In this conversation, Kevin K. Kumashiro shares his reflections on challenges to publishing anti-oppressive research in educational journals. He then invites eight current and former editors of leading educational research journals—William F. Pinar, Elizabeth Graue, Carl A. Grant, Maenette K. P. Benham, Ronald H. Heck, James Joseph Scheurich, Allan Luke, and Carmen Luke — to critique and expand on his analysis. Kumashiro begins the conversation by describing his own experiences submitting manuscripts to educational research journals and receiving comments by anonymous reviewers and journal editors. He suggests three ways to rethink the collaborative potential of the peer-review process: as constructive, as multilensed, and as situated. The eight current and former editors of leading educational research journals then critique and expand Kumashiro's analysis. Kumashiro concludes the conversation with additional reflections on barriers and contradictions involved in advancing anti-oppressive educational research in educational journals.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 2005
Research Article|
September 09 2008
Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication Available to Purchase
KEVIN KUMASHIRO;
KEVIN KUMASHIRO
1
Center for Anti-Oppressive Education, Washington, D.C.
Search for other works by this author on:
Harvard Educational Review (2005) 75 (3): 257–285.
Citation
KEVIN KUMASHIRO, WILLIAM PINAR, ELIZABETH GRAUE, CARL GRANT, MAENETTE BENHAM, RONALD HECK, JAMES JOSEPH SCHEURICH, ALLAN LUKE, CARMEN LUKE; Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication. Harvard Educational Review 1 September 2005; 75 (3): 257–285. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.75.3.h317564n18346928
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.