This article is concerned with the implications of research for national policy. As a consequence, the discussion centers upon only a few of the many changes which are generally advocated for urban education. The focus is upon those few basic aspects of urban public education which probably could be reached and fundamentally changed by the relatively limited instruments of national policy. Although they have enormous potential for creativity, these instruments—the law, money,and administrative requirements—also have limitations. The limitations are a good deal more acute in matters of educational opportunity than in, say, voting rights. It is in large part for these intrinsic reasons, and owing to certain historic limitations (we do not have a national school system, and thus cannot have a national policy on curriculum) that policy implications assessed here may seem to some rather narrowly circumscribed. It is not my view that unique programs and personalities, engaged creatively in education under what are often very trying conditions, are not important or significant. They are, and there is much to be learned from them.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 03 2012
Policy for the Public Schools: Compensation and Integration
Harvard Educational Review (1968) 38 (1): 114–137.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
David Cohen; Policy for the Public Schools: Compensation and Integration. Harvard Educational Review 1 April 1968; 38 (1): 114–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.38.1.lk627p057l789224
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
No Choice Is the “Right” Choice: Black Parents’ Educational Decision-Making in Their Search for a “Good” School
LINN POSEY-MADDOX, MAXINE MCKINNEY de ROYSTON, ALEA R. HOLMAN, RAQUEL M. RALL, RACHEL A. JOHNSON
The Mission Project: Teaching History and Avoiding the Past in California Elementary Schools
HARPER BENJAMIN KEENAN