Recent public interest in legal cases related to the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration at the end of life, such as the highly publicized Terri Schiavo case (Quill, 2005), have created a climate in which a potentially life-sustaining intervention, such as gastrostomy tube (G-tube) feeding, might be questioned as futile, and even cruel, when suggested for a person with a severe disability experiencing a health crisis. Lack of understanding exists among some in the health care community and among members of the general public (including some guardians and family members) concerning the distinction between managing medical challenges associated with a chronic disability and providing care at what might be mistakenly perceived to be the end of life (King, 2005). This can have potentially devastating consequences. As suggested by Pugh (2005), the distinction between living with a...
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 01 2009
The Right to Nutrition and Hydration: A Need for Vigilance
Intellect Dev Disabil (2009) 47 (3): 234–238.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Allen G. Sandler; The Right to Nutrition and Hydration: A Need for Vigilance. Intellect Dev Disabil 1 June 2009; 47 (3): 234–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.3.234
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Examining Whether Student Participation in School-Sponsored Extracurricular Activities Is Represented in IEPs
Martin Agran, Stacy Dymond, Magen Rooney-Kron, James Martin
Inclusive Entrepreneurship and Motivation Among People With Intellectual Disability: “Why They Act”
Kate Caldwell, Sarah Parker Harris, Maija Renko