year to year is expected, because abiotic factors, including precipitation, humidity, and temperature, influence the life cycle and feeding activity of insect vectors as well as parasite development times (81,82,83,84,85,86,87). Forrester et al. (78) and Annetti et al. (79) quantified infection prevalence over successive years, but only the former detailed annual variation, and found that Haemoproteus exceeded Leucocytozoon prevalence in three of the four years investigated. Haemoproteus has minimal pathogenic effects (88) and low observed circulating parasitaemia in turkeys (21), though turkeys have high susceptibility to infection from vectors (89). Combined with the high prevalence we detected in Louisiana wild turkeys, this suggests that turkeys are tolerant of Haemoproteus infection.

In addition to single infections, we also quantified Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus co-infection patterns to consider whether co-infection may pose a threat to Louisiana wild turkeys. Unexpectedly, we detected over four times as many samples infected with all three genera than samples free from any Haemosporidian infection. This “tri-infection rate” was nearly double that of turkeys tested in Illinois (9.2% versus 5%; 79). Co-infections of Leucocytozoon-Haemoproteus were five times more frequent than Haemoproteus-Plasmodium co-infections, and we did not detect any co-infections of Leucocytozoon-Plasmodium. This may be because of differing ecological requirements of black flies and mosquitoes, the vectors of these two parasite species (90,91). Haemosporidian co-infections appear frequently in wild turkeys (18,78,79), and in birds generally (92,93). Co-infections with Haemoproteus and Plasmodium had additive negative impacts on body condition, but not reproductive parameters, in free-living purple martins (Progne subis) (94). Likewise, experimental inoculations with two different species of Plasmodium did not increase infection virulence in multiple host species (95,96,97). The high prevalence of co-infection we detected in Louisiana wild turkeys suggests that turkeys can survive co-infection, but whether co-infection affects metrics such as reproductive output or lifespan requires additional study, especially considering that Leucocytozoon infection is known to reduce fecundity in domestic turkey hens (25).

In our investigation of Louisiana wild turkey Haemosporidian parasites, we found that Haemoproteus had the highest infection prevalence and species diversity; male turkeys were more likely to be infected by Leucocytozoon parasites than females; and the number of triply infected turkeys exceeded that of uninfected turkeys. Studies of Haemosporidian parasites in wild turkeys were abundant when turkeys were declining in North America, but publications tapered off after turkey populations rebounded. This, combined with the fact that Leucocytozoon studies in wild birds are generally limited (12), means there are still many open questions about the role of Leucocytozoon species in the decline of wild bird populations. Experimental inoculations with Leucocytozoon parasites in wild turkeys that describe pathology would help elucidate whether Leucocytozoon infection contributes to population decline in Louisiana through mortality or negative impacts upon reproductive output, and whether one sex is more tolerant to Leucocytozoon infection than the other.

Supplemental data associated with this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-25-00022.s1.

We thank Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Turkey Program Manager Cody Cedotal, the wildlife biologists and technicians, as well as SCWDS for the diagnostics report of the emaciated turkey. We thank Danylo Zaitsev and Aidan Matthews for providing laboratory assistance and Scott Herke of Louisiana State University’s Genomics Facility for logistical support. LDWF personnel conducted the trapping and blood collection from wild turkeys. They are exempt from requiring a Scientific Collecting Permit. The Pennington Regents Chair for Wildlife Research Professorship funded L. F., T. R. K. received financial support as a Merck Awardee of The Life Sciences Research Foundation, C. R. L. received start-up funds from LSU, and K. I. L. from the LSU President’s Future Leaders in Research program.

Abbreviations:

LDWF =

Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries;

LSU =

Louisiana State University;

SCWDS =

Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study

1.
Dadam
D
,
Robinson
RA
,
Clements
A
,
Peach
WJ
,
Bennett
M
,
Rowcliffe
JM
,
Cunningham
AA.
Avian malaria-mediated population decline of a widespread iconic bird species
.
R Soc Open Sci
.
6
:
182197
;
2019
. .
2.
Miranda Paez
A
,
Chalkowski
K
,
Zohdy
S
,
Willoughby
JR.
Management of avian malaria in populations of high conservation concern
.
Parasit Vectors
15
:
208
;
2022
. .
3.
Banda
ME
,
Howe
L
,
Gartrell
BD
,
McInnes
K
,
Hunter
S
,
French
NP.
A cluster of avian malaria cases in a kiwi management programme
.
N Z Vet J
.
61
:
121
126
;
2013
. .
4.
Vanstreels
RET
, et al..
Epidemiology and pathology of avian malaria in penguins undergoing rehabilitation in Brazil
.
Vet Res
.
46
:
30
;
2015
. .
5.
Hernandez-Colina
A
,
Gonzalez-Olvera
M
,
Eckley
L
,
Lopez
J
,
Baylis
M.
Avian malaria affecting penguins in zoological gardens, aquariums and wildlife parks in the UK
.
Vet Rec
.
189
:
e511
;
2021
. .
6.
Jones
K
,
Johnson
N
,
Yang
S
,
Stokes
J
,
Smith
W
,
Wills
R
,
Goddard
J
,
Varela-Stokes
A.
Investigations into outbreaks of black fly attacks and subsequent avian Haemosporidians in backyard-type poultry and other exposed avian species
.
Avian Dis
.
59
:
24
30
;
2015
. .
7.
Kimura
M
,
Darbro
JM
,
Harrington
LC.
Avian malaria parasites share congeneric mosquito vectors
.
J Parasitol
.
96
:
144
151
;
2010
. .
8.
King
AFA.
Insects and disease. Mosquitos and malaria
.
Pop Sci Mon
.
23
:
664
658
;
1883
.
9.
Valkiūnas
G
,
Liutkevičius
G
,
Iezhova
TA.
Complete development of three species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporidia, Haemoproteidae) in the biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera, ceratopogonidae)
.
J Parasitol
.
88
:
864
868
;
2002
. .
10.
Baker
JR.
A review of the role played by the Hippoboscidae (Diptera) as vectors of endoparasites
.
J Parasitol
.
53
:
412
418
;
1967
. .
11.
Noblet
R
,
Kissam
JB
,
Adkins
TR.
Leucocytozoon smithi: incidence of transmission by black flies in South Carolina (Diptera: Simuliidae)
.
J Med Entomol
.
12
:
111
114
;
1975
. .
12.
Valkiūnas
G
,
Iezhova
TA.
Insights into the biology of Leucocytozoon species (Haemosporida, Leucocytozoidae): why is there slow research progress on agents of leucocytozoonosis
?
Microorganisms
11
:
1251
;
2023
. .
13.
Hellgren
O
,
Bensch
S
,
Malmqvist
B.
Bird hosts, blood parasites and their vectors— associations uncovered by molecular analyses of blackfly blood meals
.
Mol Ecol
.
17
:
1605
1613
;
2008
. .
14.
Valkiunas
G.
Avian malaria parasite and other Haemosporidia
. 1st ed.
Boca Raton (FL)
:
CRC Press
;
2024
.
15.
Newberne
JW.
The pathology of Leucocytozoon infection in turkeys with a note on its tissue stages
.
Am J Vet Res
.
16
:
593
597
;
1955
.
16.
Valkiunas
G
,
Iezhova
TA.
Exo-erythrocytic development of avian malaria and related Haemosporidian parasites
.
Malar J
.
16
:
101
;
2017
. .
17.
Fedynich
AM
,
Rhodes
OE.
Hemosporid (Apicomplexa, Hematozoea, Hemosporida) community structure and pattern in wintering wild turkeys
.
J Wildl Dis
.
31
:
404
409
;
1995
. .
18.
Atchley
FO.
Leucocytozoon andrewsi n. sp., from chickens observed in a survey of blood parasites in domestic animals in South Carolina
.
J Parasitol
.
37
:
483
488
;
1951
. .
19.
Byrd
MA.
Observations on ‘Leucocytozoon’ in pen-raised and free-ranging wild turkeys
.
J Wildl Manage
.
23
:
145
156
;
1959
.
20.
Virginia
W
,
Hammond Eve
J
,
Kellogg
FE
,
Bailey
RW.
Blood parasites in wild turkeys of eastern West Virginia
.
J Wildl Manage
.
36
:
624
627
;
1972
. .
21.
Cook
RS
,
Trainer
DO
,
Glazener
WC.
Haemoproteus in wild turkeys from the coastal bend of south Texas
.
J Protozool
.
13
:
588
590
;
1966
. .
22.
Skidmore
LV.
Leucocytozoon smithi infection in turkeys and its transmission by Simulium occidentale Townsend
.
J Parasitol
.
125
:
329
335
;
1931
.
23.
Solis
J.
Turkey Leucocytozoon infection
.
Poult Sci
.
51
:
1747
1752
;
1972
.
24.
Solis
AN.
Nonsusceptibility of some avian species to turkey Leucocytozoon infection
.
Poult Sci
.
52
:
498
500
;
1973
. .
25.
Jones
JE
,
Barnett
BD
,
Solis
J.
The effect of Leucocytozoon smithi infection on production, fertility, and hatchability of broad breasted white turkey hens
.
Poult Sci
.
51
:
1543
1545
;
1972
. .
26.
Johnson
EP
,
Underhill
GW
,
Cox
JA
,
Threlkeld
WL.
A blood protozoon of turkeys transmitted by Simulum nigroparvum (Twinn)
.
Am J Hyg
.
27
:
649
665
;
1938
.
27.
Savage
A
,
Isa
JM.
Case report: an outbreak of Leucocytozoon disease in wild turkeys
.
Cornell Vet
.
35
:
270
272
;
1945
.
28.
Mathis
C
,
Leger
A.
Nouvelles recherches sur Leucocytozoon sabrazesi et Leucocytozoon caulleryi de la poule domestique du Tonkin
.
Bull Soc Pathol Exot
.
3
:
504
510
;
1910
.
29.
Stephan
J.
Uber eine durch Leukocytozoen verursachte Ganse-und-Putenerkrankung
.
Dtsch Thierärzt Wochenschr
.
30
:
589
592
;
1922
.
30.
Fallis
AM
,
Desser
SS
,
Khan
LA.
On species of Leucocytozoon
.
Adv Parasitol
.
12
:
1
67
;
1974
. .
31.
Dick
JW.
Leucocytozoon smithi: persistence of gametocytes in peripheral turkey blood
.
Avian Dis
.
22
:
82
85
;
1975
. .
32.
Travis
BV
,
Goodwin
MH
,
Gambrell
E.
Preliminary note on the occurrence of Leucocytozoon smithi Laveran and Lucet (1905) in turkeys in the southeastern United States
.
J Parasitol
.
25
:
278
;
1939
. .
33.
Barnett
BD.
Leucocytozoon disease of turkeys
.
Worlds Poult Sci J
.
33
:
76
87
;
1977
. .
34.
Noblet
R
,
Moore
HS.
Prevalence and distribution of Leucocytozoon smithi and Haemoproteus meleagridis in wild turkeys of South Carolina
.
J Wildl Dis
.
11
:
516
518
;
1975
. .
35.
Alverson
DR
,
Noblet
R.
Spring relapse of Leucocytozoon smithi (Sporozoa: Leucocytozoidae) in turkeys
.
J Med Entomol
.
14
:
132
133
;
1977
. .
36.
Stafford
NJ.
Louisiana wild turkeys: history, science, management, & hunting
.
Claitor’s Law Books and Publishing Company
;
Baton Rouge (LA)
2016
.
37.
Williams
C.
The wild turkey in Louisiana
.
La Dep Wildl Fish Magx
.
2
:
126
139
;
1967
.
38.
Cedotal
C.
LDWF Wild Turkey Program Overview/Annual Report
.
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
,
Baton Rouge (LA)
2023
.
39.
Hollis
F.
The present status of the wild turkey in Louisiana. Fish and Game Division, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
,
New Orleans (LA)
1950
.
40.
Olinde
M
,
Timmer
D.
Louisiana’s wild turkey restoration program 1962–1997 Fish and Game Division, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
,
New Orleans (LA)
1997
.
41.
Ramsdale
A.
The wild turkey zone. Wild turkey population estimates
[accessed 2024 June 10]. https://wildturkeyzone.com/wildturkey/population.htm;
2006
.
42.
National Audubon Society
.
The Christmas Bird Count historical results
(accessed 2024 June 10). http://www.christmasbirdcount.org;
2020
.
43.
Ziolkowski
D
,
Lutmerding
M
,
English
W
,
Aponte
V
,
Hudson
M.-A.
North American Breeding Bird Survey dataset 1966–2022: U.S. Geological Survey data release
(
accessed 2024 June 10
). ;
2023
.
44.
Byrne
ME
,
Chamberlain
MJ
,
Collier
BA.
Potential density dependence in wild turkey productivity in the southeastern United States
.
Proc Natl Wild Turkey Symp
.
11
:
329
351
;
2015
.
45.
Schnellbacher
RW
,
Holder
K
,
Morgan
T
,
Foil
L
,
Beaufrre
H
,
Nevarez
J
,
Tully
TN.
Avian simuliotoxicosis: outbreak in Louisiana
.
Avian Dis
.
56
:
616
620
;
2012
. .
46.
Ber
JL
,
Goddard
J
,
Nations
TM
,
Outlaw
DC.
Survey and phylogenetic analysis of Leucocytozoon (Apicomplexa: Haemosporida) parasites in Mississippi black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae)
.
J Med Entomol
.
59
:
1042
1046
;
2022
. .
47.
Lynton-Jenkins
JG
,
Chaine
AS
,
Russell
AF
,
Bonneaud
C.
Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
.
Ecol Evol
.
13
:
e9819
;
2023
. .
48.
Kelly
TR
,
MacGillivray
HL
,
Sarquis-Adamson
Y
,
Watson
MJ
,
Hobson
KA
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
EA.
Seasonal migration distance varies with natal dispersal and predicts parasitic infection in song sparrows
.
Behav Ecol Sociobiol
.
70
:
1857
1866
;
2016
. .
49.
Kelly
TR
,
Bonner
SJ
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
SA
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
EA.
Exposing migratory sparrows to Plasmodium suggests costs of resistance, not necessarily of infection itself
.
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol
.
329
:
5
14
;
2018
. .
50.
Kelly
TR
,
Rubin
BD
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
S
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
E.
Experimental malaria infection affects songbirds’ nocturnal migratory activity
.
Physiol Biocheml Zool
.
93
:
97
110
;
2020
. .
51.
Boyd
RJ
,
Kelly
TR
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
SA
,
MacDougall-Shackleton
EA.
2018
Alternative reproductive strategies in white-throated sparrows are associated with differences in parasite load following experimental infection
.
Biol Lett
.
14
:
20180194
. .
52.
Bensch
S
,
Stjernman
M
,
Hasselquist
D
,
Ostman
O
,
Hansson
B
,
Westerdahl
H
,
Pinheiro
RT.
Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds
.
Proc R Soc B Biol Sci
.
267
:
1583
1589
;
2000
. .
53.
Hellgren
O
,
Waldenström
J
,
Bensch
S.
A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood
.
J Parasitol
.
90
:
797
802
;
2004
. .
54.
Altschup
SF
,
Gish
W
,
Miller
W
,
Myers
EW
,
Lipman
DJ.
Basic local alignment search tool
.
J Mol Biol
.
215
:
403
410
;
1990
. .
55.
Bensch
S
,
Hellgren
O
,
Pérez-Tris
J.
MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related Haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages
.
Mol Ecol Resour
.
9
:
1353
1358
;
2009
. .
56.
Bonferroni
CE.
Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita
.
Pubbl del R Inst Super di Sci Econ e Commer di Firenze
,
8
:
3
62
;
1936
.
57.
Cedotal
C.
Wild turkey poult production survey
.
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
,
Baton Rouge (LA)
2020
.
58.
Piratae
S
,
Vaisusuk
K
,
Chatan
W.
Prevalence and molecular identification of Leucocytozoon spp. in fighting cocks (Gallus gallus) in Thailand
.
Protozoology
120
:
2149
2155
;
2021
. .
59.
Maxwell
MH.
Attempted induction of an avian eosinophilia using various agents
.
Res Vet Sci
.
29
:
293
297
;
1980
.
60.
Watts
CR
,
Stokes
AW.
The social order of turkeys
.
Sci Am
.
224
:
112
119
;
1971
. .
61.
Miller
DA
,
Hurst
GA
,
Leopold
BD.
Habitat use of Eastern wild turkeys in central Mississippi
.
J Wildl Manage
.
63
:
210
222
;
1999
. .
62.
Badyaev
AV
,
Etges
WJ
,
Martin
TE.
Ecological and behavioral correlates of variation in seasonal home ranges of wild turkeys
.
J Wildl Manage
.
60
:
154
164
;
1966
. .
63.
Kelley
RL
,
Hurst
GA
,
Steffen
DE.
Home ranges of wild turkey gobblers in central Mississippi
.
Proceedings Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies
.
42
:
470
475
;
1988
.
64.
Gross
JT
,
Little
AR
,
Collier
BA
,
Chamberlain
MJ.
Space use, daily movements, and roosting behavior of male wild turkeys during spring in Louisiana and Texas
.
J Southeastern Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies
.
2
:
229
234
;
2015
.
65.
Byrne
ME
,
Chamberlain
MJ
,
Kimmel
FG.
Seasonal space use and habitat selection of female wild turkeys in a Louisiana bottomland forest
. Proceedings of the Annual Conference SEAFWA. Pp.
8
14
;
2011
.
66.
Buchholz
R.
Female choice, parasite load and male ornamentation in wild turkeys
.
Anim Behav
.
50
:
929
943
;
1995
. .
67.
Schofield
SW
,
Sutcliffe
JF.
Human individuals vary in attractiveness for host-seeking black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) based on exhaled carbon dioxide
.
J Med Entomol
.
33
:
102
108
;
1996
. .
68.
Wyckoff
ST
et al.
Surveillance for selected pathogens and parasites of Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) from Western Oklahoma, USA, 2018
20
.
J Wildl Dis
.
60
:
346
361
;
2024
. .
69.
Fallis
AM
,
Jacobson
RL
,
Raybouldt
JN.
Haematozoa in domestic chickens and guinea fowl in Tanzania and transmission of Leucocytozoon neavei and Leucocytozoon schoutedeni
.
J Protozool
.
2
:
438
442
;
1973
. .
70.
Lawal
JR
,
Biu
AA
,
Musa
HI.
Molecular detection of avian Haemosporidian parasites in village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Gombe State, Nigeria
.
J Vet Med Anim Sci
5
:
1095
;
2022
.
71.
Sehgal
RNM
,
Valkiunas
G
,
Iezhova
TA
,
Smith
TB.
Blood parasites of chickens in Uganda and Cameroon with molecular descriptions of Leucocytozoon schoutedeni and Trypanosoma gallinarum
.
J Parasitol
.
92
:
1336
1343
;
2006
. .
72.
Agbemelo-Tsomafo
C
,
Adjei
S
,
Kusi
KA
,
Deitsch
KW
,
Amoah
D
,
Obeng-Kyeremeh
R
,
Sumabe
AM
,
Aniweh
Y.
Prevalence of Leucocytozoon infection in domestic birds in Ghana
.
PLoS One
18
:
e0294066
;
2023
. .
73.
Win
SY
, et al.
Detection and molecular identification of Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium species from village chickens in different areas of Myanmar
.
Acta Trop
.
212
:
105719
;
2020
. .
74.
Boonchuay
K
,
Thomrongsuwannakij
T
,
Chagas
CRF
,
Pornpanom
P.
2023 Prevalence and diversity of blood parasites (Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon and Trypanosoma) in backyard chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) raised in southern Thailand
.
Animals
13
:
2719
;
2023
. .
75.
Bennett
GF
,
Earlé
RA
,
Peirce
MA
,
Huchzermeyer
FW
,
Squires-Parsons
D.
Avian leucocytozoidae: the leucocytozoids of the phasianidae sensu lato
.
J Nat Hist
.
25
:
1407
1428
;
1991
. .
76.
Chawengkirttikul
R
,
Junsiri
W
,
Watthanadirek
A
,
Poolsawat
N
,
Minsakorn
S
,
Srionrod
N
,
Anuracpreeda
P.
2021 Molecular detection and genetic diversity of Leucocytozoon sabrazesi in chickens in Thailand
.
Sci Rep
.
11
:
16686
;
2021
. .
77.
Lotta
IA
,
Valkiūnas
G
,
Pacheco
MA
,
Escalante
AA
,
Hernández
SR
,
Matta
NE.
Disentangling Leucocytozoon parasite diversity in the neotropics: descriptions of two new species and shortcomings of molecular diagnostics for leucocytozoids
.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl
.
9
:
159
173
;
2019
. .
78.
Forrester
DJ
,
Hon
LT
,
Williams
LE
,
Austin
DH.
Blood protozoa of wild turkeys in Florida
.
J Protozool
.
2
:
494
497
;
1974
. .
79.
Annetti
KL
,
Rivera
NA
,
Andrews
JE
,
Mateus-Pinilla
N.
Survey of Haemosporidian parasites in resident and migrant game birds of Illinois
.
J Fish Wildl Manage
.
8
:
661
668
;
2017
. .
80.
Haynes
E
,
Yabsley
MJ
,
Nemeth
NM
,
Danks
ZD
,
Stasiak
I
,
Garrett
KB
,
Adcock
KG
,
Chamberlain
MJ
,
Ruder
MG.
Health assessment of adult male Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) from Western Kentucky, USA
.
J Wildl Dis
.
60
:
660
669
;
2024
. .
81.
Paaijmans
KP
,
Blanford
S
,
Bell
AS
,
Blanford
JI
,
Read
AF
,
Thomas
MB.
Influence of climate on malaria transmission depends on daily temperature variation
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
107
:
15135
15139
;
2010
. .
82.
Paaijmans
KP
,
Blanford
S
,
Chan
BHK
,
Thomas
MB.
Warmer temperatures reduce the vectorial capacity of malaria mosquitoes
.
Biol Lett
.
8
:
465
468
;
2012
. .
83.
Martens
WJM
,
Niessen
LW
,
Rotmans
J
,
Jetten
TH
,
Mcmichael
AJ.
Potential impact of global climate change on malaria risk
.
Environ Health Perspect
.
103
:
458
464
;
1995
. .
84.
Loiseau
C
,
Harrigan
RJ
,
Bichet
C
,
Julliard
R
,
Garnier
S
,
Lendvai
ÁZ
,
Chastel
O
,
Sorci
G.
Predictions of avian Plasmodium expansion under climate change
.
Sci Rep
.
3
:
1126
;
2013
. .
85.
Santos-Vega
M
,
Martinez
PP
,
Vaishnav
KG
,
Kohli
V
,
Desai
V
,
Bouma
MJ
,
Pascual
M.
The neglected role of relative humidity in the interannual variability of urban malaria in Indian cities
.
Nat Commun
.
13
:
533
;
2022
. .
86.
Duque
C
,
Lubinda
M
,
Matoba
J
,
Sing’anga
C
,
Stevenson
J
,
Shields
T
,
Shiff
CJ.
Impact of aerial humidity on seasonal malaria: an ecological study in Zambia
.
Malar J
.
21
:
325
;
2022
. .
87.
Siddons
LB.
Observations on the influence of atmospheric temperature and humidity on the infectivity of Anopheles culicifacies Giles
.
J Malar Inst India
5
:
375
;
1944
.
88.
Atkinson
CT
,
Forrester
DJ
,
Greiner
EC.
Pathogenicity of Haemoproteus meleagridis (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) in experimentally infected domestic turkeys
.
J Parasitol
.
74
:
228
239
;
1988
. .
89.
Atkinson
C
,
Forrester
DJ
,
Greiner
EC.
Epizootiology of Haemoproteus melagridis (Protozoa: Haemosporina) in Florida: seasonal transmission and vector abundance
.
J Med Entomol
.
25
:
1988
;
45
51
. .
90.
Reis
S
,
Melo
M
,
Covas
R
,
Doutrelant
C
,
Pereira
H
,
de Lima
R
,
Loiseau
C.
Influence of land use and host species on parasite richness, prevalence and co-infection patterns
.
Int J Parasitol
.
51
:
83
94
;
2021
. .
91.
Fecchio
A
, et al.
Global drivers of avian Haemosporidian infections vary across zoogeographical regions
.
Global Ecol Biogeogr
.
30
:
2393
2406
;
2021
. .
92.
Fecchio
A
,
Bell
JA
,
Williams
EJ
,
Dispoto
JH
,
Weckstein
JD
,
de Angeli Dutra
D.
Co-infection with Leucocytozoon and other Haemosporidian parasites increases with latitude and altitude in New World bird communities
.
Microb Ecol
.
86
:
2838
2846
;
2023
. .
93.
Clark
NJ
,
Wells
K
,
Dimitrov
D
,
Clegg
SM.
2016 Co-infections and environmental conditions drive the distributions of blood parasites in wild birds
.
J Anim Ecol
.
85
:
1461
1470
;
2016
. .
94.
Marzal
A
,
Bensch
S
,
Reviriego
M
,
Balbontin
J
,
De Lope
F.
Effects of malaria double infection in birds: one plus one is not two
.
J Evol Biol
.,
21
:
979
987
;
2008
. .
95.
Palinauskas
V
,
Valkiunas
G
,
Bolshakov
CV
,
Bensch
S.
Plasmodium relictum (lineage SGS1) and Plasmodium ashfordi (lineage GRW2): the effects of the co-infection on experimentally infected passerine birds
.
Exp Parasitol
.
127
:
527
533
;
2011
. .
96.
Palinauskas
V
,
Žiegytė
R
,
Šengaut
J
,
Bernotienė
R.
Different paths—the same virulence: experimental study on avian single and co-infections with Plasmodium relictum and Plasmodium elongatum
.
Int J Parasitol
.
48
:
1089
1096
;
2018
. .
97.
Palinauskas
V
,
Žiegytė
R
,
Šengaut
J
,
Bernotienė
R.
Experimental study on primary bird co-infection with two Plasmodium relictum lineages—pSGS1 and pGRW11
.
Animals
12
:
1879
;
2022
. .

Supplementary data