Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of international development programming is expected to produce “evidence-based” insight for both policy and practice. While supportive of evidence-based decision making, critics of contemporary M&E practice charge that it reflects the development industry's deepening audit culture, causing deleterious effects. I offer the example of a democratization program in postwar Angola to examine how the design and conduct of M&E in this case reinforced social boundaries and hierarchies of power among the program's own staff members. These professional staff hierarchies effectively barred ground-level evidence noted by implementation agents from being incorporated into the program's formal knowledge base. The case demonstrates that monitoring and evaluation procedures within development programs, and perhaps in other bureaucracies, must be examined for their social uses and effects among practitioners. These effects not only weaken the production of actionable knowledge for development but, by reinforcing social inequalities within the very industry tasked to combat them, also structurally threaten the endeavor.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
Winter 2016
Research Article|
December 01 2016
Participation Denied: The Professional Boundaries of Monitoring and Evaluation in International Development
Human Organization (2016) 75 (4): 315–325.
Citation
Rebecca Warne Peters; Participation Denied: The Professional Boundaries of Monitoring and Evaluation in International Development. Human Organization 1 December 2016; 75 (4): 315–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/1938-3525-75.4.315
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Rapid Ethnographic Assessment of Pandemic Restrictions in Child Welfare: Lessons from Parent and Provider Experiences
Linda M. Callejas, Anna Davidson Abella, Flandra Ismajli
Another Silver Lining?: Anthropological Perspectives on the Promise and Practice of Relaxed Restrictions for Telemedicine and Medication-Assisted Treatment in the Context of COVID-19
Emery R. Eaves, Robert T. Trotter, II, Julie A. Baldwin
A Rapid Qualitative Appraisal of the Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Care Communities in the United States: Perspectives from Area Aging Staff and Advocates
Andrea Freidus, Dena Shenk, Christin Wolf
Food Supply Chains, Family Farming, and Food Policies under the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Brazilian City
Antonio de la Peña García, Silvia A. Zimmermann, Ana Alice Eleuterio
Entangled Roots and Otherwise Possibilities: An Anthropology of Disasters COVID-19 Research Agenda
A.J. Faas, Roberto Barrios, Virginia García-Acosta, Adriana Garriga-López, Seven Mattes, Jennifer Trivedi