New Hope (NH) is a random-assignment, antipoverty program in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that offers child care subsidies, wage subsidies, health insurance, and, if needed, a temporary community service job to participants working 30 or more hours per week. Despite the relative generosity of the program and supportive caseworkers, take-up was far from universal, and participants rarely used all services. Ethnographic analysis of a random sample of experimental participants found that NH's economically based offer was theoretically too narrow to motivate all participants. Four categories of personal and family circumstances were associated with take-up: 1) the constrained-by-information group (participants' understandings about the program differed from what NH in fact offered); 2) the disruptive-life group (significant personal troubles and instability); 3) the pro-con group (used often explicit cost-benefit calculations); and 4) the daily-routine group (used particular benefits but only if they helped sustain their family daily routine). Analysis of take-up of other services by the control group showed similar patterns, suggesting that these take-up patterns are not specific to NH. We conclude that use of welfare-to-work interventions reflects ecocultural conditions and personal goals and values, as well as a more conventional cost-benefit approach. Economic rational choice as well as local, situated rationality models are needed to fully account for benefit use.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2002
Research Article|
October 03 2005
"Rational" and Ecocultural Circumstances of Program Take-Up Among Low-Income Working Parents
Christina M. Gibson;
Christina M. Gibson
1
Princeton University
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas S. Weisner
Thomas S. Weisner
2
University of California, Los Angles
Search for other works by this author on:
Human Organization (2002) 61 (2): 154–166.
Citation
Christina M. Gibson, Thomas S. Weisner; "Rational" and Ecocultural Circumstances of Program Take-Up Among Low-Income Working Parents. Human Organization 1 June 2002; 61 (2): 154–166. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.61.2.8eg3xydlcjda0eqd
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Field Research in the Era of the Islamic State and Trump
William Yaworsky, Dawid Wladyka, Katarzyna Sepielak
Changes in Social Capital Associated with the Construction of the Belo Monte Dam: Comparing a Resettled and a Host Community
Adam Mayer, Maria Claudia Lopez, Guillaume Leturcq, Emilio Moran
Measuring Subjective and Objective Well-being: Analyses from Five Marine Commercial Fisheries—Where Are We Now?
Patricia M. Clay, Courtland L. Smith