Significant knowledge in the social sciences accrues ever too slowly. A major reason is that various research studies on a particular question tend to be of dissimilar designs, making their results difficult to compare. An even more important factor is that social science studies frequently produce conflicting results,which hinder theoretical developments and confuse those responsible for the implementation of social policies. In this pioneering effort the authors suggest criteria for determining when data from dissimilar studies can be pooled. Methods for recognizing fundamental differences in research designs, and for avoiding the creation of artificial differences, are offered. A paradigm, labeled the "cluster approach," is proposed as a means of combining the data of studies from which conflicting conclusions have been drawn. Major emphasis is placed on ways that the paradigm might solve problems presently faced by educational researchers,and several studies comparing the effectiveness of preschool programs are used to illustrate the cluster approach.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 December 1971
Research Article|
January 03 2012
Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies
Harvard Educational Review (1971) 41 (4): 429–471.
Citation
Richard Light, Paul Smith; Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies. Harvard Educational Review 1 December 1971; 41 (4): 429–471. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.41.4.437714870334w144
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Nací Allá: Meanings of US Citizenship for Young Children of Return Migrants to Mexico
JOANNA DREBY, SARAH GALLO, FLORENCIA SILVEIRA, MELISSA ADAMS-CORRAL
Examining the Role of Gender in Educational Policy Formation: The Case of Campus Sexual Assault Legislation, 2007–2017
DAVID R. JOHNSON, LIANG ZHANG