According to critical race theorists, legal rights in this country have been compromised by the recognition of White identity as having property value. In this article,drawing on these analyses as well as the observations of literacy scholars questioning the outcomes of literacy and education, Catherine Prendergast argues that the designation of literacy and education as "rights" is more rhetorical than real. Prendergast pays close attention to the arguments and court proceedings of three U.S. Supreme Court cases in which the value of literacy and the reality of racial discrimination have both been contested. Through an analysis of these landmark cases —Brown v. Board of Education, Washington v. Davis, and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke—the author deconstructs "the lofty prose equating education with equal opportunity" to uncover the ideologies of literacy that informed these cases. According to Prendergast, "this rhetoric has laid the foundation for the recent legal challenges to affirmative action." She concludes by suggesting that these crucial court decisions have stalled the civil rights movement by perpetuating the economy of literacy as White property.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| April 10 2009
The Economy of Literacy: How the Supreme Court Stalled the Civil Rights Movement
Harvard Educational Review (2002) 72 (2): 206–230.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Catherine Prendergast; The Economy of Literacy: How the Supreme Court Stalled the Civil Rights Movement. Harvard Educational Review 1 July 2002; 72 (2): 206–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.2.l8112t70x6klx6j0
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Nací Allá: Meanings of US Citizenship for Young Children of Return Migrants to Mexico
JOANNA DREBY, SARAH GALLO, FLORENCIA SILVEIRA, MELISSA ADAMS-CORRAL
Examining the Role of Gender in Educational Policy Formation: The Case of Campus Sexual Assault Legislation, 2007–2017
DAVID R. JOHNSON, LIANG ZHANG