The authors offer an explanation of the psychological and philosophical positions underlying aspects of educational progressivism. They contrast tenets of progressivism,most clearly identified with the work of John Dewey, with two other educational ideologies, the romantic and the cultural transmission conceptions, which historically have competed in the minds of educators as rationales for the choice of educational goals and practices. Kohlberg and Mayer maintain that only progressivism,with its cognitive-developmental psychology, its interactionist epistemology,and its philosophically examined ethics, provides an adequate basis for our understanding of the process of education.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 03 2012
Development as the Aim of Education
Harvard Educational Review (1972) 42 (4): 449–496.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Lawrence Kohlberg, Rochelle Mayer; Development as the Aim of Education. Harvard Educational Review 1 December 1972; 42 (4): 449–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.42.4.kj6q8743r3j00j60
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Nací Allá: Meanings of US Citizenship for Young Children of Return Migrants to Mexico
JOANNA DREBY, SARAH GALLO, FLORENCIA SILVEIRA, MELISSA ADAMS-CORRAL
Examining the Role of Gender in Educational Policy Formation: The Case of Campus Sexual Assault Legislation, 2007–2017
DAVID R. JOHNSON, LIANG ZHANG