Intangible assets like trademarks and patents are typically not traded on active markets, and the measurement of their fair values is based on valuation models that use significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs (i.e., guideline royalty rates under the relief-from-royalty method). Although widely accepted, all authors and lecturers emphasize the difficulties when determining guideline royalty rates under this method. Often, royalty rate analyses fail to survive audit, appeal, or other scrutiny. In developing robust Level 3 inputs, the appraiser must take into account all information that is reasonably available. A new approach is discussed, one that illustrates an alternative method with which to overcome difficulties in identifying and interpreting guideline license agreements. This approach was first introduced in a largely unnoticed lawsuit.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2017
Research Article|
June 01 2017
Back-solving Unobservable Trademark Royalty Rates—The Case of ITT vs Xylem Group
Christof U. Binder, MBA, PhD;
Christof U. Binder, MBA, PhD
Christof U. Binder is a co-founder and current Managing Partner of Trademark Comparables AG/MARKABLES, a Switzerland-based online database providing comparable data and valuation inputs for the valuation of trademarks and customer relations. Christof is an expert in trademark transactions, valuations, and litigations.
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert B. Morrison, ASA BV/IA
Robert B. Morrison, ASA BV/IA
Robert B. Morrison is Managing Partner of Morrison Valuation & Forensic Services, LLC, in Orlando, Florida. Bob served as Chairman of the ASA's Business Valuation Committee and as a national instructor and course developer for the ASA. He was also appointed to the Board of Directors of the International Institute of Business Valuers (IIBV).
Search for other works by this author on:
Business Valuation Review (2017) 36 (2): 67–77.
Citation
Christof U. Binder, Robert B. Morrison; Back-solving Unobservable Trademark Royalty Rates—The Case of ITT vs Xylem Group. Business Valuation Review 1 June 2017; 36 (2): 67–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.5791/BVR-D-17-0003.1
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
21
Views
Citing articles via
Delaware Chancery Court Addresses (In)Applicability of Control Premium in GPC Method
Joseph W. Thompson, CFA, ASA
BVC Chair Column
Ron Seigneur, CPA, ABV, ASA, CVA
Tax Amortization Benefits and Intangible Asset Valuation
Richard K. Ellsworth, PE, ASA, CFA, CCP
Size- and Leverage-Adjusting Volatility
Vincent Covrig, PhD, CFA, Mary Ann K. Travers, ASA, Bethany Harms, AM
Book Review
Gene A. Trevino, PhD, CFA, ASA