In recent years I've had the privilege of participating in numerous transactions involving psychiatrists in collaborative enterprises with social scientists. Frequently in this context I have heard the term "sociologizing," or some kindred expression, used to imply a disparagement of journeyman sociologists' activities in reconceptualizing ordinary experiences. In some cases the criticism seemed well-founded, even in terms of the most generous standards laid down by the sociologist himself for his professional methodology. The language, for example, might have been unnecessarily stultified or florid, even for the academic community's norms; or the use of statistics might have been unnecessarily mechanical and pointless. In other cases the criticism did not seem well founded and thus seemed to merit closer examination. The problems associated with it seem applicable to social science collaboration in other applied fields as well as psychiatry.
Skip Nav Destination
RESEARCH| January 06 2009
Notes on the Disparagement of "Sociologizing" in Collaborative Research
Human Organization (1957) 16 (1): 14–15.
Robert Rapoport; Notes on the Disparagement of "Sociologizing" in Collaborative Research. Human Organization 1 March 1957; 16 (1): 14–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.16.1.w16n832258692444
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
MPAs AS PROTECTED DESTINATIONS: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING FISHING, AND PERCEPTIONS OF MARINE RESERVES IN PUGET SOUND, WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES
Marc L. Miller, Richard B. Pollnac, Patrick J. Christie
RESPONSIBLE DRIVING IN THE AGE OF SMARTPHONES: APPLIED RESEARCH FOR IMPROVING ROAD SAFETY IN THE MOTOR CITY
Yuson Jung, Andrea Sankar, Kaitlin Carter, Yen-Ting Chang, Bianca Dean, Travis Kruso, Colleen Linn, Emily Lock, Craig Meiners, Molly Sanford, Haley Scott, Jasmine Walker
EDITORIAL: KEEPING PACE