Introduction

The otolaryngology (ORL) boot camp was designed to onboard ORL residents through a curriculum focusing on their needs as novice otolaryngologists. This boot camp provided systematic, specialty-wide training in core elements of knowledge, procedural skills, professionalism, supervision, and communications for residents entering ORL. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an ORL resident induction “boot camp” in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional (multicenter) study encompassing data collection through an online voluntary questionnaire. Participants were new ORL residents in the Saudi residency training program.

Results

Fifty responses were returned, with a completion rate of 88%. Sixty-four percent of the respondents were male. Most of the respondents were aged from 26 to 27 years. Respondents were from different cities. Most participants agreed that the scientific value of the course was beneficial (agree, 40%; strongly agree, 44%) and they felt better prepared for their residency training after this boot camp (agree, 44%; strongly agree, 28%).

Conclusion

Boot camp in ORL is an additional important activity during the early years of training. It provides significant effects in terms of knowledge readiness at the beginning of specialty training. We believe that boot camp should include other dimensions of training, including surgical, communication, and judgmental skills, not only for the early years of training but also during the remaining period until training completion.

The assessment, evaluation, and therapeutic intervention for patients with otolaryngology (ORL) diseases require specialized education, training, and skillsets, which are usually not inculcated during undergraduate medical education. ORL emergencies can be life-threatening and warrant a thorough, systematic, multidisciplinary, and exigent management and therapeutic intervention. As the traditional method of ORL education advances continuously, simulation-based boot camps are being more adopted to accelerate the learning process for new residents and minimizing harm to the patients.[14]

The ORL boot camps have been developed to meet the growing needs of junior residents.[4,5] An abundance of technological developments and increasing professional and social expectations have led to a major shift in medical education. Factors including restrictions on resident work hours, financial influences of surgical productivity, and ethical and medico-legal issues have a significant impact on surgical training. Residents currently have limited time to gain an efficient amount of ORL skills and knowledge, and the traditional surgical training environments and tools might be not sufficient. Simulation-based training is an effective and feasible way to provide resources and strategies to succeed in dealing with many of the aforementioned limitations.[6] To ensure that trainees are competent enough to progress in training requires developing reliable and valid assessment tools (e.g., direct observation, frequent formative feedback, participant self-directed assessment).[7,8]

Simulation-based medical education is considered to be of higher impact than traditional clinical education in achieving clinical skills.[9] This mode of training in the early stages of residency has the potential for boosting residents' self-assessments of competency, confidence, and stress hardiness in dealing with emergencies.[1014]

A small number of studies regarding otorhinolaryngology boot camps have been reported. To our best knowledge, no similar (in otorhinolaryngology) studies have been described in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Other surgical specialties have explained the influence of boot camps on resident training.

An intensive “boot camp” was planned to train junior ORL residents from local and regional hospitals of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, using intense didactic and clinical practice in a surgical environment for a concentrated, focused, and targeted learning experience. Residents actively participated in educational activities in a stress-free environment. Such a methodology is an emerging traditional training modality for the induction of new residents in improving self-confidence, knowledge bases, professional skills, and clinical performance.[5,15,16] During this boot camp, instructors helped junior residents develop essential ORL core knowledge and skills, including intubation and surgical airway management, epistaxis management, ORL procedural consultations, instrumentation, and other complex emergency skills.

This boot camp was planned to onboard ORL residents to support them through a curriculum concentrating on the topics they need as junior otolaryngologists. The goal of this boot camp is to provide basic emergency training in a safe environment, and to provide well-organized, specialty-wide training in core elements of knowledge, technical skills, professionalism, and communications for junior ORL residents. This boot camp may have the most significant impact on those procedures that are commonly encountered during the first year of training. Participants are expected to develop competence and knowledge for a variety of skills, including triage, the management of airway emergencies, bleeding, and other disorders by enhanced clinical knowledge and skills to ease transformation into new clinical roles. The main objectives of this study were to assess the effectiveness of the ORL residents' induction boot camp course, and to evaluate if this educational activity fulfilled the objectives.

Ethical approval was waived by the local ethics committee of Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Informed consent was obtained from the participants.

This was a cross-sectional study encompassing data collection through an online questionnaire. The study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC), Riyadh, and King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah.

We designed a 14-question survey to evaluate satisfaction of newly joining ORL junior residents during the beginning of their residency program regarding the conducted induction boot camp. Three questions were basic demographic questions inquiring about gender and age. In the following 11 questions, we used a 5-point Likert response scale for scoring purposes.[17] Participation in the study was voluntary, names were not taken to ensure anonymity and confidentiality, and the survey was conducted in the English language.

The online questionnaire was made through SurveyMonkey Inc. (Palo Alto, CA) and was sent to all the trainees who attended the ORL residents' induction boot camp between 10 and 21 November 2019 at KFSHRC (Riyadh), and 22 and 29 December 2019 at KAUH (Jeddah). Data collected were analyzed using SurveyMonkey software.

This study included starting ORL residents who enrolled in the Saudi ORL residency training program from different regions of the Kingdom who physically attended and finished the boot camp. Senior ORL residents were excluded from the study.

Of the surveys sent, 50 responses were returned, with a response rate of 83% and completion rate of 88%. Sixty-four percent of the respondents were male. Most of the respondents (86%) were aged from 26 to 27 years. Respondents were from different cities of the Kingdom, including Riyadh, Jeddah, Makkah, Taif, Jazan, Khobar, Dammam, Abha, Asir, and Alahsa, as well as rotating residents from the Kingdom of Bahrain.

Most participants agreed that the scientific value of the course was beneficial (agree, 40%; strongly agree, 44%) and they felt better prepared for their residency training after this course (agree, 44%; strongly agree, 28%). The participants responded to questions of whether their knowledge was enriched by this course in different subspecialties as follows: otology received the strongest agreement among the participants (agree, 56%; strongly agree, 30%), followed by laryngology (agree, 54%; strongly agree, 28%), rhinology (agree, 28%; strongly agree, 50%), pediatric ORL (agree, 43%; strongly agree, 18%), and basic science (agree, 46%; strongly agree, 16%); and head and neck anatomy, pathology, and its related management (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Percentage of participants who agreed that the course enriched their knowledge (total n = 50).

Figure 1

Percentage of participants who agreed that the course enriched their knowledge (total n = 50).

Close modal

Most of the participants thought that the course enriched their knowledge of general ORL practice (agree, 52%; strongly agree, 34%). There was variation in trainee responses to the question about whether this course added new technical skills related to ORL (strongly disagree, 12%; disagree, 22%; neither disagree nor agree, 33%; agree, 25%; strongly agree 8%) (Fig. 2). Most of the participants (90%) agreed that this course was essential for beginning trainees in ORL (agree, 71.4%; strongly agree, 18.4). Most of the respondents answered that faculty members were able to transfer the educational objectives of the course (agree, 47%; strongly agree, 29%).

Figure 2

Distribution of responses of whether this course added new technical skills related to otolaryngology (total n = 50).

Figure 2

Distribution of responses of whether this course added new technical skills related to otolaryngology (total n = 50).

Close modal

It is believed that trainees often feel less prepared when staring residency training.[1820] The main objective of the boot camp for ORL residents in Saudi Arabia was to prepare trainees to start a daily practice and to provide them with a necessary introductory knowledge level.

The effectiveness of boot camps is less understood for ORL training in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Different effective dimensions were tested, including the perception of retained knowledge in different subspecialties: otology, rhinology, head and neck, pediatric-related topics, and laryngology. The results reflected general satisfaction with regard to the general scientific value of the boot camp, with the highest satisfaction in the domains of otology, laryngology, and rhinology (Fig. 1). The results depicted in this study support the conduct of boot camps as an introduction to national ORL residency training programs.

The challenged hypothesis of boot camp effectiveness did not include the preparation for technical skills. Although the depicted results were supportive for boot camp effectiveness, technical skills and some nontechnical skills (communication, leadership, clinical judgment) were not studied. This might be related to a number of factors, including time allocation for both faculty members and trainees and resources, including simulation-based environments and technologies for ORL practices.

Malekzadeh et al[5] explained the positive impact of simulation-based learning in a study in which 30 ORL residents were included in a 1-day boot camp, 24 of whom completed the survey. Although the study was conducted among a small sample size, their early findings in 2011 revealed significant results of improvement in residents' confidence levels while performing during certain ORL emergencies, and their knowledge was noted.[5]

A study from the surgical department of the University of Toronto reported the impact of surgical skills' boot camp on postgraduate year 1 orthopedic surgeons. Residents were divided into two groups: one that would continue on to the classic residency training, and another that would receive a focused course on surgical skills. After that, both groups were evaluated using an objective structured assessment of technical skills procedure. A significant difference was seen, in which the latter group was superior in achieving skills.[16]

In a related domain, a study by Selden et al[21] described multiregional courses that targeted junior neurosurgery residents starting their training programs. The course contained nine lectures and 16 clinical skills to encounter the basics in their curriculum. A total of 186 neurosurgery residents completed the survey (precourse and immediately postcourse). Junior residents expressed that the course achieved its objectives, which included knowledge, skills, and patient care quality. After 6 months of initial testing, it was found that the amount of knowledge gained was significant (p < 0.0001).[21]

In Saudi Arabia, a 10-day boot camp was introduced to prepare young ORL trainees as part of their training requirement. In other international examples, shorter-period boot camps were shown to be beneficial for technical and nontechnical skills training and preparedness. In studies by Chin et al,[22,23] ORL head and neck surgery residents from Canada and the United States were enrolled in the analysis after joining the boot camp day. They received teaching and training of certain clinical skills along with discussions about emergency topics and the application of communication skills. Most of the residents reported a positive influence on their learning process. Moreover, they recommended boot camps for future junior residents.[22,23]

This study examined the effectiveness of boot camp, mainly for enriching young trainees' knowledge. Knowledge in surgical specialties is among other competencies that need to be built during residency, including surgical skills, psychomotor and decision-making, and leadership.[10,16,24] We believe that it will be more beneficial if other dimensions of training are included in boot camps, such as surgical skills and making clinical judgments, which were not included in the current study.

ORL boot camp in Saudi Arabia was effective and beneficial for young trainees. Most participants believed that they are better prepared for their residency training. We believe that boot camp should include other dimensions of training including technical, communication, and judgment skills.

1.
Parent
RJ,
Plerhoples
TA,
Long
EE,
et al
Early, intermediate, and late effects of a surgical skills “boot camp” on an objective structured assessment of technical skills: a randomized controlled study
.
J Am Coll Surg
.
2010
;
210
:
984
989
.
2.
Fernandez
GL,
Page
DW,
Coe
NP,
et al
Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship
.
J Surg Educ
.
2012
;
69
:
242
248
.
3.
Cohen
ER,
Barsuk
JH,
Moazed
F,
et al
Making July safer: simulation-based mastery learning during intern boot camp
.
Acad Med
.
2013
;
88
:
233
239
.
4.
Labbé
M,
Young
M,
Nguyen
LHP.
Toolbox of assessment tools of technical skills in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: a systematic review
.
Laryngoscope
.
2018
;
128
:
1571
1575
.
5.
Malekzadeh
S,
Malloy
KM,
Chu
EE,
et al
ORL emergencies boot camp: using simulation to onboard residents
.
Laryngoscope
.
2011
;
121
:
2114
2121
.
6.
Nishisaki
A,
Hales
R,
Biagas
K,
et al
A multi-institutional high-fidelity simulation “boot camp” orientation and training program for first year pediatric critical care fellows
.
Pediatr Crit Care Med
.
2009
;
10
:
157
162
.
7.
Iobst
WF,
Sherbino
J,
Cate
OT,
et al
Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education
.
Med Teach
.
2010
;
32
:
651
656
.
8.
Ericsson
KA.
Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview
.
Acad Emerg Med
.
2008
;
15
:
988
994
.
9.
McGaghie
WC,
Issenberg
SB,
Cohen
ER,
et al
Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence
.
Acad Med
.
2011
;
86
:
706
711
.
10.
Pliego
JF,
Wehbe-Janek
H,
Rajab
MH,
et al
OB/GYN boot camp using high-fidelity human simulators: enhancing residents' perceived competency, confidence in taking a leadership role, and stress hardiness
.
Simul Healthc
.
2008
;
3
:
82
89
.
11.
Okusanya
OT,
Kornfield
ZN,
Reinke
CE,
et al
The effect and durability of a pregraduation boot camp on the confidence of senior medical student entering surgical residencies
.
J Surg Educ
.
2012
;
69
:
536
543
.
12.
Martin
JA,
Regehr
G,
Reznick
R,
et al
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
.
Br J Surg
.
1997
;
84
:
273
278
.
13.
Blackmore
C,
Austin
J,
Lopushinsky
SR,
Donnon
T.
Effects of postgraduate medical education “boot camps” on clinical skills, knowledge, and confidence: a meta-analysis
.
J Grad Med Educ
.
2014
;
6
:
643
652
.
14.
Malloy
KM,
Malekzadeh
S,
Deutsch
ES.
Simulation-based otorhinolaryngology emergencies boot camp: part 1. Curriculum design and airway skills
.
Laryngoscope
.
2014
;
124
:
1562
1565
.
15.
Esterl
RM
Jr,
Henzi
DL,
Cohn
SM.
Senior medical student “Boot Camp”: can result in increased self-confidence before starting surgery internships
.
Curr Surg
.
2006
;
63
:
264
268
.
16.
Sonnadara
RR,
Van Vliet
A,
Safir
O,
et al
Orthopedic boot camp: examining the effectiveness of an intensive surgical skills course
.
Surgery
.
2011
;
149
:
745
749
.
17.
Joshi
A,
Kale
S,
Chandel
S,
Pal
DK.
Likert scale: explored and explained
.
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology
.
2015
;
7
:
396
403
.
18.
Bligh
J.
The first year of doctoring: still a survival exercise
.
Med Educ
.
2002
;
36
:
2
3
.
19.
Alexander
C,
Millar
J,
Szmidt
N,
et al
Can new doctors be prepared for practice? A review
.
Clin Teach
.
2014
;
11
:
188
192
.
20.
Cave
J,
Woolf
K,
Jones
A,
Dacre
J.
Easing the transition from student to doctor: how can medical schools help prepare their graduates for starting work?
Med Teach
.
2009
;
31
:
403
408
.
21.
Selden
NR,
Anderson
VC,
McCartney
S,
et al
Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses: knowledge retention and relevance of hands-on learning after 6 months of postgraduate year 1 training
.
J Neurosurg
.
2013
;
119
:
796
802
.
22.
Chin
CJ,
Roth
K,
Rotenberg
BW,
Fung
K.
Emergencies in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery bootcamp: a novel Canadian experience
.
Laryngoscope
.
2014
;
124
:
2275
2280
.
23.
Chin
CJ,
Chin
CA,
Roth
K,
et al
Simulation-based otolaryngology–head and neck surgery boot camp: ‘how I do it'
.
J Laryngol Otol
.
2016
;
130
:
284
290
.
24.
Oker
N,
Alotaibi
NH,
Reichelt
AC,
et al
European otorhinolaryngology training programs: results of a European survey about training satisfaction, work environment and conditions in six countries
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2017
;
274
:
4017
4029
.

Competing Interests

Source of Support: None. Conflict of Interest: None.

This work is published under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.