Most teacher evaluation policies in the United States seek to improve student outcomes by providing developmental supports to grow teachers’ skills and by imposing accountability pressures to increase their effort. In this research synthesis and analytic essay, David D. Liebowitz argues that proper policy design has been understood as successfully balancing the accountability and growth dimensions of teacher evaluation. He details six conditions that determine whether joint-aim teacher evaluation policies will improve student outcomes and assesses the extent to which they are likely to be met given the causal evidence from the education, economics, social psychology, and management research literatures. The article concludes with recommendations to more clearly delineate the accountability and growth aims of teacher evaluation.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| December 08 2022
Teacher Evaluation for Growth and Accountability: Under What Conditions Does It Improve Student Outcomes?
DAVID D. LIEBOWITZ
DAVID D. LIEBOWITZ
University of Oregon
Search for other works by this author on:
Harvard Educational Review (2022) 92 (4): 533–565.
DAVID D. LIEBOWITZ; Teacher Evaluation for Growth and Accountability: Under What Conditions Does It Improve Student Outcomes?. Harvard Educational Review 1 December 2022; 92 (4): 533–565. doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.4.533
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign in via your Institution
White Ignorance in Global Education
FRANCINE MENASHY, ZEENA ZAKHARIA
Abigail Orrick, Swati Puri, Mekka A. Smith, Eric Torres
ALYSHA BANERJI, ABHINAV GHOSH, ALYSSA NAPIER, SANTIAGO PULIDO-GÓMEZ, MEKKA A. SMITH