A translation is presented of an early formulation by Louis Rendu of the ideas later expanded in his 1841 Théorie des glaciers de Savoie, which described the movement of glaciers in terms of flowing ice. The reputation of James Forbes suffered, at least temporarily, from the accusation that he had deprived Rendu of due credit for this discovery. Although Rendu played no part in the disagreement, subsequent discussion of his scientific work has continued to view it in the context of this dispute, and concentrated on a single monograph. Rendu's earlier discussion of glaciers in his monograph about the geology of Savoy, in which he summarised his argument, but without the supporting evidence included in the latter work, was apparently overlooked even by his supporters.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 01 2016
The glacier theory of Louis Rendu (1789–1859) and the Forbes–Tyndall controversy
Earth Sciences History (2016) 35 (2): 346–353.
John Hollier, Anita Hollier; The glacier theory of Louis Rendu (1789–1859) and the Forbes–Tyndall controversy. Earth Sciences History 1 January 2016; 35 (2): 346–353. doi: https://doi.org/10.17704/1944-6178-35.2.346
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign in via your Institution
Citing articles via
Warren D. Allmon, Jesús I. Catalá-Gorgues, Rasoul Sorkhabi
OPALIZED WOOD FROM CLOVER CREEK, IDAHO: HOW AN 1895 FOSSIL TREE DISCOVERY BECAME THE STANDARD OF QUALITY FOR WOOD-OPAL IN MINERALOGICAL COLLECTIONS
MIKE VINEY, DAGMAR DIETRICH, JIM MILLS, SHARON CHENEY, MIKE RUMSEY, ROBIN HANSEN