Mega-hydraulic projects tend to produce severe social and environmental impacts, with burdens and benefits unevenly distributed among different social groups, regions, and scales. This triggers socioenvironmental conflicts, since “territory” has incommensurable functions and values for the diverse parties. This article examines the dominant human-nature interactions that underlie recent hydropower developments and the reconfiguration of the hydrosocial network in Colombia's Sogamoso basin. We use the Echelon of Rights Analysis (ERA) to examine conflicts over hydrosocial patterning, involving struggles over resources, norms, authority, and discourses. The Sogamoso mega-project highlights how modernist policies discursively frame clean energy, sustainable development, and public utility, while breaking up existing socioecological relationships and aligning water users, rights, and uses in new hydro-political network hierarchies. In Sogamoso, hydropower development discourse ends up declaring local subsistence activities illegal while denying existing rights frameworks. Therefore, crucial questions about water rights, legitimacy, and justice remain unasked and unanswered within political arenas.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Fall 2015
Social Capital, Development and Resource Distribution|
September 01 2015
Hydropower, Encroachment and the Re-patterning of Hydrosocial Territory: The Case of Hidrosogamoso in Colombia
Human Organization (2015) 74 (3): 243–254.
Citation
Bibiana Duarte-Abadía, Rutgerd Boelens, Tatiana Roa-Avendaño; Hydropower, Encroachment and the Re-patterning of Hydrosocial Territory: The Case of Hidrosogamoso in Colombia. Human Organization 1 August 2015; 74 (3): 243–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-74.3.243
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Is the Longue Durée a Legal Argument?: Understanding Takings Doctrine in Climate Change and Settler Colonial Contexts in the United States
Elizabeth Marino, Alessandra Jerolleman, Nathan Jessee, Annie Weyiouanna, Meghan Sigvana Topkok, Eli Keene, Simon Manda
Understanding the Nature of Country Food Sales among First Nations in Alberta, Canada
David Natcher, Shawn Ingram, Ana-Maria Bogdan
Latinxs in Chicago: Managing Health Inequities with Community Centers
Lilian L. Milanés
Barriers and Facilitators for Patient-Centered Care for Hospitalized COVID Patients: Lived Experiences from Ex-hospitalized Patients and Health Care Professionals
Lieke van Disseldorp, Caro-Lynn Verbaan, Annemarie Wagemakers