The reanalysis of my data reported in the foregoing review presents challenging questions. If the reviewers' methods and conclusions are justified, they have indeed exposed a grave defect in my interpretation of the data. After careful reconsideration of the problem, however, it appears to me (and to statistical analysts I have consulted) that the original conclusions still stand, that the proffered basis for rejection is fallacious.
This content is only available as a PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.