Evidence presented by Warner Slack and Douglas Porter indicates that training for the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) can effectively help students to raise their scores,and that the test adds little to a student's high school record in predicting college performance. Their findings are contrary to pronouncements by Educational Testing Service and the College Board. The authors argue that students who believed they did not have to prepare for the SAT, as well as those who have had limited opportunities for preparation, may have been needlessly deprived of admission to the college of their choice. More importantly, Slack and Porter contend that students who accept the SAT as a measure of aptitude may suffer a loss of self-esteem by interpreting low scores as an indication of their own deficiencies. They conclude that their findings raise serious doubts about the fairness of the test, its validity as a measure of academic potential,and its use as a prerequisite for admission to college.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 July 1980
Research Article|
January 03 2012
The Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Critical Appraisal
Harvard Educational Review (1980) 50 (2): 154–175.
Citation
Warner Slack; The Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Critical Appraisal. Harvard Educational Review 1 July 1980; 50 (2): 154–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.50.2.d755627708652757
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Black Bullet in the Gun: Troubling Silence and Silencing in Antiracist Teacher Education
Esther O. Ohito, Sherry L. Deckman
Book Notes
Jane Choi, Woohee Kim, Catherine E. Pitcher
Towers of Ivory and Steel: How Israeli Universities Deny Palestinian Freedom
Catherine E. Pitcher