This paper recounts a number of difficulties encountered by the author (then a graduate student) in the course of giving "expert" testimony in a class-action lawsuit seeking recognition of the right to shelter for homeless men in New York. Chief among such difficulties was the presumptive classification of much ethnographic material as "hearsay." An obscure exception to the hearsay rule—"reputation"—is introduced, and its value as applied in the present case and as a device for introducing evidence obtained through interviews generally is discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| February 21 2008
Research Findings as Testimony: A Note on the Ethnographer as Expert Witness
Human Organization (1990) 49 (2): 110–113.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Kim Hopper; Research Findings as Testimony: A Note on the Ethnographer as Expert Witness. Human Organization 1 June 1990; 49 (2): 110–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.49.2.817138613082v06l
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Environmental Justice Ethnography in the Classroom: Teaching Activism, Inspiring Involvement
William L. Alexander, E. Christian Wells, Martha Lincoln, Brittany Y. Davis, Peter C. Little
Considering Social Sustainability in Eco-Certification for Small-Scale Fishing—Why and How?
Mathilde Højrup Autzen, Alyne Elizabeth Delaney