In recent years the use of traditional statistical methods in educational research has increasingly come under attack. In this article, Ronald P. Carver exposes the fantasies often entertained by researchers about the meaning of statistical significance. The author recommends abandoning all statistical significance testing and suggests other ways of evaluating research results. Carver concludes that we should return to the scientific method of examining data and replicating results rather than relying on statistical significance testing to provide equivalent information.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 03 2012
The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing
Harvard Educational Review (1978) 48 (3): 378–399.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Ronald Carver; The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing. Harvard Educational Review 1 September 1978; 48 (3): 378–399. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.48.3.t490261645281841
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Authority and Control: The Tension at the Heart of Standards-Based Accountability
JACK SCHNEIDER, ANDREW SAULTZ
Why Trust Science?
Ellis E. Reid, V