In recent years, biography has cast off its previous poor image. As a consequence of a revised evaluation and as a result of theoretical considerations it has, in recent years, enjoyed a renaissance in a range of different disciplines. For this reason I should like to refer to this genre, which has existed since Classical times and which has enjoyed regular rebirth, as a ‘living fossil’. The virtues, conceptual interest, risks and problems involved in biography are the motives for the reflections in this article. In the palaeontological sense, fossilization involves the transformation of the original organism into a different form. The metaphor of a ‘fossilized life’ may be used with two different meanings, particularly since it has not only to do with a ‘frozen form’ but also with a transformation in comparison to the person's original life.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 January 2013
ARTICLE|
April 04 2013
‘Living Fossil’—‘Fossilized Life’? Reflections on Biography in the History of Science
Marianne Klemun
Marianne Klemun
1
Department of History, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Universitätsring 1, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Earth Sciences History (2013) 32 (1): 121–131.
Citation
David Oldroyd, Marianne Klemun; ‘Living Fossil’—‘Fossilized Life’? Reflections on Biography in the History of Science. Earth Sciences History 1 January 2013; 32 (1): 121–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.17704/eshi.32.1.0446820220487244
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
Citing articles via
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY AS DEFINED BY VISTELIUS
HANNES THIERGÄRTNER
ALBERT KOCH’S HYDRARCHOS: A HOAX OR A BONA FIDE COLLECTION OF BONES
R. BRUCE MCMILLAN