State Building, Ideologies and Civil Society in Jordan and Egypt: A Comparative Analysis and Implications for Regional Security with Lessons Learned for the UAE

This paper presents a comparative analysis of state building, ideologies, and civil society in Jordan and Egypt, with implications for regional security, particularly concerning the UAE. It examines the historical contexts, ideological frameworks, and dynamics of civil society in these countries, portraying Egypt as a nationalist revolutionary republic with civil society challenges and Jordan as a stable traditional monarchy. The study explores the roles of the Muslim Brotherhood and grassroots civil society in Egypt, the interplay between secular and Islamist movements, and the impact of these dynamics on regional stability. Jordan's conciliatory approach towards Islamist groups contrasts with Egypt's repressive strategies, highlighting different models of governance and their implications for managing ideological diversity and civil society. The paper suggests lessons for the UAE, emphasizing inclusive governance, economic diversification, regional security cooperation, and proactive strategies to enhance stability and development amidst a rapidly evolving regional context.