The emergence in recent years of heteroglossic conceptions of bi/multilingualism and the related construct of translanguaging has raised questions about how these notions relate to more traditional conceptions of additive bilingualism, biliteracy, and the overall academic achievement of minoritized students. In this article, Jim Cummins provides a critical examination of both additive bilingualism and additive approaches to language education to clarify the nature of these constructs and to elucidate their instructional implications. He proposes a synthesis of perspectives that replaces the term additive bilingualism with active bilingualism, that acknowledges the dynamic nature of bilingual and multilingual language practices and the instructional implications of this conceptualization, and that insists that education initiatives designed to promote academic achievement among minoritized students can claim empirical legitimacy only when they explicitly challenge raciolinguistic ideologies and, more generally, coercive relations of power.
Skip Nav Destination
Articles| September 01 2017
Teaching Minoritized Students: Are Additive Approaches Legitimate?
Harvard Educational Review (2017) 87 (3): 404–425.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Jim Cummins; Teaching Minoritized Students: Are Additive Approaches Legitimate?. Harvard Educational Review 1 September 2017; 87 (3): 404–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-87.3.404
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Beyond the Bus: Reconceptualizing School Transportation for Mobility Justice
SARAH WINCHELL LENHOFF, JEREMY SINGER, KIMBERLY STOKES, JAMES BEAR MAHOWALD, SAHAR KHAWAJA
“Reinventing Ourselves” and Reimagining Education: Everyday Learning and Life Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic
MARJORIE FAULSTICH ORELLANA, LU LIU, SOPHIA L. ÁNGELES
ALYSHA BANERJI, ABHINAV GHOSH, ALYSSA NAPIER, SANTIAGO PULIDO-GÓMEZ, MEKKA A. SMITH