In this article, Frederick Mosteller, Richard J. Light and Jason A. Sachs explore the nature of the empirical evidence that can inform school leaders' key decisions about how to organize students within schools: Should students be placed in heterogeneous classes or tracked classes? What is the impact of class size on student learning? How does it vary? Since tracking (or skill grouping, as the authors prefer to call it) is widely used in U.S. schools, the authors expected to find a wealth of evidence to support the efficacy of the practice. Surprisingly, they found only a handful of well-designed studies exploring the academic benefits of tracking, and of these, the results were equivocal. With regard to class size, the authors describe the Tennessee class size study, using it to illustrate that large, long-term, randomized controlled field trials can be carried out successfully in education. The Tennessee study demonstrates convincingly that student achievement continues when the students move to regular-size classes in the fourth grade and beyond. The authors suggest in conclusion that education would benefit from a commitment to sustained inquiry through well-designed, randomized controlled field trials of education innovations. Such sustained inquiry could provide a source of solid evidence on which educators could base their decisions about how to organize and support student learning in classes and schools.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 1996
Research Article|
February 10 2010
Sustained Inquiry in Education: Lessons from Skill Grouping and Class Size
Frederick Mosteller;
Frederick Mosteller
1
Harvard University and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Search for other works by this author on:
Jason Sachs
Jason Sachs
2
Harvard University
Search for other works by this author on:
Harvard Educational Review (1996) 66 (4): 797–843.
Citation
Frederick Mosteller, Richard Light, Jason Sachs; Sustained Inquiry in Education: Lessons from Skill Grouping and Class Size. Harvard Educational Review 1 December 1996; 66 (4): 797–843. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.36m328762x21610x
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Relative Racialization and Asian American College Student Activism
SAMUEL D. MUSEUS
Datafication Meets Platformization: Materializing Data Processes in Teaching and Learning
LUCI PANGRAZIO, AMY STORNAIUOLO, T. PHILIP NICHOLS, ANTERO GARCIA, THOMAS M. PHILIP
Platform Studies in Education
T. PHILIP NICHOLS, ANTERO GARCIA
The Economic, Social, and Political Dimensions of Platform Studies in Education
Alyssa Napier, Abigail Orrick
Book Notes
ALYSHA BANERJI, ABIGAIL ORRICK, ERIC TORRES